Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI)Phase 4LIFT-TBNCT07811518
Latent Infection Freshmen Tracking for Tuberculosis
A Phase 4 study testing tuberculosis preventive treatment in people with Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) and Tuberculosis (TB), run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to learn whether taking short-course preventive treatment in high school and college freshmen with strong positive tuberculosis (TB) skin tests can safely and effectively protect them from developing active TB over a 3-to-4-years period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI), Tuberculosis (TB)
- What is being tested?
- tuberculosis preventive treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,000 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 15 Aug 2022to 31 Aug 2029
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 24 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Matriculating freshmen aged 14-24 years enrolled across 26 participating educational institutions
- Completion of baseline tuberculosis screening, including systematic symptom screening, digital chest radiography, and tuberculin skin test (TST)
- Target cohort requirement: TST strong reactivity (induration ≥15 mm or severe local reactions such as blisters, necrosis, or lymphangitis) with active TB ruled out at baseline
- Control cohort requirement: TST induration <15 mm (including negative <5 mm, weakly positive 5-9 mm, and moderately positive 10-14 mm)
Who cannot join
- Presence of active TB at baseline screening
- Voluntary receipt of Vaccae vaccination (for the target cohort)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Meishan Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control
Meishan, Sichuan, 620010
Yu Zhang, MBBS, 086-028-3819-7429, zhangyu_mscdc@163.com
- Recruiting
Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001
Xian Zhang, MD, PhD, 086-513-5231-2490, zhangxian8412@163.com
About this study
Official title: Real-World Implementation and Effectiveness of Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment in School Health Services in China
The goal of this study is to learn whether taking short-course preventive treatment in high school and college freshmen with strong positive tuberculosis (TB) skin tests can safely and effectively protect them from developing active TB over a 3-to-4-years period.
Main question: Does taking short-course preventive treatment reduce the risk of active TB in freshmen who have strong positive TB skin tests?
All freshmen across 26 schools in Meishan City, Sichuan Province, China were screened for TB. Among them, the students with strong positive skin tests (indicating latent TB infection) and no active disease entered the study. Students voluntarily chose to either take a 3-month short-course preventive treatment under campus medical supervision or receive routine health observation without medication. Researchers tracked all participants for 3 to 4 years to monitor who developed active TB and evaluate the treatment's safety and effectiveness.
Read the detailed description
The Latent Infection Freshmen Tracking for Tuberculosis (LIFT-TB) study is a prospective, multi-center, real-world implementation cohort designed to evaluate the programmatic feasibility, safety, and long-term effectiveness of school-integrated short-course tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) among matriculating freshmen. Embedded within routine campus health services across 26 educational institutions (secondary vocational schools, colleges, and universities) in Meishan City, Sichuan Province, China, the protocol operationalizes proactive case-finding and preventive intervention at student entry.
Screening cascade and baseline stratification Under mandatory institutional biosecurity regulations, all newly enrolled freshmen underwent entry health evaluations comprising tuberculin skin testing (TST with 5 TU PPD-RT23), active symptom screening, and digital chest radiography (CXR). To maximize population coverage (>99%) and minimize non-response bias, a 2-week catch-up window was instituted for students initially absent. To account for widespread neonatal BCG vaccination, baseline infection risk was operationalized using TST induration thresholds.
Control cohort: Students with TST indurations <15 mm (subdivided into TST <5 mm, 5-9 mm, and 10-14 mm).
Target Cohort: Students with strong TST reactivity (≥15 mm or local severe reactions such as blisters/necrosis) in whom active TB was clinically excluded.
Intervention workflows and adherence monitoring Within the target cohort, TPT initiation was managed through shared decision-making. Eligible participants voluntarily initiated one of two WHO-recommended 3-month short-course regimens: Daily fixed-dose combination isoniazid/rifampicin (3HR). Twice-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (3H2P2). Treatment administration was embedded within campus health clinics using a hybrid directly observed therapy model combining in-person clinic DOT with smartphone-based video DOT (vDOT). Participants receiving medical observation alone without medication served as the No-TPT comparison group. Adverse events were routinely graded per CTCAE v5.0, with regular safety monitoring to capture potential hepatotoxicity.
Causal inference and emulation framework To complement primary multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling and address observational confounding inherent in non-randomized treatment assignment, the analytic workflow incorporated a Target Trial Emulation (TTE) framework as sensitivity analyses. Time zero (T0) was anchored to the date of LTBI eligibility confirmation, incorporating a 14-day grace period to align baseline entry and eliminate immortal time bias. High-dimensional baseline covariates, including demographic factors, BMI, school type, medical major, BCG status, prior TB history, and close contact history, were balanced using 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW with stabilized weights) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) across both modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations.
- Being tested
- tuberculosis preventive treatment
- Keywords
- tuberculosis preventive treatment, latent tuberculosis infection, school health services, real-world effectiveness, target trial emulation
- Medical subject headings
- Latent Tuberculosis, Tuberculosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tuberculosis preventive treatmentDrug
3HR Regimen: Isoniazid (INH) + Rifampin (RIF), once daily, 90 total doses (3 months); 3H2P2 Regimen: Isoniazid (INH) + Rifapentine (RPT), twice weekly, 24 total doses (3 months)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TPT Group | Active comparator | Initiation of a short-course TPT regimen (3HR or 3H2P2) within a 14-day grace period following being defined as the date of LTBI diagnosis/eligibility confirmation by school health services. Receives: Drug: tuberculosis preventive treatment |
| No-TPT Group | No intervention | Non-initiation of TPT, receiving standard observation and symptom monitoring through school health services. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incident active tuberculosis
Incidence of newly diagnosed active tuberculosis (pulmonary or extrapulmonary) occurring during the 4-year prospective follow-up period among eligible study participants.
Active TB cases were systematically tracked and confirmed through three integrated surveillance pathways managed by school health services: routine annual campus health evaluations; symptomatic student self-reports and clinical evaluations at campus health centers; linkage with the national electronic TB surveillance system managed by local CDC.
Diagnosis was established per national school TB guidelines. Confirmed active TB required clinical/radiological findings with microbiological/molecular confirmation (M. tuberculosis culture, AFB smear, or GeneXpert MTB/RIF). Bacteriologically negative cases were diagnosed based on chest radiography, persistent symptoms, antibiotic non-responsiveness, and expert consensus.
Measured: Up to 4 years post-baseline screening (from T0 through August 31, 2026)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2026
- Study start15 Aug 2022
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026
- Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Meishan Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gang Qin, MD, PhD, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07811518
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Tdb2130
- Acronym
- LIFT-TB
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
You NN, Zhu LM, Li GL, Martinez L, Lu W, Liu Q, Yang HT. A tuberculosis school outbreak in China, 2018: reaching an often overlooked adolescent population. Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Nov 18;147:e303. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001882.
PubMed 31736459Tang J, Xie M, Li C, Huang F, Peng L, Qu Y, Mei J, Liu Z, Liu E, Guo Y, Wang Y. A clustered pulmonary Tuberculosis outbreak at a technical school in Shenzhen, China. Front Pediatr. 2026 May 7;14:1817016. doi: 10.3389/fped.2026.1817016. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42181577Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Borisov AS, Shang N, Gordin F, Bliven-Sizemore E, Hackman J, Hamilton CD, Menzies D, Kerrigan A, Weis SE, Weiner M, Wing D, Conde MB, Bozeman L, Horsburgh CR Jr, Chaisson RE; TB Trials Consortium PREVENT TB Study Team. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 8;365(23):2155-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104875.
PubMed 22150035Spyridis NP, Spyridis PG, Gelesme A, Sypsa V, Valianatou M, Metsou F, Gourgiotis D, Tsolia MN. The effectiveness of a 9-month regimen of isoniazid alone versus 3- and 4-month regimens of isoniazid plus rifampin for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in children: results of an 11-year randomized study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 15;45(6):715-22. doi: 10.1086/520983. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
PubMed 17712755Snow KJ, Cruz AT, Seddon JA, Ferrand RA, Chiang SS, Hughes JA, Kampmann B, Graham SM, Dodd PJ, Houben RM, Denholm JT, Sawyer SM, Kranzer K. Adolescent tuberculosis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30337-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
PubMed 31753806Rodriguez-Marquez I, Benjumea-Bedoya D, Restrepo-Gouzy AV, Beltran-Arroyave CP, Marin D, Montes-Zuluaga FN, Alzate-Angel JC, Cadavid-Alvarez LM, Paniagua-Saldarriaga LA, Realpe T, Perea-Torres Y, Arango-Garcia LM, Perez-Doncel N, Arbelaez-Montoya MP, Robledo J. Adherence to treatment for tuberculosis infection in children using a comprehensive care strategy: a prospective cohort study with a historical control group. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Apr 22;46:101094. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101094. eCollection 2025 Jun.
PubMed 40329939Pelzer PT, Stuck L, Martinez L, Richards AS, Acuna-Villaorduna C, Aronson NE, Bonnet M, Carvalho AC, Chan PC, Huang LM, Fang CT, Churchyard G, Corral-Londono HD, Datta M, Espinal MA, Fielding K, Fiore-Gartland AJ, Garcia-Basteiro A, Hanekom W, Hatherill M, Hill PC, Huerga H, Jones-Lopez EC, Kritski A, Mandalakas AM, Mangtani P, Martins Netto E, Mayanja H, Mazahir R, Murray M, Rangaka M, Scriba T, Singh J, Singh S, Stein CM, Vekemans J, Verhagen LM, Villalba JA, Wajja A, Watson B, White RG, Cobelens FGJ. Effectiveness of the primary Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine against the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Microbe. 2025 Feb;6(2):100961. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100961. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
PubMed 39709975Pangprasertkul S, Buawangpong N, Pinyopornpanish K, Jiraporncharoen W, Angkurawaranon C. Treatment completion and safety profile of once-weekly 3HP regimen for tuberculosis preventive treatment in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10832-7.
PubMed 40155893National Tuberculosis Controllers Association; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for the investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Dec 16;54(RR-15):1-47.
PubMed 16357823Mohle-Boetani JC, Miller B, Halpern M, Trivedi A, Lessler J, Solomon SL, Fenstersheib M. School-based screening for tuberculous infection. A cost-benefit analysis. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):613-9.
PubMed 7637141Mandalakas AM, Hesseling AC, Kay A, Du Preez K, Martinez L, Ronge L, DiNardo A, Lange C, Kirchner HL. Tuberculosis prevention in children: a prospective community-based study in South Africa. Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 22;57(4):2003028. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03028-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
PubMed 33122339Getahun H, Matteelli A, Chaisson RE, Raviglione M. Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2127-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1405427. No abstract available.
PubMed 26017823Gao L, Zhang H, Xin H, Liu J, Pan S, Li X, Guan L, Shen F, Liu Z, Wang D, Guan X, Yan J, Li H, Feng B, Cao X, Chen Y, Cui W, Zhang Z, Ma Y, Chen X, Zhou X, Jin Q; LATENTTB-NSTM study team. Short-course regimens of rifapentine plus isoniazid to treat latent tuberculosis infection in older Chinese patients: a randomised controlled study. Eur Respir J. 2018 Dec 20;52(6):1801470. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01470-2018. Print 2018 Dec.
PubMed 30361241Gao L, Lu W, Bai L, Wang X, Xu J, Catanzaro A, Cardenas V, Li X, Yang Y, Du J, Sui H, Xia Y, Li M, Feng B, Li Z, Xin H, Zhao R, Liu J, Pan S, Shen F, He J, Yang S, Si H, Wang Y, Xu Z, Tan Y, Chen T, Xu W, Peng H, Wang Z, Zhu T, Zhou F, Liu H, Zhao Y, Cheng S, Jin Q; LATENTTB-NSTM study team. Latent tuberculosis infection in rural China: baseline results of a population-based, multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):310-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71085-0. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
PubMed 25681063Benjumea-Bedoya D, Beltran-Arroyave C, Restrepo Gouzy A, Barrera LF, Cadavid LM, Velez-Parra G, Molinares B, Marin D, Montes F, Pulido H, Suarez M, Robledo J, Arbelaez-Montoya MP. The effectiveness of preventive tuberculosis treatment in children. BMC Infect Dis. 2026 Feb 5;26(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12879-026-12726-8.
PubMed 41645075
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real-World Implementation and Effectiveness of Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment in School Health Services in China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07811518
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIFT-TB / Tdb2130
- Keywords
- tuberculosis preventive treatment, latent tuberculosis infection, school health services, real-world effectiveness, target trial emulation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of Nantong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Meishan Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control
- Study start
- 15 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to learn whether taking short-course preventive treatment in high school and college freshmen with strong positive tuberculosis (TB) skin tests can safely and effectively protect them from developing active TB over a 3-to-4-years period.
Main question: Does taking short-course preventive treatment reduce the risk of active TB in freshmen who have strong positive TB skin tests?
All freshmen across 26 schools in Meishan City, Sichuan Province, China were screened for TB. Among them, the students with strong positive skin tests (indicating latent TB infection) and no active disease entered the study. Students voluntarily chose to either take a 3-month short-course preventive treatment under campus medical supervision or receive routine health observation without medication. Researchers tracked all participants for 3 to 4 years to monitor who developed active TB and evaluate the treatment's safety and effectiveness.
Detailed description
The Latent Infection Freshmen Tracking for Tuberculosis (LIFT-TB) study is a prospective, multi-center, real-world implementation cohort designed to evaluate the programmatic feasibility, safety, and long-term effectiveness of school-integrated short-course tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) among matriculating freshmen. Embedded within routine campus health services across 26 educational institutions (secondary vocational schools, colleges, and universities) in Meishan City, Sichuan Province, China, the protocol operationalizes proactive case-finding and preventive intervention at student entry.
Screening cascade and baseline stratification Under mandatory institutional biosecurity regulations, all newly enrolled freshmen underwent entry health evaluations comprising tuberculin skin testing (TST with 5 TU PPD-RT23), active symptom screening, and digital chest radiography (CXR). To maximize population coverage (>99%) and minimize non-response bias, a 2-week catch-up window was instituted for students initially absent. To account for widespread neonatal BCG vaccination, baseline infection risk was operationalized using TST induration thresholds.
Control cohort: Students with TST indurations <15 mm (subdivided into TST <5 mm, 5-9 mm, and 10-14 mm).
Target Cohort: Students with strong TST reactivity (≥15 mm or local severe reactions such as blisters/necrosis) in whom active TB was clinically excluded.
Intervention workflows and adherence monitoring Within the target cohort, TPT initiation was managed through shared decision-making. Eligible participants voluntarily initiated one of two WHO-recommended 3-month short-course regimens: Daily fixed-dose combination isoniazid/rifampicin (3HR). Twice-weekly isoniazid plus rifapentine (3H2P2). Treatment administration was embedded within campus health clinics using a hybrid directly observed therapy model combining in-person clinic DOT with smartphone-based video DOT (vDOT). Participants receiving medical observation alone without medication served as the No-TPT comparison group. Adverse events were routinely graded per CTCAE v5.0, with regular safety monitoring to capture potential hepatotoxicity.
Causal inference and emulation framework To complement primary multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling and address observational confounding inherent in non-randomized treatment assignment, the analytic workflow incorporated a Target Trial Emulation (TTE) framework as sensitivity analyses. Time zero (T0) was anchored to the date of LTBI eligibility confirmation, incorporating a 14-day grace period to align baseline entry and eliminate immortal time bias. High-dimensional baseline covariates, including demographic factors, BMI, school type, medical major, BCG status, prior TB history, and close contact history, were balanced using 1:1 Propensity Score Matching (PSM) and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW with stabilized weights) to estimate the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) across both modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TPT Group | Active comparator | Drug: tuberculosis preventive treatmentInitiation of a short-course TPT regimen (3HR or 3H2P2) within a 14-day grace period following being defined as the date of LTBI diagnosis/eligibility confirmation by school health services. |
| No-TPT Group | No intervention | –Non-initiation of TPT, receiving standard observation and symptom monitoring through school health services. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Matriculating freshmen aged 14-24 years enrolled across 26 participating educational institutions
- Completion of baseline tuberculosis screening, including systematic symptom screening, digital chest radiography, and tuberculin skin test (TST)
- Target cohort requirement: TST strong reactivity (induration ≥15 mm or severe local reactions such as blisters, necrosis, or lymphangitis) with active TB ruled out at baseline
- Control cohort requirement: TST induration <15 mm (including negative <5 mm, weakly positive 5-9 mm, and moderately positive 10-14 mm)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presence of active TB at baseline screening
- Voluntary receipt of Vaccae vaccination (for the target cohort)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tuberculosis preventive treatment3HR Regimen: Isoniazid (INH) + Rifampin (RIF), once daily, 90 total doses (3 months); 3H2P2 Regimen: Isoniazid (INH) + Rifapentine (RPT), twice weekly, 24 total doses (3 months) | Drug | TPT Group |
Primary outcome
Incident active tuberculosis
Time frame: Up to 4 years post-baseline screening (from T0 through August 31, 2026)
Incidence of newly diagnosed active tuberculosis (pulmonary or extrapulmonary) occurring during the 4-year prospective follow-up period among eligible study participants. Active TB cases were systematically tracked and confirmed through three integrated surveillance pathways managed by school health services: routine annual campus health evaluations; symptomatic student self-reports and clinical evaluations at campus health centers; linkage with the national electronic TB surveillance system managed by local CDC. Diagnosis was established per national school TB guidelines. Confirmed active TB required clinical/radiological findings with microbiological/molecular confirmation (M. tuberculosis culture, AFB smear, or GeneXpert MTB/RIF). Bacteriologically negative cases were diagnosed based on chest radiography, persistent symptoms, antibiotic non-responsiveness, and expert consensus.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31736459You NN, Zhu LM, Li GL, Martinez L, Lu W, Liu Q, Yang HT. A tuberculosis school outbreak in China, 2018: reaching an often overlooked adolescent population. Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Nov 18;147:e303. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001882.
- Background: PubMed 42181577Tang J, Xie M, Li C, Huang F, Peng L, Qu Y, Mei J, Liu Z, Liu E, Guo Y, Wang Y. A clustered pulmonary Tuberculosis outbreak at a technical school in Shenzhen, China. Front Pediatr. 2026 May 7;14:1817016. doi: 10.3389/fped.2026.1817016. eCollection 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22150035Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Borisov AS, Shang N, Gordin F, Bliven-Sizemore E, Hackman J, Hamilton CD, Menzies D, Kerrigan A, Weis SE, Weiner M, Wing D, Conde MB, Bozeman L, Horsburgh CR Jr, Chaisson RE; TB Trials Consortium PREVENT TB Study Team. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 8;365(23):2155-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104875.
- Background: PubMed 17712755Spyridis NP, Spyridis PG, Gelesme A, Sypsa V, Valianatou M, Metsou F, Gourgiotis D, Tsolia MN. The effectiveness of a 9-month regimen of isoniazid alone versus 3- and 4-month regimens of isoniazid plus rifampin for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection in children: results of an 11-year randomized study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 15;45(6):715-22. doi: 10.1086/520983. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 31753806Snow KJ, Cruz AT, Seddon JA, Ferrand RA, Chiang SS, Hughes JA, Kampmann B, Graham SM, Dodd PJ, Houben RM, Denholm JT, Sawyer SM, Kranzer K. Adolescent tuberculosis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jan;4(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30337-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 40329939Rodriguez-Marquez I, Benjumea-Bedoya D, Restrepo-Gouzy AV, Beltran-Arroyave CP, Marin D, Montes-Zuluaga FN, Alzate-Angel JC, Cadavid-Alvarez LM, Paniagua-Saldarriaga LA, Realpe T, Perea-Torres Y, Arango-Garcia LM, Perez-Doncel N, Arbelaez-Montoya MP, Robledo J. Adherence to treatment for tuberculosis infection in children using a comprehensive care strategy: a prospective cohort study with a historical control group. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Apr 22;46:101094. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101094. eCollection 2025 Jun.
- Background: PubMed 39709975Pelzer PT, Stuck L, Martinez L, Richards AS, Acuna-Villaorduna C, Aronson NE, Bonnet M, Carvalho AC, Chan PC, Huang LM, Fang CT, Churchyard G, Corral-Londono HD, Datta M, Espinal MA, Fielding K, Fiore-Gartland AJ, Garcia-Basteiro A, Hanekom W, Hatherill M, Hill PC, Huerga H, Jones-Lopez EC, Kritski A, Mandalakas AM, Mangtani P, Martins Netto E, Mayanja H, Mazahir R, Murray M, Rangaka M, Scriba T, Singh J, Singh S, Stein CM, Vekemans J, Verhagen LM, Villalba JA, Wajja A, Watson B, White RG, Cobelens FGJ. Effectiveness of the primary Bacillus Calmette-Guerin vaccine against the risk of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Microbe. 2025 Feb;6(2):100961. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.100961. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
- Background: PubMed 40155893Pangprasertkul S, Buawangpong N, Pinyopornpanish K, Jiraporncharoen W, Angkurawaranon C. Treatment completion and safety profile of once-weekly 3HP regimen for tuberculosis preventive treatment in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10832-7.
- Background: PubMed 16357823National Tuberculosis Controllers Association; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for the investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Dec 16;54(RR-15):1-47.
- Background: PubMed 7637141Mohle-Boetani JC, Miller B, Halpern M, Trivedi A, Lessler J, Solomon SL, Fenstersheib M. School-based screening for tuberculous infection. A cost-benefit analysis. JAMA. 1995 Aug 23-30;274(8):613-9.
- Background: PubMed 33122339Mandalakas AM, Hesseling AC, Kay A, Du Preez K, Martinez L, Ronge L, DiNardo A, Lange C, Kirchner HL. Tuberculosis prevention in children: a prospective community-based study in South Africa. Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 22;57(4):2003028. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03028-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 26017823Getahun H, Matteelli A, Chaisson RE, Raviglione M. Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2127-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1405427. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI)
RecruitingObservational study
Training Protocol on the Natural History of Tuberculosis
Mycobacterium Infections, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Bedaquiline Roll-out Evidence in Contacts and People Living With HIV to Prevent TB
Tuberculosis, Latent
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Daily Rifapentine Combined With Isoniazid (1HP) for Tuberculosis Prevention in Children Less Than 13 Years of Age With and Without HIV
Tuberculosis
RecruitingPhase 2
BPaLMZ for TB Meningitis
Tuberculous Meningitis, HIV
Recruiting
Screening With Portable X-rays for Rapid Recognition of TB
Tuberculosis (TB), Tuberculosis Infection, Latent
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing tuberculosis preventive treatment in people with Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) and Tuberculosis (TB), run by Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gang Qin, MD, PhD (086-189-1228-8106, tonygqin@ntu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incident active tuberculosis (time frame: Up to 4 years post-baseline screening (from T0 through August 31, 2026)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07811518, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.