AzTrials
AzTrials

PregnancySWIPE LEFTNCT07812506

Social Media Withdrawal in Pregnancy: Effects on Maternal Mental Health and Misinformation

A study testing Brick device in people with Pregnancy, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if restricting social media use with a hardware device can improve mental health and well-being during pregnancy. It will also learn about the feasibility and acceptability of this approach. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy
What is being tested?
Brick device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2026to Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Pregnant, with a viable pregnancy at 20-24 weeks' gestation
  • English fluency
  • Daily use of a personal iOS smartphone (iOS 17 or later).
  • Average social media screen time of at least 30 minutes per day, verified at enrollment via the iOS Screen Time report.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Non-viable pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: SWIPE LEFT: Social Media Withdrawal in Pregnancy - Effects on Maternal Mental Health and Misinformation

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if restricting social media use with a hardware device can improve mental health and well-being during pregnancy. It will also learn about the feasibility and acceptability of this approach.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does restricting social media use lower the amount of time participants spend on social media?
  • Does restricting social media use improve depression, anxiety, well-being, loneliness, sleep, and physical activity?

Researchers will compare participants who use a device (Brick™) that restricts social media apps to participants receiving usual care to see if the device improves social media use and mental health outcomes.

Participants will:

  • Complete surveys about mood, sleep, and social media use, and wear/carry a smartphone app that tracks activity and sleep
  • Use the Brick device to restrict social media apps for 2 weeks, or continue their usual phone use
  • Complete follow-up surveys at the end of the 4-week study
Conditions
Pregnancy
Being tested
Brick device
Keywords
social media addiction, social media, pregnancy, mental health
Medical subject headings
Internet Addiction Disorder, Psychological Well-Being

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Brick deviceDevice

    A hardware-based device that restricts access to user-selected social media applications by requiring physical interaction with the device to unlock them. Participants in the intervention arm will use the device continuously to block access to selected social media apps during a 2-week intervention period, following a 2-week baseline monitoring period. The device is not an FDA-regulated medical device and functions as a consumer hardware tool. Participants may voluntarily reverse the intervention (unlock the device) at any point during the study.

Study groups in NCT07812506
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalParticipants randomized to this arm will complete a 2-week baseline monitoring period followed by a 2-week intervention period. During the intervention period, participants will receive the Brick™ device, a hardware-based tool that restricts access to user-selected social media applications by requiring physical interaction with the device to unlock them. Participants will be instructed on device use and asked to use it continuously to block access to their selected social media apps for the duration of the 2-week intervention period. Participants may voluntarily reverse the intervention at any point during the study.
Receives: Device: Brick device
Usual CareNo interventionParticipants randomized to this arm will complete a 2-week baseline monitoring period followed by a 2-week period of continued usual smartphone and social media behavior, without any restriction on app access. No intervention device or procedure is administered during this period. As additional compensation, participants in this arm will receive a Brick™ device following completion of all study procedures.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent reduction in social media screen time

    Daily social media screen time, defined as total minutes per day spent in social media applications as captured by the device-native iOS Screen Time report, averaged across each 14-day observation window. For each participant, percent reduction is calculated as:

    [(mean baseline daily minutes - mean post-intervention daily minutes) / mean baseline daily minutes] × 100 where the baseline value is the mean of daily social media minutes over the 14 days preceding randomization and the follow-up value is the mean over the 14-day window at the end of the intervention period. Mean percent reduction will be compared between the intervention (Brick device) group and the usual care group.

    Measured: 2-week intervention period

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Recruitment rate

    Number of participants enrolled and randomized, expressed as a proportion of those screened and confirmed eligible, and as the mean number enrolled per month over the recruitment period.

    Measured: Through completion of enrollment (approximately 9 months)

  2. Retention rate

    Proportion of randomized participants who complete the end-of-intervention assessment with evaluable primary outcome data (iOS Screen Time report for the final 14-day window)

    Measured: 2-week intervention period

  3. Adherence to Brick device use

    Among participants randomized to the intervention, the proportion of the number of minutes during which the Brick device was in use divided by the number of minutes during the active intervention period; reported as the group mean and as the proportion of participants achieving ≥90% adherent days.

    Measured: 2-week intervention period

  4. Change in EPDS Score at 4 weeks

    Change in depressive symptoms from enrollment to study completion, measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The EPDS is a 10-item self-report questionnaire; each item is scored 0 to 3 and summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms (a worse outcome). Change is calculated as the study-completion score minus the baseline score, yielding a possible range of -30 to +30, where negative values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Enrollment to study completion (4 weeks)

  5. Change in GAD-7 score at 4 weeks

    Change in anxiety symptoms from baseline to study completion, measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report questionnaire; each item is scored 0 to 3 and summed for a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms (a worse outcome). Change is calculated as the study-completion score minus the baseline score, yielding a possible range of -21 to +21, where negative values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Enrollment to study completion (4 weeks)

  6. Change in WHO-5 Score at 4 weeks

    Change in well-being from baseline to study completion, measured using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5). The WHO-5 is a 5-item self-report questionnaire; each item is scored 0 to 5 and summed for a raw score of 0 to 25, which is multiplied by 4 to yield a final score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater well-being (a better outcome). Change is calculated as the study-completion score minus the baseline score, yielding a possible range of -100 to +100, where positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Enrollment to study completion (4 weeks)

  7. Change in UCLA-LS-3 score at 4 weeks

    Change in loneliness from baseline to study completion, measured using the Three-Item UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS-3). The UCLA-LS-3 is a 3-item self-report questionnaire; each item is scored 1 to 3 and summed for a total score ranging from 3 to 9. Higher scores indicate greater loneliness (a worse outcome). Change is calculated as the study-completion score minus the baseline score, yielding a possible range of -6 to +6, where negative values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Enrollment to study completion (4 weeks)

  8. Change in B-PSQI Score at 4 weeks

    Change in sleep quality from baseline to study completion, measured using the Brief Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI). The B-PSQI is a 6-item self-report questionnaire yielding five scored components (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, and frequency of night awakenings), each scored 0 to 3 and summed for a global score ranging from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality (a worse outcome). Change is calculated as the study-completion score minus the baseline score, yielding a possible range of -15 to +15, where negative values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Enrollment to study completion (4 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07812506
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026P001582
Acronym
SWIPE LEFT
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
1 Sep 2026
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Onnela, J.-P. et al. Beiwe: A data collection platform for high-throughput digital phenotyping. J. Open Source Softw. 6, 3417 (2021).

  • Facco FL, Kramer J, Ho KH, Zee PC, Grobman WA. Sleep disturbances in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;115(1):77-83. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c4f8ec.

    PubMed 20027038
  • Screening and Diagnosis of Mental Health Conditions During Pregnancy and Postpartum: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 4. Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1232-1261. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005200.

    PubMed 37486660
  • Bilali A, Katsiroumpa A, Koutelekos I, Dafogianni C, Gallos P, Moisoglou I, Galanis P. Association Between TikTok Use and Anxiety, Depression, and Sleepiness Among Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study in Greece. Pediatr Rep. 2025 Mar 11;17(2):34. doi: 10.3390/pediatric17020034.

    PubMed 40126233
  • Calvert E, Cipriani M, Dwyer B, Lisowski V, Mikkelson J, Chen K, Flathers M, Hau C, Xia W, Castillo J, Dhima A, Ryan S, Torous J. Social Media Detox and Youth Mental Health. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Nov 3;8(11):e2545245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.45245.

    PubMed 41284297
  • Waring ME, Blackman Carr LT, Heersping GE. Social Media Use Among Parents and Women of Childbearing Age in the US. Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Feb 16;20:E07. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.220194.

    PubMed 36796010

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Brick device in people with Pregnancy, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Lydia Shook, MD ((617) 724-0287, lshook@mgh.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent reduction in social media screen time (time frame: 2-week intervention period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07812506, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in