AzTrials
AzTrials

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesmicSPIDERNCT07812675

Intertriginous/Periorificial Dermatoses in Patients With IBD on Anti-TNFα: Relative Abundance of Staphylococcus Aureus Within the Lesion Microbiota and Clinical Correlation (micSPIDER).

An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Crohn's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 5 sites in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the change in the relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion-site skin microbiota in SPIDER patients (change between inclusion and 6 months), and to assess whether this change in S. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 years and older
How many people
82 participants
Where
5 sitesFrance
Study dates
Sep 2026to Sep 2029
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult or pediatric patient (>4 years old), diagnosed with IBD and receiving anti-TNFα therapy, with skin lesions such as crusted rhinitis ± inflammatory alopecic scalp lesions ± intertrigo of the large skin folds ± folliculitis (Scalp and Periorificial Inflammatory DERmatis, SPIDER)

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with IBD
  • Receiving anti-TNFα therapy
  • WITH skin lesions such as crusted rhinitis ± inflammatory alopecic scalp lesions ± intertrigo of the large skin folds ± folliculitis (Scalp and Periorificial Inflammatory DERmatis, SPIDER)
  • Parental consent for minor patients
  • Patient who has provided free and informed consent and has signed the consent form
  • Patient affiliated to or beneficiary of a health insurance system

Who cannot join

  • Patients for whom a change in therapy is planned within 6 months (SPIDER+).
  • Patients receiving antibiotics (systemic or topical) at the time of enrollment, with a window of at least 1 month.
  • Patients who have participated in a clinical drug trial within the last three months
  • Patients currently in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • Patients under legal guardianship, conservatorship, or trusteeship
  • Patients who refuse to sign the informed consent form
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Catherine DUNYACH-REMY, Dr. contact

+334.66.68.32.02

catherine.remy@chu-nimes.fr

Anissa MEGZARI contact

+334.66.68.42.36

drc@chu-nimes.fr

5 sites in 1 country

France5 sites
  • CHU de Béziers

    Béziers, Hérault, 34500

    Louise GUILLON, Dr.

    Louise GUILLON, Dr.

  • Centre Hospitalier de MILLAU

    Millau, Aveyron, 12100

    Ariane FIZAZI, Dr., a-fizazi@chu-montpellier.fr

    Ariane FIZAZI, Dr.

  • CHU de Montpellier, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve

    Montpellier, Hérault, 34090

    Grégoire LAVAUD, Dr., gregoire.lavaud@chu-montpellier.fr

    Grégoire LAVAUD, Dr.

  • Montpellier University Hospital, Saint Eloi

    Montpellier, Hérault, 34090

    Aurélie DU THANH, Pr., a-du_thanh@chu-montpellier.fr

    Aurélie DU THANH

  • Nîmes University Hospital

    Nîmes, Gard, 30029

    Catherine DUNYACH-REMY, Dr., +334.66.68.32.02, catherine.remy@chu-nimes.fr

    Natacha CATTEAU, Dr.

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Inflammatory Skin Diseases of Skin Folds and Perioral Areas (SPIDER) in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Anti-TNFα Therapy: Characterization of the Staphylococcus Aureus Population Within the Lesion Microbiota and Correlation With Clinical Findings

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the change in the relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion-site skin microbiota in SPIDER patients (change between inclusion and 6 months), and to assess whether this change in S. aureus abundance is associated with a favorable (or unfavorable) evolution of the wounds over the same period.

Read the detailed description

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), affect around 2.5 million people worldwide, including 300,000 in France. These conditions mainly impact young adults and follow a relapsing-remitting course with significant morbidity. CD is a chronic, debilitating disease caused by complex interactions among genetic, environmental, and microbiota-related factors, leading to transmural inflammation of the digestive tract and both intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. UC affects the mucosa of the colon and rectum, with similar gastrointestinal symptoms and frequent cutaneous, ocular, and rheumatologic manifestations.

Treatment aims for deep remission and relies largely on anti-TNFα therapies, complemented by other drugs or surgery; newer biologics like vedolizumab and ustekinumab are also used. However, anti-TNFα-treated patients often develop cutaneous comorbidities, such as psoriasis, granulomatous lesions, or neutrophilic dermatoses. A significant proportion also develop skin infections, commonly due to Staphylococcus aureus. One study reported inflammatory skin lesions in 40% of IBD patients on anti-TNFα, with S. aureus nasal or cutaneous carriage frequently associated. The precise relationship between S. aureus and these lesions, however, remains unclear.

Description of the treatment/strategy/procedure: Swabbing of healthy areas and lesion sites will be performed in the same way in the SPIDER+ and SPIDER- groups at Day 0 (D0). Microbiota sequencing and cultures will be carried out under the same conditions in both groups.

Description of follow-up: SPIDER+ patients will be recruited from the dermatology departments of the participating university hospitals (CHUs), notably in Montpellier, Millau, and Béziers. They will receive follow-up over a 12-month period, with an inclusion visit followed by two follow-up visits at 6 and 12 months. On the other hand, for SPIDER- patients a follow-up visit will take place at 12 months, in order to record adverse effects of the treatment (anti-TNF).

Keywords
anti-TNFα therapies, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Staphylococcus aureus
Medical subject headings
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease, Skin Diseases, Dermatitis, Staphylococcal Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07812675
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SPIDER+ groupPatients diagnosed with IBD receiving anti-TNFα therapy with skin lesions such as crusted rhinitis ± inflammatory alopecic scalp lesions ± intertrigo of the large skin folds ± folliculitis (Scalp and Periorificial Inflammatory DERmatis, SPIDER)
SPIDER- group (control group):Patients diagnosed with IBD receiving anti-TNFα therapy for more than 1 year, WITHOUT dermatological lesions suggestive of SPIDER

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relative abundance of S. aureus in the SPIDER+ group

    Number of read sequences corresponding to S. aureus divided by the total number of read sequences (%) assessed after sequencing swabs from SPIDER lesions

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  2. Relative abundance of S. aureus in the control group

    Number of read sequences corresponding to S. aureus divided by the total number of read sequences (%) assessed after sequencing swabs from healthy areas

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  3. Relative abundance of S. aureus in the SPIDER+ group

    Number of read sequences corresponding to S. aureus divided by the total number of read sequences (%) assessed after sequencing swabs from SPIDER lesions

    Measured: Month 6

  4. Relative abundance of S. aureus according to the Physician's Global Assessment score in the SPIDER+ group

    The Physician's Global Assessment score is a clinical scale widely used in dermatology to assess the overall severity of a skin condition. Since there is no specific score for these lesions, it is the only one that can be used. The Physician's Global Assessment score is a global visual assessment of the severity of skin lesions, performed by a healthcare professional (investigator). The Physician's Global Assessment score is an ordinal scale, typically ranging from 0 to 5. A common goal in studies is to achieve a Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (resolved or minimal), often with an improvement of at least 2 points from the baseline score.

    The Physician's Global Assessment is often used as an endpoint in dermatological clinical trials. It is always combined with a quality-of-life score.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  5. Relative abundance of S. aureus according to the Physician's Global Assessment score in the SPIDER+ group

    The Physician's Global Assessment score is a clinical scale widely used in dermatology to assess the overall severity of a skin condition. Since there is no specific score for these lesions, it is the only one that can be used. The Physician's Global Assessment score is a global visual assessment of the severity of skin lesions, performed by a healthcare professional (investigator).The Physician's Global Assessment score is an ordinal scale, typically ranging from 0 to 5. A common goal in studies is to achieve a Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (resolved or minimal), often with an improvement of at least 2 points from the baseline score.

    The Physician's Global Assessment is often used as an endpoint in dermatological clinical trials. It is always combined with a quality-of-life score.

    Measured: Month 6

  6. Relative abundance of S. aureus according to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index in the SPIDER+ group

    The Dermatology Quality of Life Index is a standardized, validated, and widely used questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a dermatological condition on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 10 questions, each scored from 0 to 3 points, for a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Topics covered include: symptoms and feelings, discomfort, daily activities, and personal relationships.The optimal goal is a maximum score of 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to baseline (M0).

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  7. Relative abundance of S. aureus according to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index in the SPIDER+ group

    The Dermatology Quality of Life Index is a standardized, validated, and widely used questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a dermatological condition on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 10 questions, each scored from 0 to 3 points, for a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Topics covered include: symptoms and feelings, discomfort, daily activities, and personal relationships.The optimal goal is a maximum score of 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to baseline (M0).

    Measured: Month 6

Secondary outcomes (73)
  1. Relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion microbiota in the experimental group according to the Physician's Global Assessment score

    The Physician's Global Assessment score is a clinical scale widely used in dermatology to assess the overall severity of a skin condition. Since there is no specific score for these lesions, it is the only one that can be used. The Physician's Global Assessment score is a global visual assessment of the severity of skin lesions, performed by a healthcare professional (investigator). The Physician's Global Assessment score is an ordinal scale, typically ranging from 0 to 5. A common goal in studies is to achieve a Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (resolved or minimal), often with an improvement of at least 2 points from the baseline score.

    The Physician's Global Assessment is often used as an endpoint in dermatological clinical trials. It is always combined with a quality-of-life score.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  2. Relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion microbiota in the experimental group according to the Physician's Global Assessment score

    The Physician's Global Assessment score is a clinical scale widely used in dermatology to assess the overall severity of a skin condition. Since there is no specific score for these lesions, it is the only one that can be used. The Physician's Global Assessment score is a global visual assessment of the severity of skin lesions, performed by a healthcare professional (investigator). The Physician's Global Assessment score is an ordinal scale, typically ranging from 0 to 5. A common goal in studies is to achieve a Physician's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (resolved or minimal), often with an improvement of at least 2 points from the baseline score.

    The Physician's Global Assessment is often used as an endpoint in dermatological clinical trials. It is always combined with a quality-of-life score.

    Measured: Month 12

  3. Relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion microbiota in the experimental group according to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index

    The Dermatology Quality of Life Index is a standardized, validated, and widely used questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a dermatological condition on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 10 questions, each scored from 0 to 3 points, for a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Topics covered include: symptoms and feelings, discomfort, daily activities, and personal relationships.The optimal goal is a maximum score of 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to baseline (M0).

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  4. Relative abundance of S. aureus within the lesion microbiota in the experimental group according to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index

    The Dermatology Quality of Life Index is a standardized, validated, and widely used questionnaire designed to assess the impact of a dermatological condition on a patient's quality of life. It consists of 10 questions, each scored from 0 to 3 points, for a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Topics covered include: symptoms and feelings, discomfort, daily activities, and personal relationships.The optimal goal is a maximum score of 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to baseline (M0).

    Measured: Month 12

  5. Relative abundance of species found in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients)

    Relative abundances (in %) of each bacterial species, calculation of alpha diversity (Shannon index) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) following sequencing of swabs taken from lesions at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  6. Relative abundance of species found in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients)

    Relative abundances (in %) of each bacterial species, calculation of alpha diversity (Shannon index) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) following sequencing of swabs taken from lesions at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  7. Relative abundance of species found in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients)

    Relative abundances (in %) of each bacterial species, calculation of alpha diversity (Shannon index) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) following sequencing of swabs taken from lesions at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  8. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: axillary folds

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  9. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: axillary folds

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 6

  10. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: axillary folds

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 12

  11. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: nostrils

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  12. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: nostrils

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 6

  13. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: nostrils

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 12

  14. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: navel

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  15. Relative abundance of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: navel

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 6

  16. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: navel

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 12

  17. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: ears

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  18. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: ears

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 6

  19. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: ears

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 12

  20. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: cheek

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  21. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: cheek

    Yes/No

    Measured: Month 6

  22. Presence of S. aureus in the experimental group (SPIDER+ patients) at different colonization sites: cheek

    In %

    Measured: Month 12

  23. Evolution of lesions according to the Physician's Global Assessment score in SPIDER+ patients

    A "favorable" change in the lesion at Month12 will be defined as:

    a decrease of at least 2 points in the Physician's Global Assessment score (0-5, wherein 0 indicates improvement and 5 indicates worsening) compared to M0, or a Physician's Global Assessment score of 1 or less.

    Measured: Month 6

  24. Evolution of lesions according to the Physician's Global Assessment score in SPIDER+ patients

    A "favorable" change in the lesion at Month12 will be defined as:

    a decrease of at least 2 points in the Physician's Global Assessment score (0-5, wherein 0 indicates improvement and 5 indicates worsening) compared to Month 0, or a Physician's Global Assessment score of 1 or less.

    Measured: Month 12

  25. Evolution of lesions according to the Dermatology Live Quality Index in SPIDER+ patients

    A "favorable" change in the lesion at Month12 will be defined as: an optimal target of up to 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to Month 0.

    Measured: Month 6

  26. Evolution of lesions according to the Dermatology Live Quality Index in SPIDER+ patients

    A "favorable" change in the lesion at Month12 will be defined as: an optimal target of up to 5 points or a reduction of at least 4 points compared to Month 0.

    Measured: Month 12

  27. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: axillary folds

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  28. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: axillary folds

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  29. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: axillary folds

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  30. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: nostrils

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  31. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: nostrils

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  32. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: nostrils

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  33. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: navel

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  34. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: navel

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  35. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: navel

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  36. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: ears

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  37. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: ears

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  38. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: ears

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  39. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: cheek

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  40. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: cheek

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 6

  41. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in relation to the relative abundance of S. aureus in SPIDER+ lesion sites: cheek

    Score/5: 1 point for each staphylococcal colonization site (axillary folds, nostrils, navel, ears) and 1 point for the healthy skin area (cheek) if S. aureus is isolated after culture at M0, M6, and M12 in SPIDER+ patients.

    Measured: Month 12

  42. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER + patients

    Relative abundances (in %) of each bacterial species, including S. aureus following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  43. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER + patients: Alpha diversity

    Calculation of alpha diversity (Shannon index) following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  44. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER + patients: Beta diversity

    Calculation of beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  45. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER - patients

    Relative abundances (in %) of each bacterial species, including S. aureus following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  46. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER - patients: Alpha diversity

    Calculation of alpha diversity (Shannon index) following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  47. Abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and the microbiota (composition, alpha and beta diversity) of a healthy skin area in SPIDER - patients: beta diversity

    Calculation of beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) following sequencing of swabs taken from a healthy skin area in SPIDER+ subjects and from a site at the same location in SPIDER- subjects at time point M0.

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  48. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: length

    Measured in Mb

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  49. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: length

    Measured in Mb

    Measured: Month 6

  50. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: length

    Measured in Mb

    Measured: Month 12

  51. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: guanine-cytosine content

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  52. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: guanine-cytosine content

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 6

  53. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: guanine-cytosine content

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 12

  54. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: presence of plasmids

    YES / NO

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  55. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: presence of plasmids

    YES / NO

    Measured: Month 6

  56. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: presence of plasmids

    YES / NO

    Measured: Month 12

  57. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: genome alignment

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  58. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: genome alignment

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 6

  59. Genomes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites, healthy areas, and staphylococcal reservoirs via bacterial culture: genome alignment

    Measured in %

    Measured: Month 12

  60. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  61. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 6

  62. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 12

  63. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from healthy areas in SPIDER+ patients

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  64. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from healthy areas in SPIDER+ patients

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 6

  65. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from healthy areas in SPIDER+ patients

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 12

  66. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from staphylococcal reservoirs

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

  67. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from staphylococcal reservoirs

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 6

  68. Quantification of messenger RNA from S. aureus virulence genes isolated from staphylococcal reservoirs

    Measured via long-read sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore) in µg

    Measured: Month 12

  69. Real-time monitoring of the growth of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites

    Real-time monitoring using the Quantum automat, in %

    Measured: Month 0 to Month 12

  70. Real-time monitoring of the growth of S. aureus strains isolated from apparently healthy areas in SPIDER+ patients

    Real-time monitoring using the Quantum automat, in %

    Measured: Month 0 to Month 12

  71. Biofilm formation of S. aureus strains isolated from SPIDER+ lesion sites

    Growth curves using the Bioflux automat

    Measured: Month 0 to Month 12

  72. Biofilm formation of S. aureus strains isolated from apparently healthy areas in SPIDER+ patients

    Growth curves using the Bioflux automat

    Measured: Month 0 to Month 12

  73. Constitution of a biobank of samples taken by swabbing of lesion sites in SPIDER+ patients

    Number of samples

    Measured: Month 0, baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2026
  2. Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrolment
82 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07812675
Sponsor's protocol ID
AOI2024/2025/CDR-01
Acronym
micSPIDER
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
26 Aug 2026
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Crohn's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 5 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Catherine DUNYACH-REMY, Dr. (+334.66.68.32.02, catherine.remy@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relative abundance of S. aureus in the SPIDER+ group (time frame: Month 0, baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in