Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisEarly Phase 1Galvo vs mechNCT07814391
Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Decontamination Versus Titanium Brushes
A Early Phase 1 study testing test device GalvoSurge and Mechanical decontamination with titanium brush in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy.
Trial summary
Implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and amenable for bone reconstructive treatment will be enrolled in the study. The implants will randomly be treated with either an electrolytic or a mechanical cleaning of the implant surface (with titanium brushes). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
- What is being tested?
- test device GalvoSurge and Mechanical decontamination with titanium brush
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2027to Apr 2027
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Implants with peri-implantitis (defined according to 2017 World Workshop definitions)
- contained defects with infra osseous component amenable to reconstructive treatment
- fixed and removable superstructures
- patients with no systemic conditions affecting healing (uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic corticosteroid use, autoimmune conditions affecting connective tissue)
- smoking more than 10 cigarettes
Who cannot join
- mobile implants
- non removable crowns (both cement or screw retained) that cannot be removed prior to surgery
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Luca Cordaro, DDS MD contact
About this study
Official title: Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Decontamination Versus Titanium Brushes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and amenable for bone reconstructive treatment will be enrolled in the study. The implants will randomly be treated with either an electrolytic or a mechanical cleaning of the implant surface (with titanium brushes). In all cases, a bone graft will be used to rebuild missing bone.
Read the detailed description
Implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and amenable for bone reconstructive treatment will be enrolled in the study. All implants will receive reconstructive therapy by means of a collagenated bone graft, however the method of decontamination will be randomized between electrolytic cleaning or titanium rotating brushes. In both cases, titanium curettes will be used to remove hard deposits on the implant surface and degranulation will be completed with curettes.
- Being tested
- test device GalvoSurge, Mechanical decontamination with titanium brush
- Keywords
- electrolytic cleaning, reconstructive treatment, demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), titanium brush
- Medical subject headings
- Peri-Implantitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
test device GalvoSurgeProcedure or surgery
Also called electrolytic decontamination
Electrolytic decontamination
Mechanical decontamination with titanium brushProcedure or surgery
Also called tibrush
Reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis after removal of hard and soft tissue deposits from the implant surface followed by mechanical decontamination with titanium brush
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Test: Electrolytic decontamination | Experimental | Electrolytic decontamination with GalvoSurge (Straumann AG) Receives: Procedure: test device GalvoSurge |
| Control: Mechanical decontamination with rotating titanium brush | Experimental | Mechanical rotating brush used with titanium curettes to remove hard tissue deposits from the implant surface |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Probing pocket depth
distance (mm) between marginal mucosa and bottom of probable pocket
Measured: from baseline to 12, 24 months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
change in recession
change between baseline and 24 months (mm)
Measured: baseline to 12 and 24 months post-op
change in CAL
change in CAL between baseline and 24 months (mm)
Measured: between baseline and 24 months
Suppuration on probing (SoP)
Dichotomic variable
Measured: baseline, 12, 24 months
Bleeding on probing
Dichotomic variable (yes/ no)
Measured: baseline, 12, 24 months
Keratinized mucosa (KM)
continuous, measured in mm, from the margin of the mucosa to the mucogingival junction
Measured: baseline, 12, 24 months
Treatment Success
Composite outcome comprising implant not lost, no more than 1 mm of buccal recession, no more than 5 mm of PPD, no SOP, no more than 1 bleeding spot on probing, no loss of crestal bone (mm)
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2026
- Study startJan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant MucositisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lucrezia Paternò Holtzman, George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07814391
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0801
- Acronym
- Galvo vs mech
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Zipprich H, Weigl P, Di Gianfilippo R, Steigmann L, Henrich D, Wang HL, Schlee M, Ratka C. Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4549-4558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04421-0. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
PubMed 35322316Bernardi S, Qorri E, Botticelli G, Scarano A, Marzo G, Gatto R, Greco Lucchina A, Mortellaro C, Lupi E, Rastelli C, Falisi G. Use of electrical field for biofilm implant removal. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Apr;27(3 Suppl):114-121. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_31328.
PubMed 37129321Zhu Y, Xu Y, Ling Z, Zhao C, Xu A, He F. The biofilm removal effect and osteogenic potential on the titanium surface by electrolytic cleaning: An in vitro comparison of electrolytic parameters and five techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Apr;35(4):454-466. doi: 10.1111/clr.14245. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
PubMed 38345170Schlee M, Rathe F, Brodbeck U, Ratka C, Weigl P, Zipprich H. Treatment of Peri-implantitis-Electrolytic Cleaning Versus Mechanical and Electrolytic Cleaning-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-Six-Month Results. J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 7;8(11):1909. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111909.
PubMed 31703404Bosshardt DD, Brodbeck UR, Rathe F, Stumpf T, Imber JC, Weigl P, Schlee M. Evidence of re-osseointegration after electrolytic cleaning and regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis in humans: a case report with four implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Apr;26(4):3735-3746. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04345-1. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
PubMed 35244779Gianfreda F, Punzo A, Pistilli V, Bollero P, Cervino G, D'Amico C, Cairo F, Cicciu M. Electrolytic Cleaning and Regenerative Therapy of Peri-implantitis in the Esthetic Area: A Case Report. Eur J Dent. 2022 Oct;16(4):950-956. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750773. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
PubMed 35785819
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-implantitis With Electrolytic Decontamination Versus Titanium Brushes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07814391
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Galvo vs mech / 0801
- Keywords
- electrolytic cleaning, reconstructive treatment, demineralized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), titanium brush
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- George Eastman Dental Hospital, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and amenable for bone reconstructive treatment will be enrolled in the study. The implants will randomly be treated with either an electrolytic or a mechanical cleaning of the implant surface (with titanium brushes). In all cases, a bone graft will be used to rebuild missing bone.
Detailed description
Implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and amenable for bone reconstructive treatment will be enrolled in the study. All implants will receive reconstructive therapy by means of a collagenated bone graft, however the method of decontamination will be randomized between electrolytic cleaning or titanium rotating brushes. In both cases, titanium curettes will be used to remove hard deposits on the implant surface and degranulation will be completed with curettes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Test: Electrolytic decontamination | Experimental | Procedure: test device GalvoSurgeElectrolytic decontamination with GalvoSurge (Straumann AG) |
| Control: Mechanical decontamination with rotating titanium brush | Experimental | –Mechanical rotating brush used with titanium curettes to remove hard tissue deposits from the implant surface |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Implants with peri-implantitis (defined according to 2017 World Workshop definitions)
- contained defects with infra osseous component amenable to reconstructive treatment
- fixed and removable superstructures
- patients with no systemic conditions affecting healing (uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic corticosteroid use, autoimmune conditions affecting connective tissue)
- smoking more than 10 cigarettes
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- mobile implants
- non removable crowns (both cement or screw retained) that cannot be removed prior to surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| test device GalvoSurgeAlso: electrolytic decontaminationElectrolytic decontamination | Procedure or surgery | Test: Electrolytic decontamination |
| Mechanical decontamination with titanium brushAlso: tibrushReconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis after removal of hard and soft tissue deposits from the implant surface followed by mechanical decontamination with titanium brush | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Change in Probing pocket depth
Time frame: from baseline to 12, 24 months post-surgery
distance (mm) between marginal mucosa and bottom of probable pocket
6 secondary outcomes
change in recession
Time frame: baseline to 12 and 24 months post-op
change in CAL
Time frame: between baseline and 24 months
Suppuration on probing (SoP)
Time frame: baseline, 12, 24 months
Bleeding on probing
Time frame: baseline, 12, 24 months
Keratinized mucosa (KM)
Time frame: baseline, 12, 24 months
Treatment Success
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35322316Zipprich H, Weigl P, Di Gianfilippo R, Steigmann L, Henrich D, Wang HL, Schlee M, Ratka C. Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4549-4558. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04421-0. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 37129321Bernardi S, Qorri E, Botticelli G, Scarano A, Marzo G, Gatto R, Greco Lucchina A, Mortellaro C, Lupi E, Rastelli C, Falisi G. Use of electrical field for biofilm implant removal. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Apr;27(3 Suppl):114-121. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202304_31328.
- Background: PubMed 38345170Zhu Y, Xu Y, Ling Z, Zhao C, Xu A, He F. The biofilm removal effect and osteogenic potential on the titanium surface by electrolytic cleaning: An in vitro comparison of electrolytic parameters and five techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Apr;35(4):454-466. doi: 10.1111/clr.14245. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 31703404Schlee M, Rathe F, Brodbeck U, Ratka C, Weigl P, Zipprich H. Treatment of Peri-implantitis-Electrolytic Cleaning Versus Mechanical and Electrolytic Cleaning-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial-Six-Month Results. J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 7;8(11):1909. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111909.
- Background: PubMed 35244779Bosshardt DD, Brodbeck UR, Rathe F, Stumpf T, Imber JC, Weigl P, Schlee M. Evidence of re-osseointegration after electrolytic cleaning and regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis in humans: a case report with four implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Apr;26(4):3735-3746. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04345-1. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
- Background: PubMed 35785819Gianfreda F, Punzo A, Pistilli V, Bollero P, Cervino G, D'Amico C, Cairo F, Cicciu M. Electrolytic Cleaning and Regenerative Therapy of Peri-implantitis in the Esthetic Area: A Case Report. Eur J Dent. 2022 Oct;16(4):950-956. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750773. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of 25(OH)D3 and LL-37 Levels in Periimplant Sulcus Fluid
Peri Implantitis, Peri Implant Mucositis
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Smoking on Immune Responses in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Peri-Implant Health, Peri Implant Mucositis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Local and Systemic Inflammatory Bone Alterations Related to Dental Implant Survival.
Peri Implant Mucositis, Peri Implant Bone Loss
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of aMMP-8 and IL-1β Levels and Marginal Bone Loss Associated With Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis in Postmenopausal Women
Postmenopausal Peri-implant Health, Postmenopausal Peri-mucositis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Implantoplasty in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.
Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Luca Cordaro, DDS MD contact
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing test device GalvoSurge and Mechanical decontamination with titanium brush in people with Peri-Implantitis and Peri-implant Mucositis, run by George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lucrezia Paterno Holtzman, DDS, MS (+393398035371, lucreziaph@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Probing pocket depth (time frame: from baseline to 12, 24 months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07814391, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026.