Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Clinical EducationNCT07817771
The Effect of Video-assisted Feedback in Clinical Teaching of Pediatric Occupational Therapy in Undergraduate Student
A study testing Video-Assisted Feedback and Oral Feedback in people with Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Clinical Education, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study examined whether adding video-assisted feedback to oral feedback could improve clinical learning in undergraduate occupational therapy students during pediatric clinical training. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Clinical Education
- What is being tested?
- Video-Assisted Feedback and Oral Feedback
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2020to 3 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Undergraduate students enrolled in an occupational therapy program.
- Students participating in pediatric occupational therapy clinical training during the study period.
- Students who provided informed consent to participate in the study.
- Students who completed the scheduled clinical teaching sessions and study assessments.
Who cannot join
- Students who were unable to complete both study conditions in the crossover design.
- Students with incomplete outcome assessments.
- Students who withdrew consent during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study examined whether adding video-assisted feedback to oral feedback could improve clinical learning in undergraduate occupational therapy students during pediatric clinical training. Students participated in clinical teaching sessions and received either oral feedback alone or oral feedback combined with review of a video recording of their performance. The study evaluated students' clinical performance and anxiety to determine whether video-assisted feedback could support learning and reflection during clinical training.
- Being tested
- Video-Assisted Feedback, Oral Feedback
- Keywords
- Pediatric Occupational Therapy, Video-Assisted Feedback, Undergraduate Students, Clinical Performance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video-Assisted FeedbackBehavioural
Students received oral feedback from a clinical teacher after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session and additionally reviewed a 10-minute video recording of their own clinical performance. The video review was used to support self-reflection and identification of areas for improvement before the subsequent clinical teaching session.
Oral FeedbackBehavioural
Students received verbal feedback from a clinical teacher after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session. Feedback focused on the student's clinical performance during the session. No video recording or video-assisted self-review was provided in this condition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Assisted Feedback Followed by Oral Feedback | Experimental | Participants first received oral feedback combined with video-assisted self-review after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session. A 10-minute segment of the student's clinical performance was video recorded, and the student reviewed the recording after receiving oral feedback from the clinical teacher. In the second study period, participants received oral feedback alone without video review. Receives: Behavioral: Video-Assisted Feedback; Behavioral: Oral Feedback |
| Oral Feedback Followed by Video-Assisted Feedback | Active comparator | Participants first received oral feedback alone after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session, without video review. In the second study period, participants received oral feedback combined with video-assisted self-review. A 10-minute segment of the student's clinical performance was video recorded and reviewed after oral feedback from the clinical teacher. Receives: Behavioral: Video-Assisted Feedback; Behavioral: Oral Feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX)
Clinical performance was assessed by a clinical teacher using a 10-item Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for pediatric occupational therapy clinical training. Each item was rated on a 9-point scale. Scores of 1-3 indicated performance below expectations, 4-6 indicated performance meeting expectations, and 7-9 indicated performance exceeding expectations. The mean score across the 10 items was calculated, yielding an overall score ranging from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated better clinical performance.
Measured: Immediately after the clinical performance assessment in Period 1 and Period 2; the two study periods were conducted approximately 1-2 weeks apart.
Secondary outcomes (2)
State Anxiety Assessed Using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Subscale (STAI-S)
State anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State subscale (STAI-S), which measures the participant's current level of anxiety. Higher scores indicate greater state anxiety.
Measured: Immediately after each of the two clinical teaching sessions.
Trait Anxiety Assessed Using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait Subscale (STAI-T)
Trait anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait subscale (STAI-T), which measures relatively stable individual differences in anxiety proneness. The STAI-T consists of 20 items, with a total score ranging from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater trait anxiety.
Measured: Immediately after each of the two clinical teaching sessions.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2026
- Study start15 Apr 2020
- Primary completion30 Jan 2022
- Study completion3 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Clinical EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Participants were randomized to one of two crossover sequences: (1) video-assisted feedback followed by oral feedback alone, or (2) oral feedback alone followed by video-assisted feedback. Each participant therefore received both intervention conditions during the study.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07817771
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 110wf-WME-06
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Video-assisted Feedback in Clinical Teaching of Pediatric Occupational Therapy in Undergraduate Student
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07817771
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 110wf-WME-06
- Keywords
- Pediatric Occupational Therapy, Video-Assisted Feedback, Undergraduate Students, Clinical Performance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study examined whether adding video-assisted feedback to oral feedback could improve clinical learning in undergraduate occupational therapy students during pediatric clinical training. Students participated in clinical teaching sessions and received either oral feedback alone or oral feedback combined with review of a video recording of their performance. The study evaluated students' clinical performance and anxiety to determine whether video-assisted feedback could support learning and reflection during clinical training.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were randomized to one of two crossover sequences: (1) video-assisted feedback followed by oral feedback alone, or (2) oral feedback alone followed by video-assisted feedback. Each participant therefore received both intervention conditions during the study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Assisted Feedback Followed by Oral Feedback | Experimental | Behavioral: Video-Assisted Feedback, Behavioral: Oral FeedbackParticipants first received oral feedback combined with video-assisted self-review after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session. A 10-minute segment of the student's clinical performance was video recorded, and the student reviewed the recording after receiving oral feedback from the clinical teacher. In the second study period, participants received oral feedback alone without video review. |
| Oral Feedback Followed by Video-Assisted Feedback | Active comparator | Behavioral: Video-Assisted Feedback, Behavioral: Oral FeedbackParticipants first received oral feedback alone after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session, without video review. In the second study period, participants received oral feedback combined with video-assisted self-review. A 10-minute segment of the student's clinical performance was video recorded and reviewed after oral feedback from the clinical teacher. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Undergraduate students enrolled in an occupational therapy program.
- Students participating in pediatric occupational therapy clinical training during the study period.
- Students who provided informed consent to participate in the study.
- Students who completed the scheduled clinical teaching sessions and study assessments.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Students who were unable to complete both study conditions in the crossover design.
- Students with incomplete outcome assessments.
- Students who withdrew consent during the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Assisted FeedbackStudents received oral feedback from a clinical teacher after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session and additionally reviewed a 10-minute video recording of their own clinical performance. The video review was used to support self-reflection and identification of areas for improvement before the subsequent clinical teaching session. | Behavioural | Oral Feedback Followed by Video-Assisted Feedback, Video-Assisted Feedback Followed by Oral Feedback |
| Oral FeedbackStudents received verbal feedback from a clinical teacher after a pediatric occupational therapy clinical teaching session. Feedback focused on the student's clinical performance during the session. No video recording or video-assisted self-review was provided in this condition. | Behavioural | Oral Feedback Followed by Video-Assisted Feedback, Video-Assisted Feedback Followed by Oral Feedback |
Primary outcome
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX)
Time frame: Immediately after the clinical performance assessment in Period 1 and Period 2; the two study periods were conducted approximately 1-2 weeks apart.
Clinical performance was assessed by a clinical teacher using a 10-item Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for pediatric occupational therapy clinical training. Each item was rated on a 9-point scale. Scores of 1-3 indicated performance below expectations, 4-6 indicated performance meeting expectations, and 7-9 indicated performance exceeding expectations. The mean score across the 10 items was calculated, yielding an overall score ranging from 1 to 9. Higher scores indicated better clinical performance.
2 secondary outcomes
State Anxiety Assessed Using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Subscale (STAI-S)
Time frame: Immediately after each of the two clinical teaching sessions.
Trait Anxiety Assessed Using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait Subscale (STAI-T)
Time frame: Immediately after each of the two clinical teaching sessions.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video-Assisted Feedback and Oral Feedback in people with Undergraduate Occupational Therapy Clinical Education, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) (time frame: Immediately after the clinical performance assessment in Period 1 and Period 2; the two study periods were conducted approximately 1-2 weeks apart.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.