AzTrials
AzTrials

SepsisNCT07819708

Comparing Blood-Based Ratios for Predicting Outcomes in Sepsis and Septic Shock

An observational study of Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sepsis and septic shock are serious conditions associated with a high risk of organ dysfunction and death. Simple laboratory-based markers may help identify critically ill patients who are at greater risk of poor outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Sepsis, Septic Shock
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
10 Oct 2025to 9 Sep 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Adult patients aged 18 to 60 years with clinically confirmed sepsis or septic shock who were admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Benha University Hospital and met the predefined study eligibility criteria. Participants underwent clinical and laboratory assessment and were followed for 28 days to evaluate mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and progression of organ dysfunction.

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 to 60 years with clinically confirmed sepsis or septic shock.
  • Male and female patients.
  • Fulfillment of at least two quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment criteria, including:
  • Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15.
  • Systolic blood pressure less than 100 millimeters of mercury.
  • Respiratory rate greater than 22 breaths per minute.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Evidence of infection-related organ dysfunction demonstrated by an increase of more than 2 points in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
  • Evidence of organ dysfunction, including one or more of the following:
  • Ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen less than 300.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 15.
  • Mean arterial pressure less than 70 millimeters of mercury.
  • Serum creatinine greater than 1.2 milligrams per deciliter.
  • Urine output less than 0.5 milliliters per kilogram per hour.
  • Serum bilirubin greater than 1.2 milligrams per deciliter.
  • Platelet count less than 150,000 per microliter.
  • For patients with septic shock, persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure above 65 millimeters of mercury and serum lactate greater than 2 millimoles per liter despite adequate fluid resuscitation.
  • Ability of the patient or legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Active malignancy or chemotherapy within the previous 3 months.
  • Corticosteroid therapy within 90 days before admission.
  • Documented severe liver or kidney dysfunction.
  • Clinical conditions requiring albumin administration.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Insufficient laboratory data or inability to complete follow-up.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Benha University Hospital

    Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, 13511

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio Versus Lactate-albumin Ratio Among Critically Ill Patients in Sepsis and Septic Shock

Sepsis and septic shock are serious conditions associated with a high risk of organ dysfunction and death. Simple laboratory-based markers may help identify critically ill patients who are at greater risk of poor outcomes.

This prospective observational cohort study compared the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the lactate-to-albumin ratio in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Benha University Hospital.

A total of 60 participants were enrolled and followed for 28 days. The study evaluated the relationship of both laboratory ratios with 28-day mortality and compared their ability to predict mortality. Intensive care unit length of stay and progression of organ dysfunction were also assessed.

Conditions
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Keywords
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Lactate-to-albumin ratio, 28-day mortality, Prognostic biomarker, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Shock, Septic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07819708
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sepsis and Septic Shock CohortAdult patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Benha University Hospital. Participants underwent clinical and laboratory assessment, including measurement of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate-to-albumin ratio, and were followed for 28 days to assess mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and progression of organ dysfunction.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 28-Day All-Cause Mortality

    The number and percentage of participants who died from any cause within 28 days after study enrollment.

    Measured: From intensive care unit admission through 28 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay

    The duration of stay in the intensive care unit was recorded in days for each participant.

    Measured: From intensive care unit admission until intensive care unit discharge or death, assessed through 28 days

  2. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score

    The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was used to assess dysfunction across six organ systems: respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal, and neurological. Each organ system is scored from 0 to 4 points according to the degree of dysfunction, giving a total score ranging from 0 to 24 points. Higher scores indicate more severe organ dysfunction. Changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score during the first 24 hours were evaluated to assess progression of organ dysfunction.

    Measured: At intensive care unit admission, 6 hours, and 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2026
  2. Study start10 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion9 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion9 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07819708
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS.4.11.2025
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
9 Sep 2026
Last updated
15 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sepsis and Septic Shock, run by Benha University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

28-Day All-Cause Mortality (time frame: From intensive care unit admission through 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in