Essential TremorHDBSNCT07820189
Effects of Microelectrode-based Brain Stimulation in Humans
A study testing High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS) in people with Essential Tremor and Parkinsons Disease (PD), run by Lund University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The currently available treatments of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Essential Tremor (ET) are inadequate and accompanied by adverse side effects making the treatment much less effective. This includes treatments with pharmaceuticals as well as electrical brain stimulation (DBS; Deep Brain Stimulation). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Essential Tremor, Parkinsons Disease (PD)
- What is being tested?
- High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Mar 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The target population for the clinical device to be investigated are adult patients with Parkinson's disease or essential tremor that are already scheduled for permanent implantation of devices for deep brain stimulation. This implies that these patients are an already selected group of patients deemed to be appropriate patients for DBS.
- Patients that are fully capable of understanding the patient information.
- Patients that accept to be awake during the investigation
- Patients that accept to be video-filmed during the investigation.
Who cannot join
- Patients that do not accept to be awake during the stimulation procedure.
- Patients for which the intended extension of surgery time (up to 2,5 hours) is considered by the neurosurgeon to be an unacceptable risk.
- Patients with a known history of blood clotting disorder.
- Patients with a known history of bleeding disorder.
- Patients under age 18.
- Pregnant women and women that are breast feeding.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Sweden1 site
Skane University Hospital
Lund, Skåne County, SE-12185
Hjalmar Bjartmarz, MD, +46705343055, hjalmar.bjartmarz@skane.se
Hakan Widner, MD, +4646171000, hakan.widner@skane.se
About this study
The currently available treatments of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Essential Tremor (ET) are inadequate and accompanied by adverse side effects making the treatment much less effective. This includes treatments with pharmaceuticals as well as electrical brain stimulation (DBS; Deep Brain Stimulation). To address this challenge, we have systematically worked to identify and overcome the shortcomings with current brain stimulation. Essential has been to achieve an understanding of the mechanisms behind the ubiquitous tissue reactions (often referred to as "foreign body reactions"), with loss of nerve cells near implanted electrodes and how to accomplish minimal tissue reactions/damage, which is necessary to enable therapeutically efficient low-intensity stimulation at precise locations. A further challenge relates to individual differences at the level of neuronal networks, making the exact sites in the brain that cause therapeutic and adverse side effects when stimulated not known in advance and thus requiring individual determination. Our strategy has therefore been to develop highly biocompatible microelectrodes (thinner than a human hair and highly flexible) and a guiding investigational device for controlled insertion of a cluster of such microelectrodes in deep target tissue. This enables individualized selection of appropriate stimulation sites. This technique, termed by us "High Definition Brain Stimulation" (HDBS), proved remarkably successful in animal models of both Parkinson's disease and pain by reliably providing powerful symptom relief without noticeable adverse side effects. For this first in human (FIH) investigation of microelectrode-based brain stimulation, we have systematically minimized all identified and foreseeable risks through optimization of the microelectrodes, the design of the investigational device for HDBS and development of simple minimally invasive surgical insertion methods. Extensive monitored safety tests in animals have confirmed the picture of negligeable tissue reactions/damage and absence of bleeding in the target area. Biological safety is also ensured by using only well-established materials documented for chronic implantation in the brain, established sterilization methods, identified safe stimulation intensities, and that the insertion procedures are adapted to well-established precision neurosurgical instruments and routines. The study is an early (FIH) feasibility clinical investigation which will be conducted in up to 12 patients with Parkinson's disease and/or Essential Tremor who are already scheduled for implantation of established DBS. The HDBS device will be inserted into awake patients in the same track as planned for the established DBS electrode. The evaluation will follow a protocol that includes stimulation of predetermined subsets of microelectrodes at up to 4 predetermined levels (depth) in the brain. The stimulation intensity for each subgroup is gradually increased until either a therapeutic effect or an undesirable side effect has been achieved. If an unacceptable effect is elicited, stimulation is immediately interrupted and a new subset of electrodes will be tested. After completion of the evaluation, the HDBS cluster electrode is removed and the implantation of an established permanent DBS electrode is completed. The evaluation will take up to 2.5 hours per patient. The patient's verbal responses, gestures, changes (if any) in tremors, rigidity, speech ability (such as slurring) or facial expressions before, during and after stimulation will be linked to the stimulation parameters (stimulation intensity, subgroup of microelectrodes, depth in the brain and time of reaction) and documented in writing and through video recordings. The analysis will only be made on anonymized data. The primary objective of this early feasibility, FIH, clinical investigation is to clarify whether HDBS (High Definition Brain Stimulation), through individualized stimulation of appropriate subgroups of implanted biocompatible microelectrodes, can provide a powerful therapeutic effect with minimal negative side effects also in humans. In addition, it is intended to simultaneously obtain important information that can be used by the neurosurgeon to improve the subsequent placement of the already scheduled permanent DBS electrode in the individual patient and thereby improve the treatment. Consequently, the secondary objective is to clarify whether HDBS can be used by the neurosurgeon to improve the placement of a permanent DBS electrode. The project paves the way for permanent HDBS with completely new opportunities for powerful, sustainable therapy with minimal side-effects in Parkinson's disease, Essential Tremor and other intractable neurologic disorders. Moreover, the HDBS technology enables new and potent opportunities for brain research.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this early feasibility clinical investigation is reached if any of the tested subgroups/sites enable powerful therapeutic effects with minimal adverse effects in a patient. A continuous assessment is made as data from different patients accumulate over time to enable an estimation of the success rate.
To address the secondary objective, areas from which appropriate effects are elicited are marked with green and inappropriate areas are marked with red on the last page of the Case Report Form (CRF) for each stimulation depth to provide an overview of the results for each individual patient. This is compared to results obtained from the subsequent evaluation of different contacts on the permanent DBS 3-8 weeks after surgery to assess to what extent the mapping using HDBS can predict DBS outcomes.
- Conditions
- Essential Tremor, Parkinsons Disease (PD)
- Being tested
- High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS)
- Keywords
- First in human feasibility study, Microelectrode based deep brain stimulation, Essential Tremor, Parkinson's disease
- Medical subject headings
- Essential Tremor, Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS)Device
The investigational device will be inserted into the brain of awake patients in the same track as planned for the established Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrode. The evaluation will follow a protocol that includes stimulation of predetermined subsets of microelectrodes at up to 4 predetermined levels (depth) in the brain. The stimulation intensity for each subgroup is gradually increased until either a therapeutic effect or an undesirable side effect has been achieved. If an unacceptable effect is elicited, stimulation is immediately interrupted and a new subset of electrodes is tested. After completion of the evaluation, the investigational device will be removed and the implantation of an established permanent DBS electrode is completed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Definition Brain Stimulation | Experimental | The investigational device, comprising multiple microelectrodes, will be stereotactically inserted into the brain of awake patients in the same track as planned for the established Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrode. Receives: Device: High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in motor performance during microelectrode based deep brain stimulation
Primary outcome measure is, for each combination of stimulation sites (i.e. subgroup of stimulated microelectrodes), an aggregated outcome measure based on the following components:
- symptom relief using the clinically established instruments Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, item III) for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms: tremor and rigidity and Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS) for patients with Essential tremor; both instruments use a scale from 0 to 4; a lower score is better and
- unwanted side effects such as verbal responses, gestures, slurring of speech, dystonia or facial expressions are scored as zero (0), mild (1), moderate (2) and severe (3) for which the worst unwanted side effect measured is used in the aggregated outcome measure.
For each combination of stimulation sites, the (aggregated) primary outcome measure is either 1 or 0, depending on whether or not a powerful therapeutic effect with minimal unwanted side effects is reached.
Measured: 2.5 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Success rate
- Number of patients, expressed as percentage of all tested patients, for which it was possible to substantially reduce recorded symptoms with minimal unwanted side effects.
Measured: 2.5 hours
Thresholds for beneficial effects
If possible, for each combination of stimulation sites, a threshold expressed in micro-Amps per pulse for at least one of the following effects will be documented: 1) beneficial effects on one symptom, and 2) potent relief of one symptom.
If no beneficial effect/potent relief is achieved for a particular combination of stimulation sites this will also be documented.
Measured: 2.5 hours
Aggravation of already existing symptoms
Unwanted side effects, consisting in aggravation of existing symptoms by the stimulation. These include increased tremor estimated using ETRS for patients with Essential tremor and worsened PD symptoms (tremor and rigidity) rated using the UPDRS (item III) instrument. Both instruments use a scale from 0 to 4 where a lower score is better.
These outcome measures are documented together with stimulation intensity (in micro-Amps) and respective subgroup of microelectrodes used.
Measured: 2.5 hours
Other unwanted side effects for PD and ET patients:
Other unwanted side effects than aggravated PD/ET symptoms, such as verbal responses, gestures, slurring of speech, dystonia or facial expressions are documented and scored as zero (score=0), mild (score=1), moderate (score=2) and severe (score=3). These outcome measures of unwanted side-effects are documented together with stimulation intensity (in micro-Amps), respective subgroup of microelectrodes used (i.e. the stimulated brain sites).
Measured: 2.5 hours
Effects of DBS
Recordings of therapeutic and unwanted side effects caused by stimulation of each of the different contacts on the implanted established DBS electrodes 3-8 weeks after surgery.
Measured: 8 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Essential TremorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lund University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Skane University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jens Schouenborg, PhD, Study director, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07820189
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIV-ID 25-10-054717
- Acronym
- HDBS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Aug 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Summary data will be made available via ClinicalTrials.gov within 1 year of the study's conclusion. Individual participant data underlying the results in a publication will be anonymized and will be available with a publication to the extent that they do not allow identification of individual participants. The study is a first in human early feasibility investigation with a small number of participants. This means that only limited individual data can be shared without identifying participants.
Publications
Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Stern MB, Tilley BC, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, Van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord. 2007 Jan;22(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21198.
PubMed 17115387Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:225-234.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Microelectrode-based Brain Stimulation in Humans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07820189
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HDBS / CIV-ID 25-10-054717
- Conditions
- Essential Tremor, Parkinsons Disease (PD)
- Keywords
- First in human feasibility study, Microelectrode based deep brain stimulation, Essential Tremor, Parkinson's disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lund UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Skane University Hospital
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The currently available treatments of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Essential Tremor (ET) are inadequate and accompanied by adverse side effects making the treatment much less effective. This includes treatments with pharmaceuticals as well as electrical brain stimulation (DBS; Deep Brain Stimulation). To address this challenge, we have systematically worked to identify and overcome the shortcomings with current brain stimulation. Essential has been to achieve an understanding of the mechanisms behind the ubiquitous tissue reactions (often referred to as "foreign body reactions"), with loss of nerve cells near implanted electrodes and how to accomplish minimal tissue reactions/damage, which is necessary to enable therapeutically efficient low-intensity stimulation at precise locations. A further challenge relates to individual differences at the level of neuronal networks, making the exact sites in the brain that cause therapeutic and adverse side effects when stimulated not known in advance and thus requiring individual determination. Our strategy has therefore been to develop highly biocompatible microelectrodes (thinner than a human hair and highly flexible) and a guiding investigational device for controlled insertion of a cluster of such microelectrodes in deep target tissue. This enables individualized selection of appropriate stimulation sites. This technique, termed by us "High Definition Brain Stimulation" (HDBS), proved remarkably successful in animal models of both Parkinson's disease and pain by reliably providing powerful symptom relief without noticeable adverse side effects. For this first in human (FIH) investigation of microelectrode-based brain stimulation, we have systematically minimized all identified and foreseeable risks through optimization of the microelectrodes, the design of the investigational device for HDBS and development of simple minimally invasive surgical insertion methods. Extensive monitored safety tests in animals have confirmed the picture of negligeable tissue reactions/damage and absence of bleeding in the target area. Biological safety is also ensured by using only well-established materials documented for chronic implantation in the brain, established sterilization methods, identified safe stimulation intensities, and that the insertion procedures are adapted to well-established precision neurosurgical instruments and routines. The study is an early (FIH) feasibility clinical investigation which will be conducted in up to 12 patients with Parkinson's disease and/or Essential Tremor who are already scheduled for implantation of established DBS. The HDBS device will be inserted into awake patients in the same track as planned for the established DBS electrode. The evaluation will follow a protocol that includes stimulation of predetermined subsets of microelectrodes at up to 4 predetermined levels (depth) in the brain. The stimulation intensity for each subgroup is gradually increased until either a therapeutic effect or an undesirable side effect has been achieved. If an unacceptable effect is elicited, stimulation is immediately interrupted and a new subset of electrodes will be tested. After completion of the evaluation, the HDBS cluster electrode is removed and the implantation of an established permanent DBS electrode is completed. The evaluation will take up to 2.5 hours per patient. The patient's verbal responses, gestures, changes (if any) in tremors, rigidity, speech ability (such as slurring) or facial expressions before, during and after stimulation will be linked to the stimulation parameters (stimulation intensity, subgroup of microelectrodes, depth in the brain and time of reaction) and documented in writing and through video recordings. The analysis will only be made on anonymized data. The primary objective of this early feasibility, FIH, clinical investigation is to clarify whether HDBS (High Definition Brain Stimulation), through individualized stimulation of appropriate subgroups of implanted biocompatible microelectrodes, can provide a powerful therapeutic effect with minimal negative side effects also in humans. In addition, it is intended to simultaneously obtain important information that can be used by the neurosurgeon to improve the subsequent placement of the already scheduled permanent DBS electrode in the individual patient and thereby improve the treatment. Consequently, the secondary objective is to clarify whether HDBS can be used by the neurosurgeon to improve the placement of a permanent DBS electrode. The project paves the way for permanent HDBS with completely new opportunities for powerful, sustainable therapy with minimal side-effects in Parkinson's disease, Essential Tremor and other intractable neurologic disorders. Moreover, the HDBS technology enables new and potent opportunities for brain research.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this early feasibility clinical investigation is reached if any of the tested subgroups/sites enable powerful therapeutic effects with minimal adverse effects in a patient. A continuous assessment is made as data from different patients accumulate over time to enable an estimation of the success rate.
To address the secondary objective, areas from which appropriate effects are elicited are marked with green and inappropriate areas are marked with red on the last page of the Case Report Form (CRF) for each stimulation depth to provide an overview of the results for each individual patient. This is compared to results obtained from the subsequent evaluation of different contacts on the permanent DBS 3-8 weeks after surgery to assess to what extent the mapping using HDBS can predict DBS outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Definition Brain Stimulation | Experimental | Device: High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS)The investigational device, comprising multiple microelectrodes, will be stereotactically inserted into the brain of awake patients in the same track as planned for the established Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrode. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The target population for the clinical device to be investigated are adult patients with Parkinson's disease or essential tremor that are already scheduled for permanent implantation of devices for deep brain stimulation. This implies that these patients are an already selected group of patients deemed to be appropriate patients for DBS.
- Patients that are fully capable of understanding the patient information.
- Patients that accept to be awake during the investigation
- Patients that accept to be video-filmed during the investigation.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients that do not accept to be awake during the stimulation procedure.
- Patients for which the intended extension of surgery time (up to 2,5 hours) is considered by the neurosurgeon to be an unacceptable risk.
- Patients with a known history of blood clotting disorder.
- Patients with a known history of bleeding disorder.
- Patients under age 18.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS)The investigational device will be inserted into the brain of awake patients in the same track as planned for the established Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrode. The evaluation will follow a protocol that includes stimulation of predetermined subsets of microelectrodes at up to 4 predetermined levels (depth) in the brain. The stimulation intensity for each subgroup is gradually increased until either a therapeutic effect or an undesirable side effect has been achieved. If an unacceptable effect is elicited, stimulation is immediately interrupted and a new subset of electrodes is tested. After completion of the evaluation, the investigational device will be removed and the implantation of an established permanent DBS electrode is completed. | Device | High Definition Brain Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Changes in motor performance during microelectrode based deep brain stimulation
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Primary outcome measure is, for each combination of stimulation sites (i.e. subgroup of stimulated microelectrodes), an aggregated outcome measure based on the following components: 1. symptom relief using the clinically established instruments Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS, item III) for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) symptoms: tremor and rigidity and Essential Tremor Rating Scale (ETRS) for patients with Essential tremor; both instruments use a scale from 0 to 4; a lower score is better and 2. unwanted side effects such as verbal responses, gestures, slurring of speech, dystonia or facial expressions are scored as zero (0), mild (1), moderate (2) and severe (3) for which the worst unwanted side effect measured is used in the aggregated outcome measure. For each combination of stimulation sites, the (aggregated) primary outcome measure is either 1 or 0, depending on whether or not a powerful therapeutic effect with minimal unwanted side effects is reached.
5 secondary outcomes
Success rate
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Thresholds for beneficial effects
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Aggravation of already existing symptoms
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Other unwanted side effects for PD and ET patients:
Time frame: 2.5 hours
Effects of DBS
Time frame: 8 hours
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 17115387Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Stern MB, Tilley BC, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, Van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord. 2007 Jan;22(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21198.
- BackgroundFahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C. Clinical rating scale for tremor. In: Jankovic J, Tolosa E, eds. Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:225-234.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Summary data will be made available via ClinicalTrials.gov within 1 year of the study's conclusion. Individual participant data underlying the results in a publication will be anonymized and will be available with a publication to the extent that they do not allow identification of individual participants. The study is a first in human early feasibility investigation with a small number of participants. This means that only limited individual data can be shared without identifying participants.
Related trials for Essential Tremor
Recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Movement Disorders
Parkinson's Disease, Essential Tremor
RecruitingObservational study
Phenotype/Genotype Correlations in Movement Disorders
Movement Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of AGN-151607-DP to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Adult Participants With Upper Limb Essential Tremor
Upper Limb Essential Tremor
RecruitingObservational study
Analysis of Cutaneous Phosphorylated Alpha-Synuclein to Identify Patients at Risk of Progressing From Essential Tremor to Parkinson's Disease
Essential Tremor, Movement Disorders, Essential Tremor
RecruitingPhase 2
Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Essential Tremor
Essential Tremor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jens Schouenborg, PhD study director
Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing High Definition Brain Stimulation (HDBS) in people with Essential Tremor and Parkinsons Disease (PD), run by Lund University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jens Schouenborg, PhD (+46702924572, jens.schouenborg@med.lu.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in motor performance during microelectrode based deep brain stimulation (time frame: 2.5 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07820189, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.