Ankle RehabilitationNCT07820449
Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training
A study testing Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training in people with Ankle Rehabilitation and Ankle Instability, run by University of Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week ankle evertor and invertor strength training program performed on a specially designed device, which allows isolated strengthening of evertor and invertor muscles. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankle Rehabilitation, Ankle Instability, Ankle Sprain
- What is being tested?
- Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2017to 31 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male, aged 18 to 50 Years
- Recreationally active (regularly participating in running or sport)
- No history of ankle injury or surgery
- No musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lower extremity
- Able to perform physical exercise without restrictions
Who cannot join
- History of ankle sprain or ligament injury in the past 12 months
- Any lower extremity injury or surgery
- Neurological or cardiovascular conditions affecting exercise participation
- Currently receiving physiotherapy for lower extremity conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neuromuscular Adaptations to a 12-Week Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training Program in Healthy Adults
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week ankle evertor and invertor strength training program performed on a specially designed device, which allows isolated strengthening of evertor and invertor muscles. Outcome measures included isometric ankle torque, EMG activity of six tibial muscles, muscle coactivation, and kinematic parameters during three walking conditions. This trial was retrospectively registered. The study was conducted in 2017 as part of a doctoral dissertation at the Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, prior to the authors' awareness of prospective registration requirements.
- Being tested
- Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training
- Keywords
- ankle evertors, ankle invertors, ankle joint, strength training, subtalar axis, peroneal muscles, tibial muscles, ankle sprains
- Medical subject headings
- Ankle Injuries, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength TrainingBehavioural
Participants in experimental group were performing strength training on a specially designed device. The program consisted of 8 weeks of hypertrophy-oriented training followed by 4 weeks of neural activation training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Participants performed a 12-week ankle evertor and invertor strength training program on a specially designed device. Receives: Behavioral: Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training |
| Control Group | No intervention | Participants maintained habitual activity without any structured strength training. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Isometric Ankle Torque
Maximal isometric torque in foot eversion and inversion direction measured with a isometric device.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
EMG Activity of Tibial Muscles
Monitoring normalized RMS EMG amplitude of peroneus longus, peroneus brevis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, gastrocnemius lateralis, and soleus during different walking conditions.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Walking Speed
Monitoring walking speed (m/s) during three walking conditions.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Stretch Reflex Response
Electromyographic reflex response of ankle evertor (m. PL and PB) and invertor muscles (m TA) following mechanical perturbation.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Muscle Co-activation Index Between Pairs of Tibial Muscles During Walking
Coactivation index (%) calculated between pairs of tibial muscles (PL, PB, TA, SOL, GM, GL) during three different types of walking (normal walking, medially inclined, laterally inclined surface).
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Foot Position During Walking
Monitoring foot elevation angle (degrees) during three different types of walking.
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Contact Time
Monitoring contact time (s) during three different types of walking (flat surface, medially inclined laterally inclined).
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Stride Length
Monitoring stride length (m) during three different types of walking (flat surface, medially inclined, laterally inclined).
Measured: Baseline and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2026
- Study start2 Feb 2017
- Primary completion31 May 2017
- Study completion31 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankle RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Ljubljana
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aleš Dolenec, PhD, Study chair, University of LjubljanaRok Bavdek, PhD, Principal investigator
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07820449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EVE/INV 49382013
- Other IDs
- P5-0124
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data may be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Publications
Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther. 1990 Jun;70(6):340-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.6.340.
PubMed 2345777Voloshina AS, Ferris DP. Biomechanics and energetics of running on uneven terrain. J Exp Biol. 2015 Mar;218(Pt 5):711-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.106518. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
PubMed 25617451Santilli V, Frascarelli MA, Paoloni M, Frascarelli F, Camerota F, De Natale L, De Santis F. Peroneus longus muscle activation pattern during gait cycle in athletes affected by functional ankle instability: a surface electromyographic study. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1183-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546504274147. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
PubMed 16000658Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Nov 26;2:35. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-35.
PubMed 19939283Louwerens JW, van Linge B, de Klerk LW, Mulder PG, Snijders CJ. Peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscle activity in the stance phase. A quantified electromyographic study of 10 controls and 25 patients with chronic ankle instability. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995 Dec;66(6):517-23. doi: 10.3109/17453679509002306.
PubMed 8553819Ha SC, Fong DT, Chan KM. Review of ankle inversion sprain simulators in the biomechanics laboratory. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015 Oct 21;2(4):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015 Oct.
PubMed 29264250Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1977 Nov-Dec;5(6):241-2. doi: 10.1177/036354657700500606. No abstract available.
PubMed 563179Ferran NA, Maffulli N. Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006 Sep;11(3):659-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2006.07.002.
PubMed 16971255Falconer K, Winter DA. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Mar-Apr;25(2-3):135-49. No abstract available.
PubMed 3987606Docherty CL, Moore JH, Arnold BL. Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):310-4.
PubMed 16558526DeMers MS, Hicks JL, Delp SL. Preparatory co-activation of the ankle muscles may prevent ankle inversion injuries. J Biomech. 2017 Feb 8;52:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
PubMed 28057351Chan CW, Rudins A. Foot biomechanics during walking and running. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 May;69(5):448-61. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61642-5.
PubMed 8170197Brockett CL, Chapman GJ. Biomechanics of the ankle. Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jun;30(3):232-238. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2016.04.015.
PubMed 27594929Bavdek R, Zdolsek A, Strojnik V, Dolenec A. Peroneal muscle activity during different types of walking. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018 Sep 3;11:50. doi: 10.1186/s13047-018-0291-0. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30202446Apps C, Sterzing T, O'Brien T, Lake M. Lower limb joint stiffness and muscle co-contraction adaptations to instability footwear during locomotion. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016 Dec;31:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
PubMed 27684529
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neuromuscular Adaptations to a 12-Week Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training Program in Healthy Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07820449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EVE/INV 49382013
- Keywords
- ankle evertors, ankle invertors, ankle joint, strength training, subtalar axis, peroneal muscles, tibial muscles, ankle sprains
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LjubljanaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 12-week ankle evertor and invertor strength training program performed on a specially designed device, which allows isolated strengthening of evertor and invertor muscles. Outcome measures included isometric ankle torque, EMG activity of six tibial muscles, muscle coactivation, and kinematic parameters during three walking conditions. This trial was retrospectively registered. The study was conducted in 2017 as part of a doctoral dissertation at the Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, prior to the authors' awareness of prospective registration requirements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength TrainingParticipants performed a 12-week ankle evertor and invertor strength training program on a specially designed device. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Participants maintained habitual activity without any structured strength training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male, aged 18 to 50 Years
- Recreationally active (regularly participating in running or sport)
- No history of ankle injury or surgery
- No musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lower extremity
- Able to perform physical exercise without restrictions
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of ankle sprain or ligament injury in the past 12 months
- Any lower extremity injury or surgery
- Neurological or cardiovascular conditions affecting exercise participation
- Currently receiving physiotherapy for lower extremity conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength TrainingParticipants in experimental group were performing strength training on a specially designed device. The program consisted of 8 weeks of hypertrophy-oriented training followed by 4 weeks of neural activation training. | Behavioural | Experimental Group |
Primary outcome
Isometric Ankle Torque
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Maximal isometric torque in foot eversion and inversion direction measured with a isometric device.
7 secondary outcomes
EMG Activity of Tibial Muscles
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Walking Speed
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Stretch Reflex Response
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Muscle Co-activation Index Between Pairs of Tibial Muscles During Walking
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Foot Position During Walking
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Contact Time
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Stride Length
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 2345777Winter DA, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther. 1990 Jun;70(6):340-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.6.340.
- Results publication: PubMed 25617451Voloshina AS, Ferris DP. Biomechanics and energetics of running on uneven terrain. J Exp Biol. 2015 Mar;218(Pt 5):711-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.106518. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 16000658Santilli V, Frascarelli MA, Paoloni M, Frascarelli F, Camerota F, De Natale L, De Santis F. Peroneus longus muscle activation pattern during gait cycle in athletes affected by functional ankle instability: a surface electromyographic study. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1183-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546504274147. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 19939283Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009 Nov 26;2:35. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-2-35.
- Results publication: PubMed 8553819Louwerens JW, van Linge B, de Klerk LW, Mulder PG, Snijders CJ. Peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscle activity in the stance phase. A quantified electromyographic study of 10 controls and 25 patients with chronic ankle instability. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995 Dec;66(6):517-23. doi: 10.3109/17453679509002306.
- Results publication: PubMed 29264250Ha SC, Fong DT, Chan KM. Review of ankle inversion sprain simulators in the biomechanics laboratory. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015 Oct 21;2(4):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2015.08.002. eCollection 2015 Oct.
- Results publication: PubMed 563179Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1977 Nov-Dec;5(6):241-2. doi: 10.1177/036354657700500606. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 16971255Ferran NA, Maffulli N. Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006 Sep;11(3):659-62. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2006.07.002.
- Results publication: PubMed 3987606Falconer K, Winter DA. Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Mar-Apr;25(2-3):135-49. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 16558526Docherty CL, Moore JH, Arnold BL. Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):310-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 28057351DeMers MS, Hicks JL, Delp SL. Preparatory co-activation of the ankle muscles may prevent ankle inversion injuries. J Biomech. 2017 Feb 8;52:17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 8170197Chan CW, Rudins A. Foot biomechanics during walking and running. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994 May;69(5):448-61. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61642-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data may be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Related trials for Ankle Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Outpatient Floor Pedal Bike Utilization
Femur Fracture, Tibia Fracture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Validation Study
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Recruiting
Physical Recovery During Bracing After Ankle Fracture (Re-BAF)
Ankle Fracture, Recovery
Recruiting
Sensor Ankle Brace for Special Operations Rehabilitation
Gait, Balance
Not yet recruiting
Study of the AxisBoard Single-Leg Balance Board in Adults With Lateral Ankle Sprain
Ankle Sprains, Lateral Ankle Sprain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aleš Dolenec, PhD study chair
University of Ljubljana
Rok Bavdek, PhD principal investigator
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ankle Evertor and Invertor Strength Training in people with Ankle Rehabilitation and Ankle Instability, run by University of Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Isometric Ankle Torque (time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07820449, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2026.