Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction SocketsCGIIPMM-PLA-MRNCT07826039
3D-Printed PLA Guide Versus Resin Guide in Mandibular Molar Implant Placement
A study testing immediate implant placement using PLA guide and Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide. in people with Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction Sockets, run by Mohamed Esmail Ahmed Hassan at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This randomized clinical trial compares two tooth-supported computer-guided surgical guide systems for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a patient-specific 3D-printed PLA guide system and a modified resin guide system. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction Sockets
- What is being tested?
- immediate implant placement using PLA guide and Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 2 Nov 2025to 10 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 20-50 years.
- Non-restorable mandibular first molar indicated for extraction.
- Sufficient bony support for implant placement without the need for significant bone augmentation.
- Good oral hygiene and motivation.
- Adequate prosthetic space.
- Ability and willingness to undergo the surgical procedure and follow-up.
- Suitable for computer-guided, tooth-supported implant placement.
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension).
- Severe periodontal disease.
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Insufficient prosthetic space.
- Heavy smokers.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Computer Guided Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molars Using Patient Specific 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Guide Versus Modified Resin Guide
This randomized clinical trial compares two tooth-supported computer-guided surgical guide systems for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a patient-specific 3D-printed PLA guide system and a modified resin guide system. The study evaluates implant positioning accuracy, primary implant stability, and surgical time.
Read the detailed description
This randomized clinical trial compares two tooth-supported computer-guided surgical guide systems for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a patient-specific 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) guide system and a modified resin guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and fabrication of the surgical guides.
Implant positioning accuracy was assessed by comparing the planned and actual implant positions using preoperative and postoperative CBCT datasets. Angular deviation, coronal deviation at the implant platform, and apical deviation were recorded.
Primary implant stability was assessed immediately after implant placement using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements obtained with an Osstell device. Surgical time was recorded from seating of the surgical guide and initiation of osteotomy until completion of implant insertion.
The study was designed to compare the performance of the two guide systems in immediate mandibular molar implant placement.
- Being tested
- immediate implant placement using PLA guide, Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide.
- Keywords
- Immediate implant placement, Computer-guided implant surgery, Mandibular molar, Modified resin surgical guide, 3D-printed PLA surgical guide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
immediate implant placement using PLA guideProcedure or surgery
Preoperative virtual planning was performed using CBCT data and digital intraoral scans. The datasets were used for prosthetically driven implant planning and fabrication of a patient-specific 3D-printed PLA surgical guide. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guiding channel according to the planned implant position and trajectory. The implant was then immediately inserted. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements.
Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide.Procedure or surgery
Preoperative virtual planning was performed using CBCT data and digital intraoral scans. The datasets were used for prosthetically driven implant planning and fabrication of a tooth-supported modified resin surgical guide. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guiding channel according to the planned implant position and trajectory. The implant was then immediately inserted. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patient specific 3d printed PLA guide | Experimental | Immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets using a patient-specific tooth-supported 3D-printed PLA surgical guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and guide fabrication. The guide was fabricated from PLA according to the planned implant position. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guide's guiding channel according to the planned trajectory, followed by immediate implant insertion. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. Receives: Procedure: immediate implant placement using PLA guide |
| Modified Resin guide | Active comparator | Immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets using a tooth-supported modified resin surgical guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and guide fabrication. The guide was fabricated from light-cured surgical-guide resin according to the planned implant position. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guide's guiding channel according to the planned trajectory, followed by immediate implant insertion. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. Receives: Procedure: Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
accuracy of implant position
Accuracy of implant placement will be evaluated by comparing the planned implant position from the preoperative digital plan with the actual implant position obtained from the postoperative CBCT scan. Deviations will be assessed in three dimensions, including angular deviation (degrees), coronal deviation (platform) (mm), and apical deviation (mm). Measurements will be performed using specialized implant-planning software by superimposing the preoperative and postoperative datasets. Lower deviation values indicate greater agreement between the planned and actual implant positions.
Measured: Assessed within 1 week postoperatively, following acquisition of the postoperative CBCT scan.
Secondary outcomes (2)
primary implant stability by osstell
Primary implant stability will be assessed using an Osstell device, which measures Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values through resonance frequency analysis. A SmartPeg will be attached to the implant, and ISQ readings will be taken in two perpendicular directions (buccolingual and mesiodistal). Higher ISQ values indicate greater mechanical stability. The mean ISQ value for each implant will be recorded and used for analysis
Measured: Measured immediately at the time of implant placement during the surgical procedure.
surgical time
Surgical time will be recorded to evaluate the procedural efficiency of guided immediate implant placement. Time will be measured from seating of the surgical guide and initiation of osteotomy until completion of implant insertion. The total duration will be recorded in minutes.
Measured: Assessed intraoperatively, measured during the surgical appointment, and recorded immediately after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2026
- Study start2 Nov 2025
- Primary completion10 Aug 2026
- Study completion10 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction SocketsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mohamed Esmail Ahmed Hassan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mohamed Esmail Ahmed Hassan, Future University in Egypt
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07826039
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FUE.REC(78)/10-2025
- Acronym
- CGIIPMM-PLA-MR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared because of participant privacy and confidentiality considerations. Only aggregate study results will be reported.
Publications
Ku JK, Lee J, Lee HJ, Yun PY, Kim YK. Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02046-z.
PubMed 35034613Pieralli S, Spies BC, Hromadnik V, Nicic R, Beuer F, Wesemann C. How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 22;9(8):2322. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082322.
PubMed 32707759Shi Y, Wang J, Ma C, Shen J, Dong X, Lin D. A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.
PubMed 37875645Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Criado-Camara E, Del Amo FS, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 13;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5.
PubMed 32770283
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Computer Guided Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molars Using Patient Specific 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Guide Versus Modified Resin Guide
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07826039
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGIIPMM-PLA-MR / FUE.REC(78)/10-2025
- Keywords
- Immediate implant placement, Computer-guided implant surgery, Mandibular molar, Modified resin surgical guide, 3D-printed PLA surgical guide
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mohamed Esmail Ahmed HassanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized clinical trial compares two tooth-supported computer-guided surgical guide systems for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a patient-specific 3D-printed PLA guide system and a modified resin guide system. The study evaluates implant positioning accuracy, primary implant stability, and surgical time.
Detailed description
This randomized clinical trial compares two tooth-supported computer-guided surgical guide systems for immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets: a patient-specific 3D-printed polylactic acid (PLA) guide system and a modified resin guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and fabrication of the surgical guides.
Implant positioning accuracy was assessed by comparing the planned and actual implant positions using preoperative and postoperative CBCT datasets. Angular deviation, coronal deviation at the implant platform, and apical deviation were recorded.
Primary implant stability was assessed immediately after implant placement using Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements obtained with an Osstell device. Surgical time was recorded from seating of the surgical guide and initiation of osteotomy until completion of implant insertion.
The study was designed to compare the performance of the two guide systems in immediate mandibular molar implant placement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patient specific 3d printed PLA guide | Experimental | Procedure: immediate implant placement using PLA guideImmediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets using a patient-specific tooth-supported 3D-printed PLA surgical guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and guide fabrication. The guide was fabricated from PLA according to the planned implant position. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guide's guiding channel according to the planned trajectory, followed by immediate implant insertion. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. |
| Modified Resin guide | Active comparator | Procedure: Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide.Immediate implant placement in mandibular molar extraction sockets using a tooth-supported modified resin surgical guide system. Preoperative CBCT and digital intraoral scans were used for prosthetically driven virtual implant planning and guide fabrication. The guide was fabricated from light-cured surgical-guide resin according to the planned implant position. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guide's guiding channel according to the planned trajectory, followed by immediate implant insertion. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age 20-50 years.
- Non-restorable mandibular first molar indicated for extraction.
- Sufficient bony support for implant placement without the need for significant bone augmentation.
- Good oral hygiene and motivation.
- Adequate prosthetic space.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension).
- Severe periodontal disease.
- Patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Insufficient prosthetic space.
- Heavy smokers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| immediate implant placement using PLA guidePreoperative virtual planning was performed using CBCT data and digital intraoral scans. The datasets were used for prosthetically driven implant planning and fabrication of a patient-specific 3D-printed PLA surgical guide. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guiding channel according to the planned implant position and trajectory. The implant was then immediately inserted. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. | Procedure or surgery | patient specific 3d printed PLA guide |
| Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide.Preoperative virtual planning was performed using CBCT data and digital intraoral scans. The datasets were used for prosthetically driven implant planning and fabrication of a tooth-supported modified resin surgical guide. Following atraumatic tooth extraction and socket preparation, the guide was seated and osteotomy preparation was performed through the guiding channel according to the planned implant position and trajectory. The implant was then immediately inserted. Primary implant stability was assessed using an Osstell device and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements. | Procedure or surgery | Modified Resin guide |
Primary outcome
accuracy of implant position
Time frame: Assessed within 1 week postoperatively, following acquisition of the postoperative CBCT scan.
Accuracy of implant placement will be evaluated by comparing the planned implant position from the preoperative digital plan with the actual implant position obtained from the postoperative CBCT scan. Deviations will be assessed in three dimensions, including angular deviation (degrees), coronal deviation (platform) (mm), and apical deviation (mm). Measurements will be performed using specialized implant-planning software by superimposing the preoperative and postoperative datasets. Lower deviation values indicate greater agreement between the planned and actual implant positions.
2 secondary outcomes
primary implant stability by osstell
Time frame: Measured immediately at the time of implant placement during the surgical procedure.
surgical time
Time frame: Assessed intraoperatively, measured during the surgical appointment, and recorded immediately after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35034613Ku JK, Lee J, Lee HJ, Yun PY, Kim YK. Accuracy of dental implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jan 16;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02046-z.
- Background: PubMed 32707759Pieralli S, Spies BC, Hromadnik V, Nicic R, Beuer F, Wesemann C. How Accurate Is Oral Implant Installation Using Surgical Guides Printed from a Degradable and Steam-Sterilized Biopolymer? J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 22;9(8):2322. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082322.
- Background: PubMed 37875645Shi Y, Wang J, Ma C, Shen J, Dong X, Lin D. A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.
- Background: PubMed 32770283Ragucci GM, Elnayef B, Criado-Camara E, Del Amo FS, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Oct 13;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared because of participant privacy and confidentiality considerations. Only aggregate study results will be reported.
Related trials for Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction Sockets
Not yet recruiting
Tissue Preservation in Immediate 1C Implants Using an Anatomical Prefabricated Healing Abutment
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant
Enrolling by invitation
Implant Stability Outcomes Following Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling
Immediate Dental Implant Placement, Lower Molar Requiring Extraction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing immediate implant placement using PLA guide and Immediate implant placement using Modified resin guide. in people with Immediate Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Extraction Sockets, run by Mohamed Esmail Ahmed Hassan at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
accuracy of implant position (time frame: Assessed within 1 week postoperatively, following acquisition of the postoperative CBCT scan.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07826039, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.