AzTrials
AzTrials

Head Injury TraumaNCT07829107

The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study - Project 2

A study testing Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers and Clinical guidelines only in people with Head Injury Trauma and Traumatic Brain Injury, Mild, run by University of Michigan at 6 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, stepped-wedge, Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. It is designed to evaluate both the comparative effectiveness and implementation feasibility of a biomarker-plus-clinical guidelines algorithm to reduce low-value brain computed tomography (CT) use in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers and Clinical guidelines only
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,000 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2026to Jan 2029
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years at the time of the emergency department visit.
  • Presentation to a participating emergency department following a traumatic injury mechanism (motor vehicle collision, fall from height, assault, head injury/head trauma/head strike, struck by or against an object, facial injury or laceration, or other general trauma). Presentations may also include alcohol intoxication or syncope when associated with a suspected traumatic brain injury.
  • Evidence of potential head or brain injury, defined as (i) the head being struck by an object, (ii) the head striking a hard object or surface, (iii) exposure of the brain to significant acceleration/deceleration forces, or (iv) clinician documentation that the patient was evaluated for suspected traumatic brain injury.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 at presentation.
  • Presentation to the emergency department within 24 hours of injury.

Who cannot join

  • Planned computed tomography (CT) imaging of the maxillofacial bones, chest, abdomen, or pelvis during the ED encounter AND clinicians do not intend to avoid brain CT imaging even if the biomarker test is negative.
  • Current use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, including but not limited to: Warfarin, Factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., apixaban [Eliquis], rivaroxaban [Xarelto]), Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor.
  • Presentation >24 hours after injury, due to the declining diagnostic sensitivity of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) beyond this time window.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Devon Newman, MS contact

734-652-9679

devonn@med.umich.edu

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Henry Ford Macomb (HFM)

    Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038

    Jo-Ann Rammal, 313-404-9110, JRammal1@hfhs.org

    Joseph Miller, MD, MS

  • Henry Ford Hospital (HFH)

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

    Jo-Ann Rammal, 313-404-9110, JRammal1@hfhs.org

    Joseph Miller, MD, MS

  • Hillsboro Medical Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97216

    Maja Strusinska-Thayer, 503-418-2713, strusins@ohsu.edu

    Bory Kea, MD, MCR

  • Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

    Maja Strusinska-Thayer, 503-418-2713, strusins@ohsu.edu

    Bory Kea, MD, MCR

  • UCLA-Olive View Medical Center

    Sylmar, California, 91342

    Yesenia Perez, YPerez@dhs.lacounty.gov

    Breena Taira, MD, MPH

  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

    Torrance, California, 90502

    Evelyn Santana, 424-306-5400, evelyn.santana@lundquist.org

    Kabir Yadav, MD, MS, MHSH

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparing the Effectiveness of a Biomarker-plus-clinical Guidelines Algorithm Versus Clinical Guidelines Only for Safely Decreasing Brain Computed Tomography Utilization During Brain Injury Evaluations: The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study

This is a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, stepped-wedge, Type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. It is designed to evaluate both the comparative effectiveness and implementation feasibility of a biomarker-plus-clinical guidelines algorithm to reduce low-value brain computed tomography (CT) use in emergency department (ED) patients evaluated for suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI). The biomarkers are Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), two brain-injury proteins cleared by the FDA to support brain CT imaging decisions after trauma. All six participating EDs will contribute baseline data for the first 6 months under usual care (clinical guidelines only). Beginning in month 7, two sites will transition to implementing the biomarker-guided algorithm. At month 13, two additional sites will implement the biomarker-guided approach, and the final two sites will transition at month 19. By the end of the 24-month rollout period, all sites will have implemented the biomarker-guided pathway.

Being tested
Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers, Clinical guidelines only
Keywords
Emergency department, Struck by or against an object, traumatic brain injury, TBI, CT imaging, head CT, brain CT, biomarkers, clinical decision rule, implementation study, gfap, UCH-L1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, Ubiquitin Carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1
Medical subject headings
Brain Concussion, Emergencies, Brain Injuries, Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkersDiagnostic test

    Patients will be managed using an algorithm that integrates the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) with i-STAT whole-blood GFAP and UCH-L1 testing. Patients who meet CCHR criteria for CT imaging and those whose CT imaging decision-making is not covered by CCHR (e.g., no loss of consciousness or amnesia) will receive i-STAT testing. Sites will be assigned to one of three implementation waves, with two sites transitioning to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase every six months. Prior to their assigned transition, sites will continue to use guidelines alone. Once a site transitions to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase, the integrated biomarker-guided algorithm will become the standard-of-care protocol at that site for eligible patients and will remain the standard of care for the remainder of the study.

  • Clinical guidelines onlyDiagnostic test

    During the baseline phase, sites will rely solely on established clinical guidelines to guide brain CT utilization in patients with suspected TBI. Specifically, providers will apply the Canadian CT Head Rule, a validated decision instrument that identifies patients at high risk for clinically important brain injury who require CT imaging. All sites will begin in this Guidelines-Only baseline phase and will continue using this approach until their assigned transition to the Guidelines + Biomarkers phase. Sites will transition in three waves, with two sites transitioning every six months.

Study groups in NCT07829107
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clinical Pathway 2: Clinical Guidelines OnlyActive comparatorClinical Guidelines Only (Canadian CT Head Rule)
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Clinical guidelines only
Clinical Pathway 1: Guidelines + BiomarkersExperimentalCanadian CT Head Rule plus whole blood Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin Carboxy-Terminal Hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) measurement using the i-STAT.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Clinical pathway 1: Guidelines plus biomarkers

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The proportion of eligible emergency department (ED) patients with suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI) who receive brain CT imaging.

    Measured: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Proportion of eligible ED patients with suspected TBI who receive brain CT imaging and have a clinically significant traumatic lesion.

    Measured: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

  2. Incidence of clinically significant missed traumatic intracranial injury diagnosed within 7 days of the index ED visit

    Measured: Within 7 days of the index/initial ED visit

  3. Incidence of neurosurgical interventions within 7 days of the index ED visit, without a new traumatic event.

    Measured: Within 7 days of the index/initial ED visit

  4. ED length of stay

    This will be measured in minutes.

    Measured: Initial Emergency Department Visit (approximately 24 hours)

  5. Initial and sustained provider adherence at 6 and 24 months post-implementation

    Measured: 6 and 24 months post-implementation

  6. Provider acceptability and feedback

    Providers will answer 17 questions regarding the implementation of the biomarker-guided algorithm and acceptability. Information from this will be summarized.

    Measured: During implementation phase (months 9-32)

  7. Provider trust in biomarker-guided CT decision making as measured by the proportion of biomarker-negative patients who don't get a CT

    Measured: During implementation phase (months 9-32)

  8. 30-day ED revisits and hospitalizations

    Measured: 30 days following Initial Emergency Department Visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
We will use a complete stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design with 4 time periods (including the baseline), each 6 months long, and 3 steps (with 2 clusters switching from control to treatment at each step). Sites, not patients, will be randomized. No patients will be consented for this study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07829107
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00278426
Other IDs
HT942524TBIPHRPFPA
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
14 Sep 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in