AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Neuropathic PainNCT07831447

Hypersound Treatment for Chronic Neuropathic and Radicular Pain

A study testing Hypersound RF-PNS system in people with Chronic Neuropathic Pain and Radiculopathy, run by Hypersound Medical Inc at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate whether the investigational Hypersound system reduces pain in adults with chronic neuropathic or radicular pain. Hypersound uses externally positioned antennas to deliver radiofrequency energy intended to stimulate peripheral nerves without an implant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Radiculopathy, Sciatica
What is being tested?
Hypersound RF-PNS system
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
71 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2027to Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Clinically confirmed chronic neuropathic or radicular pain of at least three months' duration.
  • An identifiable anatomical treatment target.
  • Baseline pain meeting the minimum intensity threshold specified in the protocol.
  • Stable pain-treatment regimen as defined in the protocol.
  • Able to provide informed consent and to complete patient-reported assessments.
  • Willing to complete the treatment course and follow-up visits.

Who cannot join

  • Unstable medical or neurological disease.
  • Another dominant source of pain that would interfere with evaluation of the target pain condition.
  • Inability to reliably report outcomes.
  • Contraindications to the investigational device as specified in the protocol.
  • Major recent changes in pain treatment, as defined in the protocol.
  • Participation in another intervention likely to materially affect study outcomes.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Center for Pain and Supportive Care

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85028

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Participant-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Study of Noninvasive Hypersound Radiofrequency Neuromodulation for Chronic Neuropathic and Radicular Pain

This study will evaluate whether the investigational Hypersound system reduces pain in adults with chronic neuropathic or radicular pain. Hypersound uses externally positioned antennas to deliver radiofrequency energy intended to stimulate peripheral nerves without an implant. Approximately 71 participants will be randomly assigned in a two-to-one ratio to active Hypersound or sham treatment. Treatment consists of ten 15-minute sessions, twice weekly over five weeks. Participants will be unaware of their assigned treatment. The main comparison is the percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease in average pain intensity at 90 days after the first treatment. Pain will be measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale referring to average pain over the preceding 24 hours. Safety and additional measures of pain and daily functioning will also be assessed. Participants initially assigned to sham will be offered active treatment after the 90-day assessment and followed for another 90 days after their first active treatment.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized, participant-blinded, sham-controlled investigation evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of noninvasive Hypersound radiofrequency peripheral nerve stimulation in adults with chronic neuropathic or radicular pain, including lumbosacral radicular pain and peripheral neuropathic pain affecting the upper or lower extremities. Enrollment will follow completion of the applicable UG3 engineering, safety, and clinical-readiness milestones.

The study targets approximately 60 evaluable participants from 71 enrolled participants. Active treatment uses multiple external antennas and a prospectively defined fluctuating-stimulation algorithm within verified operating limits. Sham treatment resembles active treatment in positioning, antenna placement, duration, visit schedule, and interactions with personnel, without delivering the intended therapeutic exposure. Participants are blinded; operators may know assignment, with blinded outcome assessment and statistical analysis where feasible.

After the randomized 90-day assessment, participants initially assigned to sham are offered active treatment. Post-crossover outcomes are analyzed separately. Supportive analyses will examine perceived nerve stimulation and its relationship to pain response. Prior feasibility observations of perceived stimulation do not establish analgesic efficacy.

Being tested
Hypersound RF-PNS system, Sham Hypersound
Keywords
Hypersound, RF-PNS, Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation, Radiofrequency neuromodulation
Medical subject headings
Radiculopathy, Sciatica

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hypersound RF-PNS systemDevice

    Also called Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulator

    A nonimplantable system that uses multiple externally positioned antennas to deliver controlled radiofrequency energy intended to stimulate peripheral nerves. Participants receive ten 15-minute sessions, twice weekly over five weeks, with antennas positioned for the participant's identified anatomical treatment target. Treatment uses the final verified system and the prospectively defined fluctuating-stimulation algorithm within established operating limits. Numerical treatment settings and the final algorithm are to be specified in the protocol.

  • Sham HypersoundDevice

    Sham use of the Hypersound system. Sessions match active treatment in positioning, antenna placement, session length, visit schedule, and interaction with study personnel, but do not deliver the intended therapeutic Hypersound exposure. Participants receive ten 15-minute sham sessions, twice weekly over five weeks. The exact sham operating method is to be finalized in the protocol. After the 90-day primary assessment, participants are offered the active treatment course.

Study groups in NCT07831447
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active HypersoundExperimentalTen 15-minute sessions of active Hypersound radiofrequency peripheral nerve stimulation, twice weekly over five weeks. External antennas are positioned for the identified anatomical treatment target. Treatment uses the final verified system and prospectively defined fluctuating-stimulation algorithm within established operating limits.
Receives: Device: Hypersound RF-PNS system
Sham HypersoundSham comparatorParticipants undergo a procedure resembling active treatment, including comparable positioning, antenna placement, device and personnel interaction, and ten 15-minute sessions twice weekly over five weeks, without the intended therapeutic Hypersound exposure. After the 90-day primary assessment, participants are offered active treatment and are followed for 90 days after their first active treatment.
Receives: Device: Sham Hypersound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity is assessed with a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain), with lower scores indicating less pain. Participants rate their average pain during the preceding 24 hours. Baseline is assessed before the first treatment. A responder is a participant whose VAS score decreases by at least 50% from baseline at the 90-day assessment. The percentage of responders is compared between the randomized active Hypersound and sham groups.

    Measured: Baseline and 90 days after the first treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change From Baseline in Average 24-Hour Pain Intensity on the 100-mm VAS

    Average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours is rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain), with lower scores indicating less pain. Change is calculated as the day-90 score minus the baseline score, so negative values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Baseline and 90 days after the first treatment

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 30% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity

    Average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours is rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst imaginable pain), with lower scores indicating less pain. A responder is a participant whose VAS score decreases by at least 30% from baseline at the 90-day assessment.

    Measured: Baseline and 90 days after the first treatment

  3. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events

    Adverse events are collected and characterized by severity, seriousness, expectedness, and relationship to the device or to study treatment. Events occurring during the randomized period are summarized separately from events occurring after crossover to active treatment.

    Measured: First treatment through 90 days after the first treatment; for participants who cross over, first active treatment through 90 days after that treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2026
  2. Study startJun 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are randomized approximately 2:1 to active Hypersound or sham treatment. Sham participants are offered active treatment after the randomized 90-day primary assessment; post-crossover outcomes are analyzed separately.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
71 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07831447
Sponsor's protocol ID
HMI02
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
15 Sep 2026
Last updated
21 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in