Critical Care MedicinePhase 1NCT07835802
The TTM and ASM Trial
A Phase 1 study testing Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic and Normothermic in people with Critical Care Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care. Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medical Services, Cardiac Arrest (CA)
- What is being tested?
- Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic and Normothermic
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 17 Sep 2026to 31 Jul 2029
- Phase
- Phase 1
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-traumatic sudden cardiac arrest in adults
- Sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for at least 5 minutes
- Admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), remaining comatose and unable to follow commands
- TIMECARD score indicating moderate-to-severe illness severity
- Randomization and initiation of the intervention can be completed within 12 hours after ROSC
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years; pregnant or breastfeeding women
- TIMECARD score indicating mild risk
- Patients with terminal cancer or cancer for which active treatment has been declined
- Spontaneous hypothermia with a body temperature < 35°C; intracranial hemorrhage or massive bleeding
- Pre-arrest Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-4; receipt of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR; CPR with ECMO)
- Refusal of participation by the patient's family
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 104
Min-Shan Tsai, 886-23123456 ext. 265632, mshanmshan@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Optimization of Neurological and Functional Recovery Following Cardiac Arrest
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains one of the major challenges in clinical care.
Although improvements in resuscitation quality have increased the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), most patients still fail to survive to hospital discharge, and neurological injury is the leading determinant of poor outcome. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy caused by global cerebral hypoxia during cardiac arrest is a key contributor to long-term disability, and even survivors often experience substantial functional impairment, placing a significant burden on families and society. Targeted temperature management (TTM) has long been regarded as a cornerstone neuroprotective strategy; however, TTM and TTM2 trials reported no significant neurological difference between lower and higher temperature targets. However, these studies predominantly enrolled patients with relatively mild illness severity, and multiple real-world observational cohorts suggest that, among more severely ill resuscitated patients, lower target temperatures may still confer benefit. Consequently, the optimal temperature strategy in higher-risk subgroups remains uncertain. Seizures are another common manifestation of brain injury after cardiac arrest, occurring in approximately 20-30% of resuscitated patients and contributing to secondary neurological damage. Earlier trials evaluating prophylactic anti-seizure medication (ASM) (thiopental or diazepam/magnesium) did not demonstrate neurological benefit; however, these studies primarily focused on neuroprotection rather than seizure prevention, leaving a substantial evidence gap. Patients with moderate to severe disease severity-those at the highest risk of both cerebral injury and seizure occurrence-have never been specifically studied to determine whether personalized temperature selection or early short-term prophylactic ASM (e.g., valproic acid or levetiracetam) may provide clinical benefit. Accordingly, identifying the most appropriate temperature target for higher-risk patients and determining whether short-term prophylactic antiepileptic therapy can reduce seizure-related injury represent important unresolved questions in post-resuscitation care. The aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether, among comatose patients with moderate to severe risk after ROSC, specific TTM temperature strategies combined with early short-term prophylactic ASM can reduce postresuscitation seizure incidence and improve neurological outcomes. By addressing a population underrepresented in prior clinical trials-those at highest risk and most likely to benefit-this study aims to generate clinically meaningful evidence to guide temperature selection and prophylactic ASM after cardiac arrest. Evaluating these interventions in combination may provide a more comprehensive understanding of whether they reduce seizure burden, mitigate brain injury, and improve functional recovery.
- Being tested
- Prophylactic ASM, Hypothermic, Normothermic, ASM as needed
- Keywords
- Cardiac Arrest, Targeted Temperature Management, Seizure, Anti-Seizure Medication, outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest, Seizures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prophylactic ASMDrug
Prophylactic treatment
HypothermicProcedure or surgery
TTM 33-34℃
NormothermicProcedure or surgery
TTM 36-37.5℃
ASM as neededDrug
as needed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothermic PPX | Experimental | hypothermia + Prophylactic treatment Receives: Drug: Prophylactic ASM; Procedure: Hypothermic |
| Normothermic PPX | Active comparator | Normothermic + Prophylactic treatment Receives: Drug: Prophylactic ASM; Procedure: Normothermic |
| Hypothermic PRN | Active comparator | hypothermia + as needed Receives: Procedure: Hypothermic; Drug: ASM as needed |
| Normothermic PRN | Active comparator | Normothermic + as needed Receives: Procedure: Normothermic; Drug: ASM as needed |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
clinical & electrical seizure occurrence
Measured: Within 7 days after ROSC
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2026
- Study start17 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critical Care MedicineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, National Taiwan University Clinical Trial Center, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07835802
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202603120MINE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No