Solid NeoplasmsNCT07837505
Integrating Geriatric 8 (G8) Screening and Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) Toxicity Assessment Score Into Routine Care for Older Adults With Cancer
An observational study of Solid Neoplasms and Solid Tumors, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
This study evaluates whether using specialized geriatric screening and toxicity prediction tools can help oncologists personalize chemotherapy dosing and reduce severe side effects in older adults with solid cancers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Solid Neoplasms, Solid Tumors, Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Nov 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Older adult
Study population: Older adult patients (aged 65 years and older) with confirmed solid malignancies who are scheduled to initiate chemotherapy at the Clinical Oncology Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine. The population comprises prospectively presenting patients undergoing oncogeriatric screening and risk-adapted chemotherapy, alongside a historical control cohort of comparable older patients previously treated at the same center.
Who may be able to join
- Age 65 years or older
- Confirmed diagnosis of any solid malignancy
- Scheduled to initiate cytotoxic chemotherapy
Who cannot join
- Hematological malignancies (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma)
- Treatment plans consisting exclusively of non-chemotherapy modalities (e.g., endocrine therapy, immunotherapy monotherapy, or radiotherapy alone)
- Incomplete or missing medical records (applicable to the retrospective historical control cohort)
About this study
Official title: Integrating Geriatric 8 (G8) Screening and Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) Toxicity Assessment Score Into Routine Oncology Care for Older Adults With Cancer
This study evaluates whether using specialized geriatric screening and toxicity prediction tools can help oncologists personalize chemotherapy dosing and reduce severe side effects in older adults with solid cancers.
Older adults with cancer have diverse levels of physical resilience and functional reserve that standard oncologic performance scores often miss. Consequently, uniform standard chemotherapy dosing can lead to severe, life-threatening toxicities, unplanned hospitalizations, or early treatment discontinuation.
Read more
In this prospective-retrospective comparative study, patients aged 65 years and older who are starting chemotherapy are prospectively evaluated using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool. Patients identified as vulnerable (G8 score ≤ 14) undergo a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) across functional, nutritional, cognitive, and psychological domains. In addition, all prospective participants are evaluated using the Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) toxicity tool to calculate their risk of severe side effects. Chemotherapy doses are risk-adapted based on CARG scores:
- Low Risk: Standard chemotherapy dose
- Intermediate Risk: 20% dose reduction
- High Risk: 50% dose reduction
Participants are followed every 3 months for 1 year to evaluate treatment tolerance, adherence, tumor response, and survival. These outcomes will be compared against a historical retrospective cohort of older patients with solid tumors who received standard-dose chemotherapy without G8 screening or CARG toxicity risk stratification.
- Conditions
- Solid Neoplasms, Solid Tumors, Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity
- Keywords
- Geriatric Oncology, G8 Screening Tool, CARG Score, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Chemotherapy Toxicity, Dose Reduction, Older Adults With Cancer, Frailty
- Medical subject headings
- Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective G8/CARG-Guided Cohort | Older adult patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with solid malignancies prospectively evaluated prior to chemotherapy using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool (scores ≤ 14 trigger a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) and the Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) toxicity calculator. Chemotherapy dosing is risk-adapted: standard dose for low risk (CARG 0-5), a 20% dose reduction for intermediate risk (CARG 6-9), and a 50% dose reduction for high risk (CARG ≥ 10). Patients undergo periodic clinical, geriatric, and radiological evaluations every 3 months for 1 year. | |
| Retrospective Historical Control Cohort | A historical control cohort of older adult cancer patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with comparable solid malignancies treated with standard-dose chemotherapy prior to the institutional implementation of routine G8 screening and CARG toxicity risk assessment. Treatment-related toxicities, treatment completion, tumor response, and survival outcomes are collected retrospectively from medical records. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 to 5 Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities
Percentage of participants who experience at least one severe, life-threatening, or fatal (Grade 3, 4, or 5) adverse event related to chemotherapy. Toxicities are evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Solid NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mariam Adel Ahmed Allam, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07837505
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- G8 and CARG Toxicity in Cancer
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrating Geriatric 8 (G8) Screening and Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) Toxicity Assessment Score Into Routine Oncology Care for Older Adults With Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07837505
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- G8 and CARG Toxicity in Cancer
- Conditions
- Solid Neoplasms, Solid Tumors, Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity
- Keywords
- Geriatric Oncology, G8 Screening Tool, CARG Score, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Chemotherapy Toxicity, Dose Reduction, Older Adults With Cancer, Frailty
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates whether using specialized geriatric screening and toxicity prediction tools can help oncologists personalize chemotherapy dosing and reduce severe side effects in older adults with solid cancers.
Older adults with cancer have diverse levels of physical resilience and functional reserve that standard oncologic performance scores often miss. Consequently, uniform standard chemotherapy dosing can lead to severe, life-threatening toxicities, unplanned hospitalizations, or early treatment discontinuation.
In this prospective-retrospective comparative study, patients aged 65 years and older who are starting chemotherapy are prospectively evaluated using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool. Patients identified as vulnerable (G8 score ≤ 14) undergo a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) across functional, nutritional, cognitive, and psychological domains. In addition, all prospective participants are evaluated using the Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) toxicity tool to calculate their risk of severe side effects. Chemotherapy doses are risk-adapted based on CARG scores:
- Low Risk: Standard chemotherapy dose
- Intermediate Risk: 20% dose reduction
- High Risk: 50% dose reduction
Participants are followed every 3 months for 1 year to evaluate treatment tolerance, adherence, tumor response, and survival. These outcomes will be compared against a historical retrospective cohort of older patients with solid tumors who received standard-dose chemotherapy without G8 screening or CARG toxicity risk stratification.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective G8/CARG-Guided Cohort | – | –Older adult patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with solid malignancies prospectively evaluated prior to chemotherapy using the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool (scores ≤ 14 trigger a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment) and the Cancer and Age Research Group (CARG) toxicity calculator. Chemotherapy dosing is risk-adapted: standard dose for low risk (CARG 0-5), a 20% dose reduction for intermediate risk (CARG 6-9), and a 50% dose reduction for high risk (CARG ≥ 10). Patients undergo periodic clinical, geriatric, and radiological evaluations every 3 months for 1 year. |
| Retrospective Historical Control Cohort | – | –A historical control cohort of older adult cancer patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with comparable solid malignancies treated with standard-dose chemotherapy prior to the institutional implementation of routine G8 screening and CARG toxicity risk assessment. Treatment-related toxicities, treatment completion, tumor response, and survival outcomes are collected retrospectively from medical records. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- Older adult patients (aged 65 years and older) with confirmed solid malignancies who are scheduled to initiate chemotherapy at the Clinical Oncology Department, Assiut University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine. The population comprises prospectively presenting patients undergoing oncogeriatric screening and risk-adapted chemotherapy, alongside a historical control cohort of comparable older patients previously treated at the same center.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 65 years or older
- Confirmed diagnosis of any solid malignancy
- Scheduled to initiate cytotoxic chemotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Hematological malignancies (e.g., leukemia, lymphoma)
- Treatment plans consisting exclusively of non-chemotherapy modalities (e.g., endocrine therapy, immunotherapy monotherapy, or radiotherapy alone)
- Incomplete or missing medical records (applicable to the retrospective historical control cohort)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 to 5 Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Percentage of participants who experience at least one severe, life-threatening, or fatal (Grade 3, 4, or 5) adverse event related to chemotherapy. Toxicities are evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Solid Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Pertuzumab in Patients With Solid Tumors Previously Enrolled in a Hoffmann-La Roche-Sponsored Pertuzumab Clinical Trial
Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Risk Prediction in Solid Tumors
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Solid Neoplasms and Solid Tumors, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 to 5 Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities (time frame: Up to 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.