PeriodontitisNCT07837947
Air Polishing for Pain and Compliance in Supportive Periodontal Therapy
A study testing Trehalose Air-Polishing and Ultrasonic Instrumentation in people with Periodontitis, run by Octavi Camps-Font at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is essential for maintaining periodontal stability and preventing disease recurrence in patients who have been successfully treated for periodontitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Periodontitis
- What is being tested?
- Trehalose Air-Polishing and Ultrasonic Instrumentation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to May 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women aged 18 years or older who voluntarily agree to sign the informed consent form before any study-related procedure is performed.
- ASA physical status I or II.
- Initial diagnosis of Stage I-III periodontitis according to the 2017 World Workshop, periodontally treated and stabilized, and enrolled in a supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) program.
- Non-smokers or light smokers (<10 cigarettes/day).
- Commitment to attend all follow-up visits over the 24-month study period.
Who cannot join
- Patients requiring local anesthesia or anxiolytic premedication to undergo supportive periodontal therapy (SPT).
- Patients with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, or neurostimulators.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients with infectious respiratory diseases.
- Patients with systemic diseases or neurological disorders that may alter pain perception.
- Patients receiving medications that may influence pain perception (e.g., opioids or gabapentin).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site
Hospital Odontològic Universitat de Barcelona
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Edgar Martínez García, DDS, +34 689484177, emartiga248@alumnes.ub.edu
Octavi Camps Font, DDS, MSc, PhD, +34 665980569, ocamps@ub.edu
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Air Polishing on Pain Perception and Compliance With Supportive Periodontal Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is essential for maintaining periodontal stability and preventing disease recurrence in patients who have been successfully treated for periodontitis. However, long-term effectiveness depends on regular attendance at maintenance visits, and negative experiences associated with periodontal instrumentation, such as pain or discomfort, may affect patient acceptance and adherence to the maintenance program.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether supportive periodontal therapy performed using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder reduces patient-perceived pain and improves the clinical experience compared with conventional biofilm removal using ultrasonic instrumentation. The study will also assess whether the use of air polishing is associated with better adherence to the periodontal maintenance program while maintaining comparable periodontal clinical outcomes.
Read more
Forty periodontally stabilized adult patients enrolled in the supportive periodontal therapy program of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology at the University of Barcelona will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment groups. The control group will receive conventional supportive periodontal therapy using ultrasonic instrumentation, while the experimental group will receive supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder. Participants will be followed for 24 months.
The primary outcome will be patient-perceived pain associated with supportive periodontal therapy, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include treatment duration, adherence to scheduled maintenance visits, patient experience and acceptance of treatment, and periodontal clinical parameters. Periodontal status will be monitored throughout follow-up by assessing probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque index.
This study aims to determine whether air polishing with trehalose powder can provide a more comfortable and patient-centered approach to supportive periodontal therapy without compromising periodontal clinical outcomes, and whether an improved treatment experience may contribute to better long-term adherence to periodontal maintenance.
Read the detailed description
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that requires long-term supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) after completion of active periodontal treatment in order to maintain periodontal stability and reduce the risk of disease recurrence. The effectiveness of SPT is strongly influenced by long-term patient adherence. Therefore, improving patient comfort and treatment experience during maintenance visits may contribute to better adherence to periodontal maintenance programs.
Conventional SPT commonly involves mechanical removal of supra- and subgingival biofilm and deposits using ultrasonic instrumentation. Air-polishing devices using low-abrasive powders have been proposed as an alternative approach for biofilm removal during periodontal maintenance. Previous studies suggest that air polishing may provide effective biofilm removal while reducing patient discomfort and treatment time. However, evidence regarding the use of newer-generation air-polishing systems with trehalose-based powder during SPT remains limited. This study will therefore evaluate both patient-reported outcomes and periodontal clinical outcomes associated with this approach.
This study is designed as a randomized, superiority, parallel-group clinical trial with a 24-month follow-up period. A total of 40 periodontally stabilized adult patients enrolled in the SPT program of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology at the University of Barcelona will be included. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group, with an expected sample of 20 participants per group.
Participants allocated to the control group will receive conventional biofilm removal using ultrasonic instrumentation during supportive periodontal therapy. Participants allocated to the experimental group will receive supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder. The purpose of this comparison is to determine whether the air-polishing approach reduces patient-perceived pain and improves the overall treatment experience and adherence to the maintenance program compared with conventional ultrasonic instrumentation, while maintaining comparable periodontal clinical outcomes.
Participants will be prospectively evaluated at baseline and during follow-up visits over a period of 24 months. Maintenance visits will be performed every 6 months. At each maintenance visit, a complete periodontal examination will be performed. Periodontal clinical parameters will include probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque index.
The primary outcome of the study will be patient-perceived pain associated with supportive periodontal therapy. Immediately after treatment, perceived pain will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include patient experience, adherence to the periodontal maintenance program, treatment duration, and periodontal clinical outcomes. Adherence will be evaluated according to attendance at scheduled maintenance visits throughout the follow-up period.
Data will be prospectively collected using a specific electronic data collection form, including demographic and clinical variables as well as patient-experience questionnaires. Investigators responsible for clinical examinations will undergo calibration before participant recruitment.
Statistical analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle, with patient-perceived pain considered the primary outcome variable. The study is designed to determine whether the use of air polishing with trehalose powder provides a superior patient experience, particularly in terms of perceived pain, compared with conventional ultrasonic instrumentation, while also assessing whether both approaches provide comparable periodontal clinical outcomes over time.
The study will be conducted at the University of Barcelona Dental Hospital (Hospital Odontològic Universitat de Barcelona), in the clinical facilities of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology. Recruitment, diagnosis, and treatment of participants will be performed by residents of the Master's program under the supervision of the study investigators.
By simultaneously evaluating patient-reported outcomes, adherence, treatment efficiency, and periodontal clinical parameters, this study seeks to determine whether air polishing with trehalose powder may represent a more comfortable and patient-centered approach to supportive periodontal therapy without compromising periodontal stability. If improved comfort is associated with better adherence to scheduled maintenance visits, this approach could contribute to optimizing long-term periodontal maintenance protocols.
- Conditions
- Periodontitis
- Being tested
- Trehalose Air-Polishing, Ultrasonic Instrumentation
- Keywords
- Supportive Periodontal Therapy, Periodontal Maintenance, Air Polishing, Trehalose, Ultrasonic Instrumentation, Pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Periodontitis, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Trehalose Air-PolishingDevice
Subgingival biofilm removal during supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder.
Ultrasonic InstrumentationDevice
Conventional subgingival debridement during supportive periodontal therapy using ultrasonic instrumentation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Trehalose Air-Polishing Group | Experimental | Participants allocated to this group will receive supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder for subgingival biofilm removal. Receives: Device: Trehalose Air-Polishing |
| Ultrasonic Instrumentation Group | Active comparator | Participants allocated to this group will receive supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) using conventional ultrasonic instrumentation for subgingival biofilm and calculus removal. Receives: Device: Ultrasonic Instrumentation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain perceived during supportive periodontal therapy
Pain perceived by the participant during the supportive periodontal therapy session will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The outcome will be compared between participants treated with trehalose air-polishing and those treated with ultrasonic instrumentation.
Measured: Immediately after the supportive periodontal therapy session
Secondary outcomes (10)
Patient-reported treatment experience
Patient-reported experience with supportive periodontal therapy will be assessed using a structured questionnaire after treatment. The questionnaire will evaluate aspects related to comfort, treatment perception, satisfaction, and preference, allowing comparison between trehalose air-polishing and ultrasonic instrumentation.
Measured: Immediately after each supportive periodontal therapy session
Duration of supportive periodontal therapy session
Duration of the supportive periodontal therapy session, measured in minutes from the effective start of the clinical procedure until completion of the periodontal treatment scheduled for that visit.
Measured: At each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up
Adherence to supportive periodontal therapy
Adherence to the supportive periodontal therapy program will be assessed based on attendance at scheduled maintenance visits. Adherence will be determined from the proportion of scheduled visits attended by each participant during the follow-up period.
Measured: Throughout the 24-month follow-up
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Probing pocket depth will be measured at six sites per tooth using a UNC-15 periodontal probe and expressed in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Clinical attachment level will be measured at six sites per tooth using a UNC-15 periodontal probe and expressed in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Gingival margin position (MG)
Gingival margin position will be measured at six sites per tooth using a UNC-15 periodontal probe and expressed in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Bleeding on probin (BoP)
Bleeding on probing will be recorded at six sites per tooth and expressed as the percentage of sites presenting bleeding after periodontal probing.
Measured: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Plaque index (PI)
Plaque will be recorded at six sites per tooth and expressed as the percentage of sites presenting plaque.
Measured: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Patient knowledge and awareness of supportive periodontal therapy
Patient knowledge and awareness regarding periodontitis and the importance of supportive periodontal therapy will be assessed using an 8-item questionnaire. Each correct response will receive 1 point and each incorrect response 0 points, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge and awareness of periodontitis and supportive periodontal therapy.
Measured: Throughout the 24-month follow-up
Patient-reported perceived knowledge of periodontal disease and supportive periodontal therapy
Participants will rate their perceived level of knowledge regarding their periodontal disease and supportive periodontal therapy on a numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating a greater self-perceived level of knowledge.
Measured: Throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PeriodontitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Octavi Camps-Font
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Octavi Camps-Font, University of Barcelona
- Investigators
- Edgar Martínez García, DDS, Principal investigator, University of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07837947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 33/2026
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with external researchers, in accordance with the study protocol and applicable data protection regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Air Polishing on Pain Perception and Compliance With Supportive Periodontal Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07837947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 33/2026
- Conditions
- Periodontitis
- Keywords
- Supportive Periodontal Therapy, Periodontal Maintenance, Air Polishing, Trehalose, Ultrasonic Instrumentation, Pain, Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Octavi Camps-FontUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is essential for maintaining periodontal stability and preventing disease recurrence in patients who have been successfully treated for periodontitis. However, long-term effectiveness depends on regular attendance at maintenance visits, and negative experiences associated with periodontal instrumentation, such as pain or discomfort, may affect patient acceptance and adherence to the maintenance program.
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether supportive periodontal therapy performed using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder reduces patient-perceived pain and improves the clinical experience compared with conventional biofilm removal using ultrasonic instrumentation. The study will also assess whether the use of air polishing is associated with better adherence to the periodontal maintenance program while maintaining comparable periodontal clinical outcomes.
Forty periodontally stabilized adult patients enrolled in the supportive periodontal therapy program of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology at the University of Barcelona will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment groups. The control group will receive conventional supportive periodontal therapy using ultrasonic instrumentation, while the experimental group will receive supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder. Participants will be followed for 24 months.
The primary outcome will be patient-perceived pain associated with supportive periodontal therapy, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include treatment duration, adherence to scheduled maintenance visits, patient experience and acceptance of treatment, and periodontal clinical parameters. Periodontal status will be monitored throughout follow-up by assessing probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque index.
This study aims to determine whether air polishing with trehalose powder can provide a more comfortable and patient-centered approach to supportive periodontal therapy without compromising periodontal clinical outcomes, and whether an improved treatment experience may contribute to better long-term adherence to periodontal maintenance.
Detailed description
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease that requires long-term supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) after completion of active periodontal treatment in order to maintain periodontal stability and reduce the risk of disease recurrence. The effectiveness of SPT is strongly influenced by long-term patient adherence. Therefore, improving patient comfort and treatment experience during maintenance visits may contribute to better adherence to periodontal maintenance programs.
Conventional SPT commonly involves mechanical removal of supra- and subgingival biofilm and deposits using ultrasonic instrumentation. Air-polishing devices using low-abrasive powders have been proposed as an alternative approach for biofilm removal during periodontal maintenance. Previous studies suggest that air polishing may provide effective biofilm removal while reducing patient discomfort and treatment time. However, evidence regarding the use of newer-generation air-polishing systems with trehalose-based powder during SPT remains limited. This study will therefore evaluate both patient-reported outcomes and periodontal clinical outcomes associated with this approach.
This study is designed as a randomized, superiority, parallel-group clinical trial with a 24-month follow-up period. A total of 40 periodontally stabilized adult patients enrolled in the SPT program of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology at the University of Barcelona will be included. Participants who meet the eligibility criteria and provide written informed consent will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group, with an expected sample of 20 participants per group.
Participants allocated to the control group will receive conventional biofilm removal using ultrasonic instrumentation during supportive periodontal therapy. Participants allocated to the experimental group will receive supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder. The purpose of this comparison is to determine whether the air-polishing approach reduces patient-perceived pain and improves the overall treatment experience and adherence to the maintenance program compared with conventional ultrasonic instrumentation, while maintaining comparable periodontal clinical outcomes.
Participants will be prospectively evaluated at baseline and during follow-up visits over a period of 24 months. Maintenance visits will be performed every 6 months. At each maintenance visit, a complete periodontal examination will be performed. Periodontal clinical parameters will include probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, and plaque index.
The primary outcome of the study will be patient-perceived pain associated with supportive periodontal therapy. Immediately after treatment, perceived pain will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include patient experience, adherence to the periodontal maintenance program, treatment duration, and periodontal clinical outcomes. Adherence will be evaluated according to attendance at scheduled maintenance visits throughout the follow-up period.
Data will be prospectively collected using a specific electronic data collection form, including demographic and clinical variables as well as patient-experience questionnaires. Investigators responsible for clinical examinations will undergo calibration before participant recruitment.
Statistical analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle, with patient-perceived pain considered the primary outcome variable. The study is designed to determine whether the use of air polishing with trehalose powder provides a superior patient experience, particularly in terms of perceived pain, compared with conventional ultrasonic instrumentation, while also assessing whether both approaches provide comparable periodontal clinical outcomes over time.
The study will be conducted at the University of Barcelona Dental Hospital (Hospital Odontològic Universitat de Barcelona), in the clinical facilities of the Master's Degree in Periodontology and Peri-implantology. Recruitment, diagnosis, and treatment of participants will be performed by residents of the Master's program under the supervision of the study investigators.
By simultaneously evaluating patient-reported outcomes, adherence, treatment efficiency, and periodontal clinical parameters, this study seeks to determine whether air polishing with trehalose powder may represent a more comfortable and patient-centered approach to supportive periodontal therapy without compromising periodontal stability. If improved comfort is associated with better adherence to scheduled maintenance visits, this approach could contribute to optimizing long-term periodontal maintenance protocols.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Trehalose Air-Polishing Group | Experimental | Device: Trehalose Air-PolishingParticipants allocated to this group will receive supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder for subgingival biofilm removal. |
| Ultrasonic Instrumentation Group | Active comparator | Device: Ultrasonic InstrumentationParticipants allocated to this group will receive supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) using conventional ultrasonic instrumentation for subgingival biofilm and calculus removal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men or women aged 18 years or older who voluntarily agree to sign the informed consent form before any study-related procedure is performed.
- ASA physical status I or II.
- Initial diagnosis of Stage I-III periodontitis according to the 2017 World Workshop, periodontally treated and stabilized, and enrolled in a supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) program.
- Non-smokers or light smokers (<10 cigarettes/day).
- Commitment to attend all follow-up visits over the 24-month study period.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients requiring local anesthesia or anxiolytic premedication to undergo supportive periodontal therapy (SPT).
- Patients with pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, or neurostimulators.
- Pregnant women.
- Patients with infectious respiratory diseases.
- Patients with systemic diseases or neurological disorders that may alter pain perception.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Trehalose Air-PolishingSubgingival biofilm removal during supportive periodontal therapy using an air-polishing device with low-abrasive trehalose powder. | Device | Trehalose Air-Polishing Group |
| Ultrasonic InstrumentationConventional subgingival debridement during supportive periodontal therapy using ultrasonic instrumentation. | Device | Ultrasonic Instrumentation Group |
Primary outcome
Pain perceived during supportive periodontal therapy
Time frame: Immediately after the supportive periodontal therapy session
Pain perceived by the participant during the supportive periodontal therapy session will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The outcome will be compared between participants treated with trehalose air-polishing and those treated with ultrasonic instrumentation.
10 secondary outcomes
Patient-reported treatment experience
Time frame: Immediately after each supportive periodontal therapy session
Duration of supportive periodontal therapy session
Time frame: At each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up
Adherence to supportive periodontal therapy
Time frame: Throughout the 24-month follow-up
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Time frame: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time frame: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Gingival margin position (MG)
Time frame: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Bleeding on probin (BoP)
Time frame: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Plaque index (PI)
Time frame: Baseline and at each supportive periodontal therapy visit throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Patient knowledge and awareness of supportive periodontal therapy
Time frame: Throughout the 24-month follow-up
Patient-reported perceived knowledge of periodontal disease and supportive periodontal therapy
Time frame: Throughout the 24-month follow-up.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with external researchers, in accordance with the study protocol and applicable data protection regulations.
Related trials for Periodontitis
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Comparative Evaluation of Omega-3 and Resveratrol Supplementation in Patients With Periodontitis
Periodontitis
Recruiting
Probiotics Versus Antibiotics as an Adjuvant to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment Among Smokers With Stage II, Grade B Periodontitis
Probiotics, Antibiotics
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Recruiting
Ozone Gel Versus Chlorohexidine Gel as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Grade B Among Smokers Patients
Ozone Gel, Chlorohexidine Gel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Edgar Martínez García, DDS principal investigator
University of Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Trehalose Air-Polishing and Ultrasonic Instrumentation in people with Periodontitis, run by Octavi Camps-Font at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Octavi Camps Font, DDS, MSc, PhD (+34 665980569, ocamps@ub.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain perceived during supportive periodontal therapy (time frame: Immediately after the supportive periodontal therapy session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.