Solid Tumor CancerCMAT ProtocolNCT07838103
Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Oncology
A study testing CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Pathway and Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment in people with Solid Tumor Cancer, run by Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This pilot randomized study will evaluate whether adding a brief, structured multidimensional risk-recognition tool to standard multidisciplinary assessment can improve treatment planning for adults who are about to start first-line systemic anticancer treatment for a solid tumor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Solid Tumor Cancer
- What is being tested?
- CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Pathway and Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2027to 21 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years or older
- Histologically confirmed solid tumor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Planned initiation of first-line systemic anticancer treatment (intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, oral anticancer treatment, or a combination)
- Systemic treatment planned to be administered in the outpatient setting
- Sufficient cognitive and communicative capacity to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Clinical condition requiring urgent initiation of systemic anticancer treatment before the multidisciplinary assessment can be completed
- Systemic anticancer treatment planned to begin during an inpatient admission
- Severe cognitive impairment or communication difficulty preventing valid informed consent
- Estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months, as judged by the treating medical oncologist
- Second-line or subsequent systemic anticancer treatment
- Concurrent participation in another interventional study likely to directly affect the outcomes of this study
- Previous enrollment in this trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Mugla Education and Research Hospital
Muğla, Menteşe, 48000
Ethem Acar, Prof. Dr. (MD), +90 252 214 13 23, ethemacar@mu.edu.tr
Ozgur Tanriverdi, Prof. Dr. (Medical Oncology)
About this study
Official title: Common Multidimensional Assessment for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Oncology: Protocol for a Single-Centre Randomised Pilot Trial
This pilot randomized study will evaluate whether adding a brief, structured multidimensional risk-recognition tool to standard multidisciplinary assessment can improve treatment planning for adults who are about to start first-line systemic anticancer treatment for a solid tumor.
Before systemic anticancer treatment begins, patients may have medical, symptom-related, nutritional, psychological, social, or functional problems that can affect treatment safety, feasibility, and continuity. In routine multidisciplinary care, these issues are usually assessed by different health care professionals using discipline-specific approaches. However, risks identified in different areas may not always be considered together in a standardized way.
Read more
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive the institution's standard multidisciplinary pre-treatment assessment and usual clinical care. In the intervention group, health care professionals will additionally complete the Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT), which evaluates six areas: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Predefined criteria will be used to identify situations that require additional multidisciplinary discussion before the final treatment plan is documented.
The main outcome of the study is whether the final treatment plan differs in a clinically meaningful way from the provisional treatment plan recorded before multidisciplinary assessment. Such changes may include modifications to the anticancer treatment regimen, dose, treatment timing, frequency or route, as well as the addition of supportive, nutritional, psychological, social, or geriatric interventions.
The study will also evaluate whether the CMAT-supported approach is feasible and acceptable in routine clinical practice, how consistently different professionals identify patient risks, and whether the approach is associated with differences in early treatment-related outcomes such as severe toxicity, treatment delays or dose modifications, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, treatment discontinuation, and adherence problems.
Approximately 60 participants will be enrolled, with about 30 participants in each study group. As a pilot study, the trial is intended primarily to assess feasibility, implementation, and preliminary effect estimates to inform the design of a future larger multicenter study.
Read the detailed description
This study evaluates an organizational and decision-support approach designed to improve how information from different professional assessments is integrated before systemic anticancer treatment begins. The study does not compare multidisciplinary care with single-discipline care. Instead, it examines whether adding a common multidimensional risk-recognition and response pathway to an existing multidisciplinary assessment process changes how clinically relevant risks are identified, communicated, and incorporated into treatment planning.
In routine care, members of the multidisciplinary team perform assessments within their respective professional scopes. Although these discipline-specific assessments provide detailed information, clinically important relationships between medical, symptom-related, nutritional, psychological, social, and functional factors may not always be recognized or communicated using a common framework. The Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT) is intended to provide an additional shared assessment layer while preserving existing discipline-specific evaluations and clinical responsibilities.
In the CMAT-supported pathway, participating professionals first complete their usual discipline-specific assessments. Each professional then independently completes CMAT before viewing the CMAT responses of other professionals. CMAT assesses six domains: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Each domain is rated using a common risk scale, with an additional "not determined" option when a clinically defensible judgment cannot be made.
CMAT responses are interpreted using predefined trigger criteria. A multidisciplinary discussion is recommended when any domain is rated as high priority; significant risks are identified in multiple domains; substantial disagreement exists between professionals regarding the same domain; a psychological, nutritional, social, functional, or geriatric problem directly affects treatment feasibility or safety; or any participating professional explicitly recommends team discussion.
When a trigger criterion is met, the relevant findings are reviewed through a brief multidisciplinary discussion. Following review of the available assessments and any indicated discussion, the medical oncologist documents the final treatment and supportive-care plan. Potential responses may include additional supportive care, psychological, nutritional, social-work, or geriatric intervention, or modification of treatment-related decisions when clinically appropriate. The medical oncologist retains responsibility for all clinical treatment decisions.
CMAT is not intended to replace validated discipline-specific instruments, establish diagnoses, or independently determine anticancer treatment. The active intervention is the complete CMAT-supported pathway, consisting of independent assessment using shared terminology, predefined interpretation criteria, trigger-based multidisciplinary discussion, and structured documentation of how the integrated assessment relates to the final treatment plan.
Because this is a pilot trial, particular emphasis will be placed on implementation of the pathway in routine clinical workflow. The study will examine completion and timing of assessments, missing or undetermined responses, adherence to the predefined trigger algorithm, completion of indicated multidisciplinary discussions, agreement and disagreement between professionals, protocol deviations, and possible contamination of the control condition. These findings, together with preliminary estimates of treatment-planning and early clinical outcomes, will be used to refine the intervention and inform the design and implementation of a subsequent multicenter trial.
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor Cancer
- Being tested
- CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Pathway, Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment PathwayOther
The CMAT-supported multidisciplinary assessment pathway is an organizational and decision-support intervention added to standard pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment.
After completing their usual discipline-specific assessment, participating professionals independently complete the Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT) before viewing the responses of other professionals. CMAT evaluates six domains: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Each domain is rated using a standardized risk scale from 0 to 3, with an additional "not determined" option when a clinically defensible judgment cannot be made.
Predefined trigger criteria are then applied. A brief multidisciplinary discussion is recommended when there is a high-priority risk in any domain, significant risks in multiple domains, substantial disagreement between professionals within the same domain, a non-oncological problem tha
Standard Multidisciplinary AssessmentOther
Participants receive the institution's standard pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment. The medical oncologist, psychologist, dietitian, social worker, and, where clinically indicated, geriatrician perform their usual discipline-specific evaluations using routine clinical procedures and instruments. Each professional provides discipline-specific findings for treatment planning. No CMAT form, CMAT score, or CMAT-specific trigger algorithm is used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control (Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment) | Active comparator | Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment Receives: Other: Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment |
| Intervention: | Experimental | CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Receives: Other: CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Pathway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Change in the Treatment Plan
A clinically meaningful change is defined as at least one prespecified change between the provisional treatment plan recorded before multidisciplinary assessment and the final treatment plan. Qualifying changes include modification of the systemic anticancer treatment regimen, dose, treatment start date, treatment frequency, or route of administration; addition of supportive treatment; initiation of psychological, nutritional, social-work, or geriatric support; or another documented intervention intended to improve treatment safety or feasibility. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with at least one such change.
Measured: From baseline assessment to final treatment plan, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
Secondary outcomes (10)
CMAT Completion Rate
Among participants allocated to the intervention arm, the CMAT completion rate will be calculated as the proportion of expected CMAT assessments that are completed by participating professionals. Completion will be evaluated according to the prespecified study procedures and will be used as a measure of the feasibility of implementing the CMAT-supported multidisciplinary assessment pathway in routine clinical practice.
Measured: From randomization to completion of the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
CMAT Completion Time
Among participants allocated to the intervention arm, the time required by participating professionals to complete CMAT will be recorded. Completion time will be summarized descriptively and used to evaluate the operational burden and feasibility of incorporating CMAT into the routine pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment workflow.
Measured: During the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
Proportion of Multidisciplinary Assessments Completed Within the Planned Timeframe
The proportion of participants whose required multidisciplinary assessments are completed within the protocol-defined timeframe will be calculated. Standard discipline-specific assessments are planned to be completed before the first treatment administration and, where possible, within three working days after randomization. This outcome will assess the feasibility of integrating study procedures into routine clinical workflow without delaying clinically appropriate treatment.
Measured: From randomization to the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment, with assessments planned within 3 working days where possible
Participant Acceptability of the Assessment Process
Acceptability of the pre-treatment assessment process to participants will be assessed using a prespecified 6-item questionnaire administered to each participant in both arms immediately after completion of the multidisciplinary assessment and before the first dose of systemic anticancer treatment. Items address completion burden and perceived usefulness of the assessment process, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The outcome is reported as the proportion of participants responding 4 or 5 on each item, summarized separately by study arm.
Measured: Day 0, immediately after the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment and before the first treatment dose
Healthcare Professional Acceptability of the CMAT-Supported Pathway
Acceptability of the CMAT-supported pathway to participating healthcare professionals will be assessed using a prespecified 6-item questionnaire administered once to each participating professional (medical oncologist, oncology nurse, dietitian, social worker, psychiatrist) after the last intervention-arm participant has completed the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment. Items address completion burden and perceived usefulness in routine multidisciplinary practice, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The outcome is reported as the proportion of professionals responding 4 or 5 on each item. Mean CMAT completion time in minutes, recorded on the CMAT form for every intervention-arm participant, is reported alongside as a measure of burden.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Inter-professional Agreement in CMAT Domain Ratings
Among participants in the intervention arm, agreement between participating professionals in the identification and grading of risk across the six CMAT domains will be assessed. Agreement will be evaluated separately by domain using an appropriate agreement statistic according to the number of raters and data structure. Weighted kappa may be used for two raters, while a suitable multi-rater statistic will be used when more than two professionals provide ratings.
Measured: During the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the final treatment plan is documented
Proportion of Triggered Multidisciplinary Discussions Completed
Among participants in the intervention arm for whom at least one predefined CMAT trigger criterion indicates the need for multidisciplinary review, the proportion for whom the indicated multidisciplinary discussion is completed will be calculated. Trigger criteria include high-priority risk, significant risk across multiple domains, substantial inter-professional disagreement, a problem directly affecting treatment feasibility or safety, or an explicit recommendation for team discussion.
Measured: From completion of CMAT assessments to documentation of the final treatment plan, before systemic anticancer treatment begins
Proportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Related Toxicity
The proportion of participants experiencing at least one grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicity will be recorded by study arm. Toxicity will be graded according to the applicable version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). This outcome is exploratory in this pilot trial and will provide a preliminary estimate of early clinically significant treatment-related toxicity.
Measured: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Proportion of Participants With an Unplanned Emergency Department Visit
The proportion of participants with at least one unplanned emergency department visit during the early treatment follow-up period will be recorded and described by study arm. This clinical outcome is exploratory in the pilot trial and will be used to obtain a preliminary estimate for planning a future larger study.
Measured: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Proportion of Participants With an Unplanned Hospital Admission
The proportion of participants with at least one unplanned hospital admission during the early treatment follow-up period will be recorded and described by study arm. This clinical outcome is exploratory in the pilot trial and will be used to obtain a preliminary estimate for planning a future larger study.
Measured: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2026
- Study start10 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion21 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Solid Tumor CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are individually randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard multidisciplinary assessment alone or standard multidisciplinary assessment supplemented by the CMAT-supported pathway.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ozgur Tanriverdi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07838103
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMAT-RCT-P001
- Acronym
- CMAT Protocol
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary study publication may be shared after completion of the study, subject to applicable ethical and institutional approvals, a data-sharing agreement, and a scientifically justified request. No directly identifying participant information will be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Common Multidimensional Assessment for Multidisciplinary Decision-Making in Oncology: Protocol for a Single-Centre Randomised Pilot Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07838103
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMAT Protocol / CMAT-RCT-P001
- Conditions
- Solid Tumor Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 21 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot randomized study will evaluate whether adding a brief, structured multidimensional risk-recognition tool to standard multidisciplinary assessment can improve treatment planning for adults who are about to start first-line systemic anticancer treatment for a solid tumor.
Before systemic anticancer treatment begins, patients may have medical, symptom-related, nutritional, psychological, social, or functional problems that can affect treatment safety, feasibility, and continuity. In routine multidisciplinary care, these issues are usually assessed by different health care professionals using discipline-specific approaches. However, risks identified in different areas may not always be considered together in a standardized way.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive the institution's standard multidisciplinary pre-treatment assessment and usual clinical care. In the intervention group, health care professionals will additionally complete the Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT), which evaluates six areas: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Predefined criteria will be used to identify situations that require additional multidisciplinary discussion before the final treatment plan is documented.
The main outcome of the study is whether the final treatment plan differs in a clinically meaningful way from the provisional treatment plan recorded before multidisciplinary assessment. Such changes may include modifications to the anticancer treatment regimen, dose, treatment timing, frequency or route, as well as the addition of supportive, nutritional, psychological, social, or geriatric interventions.
The study will also evaluate whether the CMAT-supported approach is feasible and acceptable in routine clinical practice, how consistently different professionals identify patient risks, and whether the approach is associated with differences in early treatment-related outcomes such as severe toxicity, treatment delays or dose modifications, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, treatment discontinuation, and adherence problems.
Approximately 60 participants will be enrolled, with about 30 participants in each study group. As a pilot study, the trial is intended primarily to assess feasibility, implementation, and preliminary effect estimates to inform the design of a future larger multicenter study.
Detailed description
This study evaluates an organizational and decision-support approach designed to improve how information from different professional assessments is integrated before systemic anticancer treatment begins. The study does not compare multidisciplinary care with single-discipline care. Instead, it examines whether adding a common multidimensional risk-recognition and response pathway to an existing multidisciplinary assessment process changes how clinically relevant risks are identified, communicated, and incorporated into treatment planning.
In routine care, members of the multidisciplinary team perform assessments within their respective professional scopes. Although these discipline-specific assessments provide detailed information, clinically important relationships between medical, symptom-related, nutritional, psychological, social, and functional factors may not always be recognized or communicated using a common framework. The Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT) is intended to provide an additional shared assessment layer while preserving existing discipline-specific evaluations and clinical responsibilities.
In the CMAT-supported pathway, participating professionals first complete their usual discipline-specific assessments. Each professional then independently completes CMAT before viewing the CMAT responses of other professionals. CMAT assesses six domains: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Each domain is rated using a common risk scale, with an additional "not determined" option when a clinically defensible judgment cannot be made.
CMAT responses are interpreted using predefined trigger criteria. A multidisciplinary discussion is recommended when any domain is rated as high priority; significant risks are identified in multiple domains; substantial disagreement exists between professionals regarding the same domain; a psychological, nutritional, social, functional, or geriatric problem directly affects treatment feasibility or safety; or any participating professional explicitly recommends team discussion.
When a trigger criterion is met, the relevant findings are reviewed through a brief multidisciplinary discussion. Following review of the available assessments and any indicated discussion, the medical oncologist documents the final treatment and supportive-care plan. Potential responses may include additional supportive care, psychological, nutritional, social-work, or geriatric intervention, or modification of treatment-related decisions when clinically appropriate. The medical oncologist retains responsibility for all clinical treatment decisions.
CMAT is not intended to replace validated discipline-specific instruments, establish diagnoses, or independently determine anticancer treatment. The active intervention is the complete CMAT-supported pathway, consisting of independent assessment using shared terminology, predefined interpretation criteria, trigger-based multidisciplinary discussion, and structured documentation of how the integrated assessment relates to the final treatment plan.
Because this is a pilot trial, particular emphasis will be placed on implementation of the pathway in routine clinical workflow. The study will examine completion and timing of assessments, missing or undetermined responses, adherence to the predefined trigger algorithm, completion of indicated multidisciplinary discussions, agreement and disagreement between professionals, protocol deviations, and possible contamination of the control condition. These findings, together with preliminary estimates of treatment-planning and early clinical outcomes, will be used to refine the intervention and inform the design and implementation of a subsequent multicenter trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are individually randomized in a 1:1 ratio to standard multidisciplinary assessment alone or standard multidisciplinary assessment supplemented by the CMAT-supported pathway.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control (Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment) | Active comparator | Other: Standard Multidisciplinary AssessmentStandard Multidisciplinary Assessment |
| Intervention: | Experimental | Other: CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment PathwayCMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 years or older
- Histologically confirmed solid tumor
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Planned initiation of first-line systemic anticancer treatment (intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, oral anticancer treatment, or a combination)
- Systemic treatment planned to be administered in the outpatient setting
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinical condition requiring urgent initiation of systemic anticancer treatment before the multidisciplinary assessment can be completed
- Systemic anticancer treatment planned to begin during an inpatient admission
- Severe cognitive impairment or communication difficulty preventing valid informed consent
- Estimated life expectancy of less than 3 months, as judged by the treating medical oncologist
- Second-line or subsequent systemic anticancer treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment PathwayThe CMAT-supported multidisciplinary assessment pathway is an organizational and decision-support intervention added to standard pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment. After completing their usual discipline-specific assessment, participating professionals independently complete the Common Multidimensional Assessment Tool (CMAT) before viewing the responses of other professionals. CMAT evaluates six domains: oncological/medical feasibility, symptom burden, nutritional risk, psychological risk, social risk, and functional/geriatric risk. Each domain is rated using a standardized risk scale from 0 to 3, with an additional "not determined" option when a clinically defensible judgment cannot be made. Predefined trigger criteria are then applied. A brief multidisciplinary discussion is recommended when there is a high-priority risk in any domain, significant risks in multiple domains, substantial disagreement between professionals within the same domain, a non-oncological problem tha | Other | Intervention: |
| Standard Multidisciplinary AssessmentParticipants receive the institution's standard pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment. The medical oncologist, psychologist, dietitian, social worker, and, where clinically indicated, geriatrician perform their usual discipline-specific evaluations using routine clinical procedures and instruments. Each professional provides discipline-specific findings for treatment planning. No CMAT form, CMAT score, or CMAT-specific trigger algorithm is used. | Other | Control (Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Change in the Treatment Plan
Time frame: From baseline assessment to final treatment plan, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
A clinically meaningful change is defined as at least one prespecified change between the provisional treatment plan recorded before multidisciplinary assessment and the final treatment plan. Qualifying changes include modification of the systemic anticancer treatment regimen, dose, treatment start date, treatment frequency, or route of administration; addition of supportive treatment; initiation of psychological, nutritional, social-work, or geriatric support; or another documented intervention intended to improve treatment safety or feasibility. The outcome will be reported as the proportion of participants with at least one such change.
10 secondary outcomes
CMAT Completion Rate
Time frame: From randomization to completion of the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
CMAT Completion Time
Time frame: During the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment
Proportion of Multidisciplinary Assessments Completed Within the Planned Timeframe
Time frame: From randomization to the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment, with assessments planned within 3 working days where possible
Participant Acceptability of the Assessment Process
Time frame: Day 0, immediately after the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment and before the first treatment dose
Healthcare Professional Acceptability of the CMAT-Supported Pathway
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Inter-professional Agreement in CMAT Domain Ratings
Time frame: During the pre-treatment multidisciplinary assessment, before the final treatment plan is documented
Proportion of Triggered Multidisciplinary Discussions Completed
Time frame: From completion of CMAT assessments to documentation of the final treatment plan, before systemic anticancer treatment begins
Proportion of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Related Toxicity
Time frame: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Proportion of Participants With an Unplanned Emergency Department Visit
Time frame: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Proportion of Participants With an Unplanned Hospital Admission
Time frame: From the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment through Day 60 or completion of the first 2 treatment cycles, according to the prespecified follow-up framework
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary study publication may be shared after completion of the study, subject to applicable ethical and institutional approvals, a data-sharing agreement, and a scientifically justified request. No directly identifying participant information will be shared.
Related trials for Solid Tumor Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Investigate ALE.P02 as a Monotherapy or in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Adult Patients With Selected CLDN1+ Solid Tumors
Squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study of ACC-1898 in Adult Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of SC-102 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Cancers
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-3120 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors (MK-3120-002)
Advanced Solid Tumors, Malignant Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CMAT-Supported Multidisciplinary Assessment Pathway and Standard Multidisciplinary Assessment in people with Solid Tumor Cancer, run by Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ozgur Tanriverdi, Prof. Dr. Dr. (PhD, MD) (90252 211 5166, dr.ozgur.tanriverdi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Change in the Treatment Plan (time frame: From baseline assessment to final treatment plan, before the first administration of systemic anticancer treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.