AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-spinal ShiveringTRAM-MAGSNCT07838662

Prophylactic Tramadol Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering

A study testing Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate in people with Post-spinal Shivering, run by Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial compared prophylactic intravenous tramadol and magnesium sulphate for the prevention of post-spinal shivering among women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Post-spinal Shivering
What is being tested?
Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
106 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
10 Oct 2024to 10 Oct 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant women between 18 and 40 years age and undergoing elective cesarean section will be enrolled in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with severe cardiopulmonary, renal, or liver disease, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hypo- or hyperthyroidism.
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders or morbid obesity.
  • Patients who have received blood transfusion or >2,000 mL fluid intraoperatively.
  • Patients with placenta accreta or placenta percreta.
  • Patients allergic to either study drug.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Department of Anaesthesia

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54810

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: TRAM-MAGS: Tramadol Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering in Elective Cesarean Section

This randomized controlled trial compared prophylactic intravenous tramadol and magnesium sulphate for the prevention of post-spinal shivering among women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.

A total of 106 pregnant women aged 18-40 years were enrolled following ethical approval, informed consent, and counseling. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n=53 each). Group A received tramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously. Both drugs were diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Standardized anesthetic techniques, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were maintained.

Read more

Patients with major cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic disease, thyroid disorders, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, psychiatric illness, morbid obesity, significant blood transfusion or fluid administration, abnormal placental attachment, or relevant drug allergies were excluded.

Spinal anesthesia was performed using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace. Patients were monitored using ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. Post-spinal shivering was defined as involuntary muscle activity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan score of ≥2. The occurrence and severity of shivering were assessed, and adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension were recorded. Shivering was managed with warming, oxygen supplementation, or rescue medication when required.

The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal shivering. Secondary outcomes included shivering severity and adverse effects. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons were performed using the independent-samples t-test for continuous variables where appropriate and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, according to expected cell frequencies. The primary outcome and other categorical outcomes were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous tramadol with intravenous magnesium sulphate for prevention of post-spinal shivering in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over a period of six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.

Spinal anesthesia is widely used for cesarean section because of its rapid onset, reliability, avoidance of airway manipulation, and favorable maternal and neonatal safety profile. However, post-spinal shivering is a relatively common complication and may cause considerable discomfort and anxiety for the patient. Shivering may also interfere with monitoring and may increase oxygen consumption and metabolic demand. Various pharmacological agents have therefore been investigated for prevention and treatment of shivering associated with neuraxial anesthesia. Tramadol has been used as an anti-shivering agent because of its central effects on serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways, while magnesium sulphate may reduce shivering by influencing neuromuscular transmission and lowering the shivering threshold. Previous comparative studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of these agents in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The present study was therefore undertaken to compare the two agents under standardized perioperative conditions.

A total of 106 pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled after obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent. Eligible participants were women aged 18 to 40 years undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were selected through non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were excluded if they had severe systemic disease involving the cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic systems; thyroid disorders; pre-eclampsia or eclampsia; psychiatric illness; morbid obesity; significant intraoperative blood transfusion or excessive fluid administration; abnormal placental attachment; or allergy to any of the study medications.

After enrollment, participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 53 patients each. Group A received tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg intravenously. In both groups, the assigned study medication was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after establishment of spinal anesthesia. Standardized drug doses and similar perioperative conditions were used to ensure comparability between the treatment groups.

All participants received standard preoperative medications and anesthetic management according to the institutional protocol. Preoperative medications included oral ranitidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg on the night before surgery, with intravenous medications administered before anesthesia as per protocol. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the sitting position using a 25- or 26-gauge Quincke needle at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral level. A dose of 2.0-2.2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was used for the spinal block. Ringer lactate was administered as a co-load at 10 mg/kg according to the study protocol. The operating-room temperature was maintained at approximately 24-25°C.

Standard monitoring was applied throughout the perioperative period, including electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. A senior consultant supervised the anesthetic procedures. Data collection was performed by the resident responsible for assessment and documentation according to the study proforma. Standardized anesthesia and monitoring protocols were used in both groups to minimize potential confounding.

The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering after administration of the study medication. Shivering was defined as involuntary, spontaneous muscular activity lasting for more than 15 seconds and reaching a score of 2 or higher on the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The presence or absence of shivering was recorded during the observation period. In patients who developed shivering, the grade of shivering was documented. The severity categories included Grade II, Grade III, and Grade IV in accordance with the scale used in the study.

Secondary assessments included the severity of post-spinal shivering and the occurrence of perioperative adverse effects. Adverse effects monitored during the study included nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension. Patients who developed shivering were managed according to the institutional clinical protocol, including external warming, oxygen supplementation, and rescue pharmacological treatment such as pethidine or dexmedetomidine when clinically indicated.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded for all participants, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and parity. Age was categorized into 18-30 years and 31-40 years for subgroup analysis. BMI was categorized into normal-weight and overweight/obese groups. ASA physical status was categorized as ASA-I or ASA-II. Parity was categorized as parity ≤2 or >2.

The sample size was calculated using the WHO sample size calculator with an assumed statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%. The calculation was based on previously reported shivering frequencies of 7.7% in patients receiving tramadol and 30.8% in patients receiving magnesium sulphate. The resulting sample consisted of 106 participants, with 53 participants allocated to each treatment group.

Data were entered, coded, and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups to assess their comparability. The independent-samples t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables where appropriate. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables, while Fisher's exact test was applied where expected cell frequencies were small. The primary outcome, occurrence of post-spinal shivering, was compared between the two treatment groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Shivering severity grades and perioperative adverse effects were also compared between groups using appropriate categorical tests. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Stratified analysis was performed to assess whether the frequency of post-spinal shivering varied according to important baseline characteristics. Comparisons were stratified by age, BMI, ASA physical status, and parity. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was applied as appropriate within each subgroup. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Tramadol, Magnesium Sulphate
Keywords
Magnesium Sulfate, Tramadol, Shivering, Anesthesia Spinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TramadolDrug

    Also called Tramadol HCl

    Tramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering.

  • Magnesium SulphateDrug

    Also called MgSO₄

    Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering.

Study groups in NCT07838662
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tramadol GroupExperimentalParticipants in this group received prophylactic intravenous tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded.
Receives: Drug: Tramadol
Magnesium Sulphate GroupActive comparatorParticipants in this group received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded.
Receives: Drug: Magnesium Sulphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of post-spinal shivering

    Occurrence of post-spinal shivering following spinal anesthesia, defined as involuntary spontaneous muscle hyperactivity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale score ≥2.

    Measured: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Severity of post-spinal shivering

    Severity of shivering assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale and categorized as Grade II, Grade III, or Grade IV among participants who developed shivering.

    Measured: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2026
  2. Study start10 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion10 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a randomized, parallel-group controlled trial involving 106 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 53 patients each. Group A received prophylactic intravenous tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, while Group B received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg, with each drug diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Both groups received standardized anesthetic management and perioperative monitoring. The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering, with severity assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The groups were compared to determine which prophylactic intervention was more effective in preventing post-spinal shivering.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07838662
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRTH-Lahore
Acronym
TRAM-MAGS
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
11 Sep 2026
Last updated
24 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant-level data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers because no data-sharing plan was established as part of this study. The study data were collected for the stated research objectives and are maintained by the investigators. Participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected, and individual-level information will not be made publicly available. Only aggregate, de-identified results are reported in the manuscript.

Publications

  • 1. Esmat IM, Mohamed MM, Abdelaal WA, El-Hariri HM, Ashoor TM. Postspinal anesthesia shivering in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries: a randomized controlled comparison between paracetamol and dexamethasone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21:1-3. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01483-7. 2. Paliwal N, Khan IA, Paliwal Sr N. Exploring variability in spinal anesthesia levels achieved during cesarean section deliveries: a narrative review. Cureus 2025;17(7):e88429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88429. 3. Jouryabi AM, Sharami SH, Ghanaie MM, Sedighinejad A, Imantalab V, Sorouri, ZR, et al. Comparing the effects of low dose of ketamine, tramadol, and ondansetron in prevention of post spinal anesthesia shivering in cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 11(4):e116429. doi: 10.5812/aapm.116429. 4. Kanchan S, Shah AM, Shah A, Sameen Z, Arya A, Riaz S, et al. Post spinal anaesthesia shivering-incidence and associated risk factors in patients undergoing lower limb and abdominal surgeries. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022; 10(10):2285-90. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222536. 5. Qi X, Chen D, Li G, Cao J, Yan Y, Li Z, et al. Risk factors associated with intraoperative shivering during caesarean section: a prospective nested case-control study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01596-7. 6. Feng G, Wang Y, Feng J, Luo X, Li C, Yao S. The relationship between core temperature and perioperative shivering during caesarean section under intrathecal anesthesia with bupivacaine and ropivacaine: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth. 2021; 35(6):889-95. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02995-9. 7. Low RG, Izaham A, Zain JM, Nor NM, Low HJ, Yusof AM. Prevention of shivering post subarachnoid block: comparison between different doses of intravenous magnesium sulphate. Medicina. 2022;58(8):1046. doi:10.3390/medicina58081046. 8. Pryambodho, Manggala SK, Sihombing M. Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous meperidine to prevent shivering during spinal anesthesia. Med J Indones. 2022; 31(2):1

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate in people with Post-spinal Shivering, run by Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of post-spinal shivering (time frame: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07838662, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in