Post-spinal ShiveringTRAM-MAGSNCT07838662
Prophylactic Tramadol Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering
A study testing Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate in people with Post-spinal Shivering, run by Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This randomized controlled trial compared prophylactic intravenous tramadol and magnesium sulphate for the prevention of post-spinal shivering among women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-spinal Shivering
- What is being tested?
- Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2024to 10 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women between 18 and 40 years age and undergoing elective cesarean section will be enrolled in the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary, renal, or liver disease, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hypo- or hyperthyroidism.
- Patients with psychiatric disorders or morbid obesity.
- Patients who have received blood transfusion or >2,000 mL fluid intraoperatively.
- Patients with placenta accreta or placenta percreta.
- Patients allergic to either study drug.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: TRAM-MAGS: Tramadol Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering in Elective Cesarean Section
This randomized controlled trial compared prophylactic intravenous tramadol and magnesium sulphate for the prevention of post-spinal shivering among women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.
A total of 106 pregnant women aged 18-40 years were enrolled following ethical approval, informed consent, and counseling. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n=53 each). Group A received tramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously. Both drugs were diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Standardized anesthetic techniques, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were maintained.
Read more
Patients with major cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic disease, thyroid disorders, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, psychiatric illness, morbid obesity, significant blood transfusion or fluid administration, abnormal placental attachment, or relevant drug allergies were excluded.
Spinal anesthesia was performed using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace. Patients were monitored using ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. Post-spinal shivering was defined as involuntary muscle activity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan score of ≥2. The occurrence and severity of shivering were assessed, and adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension were recorded. Shivering was managed with warming, oxygen supplementation, or rescue medication when required.
The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal shivering. Secondary outcomes included shivering severity and adverse effects. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons were performed using the independent-samples t-test for continuous variables where appropriate and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, according to expected cell frequencies. The primary outcome and other categorical outcomes were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous tramadol with intravenous magnesium sulphate for prevention of post-spinal shivering in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over a period of six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.
Spinal anesthesia is widely used for cesarean section because of its rapid onset, reliability, avoidance of airway manipulation, and favorable maternal and neonatal safety profile. However, post-spinal shivering is a relatively common complication and may cause considerable discomfort and anxiety for the patient. Shivering may also interfere with monitoring and may increase oxygen consumption and metabolic demand. Various pharmacological agents have therefore been investigated for prevention and treatment of shivering associated with neuraxial anesthesia. Tramadol has been used as an anti-shivering agent because of its central effects on serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways, while magnesium sulphate may reduce shivering by influencing neuromuscular transmission and lowering the shivering threshold. Previous comparative studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of these agents in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The present study was therefore undertaken to compare the two agents under standardized perioperative conditions.
A total of 106 pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled after obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent. Eligible participants were women aged 18 to 40 years undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were selected through non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were excluded if they had severe systemic disease involving the cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic systems; thyroid disorders; pre-eclampsia or eclampsia; psychiatric illness; morbid obesity; significant intraoperative blood transfusion or excessive fluid administration; abnormal placental attachment; or allergy to any of the study medications.
After enrollment, participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 53 patients each. Group A received tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg intravenously. In both groups, the assigned study medication was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after establishment of spinal anesthesia. Standardized drug doses and similar perioperative conditions were used to ensure comparability between the treatment groups.
All participants received standard preoperative medications and anesthetic management according to the institutional protocol. Preoperative medications included oral ranitidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg on the night before surgery, with intravenous medications administered before anesthesia as per protocol. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the sitting position using a 25- or 26-gauge Quincke needle at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral level. A dose of 2.0-2.2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was used for the spinal block. Ringer lactate was administered as a co-load at 10 mg/kg according to the study protocol. The operating-room temperature was maintained at approximately 24-25°C.
Standard monitoring was applied throughout the perioperative period, including electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. A senior consultant supervised the anesthetic procedures. Data collection was performed by the resident responsible for assessment and documentation according to the study proforma. Standardized anesthesia and monitoring protocols were used in both groups to minimize potential confounding.
The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering after administration of the study medication. Shivering was defined as involuntary, spontaneous muscular activity lasting for more than 15 seconds and reaching a score of 2 or higher on the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The presence or absence of shivering was recorded during the observation period. In patients who developed shivering, the grade of shivering was documented. The severity categories included Grade II, Grade III, and Grade IV in accordance with the scale used in the study.
Secondary assessments included the severity of post-spinal shivering and the occurrence of perioperative adverse effects. Adverse effects monitored during the study included nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension. Patients who developed shivering were managed according to the institutional clinical protocol, including external warming, oxygen supplementation, and rescue pharmacological treatment such as pethidine or dexmedetomidine when clinically indicated.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded for all participants, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and parity. Age was categorized into 18-30 years and 31-40 years for subgroup analysis. BMI was categorized into normal-weight and overweight/obese groups. ASA physical status was categorized as ASA-I or ASA-II. Parity was categorized as parity ≤2 or >2.
The sample size was calculated using the WHO sample size calculator with an assumed statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%. The calculation was based on previously reported shivering frequencies of 7.7% in patients receiving tramadol and 30.8% in patients receiving magnesium sulphate. The resulting sample consisted of 106 participants, with 53 participants allocated to each treatment group.
Data were entered, coded, and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups to assess their comparability. The independent-samples t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables where appropriate. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables, while Fisher's exact test was applied where expected cell frequencies were small. The primary outcome, occurrence of post-spinal shivering, was compared between the two treatment groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Shivering severity grades and perioperative adverse effects were also compared between groups using appropriate categorical tests. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Stratified analysis was performed to assess whether the frequency of post-spinal shivering varied according to important baseline characteristics. Comparisons were stratified by age, BMI, ASA physical status, and parity. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was applied as appropriate within each subgroup. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Post-spinal Shivering
- Being tested
- Tramadol, Magnesium Sulphate
- Keywords
- Magnesium Sulfate, Tramadol, Shivering, Anesthesia Spinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TramadolDrug
Also called Tramadol HCl
Tramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering.
Magnesium SulphateDrug
Also called MgSO₄
Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tramadol Group | Experimental | Participants in this group received prophylactic intravenous tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded. Receives: Drug: Tramadol |
| Magnesium Sulphate Group | Active comparator | Participants in this group received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded. Receives: Drug: Magnesium Sulphate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of post-spinal shivering
Occurrence of post-spinal shivering following spinal anesthesia, defined as involuntary spontaneous muscle hyperactivity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale score ≥2.
Measured: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch
Secondary outcomes (1)
Severity of post-spinal shivering
Severity of shivering assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale and categorized as Grade II, Grade III, or Grade IV among participants who developed shivering.
Measured: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Sep 2026
- Study start10 Oct 2024
- Primary completion10 Oct 2025
- Study completion10 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-spinal ShiveringStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a randomized, parallel-group controlled trial involving 106 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 53 patients each. Group A received prophylactic intravenous tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, while Group B received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg, with each drug diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Both groups received standardized anesthetic management and perioperative monitoring. The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering, with severity assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The groups were compared to determine which prophylactic intervention was more effective in preventing post-spinal shivering.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ayesha Jamal, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07838662
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRTH-Lahore
- Acronym
- TRAM-MAGS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant-level data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers because no data-sharing plan was established as part of this study. The study data were collected for the stated research objectives and are maintained by the investigators. Participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected, and individual-level information will not be made publicly available. Only aggregate, de-identified results are reported in the manuscript.
Publications
1. Esmat IM, Mohamed MM, Abdelaal WA, El-Hariri HM, Ashoor TM. Postspinal anesthesia shivering in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries: a randomized controlled comparison between paracetamol and dexamethasone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21:1-3. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01483-7. 2. Paliwal N, Khan IA, Paliwal Sr N. Exploring variability in spinal anesthesia levels achieved during cesarean section deliveries: a narrative review. Cureus 2025;17(7):e88429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88429. 3. Jouryabi AM, Sharami SH, Ghanaie MM, Sedighinejad A, Imantalab V, Sorouri, ZR, et al. Comparing the effects of low dose of ketamine, tramadol, and ondansetron in prevention of post spinal anesthesia shivering in cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 11(4):e116429. doi: 10.5812/aapm.116429. 4. Kanchan S, Shah AM, Shah A, Sameen Z, Arya A, Riaz S, et al. Post spinal anaesthesia shivering-incidence and associated risk factors in patients undergoing lower limb and abdominal surgeries. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022; 10(10):2285-90. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222536. 5. Qi X, Chen D, Li G, Cao J, Yan Y, Li Z, et al. Risk factors associated with intraoperative shivering during caesarean section: a prospective nested case-control study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01596-7. 6. Feng G, Wang Y, Feng J, Luo X, Li C, Yao S. The relationship between core temperature and perioperative shivering during caesarean section under intrathecal anesthesia with bupivacaine and ropivacaine: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth. 2021; 35(6):889-95. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02995-9. 7. Low RG, Izaham A, Zain JM, Nor NM, Low HJ, Yusof AM. Prevention of shivering post subarachnoid block: comparison between different doses of intravenous magnesium sulphate. Medicina. 2022;58(8):1046. doi:10.3390/medicina58081046. 8. Pryambodho, Manggala SK, Sihombing M. Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous meperidine to prevent shivering during spinal anesthesia. Med J Indones. 2022; 31(2):1
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- TRAM-MAGS: Tramadol Versus Magnesium Sulphate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering in Elective Cesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07838662
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRAM-MAGS / PRTH-Lahore
- Conditions
- Post-spinal Shivering
- Keywords
- Magnesium Sulfate, Tramadol, Shivering, Anesthesia Spinal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital LahoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized controlled trial compared prophylactic intravenous tramadol and magnesium sulphate for the prevention of post-spinal shivering among women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.
A total of 106 pregnant women aged 18-40 years were enrolled following ethical approval, informed consent, and counseling. Participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups (n=53 each). Group A received tramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously. Both drugs were diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Standardized anesthetic techniques, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were maintained.
Patients with major cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic disease, thyroid disorders, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, psychiatric illness, morbid obesity, significant blood transfusion or fluid administration, abnormal placental attachment, or relevant drug allergies were excluded.
Spinal anesthesia was performed using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspace. Patients were monitored using ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. Post-spinal shivering was defined as involuntary muscle activity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan score of ≥2. The occurrence and severity of shivering were assessed, and adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension were recorded. Shivering was managed with warming, oxygen supplementation, or rescue medication when required.
The primary outcome was the incidence of post-spinal shivering. Secondary outcomes included shivering severity and adverse effects. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons were performed using the independent-samples t-test for continuous variables where appropriate and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, according to expected cell frequencies. The primary outcome and other categorical outcomes were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous tramadol with intravenous magnesium sulphate for prevention of post-spinal shivering in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesia, Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, over a period of six months from 10 October 2024 to 10 April 2025.
Spinal anesthesia is widely used for cesarean section because of its rapid onset, reliability, avoidance of airway manipulation, and favorable maternal and neonatal safety profile. However, post-spinal shivering is a relatively common complication and may cause considerable discomfort and anxiety for the patient. Shivering may also interfere with monitoring and may increase oxygen consumption and metabolic demand. Various pharmacological agents have therefore been investigated for prevention and treatment of shivering associated with neuraxial anesthesia. Tramadol has been used as an anti-shivering agent because of its central effects on serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways, while magnesium sulphate may reduce shivering by influencing neuromuscular transmission and lowering the shivering threshold. Previous comparative studies have reported conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of these agents in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. The present study was therefore undertaken to compare the two agents under standardized perioperative conditions.
A total of 106 pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section were enrolled after obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent. Eligible participants were women aged 18 to 40 years undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were selected through non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were excluded if they had severe systemic disease involving the cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic systems; thyroid disorders; pre-eclampsia or eclampsia; psychiatric illness; morbid obesity; significant intraoperative blood transfusion or excessive fluid administration; abnormal placental attachment; or allergy to any of the study medications.
After enrollment, participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups of 53 patients each. Group A received tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenously, while Group B received magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg intravenously. In both groups, the assigned study medication was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after establishment of spinal anesthesia. Standardized drug doses and similar perioperative conditions were used to ensure comparability between the treatment groups.
All participants received standard preoperative medications and anesthetic management according to the institutional protocol. Preoperative medications included oral ranitidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg on the night before surgery, with intravenous medications administered before anesthesia as per protocol. Spinal anesthesia was performed in the sitting position using a 25- or 26-gauge Quincke needle at the L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral level. A dose of 2.0-2.2 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine was used for the spinal block. Ringer lactate was administered as a co-load at 10 mg/kg according to the study protocol. The operating-room temperature was maintained at approximately 24-25°C.
Standard monitoring was applied throughout the perioperative period, including electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, pulse rate, and temperature monitoring. A senior consultant supervised the anesthetic procedures. Data collection was performed by the resident responsible for assessment and documentation according to the study proforma. Standardized anesthesia and monitoring protocols were used in both groups to minimize potential confounding.
The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering after administration of the study medication. Shivering was defined as involuntary, spontaneous muscular activity lasting for more than 15 seconds and reaching a score of 2 or higher on the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The presence or absence of shivering was recorded during the observation period. In patients who developed shivering, the grade of shivering was documented. The severity categories included Grade II, Grade III, and Grade IV in accordance with the scale used in the study.
Secondary assessments included the severity of post-spinal shivering and the occurrence of perioperative adverse effects. Adverse effects monitored during the study included nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, arrhythmia, and hypotension. Patients who developed shivering were managed according to the institutional clinical protocol, including external warming, oxygen supplementation, and rescue pharmacological treatment such as pethidine or dexmedetomidine when clinically indicated.
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded for all participants, including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and parity. Age was categorized into 18-30 years and 31-40 years for subgroup analysis. BMI was categorized into normal-weight and overweight/obese groups. ASA physical status was categorized as ASA-I or ASA-II. Parity was categorized as parity ≤2 or >2.
The sample size was calculated using the WHO sample size calculator with an assumed statistical power of 80% and a significance level of 5%. The calculation was based on previously reported shivering frequencies of 7.7% in patients receiving tramadol and 30.8% in patients receiving magnesium sulphate. The resulting sample consisted of 106 participants, with 53 participants allocated to each treatment group.
Data were entered, coded, and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables were assessed for distribution and summarized as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups to assess their comparability. The independent-samples t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables where appropriate. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables, while Fisher's exact test was applied where expected cell frequencies were small. The primary outcome, occurrence of post-spinal shivering, was compared between the two treatment groups using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Shivering severity grades and perioperative adverse effects were also compared between groups using appropriate categorical tests. A two-sided p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Stratified analysis was performed to assess whether the frequency of post-spinal shivering varied according to important baseline characteristics. Comparisons were stratified by age, BMI, ASA physical status, and parity. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was applied as appropriate within each subgroup. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a randomized, parallel-group controlled trial involving 106 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two groups of 53 patients each. Group A received prophylactic intravenous tramadol 0.5 mg/kg, while Group B received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg, with each drug diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered after spinal anesthesia. Both groups received standardized anesthetic management and perioperative monitoring. The primary outcome was the occurrence of post-spinal shivering, with severity assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale. The groups were compared to determine which prophylactic intervention was more effective in preventing post-spinal shivering.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tramadol Group | Experimental | Drug: TramadolParticipants in this group received prophylactic intravenous tramadol at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded. |
| Magnesium Sulphate Group | Active comparator | Drug: Magnesium SulphateParticipants in this group received prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulphate at a dose of 30 mg/kg after administration of spinal anesthesia. The drug was diluted in 100 mL isotonic saline and administered according to the study protocol. Standardized spinal anesthesia, perioperative monitoring, operating-room temperature, fluid co-loading, and postoperative observation were provided. Post-spinal shivering was assessed using the Crossley and Mahajan scale, and its occurrence and severity were recorded. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant women between 18 and 40 years age and undergoing elective cesarean section will be enrolled in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with severe cardiopulmonary, renal, or liver disease, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hypo- or hyperthyroidism.
- Patients with psychiatric disorders or morbid obesity.
- Patients who have received blood transfusion or >2,000 mL fluid intraoperatively.
- Patients with placenta accreta or placenta percreta.
- Patients allergic to either study drug.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TramadolAlso: Tramadol HClTramadol 0.5 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering. | Drug | Tramadol Group |
| Magnesium SulphateAlso: MgSO₄Magnesium sulphate 30 mg/kg intravenously in 100 mL isotonic saline after spinal anesthesia for prevention of post-spinal shivering. | Drug | Magnesium Sulphate Group |
Primary outcome
Incidence of post-spinal shivering
Time frame: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch
Occurrence of post-spinal shivering following spinal anesthesia, defined as involuntary spontaneous muscle hyperactivity lasting more than 15 seconds with a Crossley and Mahajan shivering scale score ≥2.
1 secondary outcome
Severity of post-spinal shivering
Time frame: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
- Results publication1. Esmat IM, Mohamed MM, Abdelaal WA, El-Hariri HM, Ashoor TM. Postspinal anesthesia shivering in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries: a randomized controlled comparison between paracetamol and dexamethasone. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021; 21:1-3. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01483-7. 2. Paliwal N, Khan IA, Paliwal Sr N. Exploring variability in spinal anesthesia levels achieved during cesarean section deliveries: a narrative review. Cureus 2025;17(7):e88429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88429. 3. Jouryabi AM, Sharami SH, Ghanaie MM, Sedighinejad A, Imantalab V, Sorouri, ZR, et al. Comparing the effects of low dose of ketamine, tramadol, and ondansetron in prevention of post spinal anesthesia shivering in cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 11(4):e116429. doi: 10.5812/aapm.116429. 4. Kanchan S, Shah AM, Shah A, Sameen Z, Arya A, Riaz S, et al. Post spinal anaesthesia shivering-incidence and associated risk factors in patients undergoing lower limb and abdominal surgeries. Int J Res Med Sci. 2022; 10(10):2285-90. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20222536. 5. Qi X, Chen D, Li G, Cao J, Yan Y, Li Z, et al. Risk factors associated with intraoperative shivering during caesarean section: a prospective nested case-control study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01596-7. 6. Feng G, Wang Y, Feng J, Luo X, Li C, Yao S. The relationship between core temperature and perioperative shivering during caesarean section under intrathecal anesthesia with bupivacaine and ropivacaine: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth. 2021; 35(6):889-95. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02995-9. 7. Low RG, Izaham A, Zain JM, Nor NM, Low HJ, Yusof AM. Prevention of shivering post subarachnoid block: comparison between different doses of intravenous magnesium sulphate. Medicina. 2022;58(8):1046. doi:10.3390/medicina58081046. 8. Pryambodho, Manggala SK, Sihombing M. Intravenous magnesium sulfate versus intravenous meperidine to prevent shivering during spinal anesthesia. Med J Indones. 2022; 31(2):1
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant-level data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers because no data-sharing plan was established as part of this study. The study data were collected for the stated research objectives and are maintained by the investigators. Participant confidentiality and privacy will be protected, and individual-level information will not be made publicly available. Only aggregate, de-identified results are reported in the manuscript.
Related trials for Post-spinal Shivering
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Two Doses of IV Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering
Post Spinal Anesthesia Shivering
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Optimizing the Paracetamol Dose for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries
Shivering, Postoperative Shivering
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Preoperative Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Incidence of Intraoperative Shivering in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
Shivering, Hypothermia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Intravenous Paracetamol Versus Magnesium Sulfate for Control of Shivering Following Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
Shivering, Post-Spinal Shivering
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Intravenous Midazolam-Ketamine Combination Versus Placebo for Prevention of Post-Spinal Shivering in Elective Cesarean Section
Shivering, Post-Spinal Shivering
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tramadol and Magnesium Sulphate in people with Post-spinal Shivering, run by Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of post-spinal shivering (time frame: From administration of spinal anesthesia until the end of the surgical procedure-Last Stitch). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07838662, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.