AzTrials
AzTrials

Upper Crossed SyndromeJAM-USCNCT07841639

Comparative Effect of Janda's Approach and Mckenzie Exercises in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome

A study testing McKenzie Treatment, Janda's Approach and Baseline Treatment in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was conducted compare the effect Janda's Approach and Mckenzie Excercises in patients with Upper Crossed Syndrome Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 35 years
Conditions the study is for
Upper Crossed Syndrome
What is being tested?
McKenzie Treatment, Janda's Approach and Baseline Treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Oct 2025to 25 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both male and females
  • Age between 20-35 years
  • Excessive Forward Head > 46
  • Excessive Forward shoulder > 52
  • Excessive kyphosis > 42
  • Neck pain scores 4-8 on NPRS
  • Sedentary or moderately active individuals with prolonged desk/workstation use
  • Functional disability ≥10% on the Neck Disability Index

Who cannot join

  • Cervical and upper limb fracture history.
  • Has vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
  • History of surgery to the cervical spine.
  • Infections or neoplastic processes of the spine.
  • Diagnosed cases of osteoporosis.
  • Rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis.
  • Pregnancy
  • Neurological disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Shagufta Medical Complex

    Sheikhupura, Punjab Province, 39460

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effect of Janda's Approach and Mckenzie Exercises on Pain Intensity, Craniovertebral Angle and Functional Disability in Patients With Upper Cross Syndrome

This study was conducted compare the effect Janda's Approach and Mckenzie Excercises in patients with Upper Crossed Syndrome

Being tested
McKenzie Treatment, Janda's Approach, Baseline Treatment
Keywords
Upper Cross Syndrome, Janda's Approach, McKenzie Exercises, Craniovertebral Angle, Neck Disability, Forward Head Posture
Medical subject headings
Oculocerebral hypopigmentation syndrome type Preus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • McKenzie TreatmentOther

    • Cervical Retraction (Chin Tucks) and Basic Postural Drills: 5-10 reps for, 3-4 times/day.
    • Cervical Extension in lying and Thoracic Extension: 10-15 reps for 30-35 minutes.
    • Shoulder Retraction, Prone Scapular Squeeze and Wall Angels: 5-10 sec hold, more sets.
    • Standing Shoulder Rows (with resistance band) and Neck Isometrics: Functional drills for 40 mins.
    • Sitting Posture Drills and Computer Ergonomics Practice: Stimulate workstation posture tasks for 40-45 minutes.
    • Full McKenzie Cervical Series and Posture Checklist: Emphasize home program, relapse prevention for 45 minutes.
  • Janda's ApproachOther

    Week 1:

    • Chin Tucks (Deep Neck Flexors): 3 sets x 10-12 reps
    • Scapular Retraction (Low Resistance):3 sets x 10-12 reps
    • Pectoralis Stretch (Doorway Stretch): 30 seconds x 2
    • Upper Trapezius Stretch (Lateral Neck Flexion): 30 seconds x 2
    • Educate on sitting posture and workstation ergonomics

    Week 2:

    • Chin Tucks: 3 sets x 12-15 reps
    • Prone Y/T/W: 3 sets x 10-12 reps
    • Levator Scapulae Stretch: 30 seconds x 2
    • Pectoralis Stretch: 30 seconds x 2
    • Begin postural correction during daily activities (sitting, standing)

    Week 3:

    • Chin Tucks: 3 sets x 15 reps
    • Prone Y/T/W: 3 sets x 15 reps
    • Upper Trapezius Stretch: 45 seconds x 2
    • Levator Scapulae Stretch: 45 seconds x 2
    • Correct head positioning during tasks like typing or sitting

    Week 4:

    • Scapular Retraction with Resistance Bands: 3 sets x 10 reps
    • Shoulder Retraction: 3 sets x 10-12 reps
    • Pectoralis Stretch: 45 seconds x 2
    • Upper Trapezius Stretch: 45 seconds x 2
    • Focus on functional postural exercises (standing rows)
  • Baseline TreatmentOther

    • Application of a heating pad for muscle relaxation (10 minutes)
    • TENS therapy (10 minutes) to alleviate pain
    • Range-of-motion exercises for the cervical spine and shoulders to maintain flexibility.
    • Stretching exercises targeted the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and pectoralis muscles
Study groups in NCT07841639
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Janda's ApproachActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Janda's Approach; Other: Baseline Treatment
Mckenzie ExcercisesActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: McKenzie Treatment; Other: Baseline Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    The 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) ranged from 0 to 10, with 10 denoting "the highest level of pain imaginable" and 0 denoting "no pain". It was a simple indicator of pain intensity since patients chose the number that most accurately represented their level of pain.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.

  2. Neck Disability Index

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was a standardized, self-administered questionnaire used to evaluate how neck pain affected a person's ability to perform everyday activities. It consisted of 10 items that assessed different aspects of life impacted by neck pain, including pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item was scored on a scale from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicated greater disability. The total score could range from 0 to 50 and was often converted into a percentage to interpret the level of disability. A score between 0-8% suggested no disability, 10-28% indicated mild disability, 30-48% moderate disability, 50-64% severe disability, and 70% or higher reflected complete disability.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  3. Photogrammetry Method for Craniovertebral Angle

    A photogrammetric method was used to evaluate forward head posture (craniovertebral angle), rounded shoulders, and thoracic kyphosis from a lateral view. Key anatomical landmarks-tragus, acromion, C7, and T12-were marked on participants. Individuals stood in a natural posture, barefoot, on a marked board while facing forward. A digital camera, placed 265 cm away, captured three side-view photographs.

    The images were analyzed using USC software, which measured:

    • Forward head angle: angle between the line from tragus to C7 and the vertical.
    • Rounded shoulder angle: angle from acromion to the vertical.
    • Kyphosis angle: arc between C7 and T12.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  4. ROM Cervical Spine (Flexion)

    Changes in cervical spine flexion ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  5. ROM Cervical Spine (Extension)

    Changes in cervical spine extension ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  6. ROM Cervical Spine (Lateral Flexion) Right Side

    Changes in cervical spine lateral flexion on right side ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  7. ROM Cervical Spine (Lateral Flexion) Left Side

    Changes in cervical spine lateral flexion on left side ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  8. ROM Cervical Spine (Rotation) Right Side

    Changes in cervical spine rotation on right side ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

  9. ROM Cervical Spine (Rotation) Left Side

    Changes in cervical spine rotation on left side ROM at baseline and 6th week of intervention was measured using goniometer.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion25 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07841639
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR & AHS/25/0145
Acronym
JAM-USC
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
21 Sep 2026
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Aneis YM, El-Badrawy NM, El-Ganainy AA, Atta HK. The effectiveness of a multimodal approach in the treatment of patients with upper crossed syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2022 Oct;32:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 18.

    PubMed 36180139
  • Jeong GH, Lee BH. Effects of Telerehabilitation Combining Diaphragmatic Breathing Re-Education and Shoulder Stabilization Exercises on Neck Pain, Posture, and Function in Young Adult Men with Upper Crossed Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 11;13(6):1612. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061612.

    PubMed 38541838
  • Titcomb DA, Melton BF, Miyashita T, Bland HW. The Effects of Postural Education or Corrective Exercise on the Craniovertebral Angle in Young Adults with Forward Head Posture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Aug 1;16(1):954-973. doi: 10.70252/PYPQ8483. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37649869
  • Haghighat F, Moradi R, Rezaie M, Yarahmadi N, Ghaffarnejad F. Added value of diaphragm myofascial release on forward head posture and chest expansion in women with symptomatic forward head posture: A randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2025 Dec;45:645-651. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.015. Epub 2025 Aug 8.

    PubMed 41316631
  • Kim Y, Cha Y, Yoon S. Effects of hip extensor exercises on neck disability, cervical alignment, muscle imbalance, and blood flow in forward head posture. Technol Health Care. 2026 Mar;34(2):145-153. doi: 10.1177/09287329251392400. Epub 2025 Nov 11.

    PubMed 41217962

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing McKenzie Treatment, Janda's Approach and Baseline Treatment in people with Upper Crossed Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks.). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07841639, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in