AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaSANDBOXNCT07842029

Evaluation of Blood-Based Biomarkers and Remote Cognitive Assessment for Dementia Triage (SANDBOX)

An observational study of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, run by Prima Mente at 12 sites in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK, and long waits for diagnosis can delay access to care and treatment. The SANDBOX study is a research study in NHS Memory Clinics investigating whether providing clinicians with additional test results could help them diagnose dementia earlier. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dementia, Cognitive Impairment
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
12 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
13 Nov 2025to 30 Nov 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults aged 50 years or older with subjective or objective cognitive impairment who have been referred to Memory Clinics for diagnostic clarification. Participants are recruited from Memory Clinic waiting lists across multiple NHS sites in England and Wales and are awaiting secondary care assessment for memory concerns. The study population includes individuals experiencing cognitive difficulties but without a prior dementia diagnosis.

Who may be able to join

  • The participant is willing and able to provide informed consent for participation in the study, or if unable to consent, a consultee (nearest of kin or holder of Power of Attorney) is available to make a declaration.
  • Eligibility for recruitment in Scotland is restricted to participants who are able to provide informed consent themselves; participants requiring consultee consent will not be recruited in Scotland.
  • Male or female, aged 50 years or older.
  • The participant is currently on a waiting list for a participating Memory Clinic.
  • The participant lives within traveling distance to a study site.
  • The participant agrees to complete all study procedures, including genetic testing.

Who cannot join

  • The participant may not enter the study if any of the following criteria apply:
  • The participant has known or anticipated challenges with venous blood sampling.
  • The participant is not fluent in English.
  • The participant has a historical diagnosis of dementia.

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Victoria B Medina, MRes contact

+447493339995

victoria@primamente.com

Hayley Holt, PhD contact

hayley@primamente.com

12 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom12 sites, 11 recruiting
  • Bradford District Care Foundation Trust

    Bradford, BD9 6DP

    Ireen Mumba, +44 07385113354, ireen.mumba@bdct.nhs.uk

    Gregor Russell

    Recruiting
  • Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board

    Bridgend, CF31 1RQ

    Cerys Evenden, +44 01656 752477, Cerys.Evenden@wales.nhs.uk

    Eleanor James, +44 01685 728803, Eleanor.James@wales.nhs.uk

    Recruiting
  • Hywel Dda University Health Board

    Llanelli, SA148QF

    Active, not recruiting
  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, Greater London, W6 8RF

    Rylie Johnson, +44 2033115228, rylie.johnson@nhs.net

    Richard Perry

    Recruiting
  • Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust

    London, London, NW5 3EG

    Joe Gilbert, +44 07858679543, joe.gilbert2@nhs.net

    Guy Harman

    Recruiting
  • West London NHS Trust

    London, London, UB1 3HW

    Petya Apostolova, +44 07517 988317, petya.apostolova1@nhs.net

    Malgorzata Raczek

    Recruiting
  • Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

    London, Surrey, KT22 7AD

    Aisling Quinn, 01372 216584, Aisling.Quinn@sabp.nhs.uk

    Ramin Nilforooshan

    Recruiting
  • Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5PL

    Claire Airey, 07974 096892, Claire.airey@cntw.nhs.uk

    Meher Lad

    Recruiting
  • Aneurin Bevan University Health Board Clinical Research Centre

    Newport, Wales, NP20 2UB

    Heeam Nassa, 01633 238480, ABB.RandD@wales.nhs.uk

    Chineze Ivenso

    Recruiting
  • Cardiff and Vale University Health Board

    Penarth, CF64 2XX

    Matthew Forrester, +44 02921826908, Matthew.Forester@wales.nhs.uk

    Biju Mohamed

    Recruiting
  • Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust

    Reading, RG6 7BE

    Mathew Baker, +44 07411339048, research@berkshire.nhs.uk

    Rohan Vanderputt

    Recruiting
  • Swansea Bay University Health Board

    Swansea, SA2 8PP

    Caradog Thomas, +44 01792957587, caradog.thomas@wales.nhs.uk

    Alison Blows, +44 01792 957588, Alison.Blows@wales.nhs.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: SANDBOX: Scalable Assessment of Neurodegenerative Diagnosis Via Biomarkers and Online Examination

Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK, and long waits for diagnosis can delay access to care and treatment. The SANDBOX study is a research study in NHS Memory Clinics investigating whether providing clinicians with additional test results could help them diagnose dementia earlier.

Adults aged 50 or over who have been referred to a Memory Clinic by their GP may be invited to take part. Taking part is voluntary and will not affect a participant's care. Participation adds to their NHS care and does not replace or delay it.

Read more

Participants complete three assessments: a blood test that measures two proteins which can indicate whether Alzheimer's-related changes may be happening in the brain (not currently available on the NHS); a genetic test for the APOE gene, which influences Alzheimer's risk; and a cognitive assessment of memory and thinking that includes a recorded speech task analysed for subtle language changes. All results are shared with the participant's clinician.

This research will help determine whether this approach can support earlier dementia diagnosis and improve care for patients across the UK.

Read the detailed description

The SANDBOX study evaluates an approach to integrating blood-based biomarkers, APOE4 genetic testing, and digitally administered cognitive assessments into Memory Clinic diagnostic pathways. The primary aim is to assess whether this approach improves efficiency of dementia diagnosis and patient flow through Memory Clinic services.

Participants will undergo baseline assessment including venous blood draw (42.5 mL) for analysis of plasma phosphorylated tau-217, epigenetic markers in cell-free DNA, and APOE4 genotyping. Dried blood spot samples will be collected via finger-prick.

Digital cognitive testing will be conducted using CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) and recorded speech analysis.

Blood biomarker and genetic results will be withheld from clinical teams until participants have a Memory Clinic appointment scheduled, to prevent bias in triage decisions. Results will then be shared with clinicians to support diagnostic assessment. All participants will be offered genetic counseling regarding APOE4 status.

A follow-up assessment occurs at 12 months (repeat blood draws and cognitive testing). Psychological impact of genetic disclosure will be monitored using validated questionnaires (Health Anxiety Inventory, CES-D, EQ-5D-5L, IGT-AD Scale).

Health economic analysis will evaluate cost-effectiveness of the triage system compared to standard UK practice. AI-based exploratory analyses will investigate relationships between biomarkers and dementia progression.

Keywords
SANDBOX, dementia, cognitive impairment, cognitive decline, Alzheimer's, Neurodegeneration
Medical subject headings
Dementia, Cognitive Dysfunction, Nerve Degeneration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Memory Clinic Performance Metrics

    Time from the date of referral to the participant's Memory Clinic to the date of their first clinical assessment appointment. Reported as the mean number of days from referral to assessment.

    Measured: From referral into the Memory Service through first Memory Clinic assessment (up to 12 months)

  2. Usability and Acceptability of Biomarker Enabled Approach-Clinician Feedback

    Clinician feedback on the usability and acceptability of the biomarker-enabled approach is assessed using a structured questionnaire. Responses are recorded using categorical Likert-type scales (e.g., Very satisfied to Very dissatisfied), scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction or perceived effectiveness of the triage system. We will aggregate scores into a composite overall acceptability score.

    Measured: Every 3 months throughout the study (up to 36 months)

  3. Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)

    Health-related quality of life measured using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The instrument includes five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each scored on a 5-level scale ranging from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). Domain responses are combined into a single EQ-5D-5L index score, where higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  4. Health-Related Quality of Life - Self Rated Overall Health (EQ VAS)

    Self-reported health status measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). The VAS ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health imaginable and 100 represents the best health imaginable. Higher VAS scores indicate better self-reported health status.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers (PrecivityAD2)

    Plasma Alzheimer's disease biomarkers measured using the PrecivityAD2 blood test (C2N Diagnostics), including the amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40), percent phosphorylated tau-217 (%p-tau217). The Amyloid Probability Score (APS2) is a composite algorithm score derived from these biomarkers and ranges from 0 to 100, correlated with clinical diagnosis and cognitive performance. Higher APS2 values indicate a greater likelihood of brain amyloid pathology consistent with Alzheimer's disease. APS2 values from 0-47 are interpreted as negative for brain amyloid plaques, while higher scores indicate increased probability of amyloid positivity.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  2. Epigenetic Biomarkers in Cell-Free DNA

    Methylation biomarkers in cell-free DNA analyzed by our models for associations with dementia-related clinical variables, including diagnosis and cognitive performance.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 6 months (Study Visit 4), and 12 months (Study Visit 5)

  3. Digital Cognitive Testing Performance (CANTAB)

    Cognitive performance measured by CANTAB (Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery) across multiple domains including episodic memory, visuospatial working memory, attention, associative learning, decision-making, visual-constructional ability, planning, processing speed, and task switching. Performance is reported as standardized z-scores and percentiles relative to an age-matched reference population. Z-scores range from negative to positive values, where 0 represents average performance; positive values indicate above-average cognitive performance and negative values indicate below-average performance.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  4. Voice-Based Biomarkers from Free Speech Analysis

    Speech parameters analysed from digitally recorded free speech tasks (narration of a complex scene with delayed repetition). Participants verbally describe the "cookie jar" scene and, after completing the CANTAB digital cognitive assessment, are asked to repeat the narration from memory. Speech recordings are analysed to derive quantitative speech parameters reflecting language production, including measures of fluency, lexical complexity, and acoustic features.These parameters are combined into a composite score reflecting evidence of dementia-related changes in speed, which is evaluated for associations with cognitive impairment.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  5. Clinical and Demographic Data

    Diagnosis, in-clinic cognitive test results, and demographic variables to characterise the study population and explore associations with dementia biomarkers.

    Measured: Study Visit 2, occurring at variable timepoints up to 12 months after baseline depending on clinic wait times

  6. Acceptability and Feedback of Biomarker Enabled-Approach

    Participant acceptability of the genetic risk disclosure and biomarker enabled approach assessed using a study-specific 8-item questionnaire. The questionnaire includes categorical response options such as Likert-type ratings (e.g., strongly disagree to strongly agree), ordinal satisfaction scales (e.g., very satisfied to very dissatisfied), binary responses, and open-ended feedback. Responses are analysed descriptively to assess participant perceptions of the genetic risk disclosure and diagnostic process.

    Measured: 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3) and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  7. Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Anxiety Symptoms (Health Anxiety Inventory)

    Health anxiety symptoms assessed using the Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI). The HAI consists of multiple items assessing concerns about health and illness, with responses scored on a Likert-type scale and summed to generate a total score. Total scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating greater health-related anxiety.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  8. Psychological impact of genetic disclosure: Assessment of Depression Symptoms (CES-D)

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The CES-D includes 20 items assessing symptoms of depression over the past week. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.

    Measured: Baseline (Study Visit 1), 2 weeks after return of results (Study Visit 3), and 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  9. Genetic Risk Perception and Understanding (IGT-AD Scale)

    Genetic risk perception and understanding assessed using the REVEAL Impact of Genetic Testing in Alzheimer's Disease (IGT-AD) Scale. The questionnaire includes multiple items rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (often). Item scores are summed to produce a total score, with higher scores indicating greater psychological impact or concern related to receiving genetic testing results.

    Measured: 12 months (Study Visit 4)

  10. Per-Patient Cost of Biomarker Enabled Approach Implementation

    Cost estimates per patient derived from resource requirements for blood collection, phlebotomy services, dried blood spot kits, biomarker laboratory analysis (PrecivityAD2 and epigenetic markers), genetic testing, and remote cognitive testing infrastructure.

    Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), calculated from resource utilisation data

  11. Diagnostic Efficiency Compared to Standard UK Practice

    Time from GP referral to clinical diagnosis in study participants compared to standard UK practice using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) data as the comparator.

    Measured: Measured from baseline through Memory Clinic diagnosis (up to 12 months); compared to CPRD data throughout study duration (up to 36 months)

  12. Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) Gained

    Incremental quality-adjusted life-years gained due to earlier diagnosis and access to pharmacological (e.g., donepezil) and non-pharmacological care (e.g., dementia support workers, caregiver support), calculated from EQ-5D-5L data using health economic modeling.

    Measured: Study duration (up to 36 months) with health economic modeling projecting outcomes over ≥10 years

  13. Cost-Effectiveness by APOE4 Carrier Status (Subgroup Analysis)

    Incremental cost-effectiveness results stratified by APOE4 carrier status (non-carrier, heterozygous carrier, homozygous carrier) to evaluate variability in outcomes and cost per QALY gained based on genetic risk category.

    Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with health economic modeling

  14. Health Economic Model Robustness

    Results of probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses to quantify the impact of data uncertainty and structural model assumptions on cost-effectiveness estimates.

    Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months), with final analysis upon study completion

  15. Healthcare Resource Utilisation

    Healthcare resource utilisation following diagnostic evaluation, measured as the number of further investigations requested or avoided per participant (e.g., additional bloods, MRI, or other diagnostic tests), derived from a survey completed by the treating clinical team. The number of investigations are used to characterise healthcare resource use associated with the diagnostic pathway.

    Measured: Throughout study duration (up to 36 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2026
  2. Study start13 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07842029
Sponsor's protocol ID
SB-001
Other IDs
347200
Acronym
SANDBOX
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
13 Feb 2026
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment, run by Prima Mente at 12 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Victoria B Medina, MRes (+447493339995, victoria@primamente.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Memory Clinic Performance Metrics (time frame: From referral into the Memory Service through first Memory Clinic assessment (up to 12 months)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in