AzTrials
AzTrials

Right-sided Double-lumen Tube PositioningNCT07849400

Video-guided Versus Conventional Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Placement for Thoracoscopic Surgery

A study testing Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube and Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in people with Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Positioning and Lung Isolation During Thoracoscopic Surgery, run by Diansan Su at 3 sites in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Right-sided double-lumen tubes are used for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery but can be difficult to position because of right bronchial anatomy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare a continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube with a conventional right-sided double-lumen… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube and Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
566 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Oct 2026to 30 May 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
  • Patients scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery requiring lung isolation with a right-sided double-lumen tube.
  • Patients who provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to placement of a right-sided double-lumen tube, including right main bronchial lesions that preclude its use.
  • Known tracheobronchial anatomical abnormalities.
  • Known or anticipated difficult airway.
  • Requirement for rapid sequence induction.
  • Emergency surgery.
  • Thoracic surgery within 4 weeks before enrollment, recent respiratory infection, or known or suspected pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Severe respiratory instability.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial that may affect the study outcomes.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China3 sites
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine,

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

    Research Coordinator, 86057187236169, wen_heng@yeah.net

  • Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University(The First Hospital of Jiaxing)

    Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000

    Yang Research Coordinator, 8617816519327, mail17816519327@163.com

  • The Second Hospital of Jiaxing

    Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000

    Chang Research Coordinator, 8615157300638, 15157300638@163.com

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Continuous Video-guided Versus Conventional Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Placement for Lung Isolation in Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Right-sided double-lumen tubes are used for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery but can be difficult to position because of right bronchial anatomy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial will compare a continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube with a conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery requiring right-sided lung isolation. The primary objective is to determine whether continuous video guidance increases the rate of successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning. Secondary outcomes include positioning time, clinically relevant intraoperative tube displacement, rescue fiberoptic bronchoscopy, lung collapse quality, hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation, and airway-related complications.

Being tested
Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube, Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Multiple Pulmonary Nodules

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tubeDevice

    Participants will receive a continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery. The device incorporates an integrated visualization system that provides continuous real-time airway visualization during tube positioning and intraoperative management.

  • Conventional right-sided double-lumen tubeDevice

    Participants will receive a conventional right-sided double-lumen tube for lung isolation during thoracoscopic surgery according to standard clinical practice.

Study groups in NCT07849400
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tubeExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube
Conventional right-sided double-lumen tubeActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning assessed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy

    Successful initial positioning is defined as Grade 1 (optimal) or Grade 2 (acceptable) tube position at the first protocol-mandated fiberoptic bronchoscopic assessment before any bronchoscopic adjustment. Grade 3 (malposition) is considered unsuccessful. Successful positioning requires an acceptable bronchial cuff position, adequate alignment of the right upper-lobe ventilation slot with the right upper-lobe bronchial orifice, absence of clinically relevant right upper-lobe obstruction, and a patent bronchus intermedius without the need for further advancement, withdrawal, or rotation of the tube. Each participant will be classified as successful or unsuccessful.

    Measured: Intraoperatively, immediately after initial tube positioning and before initiation of one-lung ventilation.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Time to initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning

    Time in seconds from passage of the double-lumen tube through the vocal cords into the trachea until the anesthesiologist completes the initial right-sided bronchial positioning and no further tube advancement, withdrawal, or rotation is performed before the protocol-mandated fiberoptic bronchoscopic assessment.

    Measured: Periprocedural, during initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning.

  2. Number of unplanned intraoperative right-sided double-lumen tube repositioning events per participant

    An event is defined as any unplanned advancement, withdrawal, rotation, or other repositioning of the right-sided double-lumen tube after satisfactory initial positioning has been confirmed. Minor positional changes not requiring intervention are not counted. For each repositioning event, the use of unplanned fiberoptic bronchoscopy for guidance or confirmation will be recorded as an event characteristic. The total number of repositioning events will be recorded for each participant.

    Measured: Intraoperatively, from confirmation of satisfactory initial tube position until completion of one-lung ventilation.

  3. Quality of surgical lung collapse assessed by a 3-point surgeon-rated scale

    The operating surgeon will assess the quality of surgical lung collapse using a predefined 3-point ordinal scale: 1 = poor, lung collapse is insufficient and interferes with surgical exposure or requires additional intervention; 2 = moderate, lung collapse is partially adequate with some interference with surgical exposure but without the need for additional intervention; and 3 = good, lung collapse is adequate and does not interfere with surgical exposure. Higher scores indicate better lung collapse.

    Measured: Intraoperatively, approximately 20 minutes after initiation of one-lung ventilation.

  4. Number of hypoxemic episodes during one-lung ventilation per participant

    A hypoxemic episode is defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) below 90% for at least 1 minute during one-lung ventilation, measured continuously by pulse oximetry. A new hypoxemic episode will be counted only after SpO₂ has recovered to 90% or above for at least 1 minute following the previous episode. The total number of hypoxemic episodes will be recorded for each participant.

    Measured: Intraoperatively, during one-lung ventilation.

  5. Airway-related complications

    Measured: From airway instrumentation until 24 hours after surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 May 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
566 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07849400
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZJU20260827
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
13 Sep 2026
Last updated
30 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The plan for sharing de-identified individual participant data has not yet been finalized. Any future data sharing will be considered in accordance with participant privacy, institutional data governance, applicable ethics requirements, and relevant study policies.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Continuous video-guided right-sided double-lumen tube and Conventional right-sided double-lumen tube in people with Right-sided Double-lumen Tube Positioning and Lung Isolation During Thoracoscopic Surgery, run by Diansan Su at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heng Wen (+86057187236169, wen_heng@yeah.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with successful initial right-sided double-lumen tube positioning assessed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy (time frame: Intraoperatively, immediately after initial tube positioning and before initiation of one-lung ventilation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in