Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)RAPTORNCT07853001
Patient Reported Outcomes and Different Renal Artery Clamping Techniques During Robot Assisted Kidney Resection
A study testing Standard clamping strategy and Early declamping strategy in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), run by Bjarte Almas at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The target population for this study consists of all patients undergoing kidney surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, with the primary focus being patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. The study has two main objectives. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)
- What is being tested?
- Standard clamping strategy and Early declamping strategy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Sep 2034
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed written informed consent obtained prior to any study specific procedures
- Patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol
- Age >18
- Patients scheduled for robot-assisted partial kidney resection with either the trans- or retroperitoneal access
- Other patients scheduled for surgery for kidney cancer, to be included as control group
Who cannot join
- Previous kidney surgery on the affected side
- Preexisting extensive intraabdominal adhesions preventing the use of the transabdominal access
- Preexisting severe pain condition requiring regular use of opioids adding up to more than equivalent of 10mg po morphine daily
- Any other physical or mental illness that according to the treating surgeon makes the patient unfit for inclusion in the study
- Confirmed metastatic renal cancer or any other metastatic cancer.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Norway1 site
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, Vestland, 5008
Bjarte Almås, MD, PhD, +4755971637, bjarte.almas@helse-bergen.no
Karin M. Hjelle, MD, PhD, +4755975000, karin.margrethe.hjelle@helse-bergen.no
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Cohort Study With Emphasis on Patient Reported Outcomes and Different Renal Artery Clamping Techniques During Robot Assisted Kidney Resection - the RAPTOR Study
The target population for this study consists of all patients undergoing kidney surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, with the primary focus being patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The study has two main objectives. First, the investigators aim to assess whether a flank approach to robot assisted partial nephrectomy may be superior to a trans abdominal approach with regard to postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life. Second, while conducting this study, the investigators also seek to compare two methods of renal artery clamping during the partial nephrectomy procedure. Specifically, the investigators aim to determine whether a technique that reduces the duration of ischemia can be performed without causing an unacceptable increase in blood loss or postoperative complications.
Read the detailed description
Renal cell carcinoma can be managed with surgical excision, surveillance, or ablative techniques. For localized renal tumors, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become a standard treatment because it preserves renal function while maintaining oncological outcomes comparable to radical nephrectomy. Two minimally invasive surgical approaches are commonly used for RAPN: the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach. Although both techniques are considered safe and effective, existing literature has mainly focused on perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, complications, and oncological results. Limited data are available regarding patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life.
The RAPTOR study is a prospective clinical study designed to evaluate both patient-reported outcomes after kidney surgery and surgical outcomes associated with different renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The first study component (PROMs arm) will compare patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the retroperitoneal approach results in reduced postoperative pain compared with the transperitoneal approach. Secondary objectives include comparisons of postoperative opioid consumption, recovery after surgery, quality of life, duration of sick leave, perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and long-term renal function.
The second study component (clamping arm) is a randomized comparison of two commonly used renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. During standard declamping, the renal artery clamp remains in place until all renorrhaphy suturing has been completed. During early declamping, the renal artery clamp is removed after closure of the resection bed but before completion of renorrhaphy. Early declamping may reduce warm ischemia time and thereby preserve renal function, but concerns remain regarding the possibility of increased bleeding. Existing evidence suggests that early declamping may reduce ischemia time without clinically relevant increases in blood loss or complications; however, high-level prospective evidence remains limited.
Patients scheduled for surgery for renal cancer at Haukeland University Hospital will be screened for eligibility. Patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy will be assigned to either a transperitoneal cohort or a retroperitoneal cohort according to tumor characteristics and surgeon preference. Patients undergoing other forms of kidney cancer surgery, including nephrectomy, will be enrolled as an observational control cohort for analyses involving patient-reported outcomes.
Within both partial nephrectomy cohorts, patients will undergo stratified block randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either early declamping or standard declamping. Randomization will occur after the surgical approach has been selected to ensure balanced allocation of declamping strategies within both surgical access groups.
Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using validated Norwegian-language instruments. Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), postoperative recovery using the Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO), and quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Assessments will be completed preoperatively (baseline), on the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery.
The primary endpoint in the PROMs arm is change in postoperative pain from baseline to postoperative day one, measured using the mean pain severity score from the Brief Pain Inventory. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, pain at 6 weeks and 1 year, postoperative recovery scores, quality-of-life scores, duration of sick leave, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins, transfusions, recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and long-term renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
The primary endpoint in the clamping arm is intraoperative blood loss during partial nephrectomy. Secondary endpoints include warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, transfusions, operative time, positive surgical margins, renal function, recurrence outcomes, and survival outcomes.
Perioperative variables collected will include operative duration, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, postoperative opioid use converted to morphine equivalents, pathology findings, complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, transfusions, length of stay, renal function, and oncological outcomes. Follow-up assessments will occur at 6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. Long-term follow-up will include recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and renal function.
The study is expected to enroll approximately 120-150 patients. Sample size calculations indicate that 88 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are required to detect a clinically meaningful difference in postoperative pain between surgical approaches and to evaluate non-inferiority of early declamping with respect to blood loss. Enrollment is expected to take approximately 2-3 years.
The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable Norwegian regulations. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment. The patient-reported outcomes component is observational and presents minimal risk beyond completion of questionnaires. In the randomized declamping component, both interventions represent accepted surgical techniques currently used in clinical practice. An interim analysis is planned after approximately half of the randomized participants have been enrolled to assess safety and study conduct.
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)
- Being tested
- Standard clamping strategy, Early declamping strategy
- Keywords
- renal cell carcinoma, Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy, Retroperitoneal Approach, Transperitoneal Approach, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Warm Ischemia Time, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Recovery, Renal Function, Kidney Cancer, Early Declamping, Renal Artery Clamping
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Kidney Neoplasms, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard clamping strategyProcedure or surgery
Patients randomized to standard declamping will have the clamp on until tumour resection, renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed
Early declamping strategyProcedure or surgery
The patients randomized to early declamping strategy will have the clamp on until tumour resection and ranorraphy is completed, but the clamp is removed before adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early declamping | Experimental | Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to early renal artery declamping. After tumor excision and closure of the resection bed, the renal artery clamp is removed before completion of renorrhaphy. This strategy is intended to reduce warm ischemia time while maintaining acceptable bleeding and complication rates. Receives: Procedure: Early declamping strategy |
| Standard declamping | Active comparator | Participants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to standard renal artery declamping. The renal clamping stays on until all renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces are completed Receives: Procedure: Standard clamping strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity score from baseline to postoperative day
Pain severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. The scale measures the patients subjective assessment of pain on 15 different items. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates worst thinkable pain. The outcome measure will be calculated as the change from baseline to postoperative day 1 using the mean score of items 3-6.
Measured: First post operative day
Intraoperative blood loss during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Blood loss will be measured intraoperatively in milliliters and compared between early and standard renal artery declamping strategies.
Measured: Day of Surgery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Total opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours
Opioid administration will be converted to oral morphine equivalents and summed over the first 24 hours after surgery.
Measured: First postoperative day
Change in Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO) score
Recovery will be assessed using Quality of recovery 15, Norwegian version (QoR-15NO). The scale measures recovery after surgery on a 15 item scale ranging from 0 to 10 where 0 is worst possible recovery, and 10 is best possible recovery. The outcome measure will be the change from baseline to postoperative day 1, at 6 weeks, and 1 year after surgery.
Measured: Baseline, first postoperative day, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30)
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30) questionnaire. The scale measures quality of life on a 30 item scale on a range of 1 to 4 ( 1 to seven regarding items 29 and 30), where 1 is best quality of life, and 4 is worst.
Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Warm ischemia time will be measured in minutes from application to removal of the renal artery clamp.
Measured: Day of Surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications
Complications will be graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Measured: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Length of stay after surgery
Measured as the number of days between surgery and discharge.
Measured: Between surgery and discharge, average 2 days
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
Renal function will be assessed by comparing postoperative eGFR with baseline values.
Measured: Baseline, first post operative day, 6 weeks, 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.
Recurrence-free survival
Time from surgery to radiologically or pathologically confirmed recurrence
Measured: Up to 5 Years
Disease-Specific Survival
Time from surgery to death attributable to renal cancer.
Measured: Up to 5 Years
Overall survival
Time from surgery to death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 5 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bjarte Almas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, University of Bergen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Bjarte Almas, Haukeland University Hospital
- Investigators
- Bjarte Almås, MD.PhD, Principal investigator, Haukeland University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07853001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 987718
- Acronym
- RAPTOR
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the publication will be shared beginning 12 months after primary publication.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Cohort Study With Emphasis on Patient Reported Outcomes and Different Renal Artery Clamping Techniques During Robot Assisted Kidney Resection - the RAPTOR Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07853001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAPTOR / 987718
- Conditions
- Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)
- Keywords
- renal cell carcinoma, Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy, Retroperitoneal Approach, Transperitoneal Approach, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Warm Ischemia Time, Postoperative Pain, Postoperative Recovery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bjarte AlmasUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, University of Bergen
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The target population for this study consists of all patients undergoing kidney surgery at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway, with the primary focus being patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The study has two main objectives. First, the investigators aim to assess whether a flank approach to robot assisted partial nephrectomy may be superior to a trans abdominal approach with regard to postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life. Second, while conducting this study, the investigators also seek to compare two methods of renal artery clamping during the partial nephrectomy procedure. Specifically, the investigators aim to determine whether a technique that reduces the duration of ischemia can be performed without causing an unacceptable increase in blood loss or postoperative complications.
Detailed description
Renal cell carcinoma can be managed with surgical excision, surveillance, or ablative techniques. For localized renal tumors, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become a standard treatment because it preserves renal function while maintaining oncological outcomes comparable to radical nephrectomy. Two minimally invasive surgical approaches are commonly used for RAPN: the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach. Although both techniques are considered safe and effective, existing literature has mainly focused on perioperative outcomes such as operative time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, complications, and oncological results. Limited data are available regarding patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain, recovery, and quality of life.
The RAPTOR study is a prospective clinical study designed to evaluate both patient-reported outcomes after kidney surgery and surgical outcomes associated with different renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.
The first study component (PROMs arm) will compare patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the retroperitoneal approach results in reduced postoperative pain compared with the transperitoneal approach. Secondary objectives include comparisons of postoperative opioid consumption, recovery after surgery, quality of life, duration of sick leave, perioperative outcomes, oncological outcomes, and long-term renal function.
The second study component (clamping arm) is a randomized comparison of two commonly used renal artery declamping strategies during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. During standard declamping, the renal artery clamp remains in place until all renorrhaphy suturing has been completed. During early declamping, the renal artery clamp is removed after closure of the resection bed but before completion of renorrhaphy. Early declamping may reduce warm ischemia time and thereby preserve renal function, but concerns remain regarding the possibility of increased bleeding. Existing evidence suggests that early declamping may reduce ischemia time without clinically relevant increases in blood loss or complications; however, high-level prospective evidence remains limited.
Patients scheduled for surgery for renal cancer at Haukeland University Hospital will be screened for eligibility. Patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy will be assigned to either a transperitoneal cohort or a retroperitoneal cohort according to tumor characteristics and surgeon preference. Patients undergoing other forms of kidney cancer surgery, including nephrectomy, will be enrolled as an observational control cohort for analyses involving patient-reported outcomes.
Within both partial nephrectomy cohorts, patients will undergo stratified block randomization in a 1:1 ratio to either early declamping or standard declamping. Randomization will occur after the surgical approach has been selected to ensure balanced allocation of declamping strategies within both surgical access groups.
Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using validated Norwegian-language instruments. Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), postoperative recovery using the Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO), and quality of life using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Assessments will be completed preoperatively (baseline), on the first postoperative day, at 6 weeks after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery.
The primary endpoint in the PROMs arm is change in postoperative pain from baseline to postoperative day one, measured using the mean pain severity score from the Brief Pain Inventory. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours, pain at 6 weeks and 1 year, postoperative recovery scores, quality-of-life scores, duration of sick leave, operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, positive surgical margins, transfusions, recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and long-term renal function measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
The primary endpoint in the clamping arm is intraoperative blood loss during partial nephrectomy. Secondary endpoints include warm ischemia time, postoperative complications, transfusions, operative time, positive surgical margins, renal function, recurrence outcomes, and survival outcomes.
Perioperative variables collected will include operative duration, warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, postoperative opioid use converted to morphine equivalents, pathology findings, complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, transfusions, length of stay, renal function, and oncological outcomes. Follow-up assessments will occur at 6 weeks, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery. Long-term follow-up will include recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, and renal function.
The study is expected to enroll approximately 120-150 patients. Sample size calculations indicate that 88 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy are required to detect a clinically meaningful difference in postoperative pain between surgical approaches and to evaluate non-inferiority of early declamping with respect to blood loss. Enrollment is expected to take approximately 2-3 years.
The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable Norwegian regulations. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment. The patient-reported outcomes component is observational and presents minimal risk beyond completion of questionnaires. In the randomized declamping component, both interventions represent accepted surgical techniques currently used in clinical practice. An interim analysis is planned after approximately half of the randomized participants have been enrolled to assess safety and study conduct.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early declamping | Experimental | Procedure: Early declamping strategyParticipants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to early renal artery declamping. After tumor excision and closure of the resection bed, the renal artery clamp is removed before completion of renorrhaphy. This strategy is intended to reduce warm ischemia time while maintaining acceptable bleeding and complication rates. |
| Standard declamping | Active comparator | Procedure: Standard clamping strategyParticipants undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy randomized to standard renal artery declamping. The renal clamping stays on until all renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces are completed |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Signed written informed consent obtained prior to any study specific procedures
- Patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol
- Age >18
- Patients scheduled for robot-assisted partial kidney resection with either the trans- or retroperitoneal access
- Other patients scheduled for surgery for kidney cancer, to be included as control group
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Previous kidney surgery on the affected side
- Preexisting extensive intraabdominal adhesions preventing the use of the transabdominal access
- Preexisting severe pain condition requiring regular use of opioids adding up to more than equivalent of 10mg po morphine daily
- Any other physical or mental illness that according to the treating surgeon makes the patient unfit for inclusion in the study
- Confirmed metastatic renal cancer or any other metastatic cancer.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard clamping strategyPatients randomized to standard declamping will have the clamp on until tumour resection, renorraphy and adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed | Procedure or surgery | Standard declamping |
| Early declamping strategyThe patients randomized to early declamping strategy will have the clamp on until tumour resection and ranorraphy is completed, but the clamp is removed before adaptation of the resection surfaces is performed | Procedure or surgery | Early declamping |
Primary outcome
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity score from baseline to postoperative day
Time frame: First post operative day
Pain severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. The scale measures the patients subjective assessment of pain on 15 different items. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10 indicates worst thinkable pain. The outcome measure will be calculated as the change from baseline to postoperative day 1 using the mean score of items 3-6.
Intraoperative blood loss during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Time frame: Day of Surgery
Blood loss will be measured intraoperatively in milliliters and compared between early and standard renal artery declamping strategies.
10 secondary outcomes
Total opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours
Time frame: First postoperative day
Change in Quality of Recovery-15 Norwegian version (QoR-15NO) score
Time frame: Baseline, first postoperative day, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Change in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life 30 (EORTC QLQ 30)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks and 1 year after surgery
Warm ischemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Time frame: Day of Surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time frame: 30 and 90 days after surgery
Length of stay after surgery
Time frame: Between surgery and discharge, average 2 days
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
Time frame: Baseline, first post operative day, 6 weeks, 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.
Recurrence-free survival
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Disease-Specific Survival
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 5 Years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the publication will be shared beginning 12 months after primary publication.
Related trials for Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab and Lenvatinib With or Without SBRT Before Surgery for Non-Clear Cell Kidney Cancer
Nonmetastatic Locally Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Pucotenlimab, Lenvatinib, and SBRT Before Surgery for Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Bjarte Almås, MD.PhD principal investigator
Haukeland University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standard clamping strategy and Early declamping strategy in people with Renal Cell Carcinoma (Kidney Cancer), run by Bjarte Almas at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bjarte Almås, MD, PhD (+4755971637, bjarte.almas@helse-bergen.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity score from baseline to postoperative day (time frame: First post operative day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2026.