AzTrials
AzTrials

Soccer PerformanceNCT07853638

Combined Technical and Balance Training in U12 Soccer Players

A study testing Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training in people with Soccer Performance, run by University of Manouba at 1 site in Tunisia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was designed as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of a combined technical and balance training program on dynamic postural control, inter-limb asymmetry, and soccer-specific performance in young soccer players. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 11 to 12 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Soccer Performance
What is being tested?
Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteTunisia
Study dates
1 Sep 2024to 15 Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 11 to 12 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male soccer players aged 10-12 years.
  • Registered members of a soccer club.
  • Regular participation in soccer training.
  • Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians.

Who cannot join

  • Current musculoskeletal injury affecting participation in training or testing.
  • History of surgery or chronic medical condition affecting physical performance.
  • Inability to complete the testing procedures or intervention program.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tunisia1 site
  • Université Manouba

    Manouba, 2010

Other trials in Tunisia

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Combined Non-Dominant-Limb-Focused Technical and Unstable-Surface Balance Training Program on Dynamic Postural Control, Inter-Limb Asymmetry, and Soccer-Specific Performance in Young Soccer Players

This study was designed as a two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of a combined technical and balance training program on dynamic postural control, inter-limb asymmetry, and soccer-specific performance in young soccer players.

Thirty male U12 soccer players were randomly allocated to an experimental group (n = 15) or a control group (n = 15). The intervention lasted 8 weeks, with two training sessions per week. The experimental group performed additional exercises specifically targeting the non-dominant leg, including three technical exercises focused on non-dominant-leg skills and one dynamic bipodal balance exercise performed on unstable balance cushions. The control group continued their conventional soccer training program without additional targeted exercises.

Read more

Assessments were performed before and after the intervention period. Dynamic postural control was evaluated using the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). Soccer-specific performance was assessed using technical skill tests, including shooting, juggling, and dribbling performance. Inter-limb asymmetry was evaluated by comparing dominant and non-dominant limb performance.

The primary objective was to determine whether a combined training approach emphasizing non-dominant-leg technical practice and dynamic balance stimulation could improve limb-specific performance and reduce inter-limb differences in young soccer players.

The study was conducted under ethical approval from the Deanship of Scientific Research at Palestine Technical University-Kadoorie. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all participants before participation.

Being tested
Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training
Keywords
Soccer, Youth soccer players, U12 soccer players, Technical training, Balance training, Dynamic postural control, Inter-limb asymmetry, Limb dominance, Non-dominant leg, Soccer-specific performance, Randomized controlled trial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combined technical and unstable-surface balance trainingBehavioural

    An 8-week soccer training program including three technical exercises focused on the non-dominant foot and one bipodal unstable-surface balance exercise using unstable cushions. Training sessions were performed twice weekly in addition to regular soccer practice.

Study groups in NCT07853638
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combined technical and unstable-surface balance trainingExperimentalParticipants assigned to this arm received an 8-week combined training program consisting of three technical exercises focused on the non-dominant foot and one bipodal unstable-surface balance exercise using unstable cushions. Training sessions were performed twice per week in addition to their regular soccer training.
Receives: Behavioral: Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training
Conventional soccer trainingActive comparatorParticipants assigned to this arm continued their regular soccer training program without receiving the additional technical exercises or unstable-surface balance training.
Receives: Behavioral: Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dynamic postural control assessed by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)

    Change in dynamic postural control assessed using the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) following the 8-week intervention. The SEBT evaluates functional postural control in multiple directions and measures changes in lower-limb dynamic stability.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Dynamic balance asymmetry between dominant and non-dominant limbs

    Change in inter-limb asymmetry during the Star Excursion Balance Test after the 8-week intervention. Asymmetry was calculated from normalized reach distances using the formula: |dominant - non-dominant| / dominant × 100.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  2. Loughborough Soccer Shooting Test

    Change in shooting accuracy after the 8-week intervention. Shooting performance was assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Shooting Test. Participants completed three trials for each limb, and the best score obtained for each leg was retained for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  3. Juggling Test

    Change in ball control ability after the 8-week intervention. The juggling test assessed technical coordination using dominant and non-dominant legs. The best score from three trials was retained for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  4. Slalom running performance

    Change in change-of-direction speed after the 8-week intervention. Participants performed a 15-m slalom running test around seven cones using a photoelectric cell system. Mean completion time was retained for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  5. Slalom dribbling performance

    Change in dribbling ability after the 8-week intervention. Participants performed a 15-m slalom course while dribbling with the dominant and non-dominant leg. Mean completion time was retained for analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  6. Skill index

    Change in skill index after the 8-week intervention. The skill index was calculated as the ratio between slalom running time and slalom dribbling time. The index was calculated separately for the dominant and non-dominant limbs.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

  7. Inter-limb asymmetry

    Change in inter-limb asymmetry after the 8-week intervention. Asymmetry was calculated from the difference between dominant and non-dominant limb skill index values using the percentage asymmetry formula.

    Measured: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion7 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion15 Nov 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. Participants are randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either a combined non-dominant-limb-focused technical and unstable-surface balance training program or conventional soccer training. Both groups continue their regular soccer activities during the 8-week intervention period.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07853638
Sponsor's protocol ID
UManouba-U12-NDL-RCT
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
26 Sep 2026
Last updated
2 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Combined technical and unstable-surface balance training in people with Soccer Performance, run by University of Manouba at 1 site in Tunisia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dynamic postural control assessed by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) (time frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in