Physical InactivityNCT07856628
Sex Differences in Heart Rate Variability Responses to Eight Weeks of Circuit Training
A study testing Circuit Training Program in people with Physical Inactivity, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
The main goal of this study is to find out how an 8-week circuit training exercise program affects heart health and how the body recovers in young adults who do not regularly exercise. The researchers also want to see if these responses are different between men and women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Physical Inactivity
- What is being tested?
- Circuit Training Program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 17 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 6 Mar 2025to 5 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Physically inactive, defined as engaging in less than 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or less than 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week.
- Enrolled university student.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and attend supervised training sessions twice per week for 8 weeks.
Who cannot join
- Regular engagement in structured exercise or training programs.
- Current consumption of dietary supplements.
- Inability or unwillingness to refrain from caffeine, alcohol, and vigorous physical activity for 24 hours prior to heart rate variability (HRV) testing sessions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site
Exercise and Sports Science Laboratory, Universiti Sains Malaysia
Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, 16150
About this study
Official title: Circuit Training and Autonomic Recovery: Sex Differences in Heart Rate Variability Among Inactive Young Adults
The main goal of this study is to find out how an 8-week circuit training exercise program affects heart health and how the body recovers in young adults who do not regularly exercise. The researchers also want to see if these responses are different between men and women.
The body's nervous system controls automatic functions like heart rate. Measuring changes in heart rate patterns-known as heart rate variability (HRV)-helps show how well the body switches between "fight-or-flight" (stress/exercise mode) and "rest-and-digest" (recovery mode). While men and women naturally have different heart rate patterns at rest, less is known about whether they recover differently after a structured exercise program.
Read more
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does 8 weeks of circuit training improve heart rate recovery and nervous system balance in inactive young adults?
- Do men and women show different heart rate responses or recovery patterns after taking part in circuit training?
To answer these questions, inactive university students took part in an 8-week supervised circuit training program. Participants were considered inactive if they did less than 150 minutes of moderate exercise or less than 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week.
Participants completed 20 exercise sessions (2 times per week) led by the study team:
- Exercise Sessions: Each session started with a 5-minute warm-up, followed by 10 exercise stations using light weights, resistance bands, and bodyweight movements. Exercises targeted both upper and lower body muscles.
- Workouts and Rest: Participants did each exercise for 30 seconds, rested for 1 minute between stations, and rested for 5 minutes between full sets.
- Progression: During Weeks 1 to 4, participants did 2 sets per session. During Weeks 5 to 8, they increased to 3 sets per session.
To measure heart rate recovery, participants wore a heart rate chest monitor while resting quietly lying down:
- Before starting the 8-week program (Baseline)
- At 10 minutes after a workout at Week 8 (Short-term recovery)
- At 24 hours after a workout at Week 8 (Full recovery)
The researchers compared the heart rate data between men and women across these time points to see how quickly their nervous systems returned to a resting state after exercise.
Read the detailed description
This study evaluates the effects of an 8-week supervised circuit training program on heart rate variability (HRV) and autonomic recovery patterns among physically inactive young adults, with a specific focus on sex-related differences.
Participants undergo an 8-week exercise intervention consisting of 20 total sessions scheduled twice per week. The intervention follows a progressive volume design:
- Weeks 1 to 4: Participants perform 2 complete sets per session (8 sessions total).
- Weeks 5 to 8: Participants perform 3 complete sets per session (12 sessions total).
Each exercise session begins with a 5-minute dynamic warm-up. The circuit consists of 10 sequential exercise stations targeting major upper-body and lower-body muscle groups using body weight, resistance bands, and dumbbells: 1. Heel raises with dumbbells 2. Lateral raises with resistance bands 3. Leg abductions with resistance bands 4. Shoulder extensions and flexions with resistance bands 5. Jump rope 6. Triceps extensions with dumbbells 7. Half squats with resistance bands 8. Standing chest fly with dumbbells 9. Leg curls with resistance bands 10. Bicep curls with dumbbells
Participants perform each exercise station for 30 seconds, followed by a 1-minute rest interval between stations. A 5-minute rest period is provided between complete circuits. All sessions take place under direct supervision.
Autonomic function is evaluated via continuous beat-to-beat R-R interval recordings using a validated heart rate monitor while participants rest quietly in a supine position in a climate-controlled room (21 °C). Heart rate variability is assessed across three specific time points:
- Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment prior to beginning the 8-week training protocol.
- Post-10 Minutes: Immediate post-exercise recovery assessment within 10 minutes following the final training session at Week 8.
- Post-24 Hours: Delayed recovery assessment 24 hours following the final training session at Week 8.
Extracted frequency-domain HRV parameters include Low Frequency (LF: 0.04-0.15 Hz), High Frequency (HF: 0.15-0.40 Hz), and the LF/HF ratio, analyzed in both absolute power values (ms2) and normalized units (n.u.). Comparisons are conducted between male and female participants across time points to analyze sex-specific autonomic adaptations and recovery trajectories following circuit training.
- Conditions
- Physical Inactivity
- Being tested
- Circuit Training Program
- Keywords
- Heart rate variability, Autonomic recovery, Sex differences, Circuit training, Frequency domain, Physically inactive
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Circuit Training ProgramBehavioural
Also called Progressive Circuit Training Protocol
Participants complete an 8-week supervised circuit training intervention consisting of 20 total sessions (2 sessions per week). Each session begins with a 5-minute warm-up, followed by 10 exercise stations targeting both upper-body and lower-body muscle groups using body weight, resistance bands, and dumbbells.
The 10 stations include: heel raises with dumbbells, lateral raises with resistance bands, leg abductions with resistance bands, shoulder extensions and flexions with resistance bands, jump rope, triceps extensions with dumbbells, half squats with resistance bands, standing chest fly with dumbbells, leg curls with resistance bands, and bicep curls with dumbbells.
Each exercise station is performed for 30 seconds with a 1-minute rest interval between stations, and a 5-minute rest interval between complete sets. Training volume progresses from 2 sets per session in Weeks 1-4 (8 sessions) to 3 sets per session in Weeks 5-8 (12 sessions)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Male Group | Experimental | Male participants undergoing an 8-week supervised circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets per session for weeks 1-4, 3 sets per session for weeks 5-8). Receives: Behavioral: Circuit Training Program |
| Female Group | Experimental | Female participants undergoing the identical 8-week supervised circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets per session for weeks 1-4, 3 sets per session for weeks 5-8). Receives: Behavioral: Circuit Training Program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Low-Frequency (LF) Power in Normalized Units (LF n.u.)
Frequency-domain heart rate variability metric reflecting combined sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic modulation (measured in normalized units, n.u.).
Measured: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Change in High-Frequency (HF) Power in Normalized Units (HF n.u.)
Frequency-domain heart rate variability metric reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) autonomic modulation (measured in normalized units, n.u.)
Measured: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Change in Low-Frequency to High-Frequency Ratio (LF/HF Ratio)
Ratio of LF power to HF power, used as an index of sympathovagal balance during recovery.
Measured: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2026
- Study start6 Mar 2025
- Primary completion5 Mar 2026
- Study completion5 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Physical InactivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study uses a two-arm non-randomized parallel design comparing male and female cohorts. Participants are assigned to their respective arm based on biologically determined sex (male vs. female). Both groups receive the identical supervised 8-week progressive circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets in weeks 1-4, 3 sets in weeks 5-8) and undergo identical heart rate variability (HRV) evaluations at baseline, 10 minutes post-training, and 24 hours post-training.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Marilyn Li Yin Ong, Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Investigators
- Marilyn Li Yin Ong, PhD, Principal investigator, Universiti Sains Malaysia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07856628
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USM/JEPeM/KK/25010089
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to maintain participant privacy and confidentiality. All relevant aggregated datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are provided within the results section of the published article.
Publications
Ramos-Campo DJ, Andreu Caravaca L, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Rubio-Arias JA. Effects of Resistance Circuit-Based Training on Body Composition, Strength and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biology (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;10(5):377. doi: 10.3390/biology10050377.
PubMed 33924785Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29034226Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
PubMed 8598068Kappus RM, Ranadive SM, Yan H, Lane-Cordova AD, Cook MD, Sun P, Harvey IS, Wilund KR, Woods JA, Fernhall B. Sex differences in autonomic function following maximal exercise. Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Dec 1;6:28. doi: 10.1186/s13293-015-0046-6. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26629325Koenig J, Thayer JF. Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 May;64:288-310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
PubMed 26964804Ibrahim NS, Muhamad AS, Chen CK, & Ooi FK. (2022) Effects of probiotics consumption and resistance exercise on bone metabolism markers in physically inactive young males. Malays J Sport Sci Recreat 18(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjssr.v18i1.17643
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Circuit Training and Autonomic Recovery: Sex Differences in Heart Rate Variability Among Inactive Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07856628
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- USM/JEPeM/KK/25010089
- Conditions
- Physical Inactivity
- Keywords
- Heart rate variability, Autonomic recovery, Sex differences, Circuit training, Frequency domain, Physically inactive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 17 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universiti Sains MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main goal of this study is to find out how an 8-week circuit training exercise program affects heart health and how the body recovers in young adults who do not regularly exercise. The researchers also want to see if these responses are different between men and women.
The body's nervous system controls automatic functions like heart rate. Measuring changes in heart rate patterns-known as heart rate variability (HRV)-helps show how well the body switches between "fight-or-flight" (stress/exercise mode) and "rest-and-digest" (recovery mode). While men and women naturally have different heart rate patterns at rest, less is known about whether they recover differently after a structured exercise program.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does 8 weeks of circuit training improve heart rate recovery and nervous system balance in inactive young adults?
- Do men and women show different heart rate responses or recovery patterns after taking part in circuit training?
To answer these questions, inactive university students took part in an 8-week supervised circuit training program. Participants were considered inactive if they did less than 150 minutes of moderate exercise or less than 75 minutes of vigorous exercise per week.
Participants completed 20 exercise sessions (2 times per week) led by the study team:
- Exercise Sessions: Each session started with a 5-minute warm-up, followed by 10 exercise stations using light weights, resistance bands, and bodyweight movements. Exercises targeted both upper and lower body muscles.
- Workouts and Rest: Participants did each exercise for 30 seconds, rested for 1 minute between stations, and rested for 5 minutes between full sets.
- Progression: During Weeks 1 to 4, participants did 2 sets per session. During Weeks 5 to 8, they increased to 3 sets per session.
To measure heart rate recovery, participants wore a heart rate chest monitor while resting quietly lying down:
- Before starting the 8-week program (Baseline)
- At 10 minutes after a workout at Week 8 (Short-term recovery)
- At 24 hours after a workout at Week 8 (Full recovery)
The researchers compared the heart rate data between men and women across these time points to see how quickly their nervous systems returned to a resting state after exercise.
Detailed description
This study evaluates the effects of an 8-week supervised circuit training program on heart rate variability (HRV) and autonomic recovery patterns among physically inactive young adults, with a specific focus on sex-related differences.
Participants undergo an 8-week exercise intervention consisting of 20 total sessions scheduled twice per week. The intervention follows a progressive volume design:
- Weeks 1 to 4: Participants perform 2 complete sets per session (8 sessions total).
- Weeks 5 to 8: Participants perform 3 complete sets per session (12 sessions total).
Each exercise session begins with a 5-minute dynamic warm-up. The circuit consists of 10 sequential exercise stations targeting major upper-body and lower-body muscle groups using body weight, resistance bands, and dumbbells: 1. Heel raises with dumbbells 2. Lateral raises with resistance bands 3. Leg abductions with resistance bands 4. Shoulder extensions and flexions with resistance bands 5. Jump rope 6. Triceps extensions with dumbbells 7. Half squats with resistance bands 8. Standing chest fly with dumbbells 9. Leg curls with resistance bands 10. Bicep curls with dumbbells
Participants perform each exercise station for 30 seconds, followed by a 1-minute rest interval between stations. A 5-minute rest period is provided between complete circuits. All sessions take place under direct supervision.
Autonomic function is evaluated via continuous beat-to-beat R-R interval recordings using a validated heart rate monitor while participants rest quietly in a supine position in a climate-controlled room (21 °C). Heart rate variability is assessed across three specific time points:
- Baseline: Pre-intervention assessment prior to beginning the 8-week training protocol.
- Post-10 Minutes: Immediate post-exercise recovery assessment within 10 minutes following the final training session at Week 8.
- Post-24 Hours: Delayed recovery assessment 24 hours following the final training session at Week 8.
Extracted frequency-domain HRV parameters include Low Frequency (LF: 0.04-0.15 Hz), High Frequency (HF: 0.15-0.40 Hz), and the LF/HF ratio, analyzed in both absolute power values (ms2) and normalized units (n.u.). Comparisons are conducted between male and female participants across time points to analyze sex-specific autonomic adaptations and recovery trajectories following circuit training.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study uses a two-arm non-randomized parallel design comparing male and female cohorts. Participants are assigned to their respective arm based on biologically determined sex (male vs. female). Both groups receive the identical supervised 8-week progressive circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets in weeks 1-4, 3 sets in weeks 5-8) and undergo identical heart rate variability (HRV) evaluations at baseline, 10 minutes post-training, and 24 hours post-training.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Male Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Circuit Training ProgramMale participants undergoing an 8-week supervised circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets per session for weeks 1-4, 3 sets per session for weeks 5-8). |
| Female Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Circuit Training ProgramFemale participants undergoing the identical 8-week supervised circuit training intervention (2 sessions per week; 2 sets per session for weeks 1-4, 3 sets per session for weeks 5-8). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Physically inactive, defined as engaging in less than 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or less than 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity per week.
- Enrolled university student.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and attend supervised training sessions twice per week for 8 weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Regular engagement in structured exercise or training programs.
- Current consumption of dietary supplements.
- Inability or unwillingness to refrain from caffeine, alcohol, and vigorous physical activity for 24 hours prior to heart rate variability (HRV) testing sessions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Circuit Training ProgramAlso: Progressive Circuit Training ProtocolParticipants complete an 8-week supervised circuit training intervention consisting of 20 total sessions (2 sessions per week). Each session begins with a 5-minute warm-up, followed by 10 exercise stations targeting both upper-body and lower-body muscle groups using body weight, resistance bands, and dumbbells. The 10 stations include: heel raises with dumbbells, lateral raises with resistance bands, leg abductions with resistance bands, shoulder extensions and flexions with resistance bands, jump rope, triceps extensions with dumbbells, half squats with resistance bands, standing chest fly with dumbbells, leg curls with resistance bands, and bicep curls with dumbbells. Each exercise station is performed for 30 seconds with a 1-minute rest interval between stations, and a 5-minute rest interval between complete sets. Training volume progresses from 2 sets per session in Weeks 1-4 (8 sessions) to 3 sets per session in Weeks 5-8 (12 sessions) | Behavioural | Female Group, Male Group |
Primary outcome
Change in Low-Frequency (LF) Power in Normalized Units (LF n.u.)
Time frame: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Frequency-domain heart rate variability metric reflecting combined sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic modulation (measured in normalized units, n.u.).
Change in High-Frequency (HF) Power in Normalized Units (HF n.u.)
Time frame: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Frequency-domain heart rate variability metric reflecting parasympathetic (vagal) autonomic modulation (measured in normalized units, n.u.)
Change in Low-Frequency to High-Frequency Ratio (LF/HF Ratio)
Time frame: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).
Ratio of LF power to HF power, used as an index of sympathovagal balance during recovery.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 33924785Ramos-Campo DJ, Andreu Caravaca L, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Rubio-Arias JA. Effects of Resistance Circuit-Based Training on Body Composition, Strength and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biology (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;10(5):377. doi: 10.3390/biology10050377.
- Background: PubMed 29034226Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 28;5:258. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 8598068Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26629325Kappus RM, Ranadive SM, Yan H, Lane-Cordova AD, Cook MD, Sun P, Harvey IS, Wilund KR, Woods JA, Fernhall B. Sex differences in autonomic function following maximal exercise. Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Dec 1;6:28. doi: 10.1186/s13293-015-0046-6. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 26964804Koenig J, Thayer JF. Sex differences in healthy human heart rate variability: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 May;64:288-310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
- BackgroundIbrahim NS, Muhamad AS, Chen CK, & Ooi FK. (2022) Effects of probiotics consumption and resistance exercise on bone metabolism markers in physically inactive young males. Malays J Sport Sci Recreat 18(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjssr.v18i1.17643
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared to maintain participant privacy and confidentiality. All relevant aggregated datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are provided within the results section of the published article.
Related trials for Physical Inactivity
Enrolling by invitation
Recreational Badminton, Sleep and Melatonin
Sedentary Behavior
Active, not recruiting
Future School of Comprehensive Well-Being
Learning, Comprehensive Wellbeing
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Role of ET-1, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior in Microvascular Dysfunction Following GDM
Gestational Diabetes, Endothelial Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Wearable Ankle Power Training (WearAPT) for Enhanced Mobility in Aging
Sedentary Behavior / Physical Inactivity, Aged
Active, not recruiting
Promoting Physical Activity in Older Hispanic/Latino(a) Adults
Sedentary Behavior, Physical Inactivity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marilyn Li Yin Ong, PhD principal investigator
Universiti Sains Malaysia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Circuit Training Program in people with Physical Inactivity, run by Universiti Sains Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Low-Frequency (LF) Power in Normalized Units (LF n.u.) (time frame: Measured at Baseline (Week 0), Post-10 minutes (Week 8), and Post-24 hours (Week 8).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07856628, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.