AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary IncontinenceNCT07858968

Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Programme for Women With Urinary Incontinence in a Peruvian Public Hospital

A study testing Supervised group pelvic floor muscle training and Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessions in people with Urinary Incontinence and Urinary Incontinence, Stress, run by Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins at 1 site in Peru.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates whether a 12-week pelvic floor rehabilitation programme improves urinary incontinence symptoms in adult women treated at Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, a public tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Supervised group pelvic floor muscle training and Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
89 participants
Where
1 sitePeru
Study dates
3 Aug 2026to 31 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18 years or older, insured by EsSalud and treated at Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins
  • Urinary incontinence diagnosed by the Urology Service of the hospital
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Current pregnancy
  • Urinary incontinence of documented neurological cause
  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage II or higher (POP-Q)
  • Severe cognitive impairment preventing active participation or completion of questionnaires
  • Refusal to sign informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Peru1 site
  • Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins

    Lima, Lima Province

Other trials in Peru

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Programme in Patients With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Treated at Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins: A Prospective Pre-Post Study

This study evaluates whether a 12-week pelvic floor rehabilitation programme improves urinary incontinence symptoms in adult women treated at Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, a public tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru. Women referred by the Urology Service attend supervised group pelvic floor muscle training with a physiotherapist, together with individual sessions with a physiatrist that may include EMG biofeedback, electrical stimulation, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, myofascial techniques or bladder training. The main question is whether symptom severity, measured with the ICIQ-SF questionnaire, improves between baseline and week 12. Participants are followed for 6 months.

Read the detailed description

This single-arm, prospective pre-post study follows the TREND recommendations for nonrandomised evaluations. It includes two prespecified analytic populations. The full cohort is used to assess effectiveness, while a urodynamic subcohort, formed by participants with a prior urodynamic study classifying them as having urodynamic stress incontinence, detrusor overactivity or mixed incontinence, is used to explore whether urodynamic type predicts response.

Assessments take place at baseline, week 4, week 12 and 6 months. The primary analysis compares ICIQ-SF scores between baseline and week 12 using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on distribution. The planned sample size of 90 was calculated to detect a 3-point difference in the ICIQ-SF with 85% power and a two-sided alpha of 0.05, allowing for 15% attrition.

This study was registered retrospectively. Enrolment began on 3 August 2026 and closed on 9 September 2026, with 89 participants completing the baseline visit. The primary outcome and its analysis were defined in the ethics-approved protocol (version 1.2, 14 July 2026) before any week-12 data were collected. Perineometry and the Modified Oxford scale, originally planned at weeks 4 and 12, were withdrawn in September 2026 because of their dependence on the evaluator, and baseline values are reported descriptively only. All protocol changes were reported to the Ethics Committee.

Being tested
Supervised group pelvic floor muscle training, Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessions
Keywords
Pelvic floor muscle training, Pelvic floor rehabilitation, EMG biofeedback, Group exercise, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, Bladder training, ICIQ-SF, Women, Peru
Medical subject headings
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Stress, Urinary Incontinence, Urge

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Supervised group pelvic floor muscle trainingBehavioural

    Group sessions of about 45 minutes led by a physiotherapist, three times a week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). The physiotherapist follows a specific, standardised protocol organised in three progressive phases of 12 sessions each, covering pelvic floor, trunk and breathing exercises without equipment or manual contact. Groups include approximately six participants

  • Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessionsOther

    Individual sessions delivered by the principal investigator. At every session, EMG biofeedback is used to show the patient how she contracts her pelvic floor, and she receives education tailored to the progress observed. Home exercises are not a standard set; they are individually prescribed and adjusted at each visit according to her progress, together with reinforcement of the exercises practised in the group sessions. Depending on clinical indication, sessions may also include surface electrical stimulation, transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, myofascial techniques or bladder training. Women with stress incontinence attend three sessions in month 1 and two per month thereafter, while those with urgency or mixed incontinence attend four sessions per month throughout.

Study groups in NCT07858968
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pelvic floor rehabilitation programmeExperimentalWomen with urinary incontinence receive a 12-week multimodal pelvic floor rehabilitation programme combining supervised group exercise, individual physiatrist-led sessions and a home exercise programme. Interventions: Supervised group pelvic floor muscle training; Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessions
Receives: Behavioral: Supervised group pelvic floor muscle training; Other: Individual physiatrist-led pelvic floor sessions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in ICIQ-SF total score

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) measures the frequency, amount and impact of urinary leakage. Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The change is calculated as the week-12 score minus the baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Responders on the ICIQ-SF

    Proportion of participants with a reduction of 3 or more points in the ICIQ-SF total score from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. ICIQ-SF total score over time

    ICIQ-SF total score, range 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, week 4, week 12 and 6 months

  3. Urine loss on the 1-hour pad test

    Urine loss in grams on the 1-hour ICS pad test, and proportion of participants with less than 2 g.

    Measured: Baseline and week 12

  4. Urinary incontinence-related quality of life

    Total score of a 10-item urinary quality-of-life questionnaire based on the ICIQ-LUTSqol, range 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater impact.

    Measured: Baseline, week 12 and 6 months

  5. Sexual function

    Female Sexual Function Index total score in sexually active women, range 2 to 36, with lower scores indicating poorer function.

    Measured: Baseline, week 12 and 6 months

  6. Functioning and disability

    WHODAS 2.0 12-item total score, range 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater limitation.

    Measured: Baseline, week 12 and 6 months

  7. Global impression of improvement

    Proportion of participants rating themselves "very much better" or "much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement.

    Measured: Week 12

  8. Prescription of bladder medication

    Proportion of participants with an active prescription for an antimuscarinic or beta-3 agonist.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 months

  9. Perineal Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Perineal pain intensity measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with higher scores indicating more severe pain. Used as a safety measure.

    Measured: Baseline, week 4 and week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2026
  2. Study start3 Aug 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
89 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07858968
Sponsor's protocol ID
HNERM-ERDSP-F2
Other IDs
0553220260024952
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
28 Sep 2026
Last updated
5 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data are protected under Peruvian Law 29733 on Personal Data Protection, and the informed consent did not include sharing individual data with third parties. Only aggregated results will be published.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in