Integrated Digital Psychosocial and Reproductive Health E-Clinic for Women and Adolescent Girls in Jordan

Psychological well-being will be assessed using the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), a 5-item measure of subjective psychological well-being. Each item is scored from 0 to 5. The 5 item scores are summed to produce a raw total score ranging from 0 to 25. The raw total is multiplied by 4 to produce the reported WHO-5 score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better psychological well-being. Change from baseline will be calculated as the follow-up score minus the baseline score; positive change scores indicate improvement.

Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5), a 20-item self-report measure. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The 20 item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater post-traumatic stress symptom severity and lower scores indicate fewer symptoms. Change from baseline will be calculated as the follow-up total score minus the baseline total score; negative change scores indicate improvement.

Electronic health literacy will be assessed using the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), an 8-item self-report measure. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The 8 item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate greater perceived electronic health literacy. Change from baseline will be calculated as the follow-up total score minus the baseline total score; positive change scores indicate improvement.

Reproductive-health knowledge will be assessed using the study-specific 12-item Reproductive-Health Literacy/Knowledge Module. Each item has True, False, and Don't know response options. A correct response is scored 1, while an incorrect or Don't know response is scored 0. The 12 item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate greater reproductive-health knowledge. Change from baseline will be calculated as the follow-up total score minus the baseline total score; positive change scores indicate improvement.

Reproductive-health attitudes and self-efficacy will be assessed using a study-specific 7-item questionnaire comprising 3 reproductive-health attitude items and 4 self-efficacy items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). To obtain one reported value, the mean of all 7 items will be calculated for each participant, producing an overall score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more positive reproductive-health attitudes and greater self-efficacy. Change from baseline will be calculated as the follow-up mean score minus the baseline mean score; positive change scores indicate improvement.

Acceptability of the e-clinic will be assessed using the 4 scored items in the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) section of the study questionnaire. The items assess overall satisfaction, appeal, acceptability of using the e-clinic, and willingness to continue using the e-clinic. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 4 scored items will be calculated, producing a score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability of the e-clinic.

Usability will be assessed using the study-specific 5-item Usability and Accessibility domain of the E-Clinic Implementation Research Questionnaire. The items assess whether the e-clinic content was clear and easy to understand, whether the platform was easy to navigate and use, whether it could be accessed when needed, whether use was feasible given time, device and internet access, and whether it was suitable for the participant's literacy and communication needs. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 5 items will be calculated, producing one domain score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived usability and accessibility.

Privacy, safety, and cultural fit will be assessed using the study-specific 3-item Privacy, Safety, and Cultural Fit domain of the E-Clinic Implementation Research Questionnaire. The items assess whether the participant felt safe using the e-clinic, whether the e-clinic protected privacy and confidentiality, and whether the e-clinic was culturally respectful and appropriate. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 3 items will be calculated, producing one domain score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more favorable perceptions of privacy, safety, and cultural fit.

Engagement with one-to-one psychosocial support will be assessed as the total number of individual psychosocial consultation sessions completed by each participant during the follow-up period. The reported value is a count of completed sessions.

Participants will report whether they used virtual group or peer-support sessions during the follow-up period (No/Yes). The number and percentage of participants reporting participation will be reported.

Engagement with educational content will be assessed as the number of e-clinic educational modules completed and used by each participant during the follow-up period. The reported value is a count of modules.

Participants will report whether they used e-clinic self-help exercises or activities during the follow-up period (No/Yes). The number and percentage of participants reporting use will be reported.

Participants will report whether they used referral information or referral support provided through the e-clinic during the follow-up period (No/Yes). The number and percentage of participants reporting use will be reported.

Perceived relevance and usefulness will be assessed using the study-specific 4-item Relevance and Usefulness domain of the E-Clinic Implementation Research Questionnaire. The items assess whether the content was relevant to the participant's needs, improved knowledge about reproductive and emotional health, improved understanding of emotional distress, stress, anxiety, or sadness, and improved the participant's ability to determine when professional care is needed. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 4 items will be calculated, producing one domain score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived relevance and usefulness.

Emotional support and overall success will be assessed using the study-specific 3-item Emotional Support and Overall Success domain of the E-Clinic Implementation Research Questionnaire. The items assess whether the e-clinic helped the participant feel less alone in dealing with concerns, whether the participant would recommend the e-clinic to others with similar needs, and overall satisfaction with the e-clinic. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 3 items will be calculated, producing one domain score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived emotional support and overall success.

Perceived appropriateness of the e-clinic will be assessed using the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) section of the study questionnaire. The items assess whether the e-clinic effectively addresses the participant's health needs, is relevant to the participant's personal situation, provides support appropriate to the participant's concerns, and is a good fit for the type of care needed. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 4 items will be calculated, producing a score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness of the e-clinic.

Feasibility of the e-clinic will be assessed using the 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) section of the study questionnaire. The items assess ease of accessing and using the e-clinic, ability to use it without difficulty in daily life, fit with the participant's routine and schedule, and practicality of continued use over time. Each item is rated from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). The mean of the 4 items will be calculated, producing a score ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility of using the e-clinic.

Participants will report whether an e-clinic provider recommended that they seek additional support or referral during the follow-up period (No/Yes). The number and percentage of participants who received a referral recommendation will be reported.

Among participants who received an e-clinic referral recommendation, referral completion status will be assessed at follow-up using the response categories completed, partially completed, not completed, or not applicable, consistent with the study questionnaire. The number and percentage of referred participants in each category will be reported.

Among participants who did not complete a recommended referral, the main reported barrier will be categorized as cost, transport, family or social barriers, stigma or embarrassment, privacy concerns, time, service unavailable, or other. The number and percentage of participants in each barrier category will be reported.