Autobiographical Episodic MemoryNCT07862140
Real-World Episodic Memory
A study testing Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues. in people with Autobiographical Episodic Memory, run by Florida State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Episodic memory allows us to project ourselves back in time to mentally re-experience the past in vivid detail. This remarkable feat helps to define our personal identities and enables context-appropriate predictions that guide adaptive behavior. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Autobiographical Episodic Memory
- What is being tested?
- Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues.
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 170 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 31 Jan 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Fluent in English, right-handed, normal or corrected-to-normal vision, normal hearing.
- Exclusion Criteria: Metallic implants, claustrophobic, hearing implant, neurostimulator implant, pacemaker, aneurysm clip
- -
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Florida State University
Tallahassee, Florida, 32306
Chris Martin, PhD, 850-631-0946, cmartin@psy.fsu.edu
About this study
Episodic memory allows us to project ourselves back in time to mentally re-experience the past in vivid detail. This remarkable feat helps to define our personal identities and enables context-appropriate predictions that guide adaptive behavior. Unfortunately, episodic memory loss is a common cognitive consequence of neurological disease, psychiatric disorders, and normative aging, that reflects dysfunction in the hippocampus and the neocortical network to which it connects. This decline can present along a range of severity that spans an impoverished ability to recollect fine-grained event details, e.g., the color of the shirt your spouse was wearing at a birthday party, to forgetting course-grained event details, e.g., having attended a birthday party last weekend. Treating these kinds of memory loss remains challenging because interventions must target information that is definitionally idiosyncratic. However, recent methodological and theoretical advances in cognitive neuroscience reveal novel strategies that may solve this problem. Evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational modeling studies suggest that the degree to which episodic memories overlap in the hippocampus can be modified in a predictable, experience-dependent manner. Specifically, strong concurrent reactivation of multiple memories can enhance recall of coarse-grained episodic information by increasing hippocampal integration. Conversely, coupling strong and moderate reactivation of memories can enhance recall of fine-grained episodic information be increasing hippocampal differentiation. Consistent with this idea, recent evidence suggests that using a smartphone to record and subsequently replay real-world memory cues can indeed improve episodic memory by reducing representational overlap among memories in the hippocampus. Against this background, this proposal is organized around two primary aims. First, we seek to establish smartphone-guided memory reactivation protocols that selectively promote integration and differentiation of real-world episodic memories in the hippocampus. Experiments in this aim will specifically ask whether unstructured and structured (in terms of narrative, space, and time) reactivation can be used to achieve these outcomes. Second, we will ask whether the benefits of memory reactivation are associated with behavioral and representational costs. Experiments in this aim will probe for undesirable downsides that accompany, or potentially explain, reactivation-based improvements in episodic memory. Our approach combines smartphone technology, pattern-based analysis of functional neuroimaging data, and careful characterization of recall data with neurocognitive theory inspired by computational models of learning mechanisms. Achieving our aims will establish an empirical foundation on which future interventions can be built to systematically target real-world episodic memories at a level of abstraction, i.e., fine-grained vs. coarse-grained detail, that is appropriate for the severity of memory loss.
- Conditions
- Autobiographical Episodic Memory
- Being tested
- Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues.
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, episodic memory, cued recall
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues.Behavioural
Participants will use HippoCamera, a smartphone application, to record and replay memory cues.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Within-subject design | Other | All subjects enrolled and participated in this study will be in the same arm. Receives: Behavioral: Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Verbal cued recall
Participants will verbally describe their memories of cued real-world events. Each trial is cued with a self-generated audio-visual clip that was created during a six-week period.
Measured: Verbal recall data will be obtained at the end of the six-week record and replay period.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026
- Primary completion31 Jan 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Autobiographical Episodic MemoryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants will be exposed to all conditions in the context of a within-subjects experimental design.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Florida State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chris Martin, Florida State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07862140
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00002599
- Other IDs
- R01MH142884
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real-World Episodic Memory
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07862140
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00002599
- Conditions
- Autobiographical Episodic Memory
- Keywords
- autobiographical memory, episodic memory, cued recall
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 170 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Florida State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Episodic memory allows us to project ourselves back in time to mentally re-experience the past in vivid detail. This remarkable feat helps to define our personal identities and enables context-appropriate predictions that guide adaptive behavior. Unfortunately, episodic memory loss is a common cognitive consequence of neurological disease, psychiatric disorders, and normative aging, that reflects dysfunction in the hippocampus and the neocortical network to which it connects. This decline can present along a range of severity that spans an impoverished ability to recollect fine-grained event details, e.g., the color of the shirt your spouse was wearing at a birthday party, to forgetting course-grained event details, e.g., having attended a birthday party last weekend. Treating these kinds of memory loss remains challenging because interventions must target information that is definitionally idiosyncratic. However, recent methodological and theoretical advances in cognitive neuroscience reveal novel strategies that may solve this problem. Evidence from behavioral, neuroimaging, and computational modeling studies suggest that the degree to which episodic memories overlap in the hippocampus can be modified in a predictable, experience-dependent manner. Specifically, strong concurrent reactivation of multiple memories can enhance recall of coarse-grained episodic information by increasing hippocampal integration. Conversely, coupling strong and moderate reactivation of memories can enhance recall of fine-grained episodic information be increasing hippocampal differentiation. Consistent with this idea, recent evidence suggests that using a smartphone to record and subsequently replay real-world memory cues can indeed improve episodic memory by reducing representational overlap among memories in the hippocampus. Against this background, this proposal is organized around two primary aims. First, we seek to establish smartphone-guided memory reactivation protocols that selectively promote integration and differentiation of real-world episodic memories in the hippocampus. Experiments in this aim will specifically ask whether unstructured and structured (in terms of narrative, space, and time) reactivation can be used to achieve these outcomes. Second, we will ask whether the benefits of memory reactivation are associated with behavioral and representational costs. Experiments in this aim will probe for undesirable downsides that accompany, or potentially explain, reactivation-based improvements in episodic memory. Our approach combines smartphone technology, pattern-based analysis of functional neuroimaging data, and careful characterization of recall data with neurocognitive theory inspired by computational models of learning mechanisms. Achieving our aims will establish an empirical foundation on which future interventions can be built to systematically target real-world episodic memories at a level of abstraction, i.e., fine-grained vs. coarse-grained detail, that is appropriate for the severity of memory loss.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants will be exposed to all conditions in the context of a within-subjects experimental design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Within-subject design | Other | Behavioral: Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues.All subjects enrolled and participated in this study will be in the same arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Fluent in English, right-handed, normal or corrected-to-normal vision, normal hearing.
- Exclusion Criteria: Metallic implants, claustrophobic, hearing implant, neurostimulator implant, pacemaker, aneurysm clip
- -
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues.Participants will use HippoCamera, a smartphone application, to record and replay memory cues. | Behavioural | Within-subject design |
Primary outcome
Verbal cued recall
Time frame: Verbal recall data will be obtained at the end of the six-week record and replay period.
Participants will verbally describe their memories of cued real-world events. Each trial is cued with a self-generated audio-visual clip that was created during a six-week period.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Participants use a smartphone to replay self-generated autobiographical memory cues. in people with Autobiographical Episodic Memory, run by Florida State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chris Martin, PhD (850-631-0946, cmartin@psy.fsu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Verbal cued recall (time frame: Verbal recall data will be obtained at the end of the six-week record and replay period.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.