AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Cancer LymphedemaNCT07862296

Radial Shock Wave Treatment Alongside Decongestive Care for Arm Swelling After Breast Cancer

A study testing Complex decongestive therapy and Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in people with Breast Cancer Lymphedema, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Arm swelling can persist after breast cancer treatment and may interfere with comfort, movement, and everyday activities. Decongestive care combines several approaches to manage this swelling. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer Lymphedema
What is being tested?
Complex decongestive therapy and Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
5 Oct 2022to 1 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • A history of breast cancer with unilateral upper-limb lymphedema established by clinical evaluation and lymphoscintigraphy.
  • Stage 2 or stage 3 lymphedema according to the International Society of Lymphology classification.
  • Availability of electronic medical records containing sex, age, weight, height, body mass index, occupation, comorbid conditions, medication use, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy history.
  • Written informed consent to participate.

Who cannot join

  • Active malignancy.
  • Ongoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
  • Clinical evidence of infection in the affected upper limb.
  • Advanced cardiac or renal failure.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital

    Konya, Konya, 42250

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Complex Decongestive Therapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Lymphedema

Arm swelling can persist after breast cancer treatment and may interfere with comfort, movement, and everyday activities. Decongestive care combines several approaches to manage this swelling. This study examined whether adding radial shock wave treatment changed short-term outcomes compared with decongestive care alone.

Twenty-one adults with stage 2 or stage 3 lymphedema affecting one arm were assigned to two treatment groups. Both groups were allocated to a four-week decongestive program. The combined-treatment schedule also included twelve shock wave sessions. Assessments before and after treatment covered arm size, the thickness of the skin and the tissue beneath it, pain, difficulty using the arm, lymphedema-related quality of life, and shoulder and wrist movement. A physician who did not know the treatment assignment performed the physical and ultrasound measurements.

Read the detailed description

This single-center study evaluated a noninvasive addition to intensive rehabilitation for unilateral upper-limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. It was conducted at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine Hospital in Konya, Türkiye.

The comparison was designed to examine the contribution of radial shock wave treatment separately from the decongestive program received by both groups. Overall limb measurements and regional ultrasound assessments were used to examine different aspects of the response to treatment. Questionnaires and joint measurements provided complementary information about symptoms, everyday arm use, and mobility.

The assessment schedule included examinations before treatment and at the end of the four-week course. Circumference measurements were also obtained weekly during the intervention period. The same physician performed the objective assessments without knowledge of group assignment. Participants and the personnel providing treatment were aware of the assigned intervention.

The Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine Local Ethics Committee approved the study on October 4, 2022, under decision number 2022/410. Each participant provided written consent. This record describes a study that had already been completed before its initial submission to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Being tested
Complex decongestive therapy, Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Keywords
Upper-limb lymphedema, Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, Complex decongestive therapy, Ultrasonography, Cancer rehabilitation, Arm function
Medical subject headings
Breast Cancer Lymphedema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Complex decongestive therapyOther

    The planned course comprised four weeks of treatment on five days per week. Components included manual lymphatic drainage, multilayer short-stretch bandaging, skin care, and therapeutic exercise. Exercise activities addressed breathing, posture, shoulder-girdle movement, gentle stretching, and low-intensity active movement of the upper limb and fingers. Movements were performed slowly within a pain-free range while the compression bandages were in place.

  • Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapyDevice

    An Intelect RPW Lite system (Chattanooga) was used to deliver radial pressure pulses with the participant lying supine. The scheduled regimen consisted of three sessions per week for four weeks. Each session used a pressure setting of 2 bar and a frequency of 4 Hz, with 2,500 pulses in total. Of these, 750 were directed to the axillary region and 250 to the cubital region; the remaining 1,500 were distributed across the arm, forearm, and hand.

Study groups in NCT07862296
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Decongestive care with radial shock wave therapyExperimentalParticipants were allocated to a four-week course of complex decongestive therapy with additional radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment. Decongestive sessions were scheduled on five days each week, and shock wave sessions on three days each week.
Receives: Other: Complex decongestive therapy; Device: Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Decongestive care aloneActive comparatorParticipants were allocated to the same four-week complex decongestive program, without shock wave treatment. The planned schedule consisted of five treatment days per week.
Receives: Other: Complex decongestive therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in calculated affected upper-limb volume

    Volume of the affected upper limb was estimated from circumference measurements using the truncated-cone method and expressed in liters. The week-4 volume was subtracted from the pretreatment volume. A positive value indicates a reduction in calculated limb volume.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Reduction in arm circumference 10 cm above the cubital fossa

    Circumference of the affected arm was measured in centimeters at a level 10 cm proximal to the cubital fossa. The reduction was calculated as the pretreatment measurement minus the week-4 measurement. Positive values represent a smaller circumference after treatment.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  2. Reduction in forearm circumference 10 cm below the cubital fossa

    Circumference of the affected forearm was recorded in centimeters at a level 10 cm distal to the cubital fossa. The week-4 measurement was subtracted from the pretreatment measurement. Positive values represent a decrease in circumference.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  3. Reduction in skin thickness at 10 cm proximal to the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the skin in the affected upper limb was measured 10 cm proximal to the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  4. Reduction in skin thickness at the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the skin in the affected upper limb was measured at the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  5. Reduction in skin thickness at 10 cm distal to the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the skin in the affected upper limb was measured 10 cm distal to the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  6. Reduction in subcutaneous tissue thickness at 10 cm proximal to the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the subcutaneous tissue in the affected upper limb was measured 10 cm proximal to the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  7. Reduction in subcutaneous tissue thickness at the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the subcutaneous tissue in the affected upper limb was measured at the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  8. Reduction in subcutaneous tissue thickness at 10 cm distal to the cubital fossa

    The thickness of the subcutaneous tissue in the affected upper limb was measured 10 cm distal to the cubital fossa by ultrasound using a linear-array transducer. Values were recorded in millimeters by the masked physician. Reduction was calculated as pretreatment thickness minus week-4 thickness; a positive value denotes thinning of the measured layer.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  9. Reduction in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score

    The Turkish QuickDASH questionnaire was used to assess upper-limb symptoms and activity limitations. This 11-item instrument produces a score from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating greater disability. The reduction was calculated as the baseline score minus the week-4 score; a positive value indicates improvement.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  10. Reduction in upper-limb pain on the Visual Analog Scale

    Participants rated pain in the affected upper limb using a Visual Analog Scale scored from 0, indicating no pain, to 10, indicating the most severe pain. Pain reduction was calculated by subtracting the week-4 score from the pretreatment score. Positive values indicate lower pain after treatment.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  11. Reduction in the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm function domain score

    The function domain of the Turkish Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm assessed limitations in daily activities attributable to arm lymphedema. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The baseline domain score minus the week-4 domain score was calculated; positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  12. Reduction in the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm appearance domain score

    The appearance domain of the Turkish Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm assessed the perceived effect of arm lymphedema on appearance. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The baseline domain score minus the week-4 domain score was calculated; positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  13. Reduction in the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm symptoms domain score

    The symptoms domain of the Turkish Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm assessed symptoms associated with arm lymphedema. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The baseline domain score minus the week-4 domain score was calculated; positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  14. Reduction in the Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm mood domain score

    The mood domain of the Turkish Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm assessed the emotional impact of arm lymphedema. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. The baseline domain score minus the week-4 domain score was calculated; positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  15. Increase in active shoulder flexion, abduction, adduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation

    Active shoulder flexion, abduction, adduction, extension, external rotation,internal rotation of the affected shoulder were measured in degrees with a standard goniometer by the masked physician. The pretreatment value was subtracted from the week-4 value. A positive result indicates an increase in the available range of motion.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

  16. Increase in active wrist flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation

    Active flexion, extension, radial deviation,ulnar deviation of the affected wrist were measured in degrees with a standard goniometer by the masked physician. Changes were calculated as the week-4 value minus the pretreatment value. Positive values indicate a gain in range of motion.

    Measured: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2026
  2. Study start5 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07862296
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-70632468-050.01.04-372389
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
1 Oct 2026
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified participant-level data supporting the published findings will be made available to researchers following approval of a reasonable request submitted to the corresponding author. Requests will be assessed by the study team. Any data transfer will be subject to applicable institutional and ethical requirements and must be consistent with participant consent and the protection of participant confidentiality.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Complex decongestive therapy and Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in people with Breast Cancer Lymphedema, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction in calculated affected upper-limb volume (time frame: Before the first treatment session and at the end of the four-week treatment course.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT07862296 | AzTrials