Acute Pulmonary EmbolismPMT-LDCDT-PENCT07865572
Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy With or Without Low-Dose Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism
A study testing PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) and PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) in people with Acute Pulmonary Embolism, run by Qiu Jipeng.
Trial summary
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular cause of death. In patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using large-bore catheters achieves rapid hemodynamic improvement while avoiding the bleeding risk of systemic thrombolysis, and low-dose… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pulmonary Embolism
- What is being tested?
- PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) and PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2026to 31 Dec 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-80 years.
- Acute pulmonary embolism confirmed by CTPA, with symptom onset to diagnosis ≤14 days.
- Imaging evidence of right ventricular dysfunction (CTPA RV/LV diameter ratio ≥1.0, or echocardiographic right ventricular dilation/hypokinesia) and elevated cardiac injury biomarkers (troponin I or T above the upper limit of normal).
- Presence of a contraindication to systemic thrombolysis, or failure of systemic thrombolysis, or clinical deterioration during anticoagulation.
- Thrombus visible in the main pulmonary artery and/or lobar arteries on CTPA.
- Provision of signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Cardiac arrest at enrollment; systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg for >15 minutes unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and vasopressors.
- Active bleeding; known coagulopathy (INR >2.0 or platelet count <50×10⁹/L); intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days, or intracranial tumor/vascular malformation; major surgery, major trauma, or stroke within 30 days.
- Known heparin allergy or a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- Prior systemic thrombolytic therapy.
- Known chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH); severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <30%); severe valvular heart disease; end-stage renal disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²); pregnancy or lactation.
- Intracardiac or intrapulmonary mass on CTPA; severe stenosis or occlusion of the inferior vena cava or iliofemoral vein.
- CTPA image quality inadequate for independent core laboratory interpretation.
- Current participation in another clinical study that could interfere with endpoint assessment.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone Versus Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Combined With Low-Dose Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular cause of death. In patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using large-bore catheters achieves rapid hemodynamic improvement while avoiding the bleeding risk of systemic thrombolysis, and low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) can dissolve residual thrombus with a lower systemic bleeding risk. This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized cohort study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of PMT alone versus PMT combined with low-dose CDT (PMT+LDCDT) in patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE. Approximately 150 patients will be enrolled and allocated to either PMT alone or PMT+LDCDT based on operator assessment. The primary safety endpoint is the composite incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 48 hours, and the primary efficacy endpoint is the change in the right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours assessed by a CTPA core laboratory.
Read the detailed description
Acute PE is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death, and patients with intermediate-high risk PE-hemodynamically stable but with imaging-confirmed right ventricular dysfunction and elevated cardiac injury biomarkers-are at substantial risk of early deterioration. PMT with large-bore catheters enables immediate thrombus removal and hemodynamic recovery without systemic thrombolytic exposure, whereas CDT delivers low-dose thrombolytics locally to dissolve residual thrombus with a reduced systemic bleeding risk. Combining PMT with low-dose CDT (PMT+LDCDT) may improve thrombus clearance without a meaningful increase in bleeding. This prospective, multicenter cohort study will enroll approximately 150 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE at centers with pulmonary vascular interventional capability. Patients will be allocated to PMT alone or PMT+LDCDT according to the operator's pre- and intra-procedural assessment. Participants will be followed at 24 h, 48 h, 7 days/discharge, 30 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months. The study will evaluate safety (48-hour MAE composite: all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage, ISTH major bleeding and other major adverse events) and efficacy (change in RV/LV diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours by CTPA core laboratory), as well as thrombus clearance, procedure time, length of stay, and the incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) at 6 and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Acute Pulmonary Embolism
- Being tested
- PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only), PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only)Device
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system (e.g., FlowTriever, Indigo aspiration system)
PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT)Device
Low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis: Alteplase (rt-PA), ≤20 mg (≤10 mg per lung), infused over ≤30 min via pulmonary artery catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) | Active comparator | PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) Receives: Device: PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) |
| PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) | Experimental | PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) Receives: Device: PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 48 hours after the procedure
Measured: within 48 hours post-procedure
Change in the RV/LV diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours (ΔRV/LV) measured by CTPA core laboratory
Measured: baseline and 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Pulmonary EmbolismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Qiu Jipeng
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Qiu Jipeng, Sixth Hospital of Wuhan, Affiliated Hospital of Jianghan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07865572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WH6-PMT-LDCDT-2026-01
- Acronym
- PMT-LDCDT-PE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone Versus Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Combined With Low-Dose Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in the Treatment of Acute Intermediate-High Risk Pulmonary Embolism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07865572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PMT-LDCDT-PE / WH6-PMT-LDCDT-2026-01
- Conditions
- Acute Pulmonary Embolism
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Qiu JipengUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular cause of death. In patients with intermediate-high risk acute PE, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) using large-bore catheters achieves rapid hemodynamic improvement while avoiding the bleeding risk of systemic thrombolysis, and low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) can dissolve residual thrombus with a lower systemic bleeding risk. This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized cohort study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of PMT alone versus PMT combined with low-dose CDT (PMT+LDCDT) in patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE. Approximately 150 patients will be enrolled and allocated to either PMT alone or PMT+LDCDT based on operator assessment. The primary safety endpoint is the composite incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 48 hours, and the primary efficacy endpoint is the change in the right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours assessed by a CTPA core laboratory.
Detailed description
Acute PE is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death, and patients with intermediate-high risk PE-hemodynamically stable but with imaging-confirmed right ventricular dysfunction and elevated cardiac injury biomarkers-are at substantial risk of early deterioration. PMT with large-bore catheters enables immediate thrombus removal and hemodynamic recovery without systemic thrombolytic exposure, whereas CDT delivers low-dose thrombolytics locally to dissolve residual thrombus with a reduced systemic bleeding risk. Combining PMT with low-dose CDT (PMT+LDCDT) may improve thrombus clearance without a meaningful increase in bleeding. This prospective, multicenter cohort study will enroll approximately 150 patients with acute intermediate-high risk PE at centers with pulmonary vascular interventional capability. Patients will be allocated to PMT alone or PMT+LDCDT according to the operator's pre- and intra-procedural assessment. Participants will be followed at 24 h, 48 h, 7 days/discharge, 30 days, 90 days, 6 months and 12 months. The study will evaluate safety (48-hour MAE composite: all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage, ISTH major bleeding and other major adverse events) and efficacy (change in RV/LV diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours by CTPA core laboratory), as well as thrombus clearance, procedure time, length of stay, and the incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) at 6 and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) | Active comparator | Device: PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only)PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) |
| PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) | Experimental | Device: PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT)PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18-80 years.
- Acute pulmonary embolism confirmed by CTPA, with symptom onset to diagnosis ≤14 days.
- Imaging evidence of right ventricular dysfunction (CTPA RV/LV diameter ratio ≥1.0, or echocardiographic right ventricular dilation/hypokinesia) and elevated cardiac injury biomarkers (troponin I or T above the upper limit of normal).
- Presence of a contraindication to systemic thrombolysis, or failure of systemic thrombolysis, or clinical deterioration during anticoagulation.
- Thrombus visible in the main pulmonary artery and/or lobar arteries on CTPA.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Cardiac arrest at enrollment; systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg for >15 minutes unresponsive to fluid resuscitation and vasopressors.
- Active bleeding; known coagulopathy (INR >2.0 or platelet count <50×10⁹/L); intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days, or intracranial tumor/vascular malformation; major surgery, major trauma, or stroke within 30 days.
- Known heparin allergy or a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- Prior systemic thrombolytic therapy.
- Known chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH); severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <30%); severe valvular heart disease; end-stage renal disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²); pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only)Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy system (e.g., FlowTriever, Indigo aspiration system) | Device | PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) |
| PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT)Low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis: Alteplase (rt-PA), ≤20 mg (≤10 mg per lung), infused over ≤30 min via pulmonary artery catheter | Device | PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) |
Primary outcome
Composite incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 48 hours after the procedure
Time frame: within 48 hours post-procedure
Change in the RV/LV diameter ratio from baseline to 48 hours (ΔRV/LV) measured by CTPA core laboratory
Time frame: baseline and 48 hours
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
CTEPH Differential Diagnosis Assisted by Enhanced Large Language Model Support
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH), Acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Alteplase for High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism
Pulmonary Embolism Acute
RecruitingObservational study
A Real-World Study of EkoSonic Endovascular System in Chinese Populations With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Not yet recruiting
Post Pulmonary Embolism In Patients Treated With Catheter Based Therapy
Pulmonary Embolism Acute
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Value of Novel Thrombus Markers in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PMT alone (percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy only) and PMT plus low-dose catheter-directed thrombolysis (PMT+LDCDT) in people with Acute Pulmonary Embolism, run by Qiu Jipeng.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 48 hours after the procedure (time frame: within 48 hours post-procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.