Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia InductionNCT07867600
Low Dose Induction for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients
A study testing Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF in people with Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction, run by Azza Shibl Sayed at 2 sites in Egypt.
Trial summary
the standard induction treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia has high early morbidity and mortality that jeopardize the outcome especially in developing countries. SIOP recommended lower dose induction synergistic G- CSF to minimize these unwanted toxicities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction
- What is being tested?
- Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesEgypt
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2022to Jul 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Denovo pediatric AML patients.
- equal or <18 years old
Who cannot join
- Children with promyelocytic leukemia
- Down syndrome with AML with age less than 4 years.
- AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome or prior chemotherapy.
- death before treatment initiation
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut Univeristy
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515
- Recruiting
South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut Univeristy
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71515
Omima Shaker, Master, 00201019739885, dromimaali@aun.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Outcome of Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated According to SIOP Guidelines in Developing Countries
the standard induction treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia has high early morbidity and mortality that jeopardize the outcome especially in developing countries. SIOP recommended lower dose induction synergistic G- CSF to minimize these unwanted toxicities. the study aimed at minimizing the toxicities during induction without jeopardizing the survival.
Read the detailed description
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for 15% to 20% of all childhood leukemias. In most children, AML presents as a de novo entity, but in a minority, it is a secondary malignancy. Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease and its diagnosis involves a combination of diagnostic analyses including morphology, immunophenotyping, cytochemistry, and leukemic blasts derived from peripheral blood or bone marrow demonstrating cytogentic and molecular characteristics. The treatment of AML comprises induction of remission followed by intensive consolidation therapy with the use of chemotherapy alone or in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The standard chemotherapy courses for remission induction and consolidation are typically accompanied by an extended period of myelosuppression during which there is significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment-related morbidity and treatment-related mortality (TRM) represents a significant challenge in pediatric AML worldwide. In low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), mortality associated with initial disease and treatment can be up to 50 %. It is now well understood and accepted that if the relapse rate with a given therapy is excessive then the treatment may need intensification; however, if toxic death rates are too high, de-intensification may save more lives, depending on the enhancement of supportive care. During tumor formation, new mutations are constantly occurring giving rise to drug resistant mutation at a very low frequency. With the pre- existence of small drug-resistant sub clones giving the current chemotherapy at the maximum tolerated dose that eliminates a dominant drug sensitive clone might allow the competitive release of resistant sub clones to undergo accelerated growth in a resource-rich environment, resulting in more rapid disease progression or relapse. Reducing chemotherapy drug dosage may be a logical way to maintain a stable population of sensitive sub clone, thereby restricting the growth of resistant cell. Intensifying the induction courses can decrease relapse rates but not improve OS. The initial concerns for offering a low dose intensity regimen for children with AML in most studies was based on the high risk of toxicity related deaths or treatment abandonment specially for children in limited resources countries. According to SIOP/PODC, patients with AML treated with low dose chemotherapy (LDC/G-CSF) receive only a two -drug regimen with 10 \& 2 times lower doses of cytrabine \& anthracyclines respectively than those given standard AML remission induction regimens. Although the mechanism \& clinical efficacy of LDC/G-CSF are still unknown, it is possible that granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) makes leukemia cells more vulnerable to chemotherapy through sensitization or priming.G-CSF can also reduce the overall viability of AML cells when cocultured with BM stroma but not alone. G- CSF mobilizes T-regulatory cells and has other immunomodulatory effects.
- Being tested
- Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF
- Keywords
- MAG/GCSF, pediatric AML, SIOP-PODC, Survival, Toxicity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSFCombination product
low dose mitothantrone and Ara C concurrently with G-CSF during induction treatment of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia to be compared with the standard induction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| low dose induction/GCSF | Experimental | low dose Ara C, mitothantrone concurrently with GCSF Receives: Combination Product: Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF |
| Standard induction | Active comparator | the established, standard induction regimen, ADE Receives: Combination Product: Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of low dose induction for pediatric AML
assessment of each induction response by performing bone marrow aspirate and analysis of each participant response. BM response may be: CR (complete remission), PR (partial remission), NR(no response) or induction deaths
Measured: 6 years
number of participants with low dose induction-related Toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5
the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v5) using a range of grades (1-5):
- mild
- moderate
- severe
- life threatening
- death
Measured: 6 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Event free survival of AML patients with low dose induction
time from enrollment to occurrence of any event (death, induction failure, refractory relapse or 2nd malignancy) or to last follow up of living patients using Kaplan Meier and hazard cox regression survival analysis
Measured: 10 years
Overall survival of pediatric patients with AML using low dose induction
time from enrollment to occurrence of death of any cause or to last follow up of living patients using Kaplan Meier and hazard cox regression survival analysis
Measured: 10 years
Event Free Survival of unfavourable and favourable sub groups of AML patients with low dose induction
time from enrollment to occurrence of any event (death, induction failure, refractory relapse or 2nd malignancy) or to last follow up of living patients using Kaplan Meier and hazard cox regression survival analysis
Measured: 10 years
number of participants with Long term low dose induction related- toxicities assessed by CTCAE v5
the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v5) using a range of grades (1-5):
- mild
- moderate
- severe
- life threatening
- death
Measured: 10 years
Duration of neutrophil recovery after low dose induction
calculating days of neutropenia after dose till recovery
Measured: 6 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2026
- Study start28 Jul 2022
- Primary completionJul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia InductionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azza Shibl Sayed
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Azza Shibl Sayed, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07867600
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- I0RG0006563
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Bansal D, Davidson A, Supriyadi E, Njuguna F, Ribeiro RC, Kaspers GJL. SIOP PODC adapted risk stratification and treatment guidelines: Recommendations for acute myeloid leukemia in resource-limited settings. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Nov;70(11):e28087. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28087. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
PubMed 31774234
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome of Pediatric Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated According to SIOP Guidelines in Developing Countries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07867600
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- I0RG0006563
- Keywords
- MAG/GCSF, pediatric AML, SIOP-PODC, Survival, Toxicity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Azza Shibl SayedUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
the standard induction treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia has high early morbidity and mortality that jeopardize the outcome especially in developing countries. SIOP recommended lower dose induction synergistic G- CSF to minimize these unwanted toxicities. the study aimed at minimizing the toxicities during induction without jeopardizing the survival.
Detailed description
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for 15% to 20% of all childhood leukemias. In most children, AML presents as a de novo entity, but in a minority, it is a secondary malignancy. Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease and its diagnosis involves a combination of diagnostic analyses including morphology, immunophenotyping, cytochemistry, and leukemic blasts derived from peripheral blood or bone marrow demonstrating cytogentic and molecular characteristics. The treatment of AML comprises induction of remission followed by intensive consolidation therapy with the use of chemotherapy alone or in combination with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The standard chemotherapy courses for remission induction and consolidation are typically accompanied by an extended period of myelosuppression during which there is significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment-related morbidity and treatment-related mortality (TRM) represents a significant challenge in pediatric AML worldwide. In low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), mortality associated with initial disease and treatment can be up to 50 %. It is now well understood and accepted that if the relapse rate with a given therapy is excessive then the treatment may need intensification; however, if toxic death rates are too high, de-intensification may save more lives, depending on the enhancement of supportive care. During tumor formation, new mutations are constantly occurring giving rise to drug resistant mutation at a very low frequency. With the pre- existence of small drug-resistant sub clones giving the current chemotherapy at the maximum tolerated dose that eliminates a dominant drug sensitive clone might allow the competitive release of resistant sub clones to undergo accelerated growth in a resource-rich environment, resulting in more rapid disease progression or relapse. Reducing chemotherapy drug dosage may be a logical way to maintain a stable population of sensitive sub clone, thereby restricting the growth of resistant cell. Intensifying the induction courses can decrease relapse rates but not improve OS. The initial concerns for offering a low dose intensity regimen for children with AML in most studies was based on the high risk of toxicity related deaths or treatment abandonment specially for children in limited resources countries. According to SIOP/PODC, patients with AML treated with low dose chemotherapy (LDC/G-CSF) receive only a two -drug regimen with 10 \& 2 times lower doses of cytrabine \& anthracyclines respectively than those given standard AML remission induction regimens. Although the mechanism \& clinical efficacy of LDC/G-CSF are still unknown, it is possible that granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) makes leukemia cells more vulnerable to chemotherapy through sensitization or priming.G-CSF can also reduce the overall viability of AML cells when cocultured with BM stroma but not alone. G- CSF mobilizes T-regulatory cells and has other immunomodulatory effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| low dose induction/GCSF | Experimental | Combination Product: Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSFlow dose Ara C, mitothantrone concurrently with GCSF |
| Standard induction | Active comparator | Combination Product: Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSFthe established, standard induction regimen, ADE |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Denovo pediatric AML patients.
- equal or <18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children with promyelocytic leukemia
- Down syndrome with AML with age less than 4 years.
- AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome or prior chemotherapy.
- death before treatment initiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSFlow dose mitothantrone and Ara C concurrently with G-CSF during induction treatment of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia to be compared with the standard induction | Combination product | Standard induction, low dose induction/GCSF |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of low dose induction for pediatric AML
Time frame: 6 years
assessment of each induction response by performing bone marrow aspirate and analysis of each participant response. BM response may be: CR (complete remission), PR (partial remission), NR(no response) or induction deaths
number of participants with low dose induction-related Toxicity assessed by CTCAE v5
Time frame: 6 years
the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE v5) using a range of grades (1-5): 1. mild 2. moderate 3. severe 4. life threatening 5. death
5 secondary outcomes
Event free survival of AML patients with low dose induction
Time frame: 10 years
Overall survival of pediatric patients with AML using low dose induction
Time frame: 10 years
Event Free Survival of unfavourable and favourable sub groups of AML patients with low dose induction
Time frame: 10 years
number of participants with Long term low dose induction related- toxicities assessed by CTCAE v5
Time frame: 10 years
Duration of neutrophil recovery after low dose induction
Time frame: 6 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 31774234Bansal D, Davidson A, Supriyadi E, Njuguna F, Ribeiro RC, Kaspers GJL. SIOP PODC adapted risk stratification and treatment guidelines: Recommendations for acute myeloid leukemia in resource-limited settings. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Nov;70(11):e28087. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28087. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy of Quizartinib in Children and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), a Cancer of the Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Selinexor Combined With Induction Chemotherapy for Children With NUP98-positive AML
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Clinical Study of Induction Therapy Options Based on Molecular Subtyping and MRD in Children and Adolescents With AML
AML, Childhood, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low dose Ara C/ anthracycline combined with GCSF in people with Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction, run by Azza Shibl Sayed at 2 sites in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Azza Shibl, MD (00201021880322, azzashibl@aun.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of low dose induction for pediatric AML (time frame: 6 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07867600, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2026.