Neonatal ResuscitationNCT07867652
Video-Based Self-Assessment in Neonatal Resuscitation Training
A study testing Video-Based Self-Assessment in people with Neonatal Resuscitation and Simulation-Based Education, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of video-based self-assessment in simulation-based neonatal resuscitation skills training on neonatal resuscitation skills, clinical judgment, student satisfaction, and self-confidence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neonatal Resuscitation, Simulation-Based Education, Self-Assessment
- What is being tested?
- Video-Based Self-Assessment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 84 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 9 Oct 2026to 4 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Volunteering to participate in the study.
- Being an active fourth-year student in the Midwifery Department of Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences.
- Regularly attending the relevant theoretical courses.
- Providing informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Having previously attended a Neonatal Resuscitation Program, certificate training, or course.
- Having previously participated in any simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training.
- Being absent from the simulation training or any of the assessment sessions.
- Withdrawing from the study at any stage.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Health Sciences
Üsküdar, Istanbul, 34668
Leyla KAYA, PhD, 05456449327, leylakaya02@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of Video-Based Self-Assessment in Simulation-Based Neonatal Resuscitation Skills Training
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of video-based self-assessment in simulation-based neonatal resuscitation skills training on neonatal resuscitation skills, clinical judgment, student satisfaction, and self-confidence.
Read the detailed description
This study will be conducted with fourth-year midwifery students to evaluate the effectiveness of video-based self-assessment in simulation-based neonatal resuscitation skills training. Eligible students who provide informed consent will participate in the study and will be assigned to study groups according to the research design.
During the preparation phase of the study, the researchers will review the current literature on neonatal resuscitation, and the theoretical training content will be developed into an 8-week PowerPoint presentation delivered 2 hours per week. The theoretical training will cover the fundamental steps of neonatal resuscitation, decision-making processes, and clinical applications, and will also include case discussions and video demonstrations of skills. Following the theoretical training, both groups will participate in standardized simulation practice and debriefing sessions.
The sample size was calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 prior to data collection. The effect size used in the power analysis was Cohen's d = 1.05, calculated based on previously reported post-intervention total scores of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SS-SCL). The analysis was performed using the "Means: Difference between two independent means (two groups)" option, with a two-tailed hypothesis, α = 0.05, statistical power (1-β) = 0.95, and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The minimum required sample size was determined to be 50 participants, with 25 participants in each group. Accounting for a potential 20% attrition rate, the target sample size was increased to 60 participants, with 30 participants per group. However, because all 84 students enrolled in the course were accessible and the intervention was educational in nature, the study was planned to include all 84 students, with 42 participants in each group.
Participants will receive simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training. A standardized neonatal resuscitation simulation scenario will be used across all assessment sessions. In the intervention group, video recordings of simulation performances will be used for video-based self-assessment, allowing students to review and evaluate their own performance. The comparison group will receive simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training without video-based self-assessment.
The effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated based on neonatal resuscitation skills, clinical judgment, student satisfaction, and self-confidence. Clinical judgment will be assessed using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), which evaluates four dimensions of clinical judgment: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting.
Assessments will be conducted at three time points: pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and 4 weeks after the intervention (follow-up). The findings will be used to determine whether incorporating video-based self-assessment into simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training improves students' learning outcomes and whether these effects are maintained over time.
Ethics committee approval was obtained from the University of Health Sciences Hamidiye Ethics Committee for Non-Drug and Non-Medical Device Interventional Research (Date: August 26, 2026; No: 26-17).
- Conditions
- Neonatal Resuscitation, Simulation-Based Education, Self-Assessment, Clinical Assessment, Self-Confidence
- Being tested
- Video-Based Self-Assessment
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Video-Based Self-AssessmentBehavioural
Participants will review video recordings of their own neonatal resuscitation simulation performance to identify their strengths and areas requiring improvement and to support self-reflection and self-awareness.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Based Self-Assessment | Experimental | Participants in this group will receive nine weeks of neonatal resuscitation training based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines. Following the theoretical training, participants will perform neonatal resuscitation in a simulation setting, and their performances will be video-recorded by the researchers. After completing the simulation, participants will individually review their own video recordings to critically reflect on their performance, identify strengths, and recognize areas requiring improvement. No scoring or assessment form will be used by participants during the video review. Following the simulation and video-based self-assessment, participants will attend a standardized researcher-led debriefing session. Outcome assessments will be conducted at pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and four weeks after the post-test (follow-up). Receives: Behavioral: Video-Based Self-Assessment |
| Control Group | No intervention | Participants in this group will receive the same nine weeks of neonatal resuscitation training based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and will perform neonatal resuscitation in a standard simulation setting. Participants will not participate in video-based self-assessment during the intervention period. Following each simulation session, participants will attend the same standardized researcher-led debriefing session as the experimental group. Outcome assessments will be conducted at pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and four weeks after the post-test (follow-up). After completion of all study procedures, participants in the control group will be offered the opportunity to review video recordings of their own performance. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neonatal Resuscitation Skills Assessment Form
It is based on the General Directorate of Public Health, Newborn Resuscitation/Neonatal Resuscitation Programme (NRP) Certified Practitioner Training Programme.
Measured: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR)
The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), developed by Lasater (2007) based on Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model and adapted into Turkish by Sezer et al., will be used to assess students' clinical judgment skills. The rubric consists of 11 items across four dimensions: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. Each item is scored from 1 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 11 to 44, with higher scores indicating higher levels of clinical judgment. The Turkish version demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 for the overall rubric and coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 for the subscales. In this study, the rubric will be completed by trained observers during the simulation sessions.
Measured: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS)
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006) to assess students' satisfaction and self-confidence in learning within simulation-based learning environments. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ünver et al. The Turkish version consists of 12 items and includes two subscales: "Satisfaction with Current Learning" (5 items) and "Self-Confidence in Learning" (7 items). The scale contains no negatively worded items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning (Jeffries \& Rizzolo, 2006; Ünver et al.). In the Turkish validity and reliability study, Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.85 for the Satisfaction with Current Learning subscale, 0.77 for the Self-Confidence in Learning subscale, and 0.89 for the total scale (Ünver et al.).
Measured: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2026
- Study start9 Oct 2026
- Primary completion4 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion4 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Neonatal ResuscitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Leyla Kaya, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Investigators
- Leyla KAYA, PhD, Principal investigator, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07867652
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 26.08.2026/26-17
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Video-Based Self-Assessment in Simulation-Based Neonatal Resuscitation Skills Training
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07867652
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 26.08.2026/26-17
- Conditions
- Neonatal Resuscitation, Simulation-Based Education, Self-Assessment, Clinical Assessment, Self-Confidence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 84 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 4 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of video-based self-assessment in simulation-based neonatal resuscitation skills training on neonatal resuscitation skills, clinical judgment, student satisfaction, and self-confidence.
Detailed description
This study will be conducted with fourth-year midwifery students to evaluate the effectiveness of video-based self-assessment in simulation-based neonatal resuscitation skills training. Eligible students who provide informed consent will participate in the study and will be assigned to study groups according to the research design.
During the preparation phase of the study, the researchers will review the current literature on neonatal resuscitation, and the theoretical training content will be developed into an 8-week PowerPoint presentation delivered 2 hours per week. The theoretical training will cover the fundamental steps of neonatal resuscitation, decision-making processes, and clinical applications, and will also include case discussions and video demonstrations of skills. Following the theoretical training, both groups will participate in standardized simulation practice and debriefing sessions.
The sample size was calculated using G*Power version 3.1.9.7 prior to data collection. The effect size used in the power analysis was Cohen's d = 1.05, calculated based on previously reported post-intervention total scores of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SS-SCL). The analysis was performed using the "Means: Difference between two independent means (two groups)" option, with a two-tailed hypothesis, α = 0.05, statistical power (1-β) = 0.95, and a 1:1 allocation ratio. The minimum required sample size was determined to be 50 participants, with 25 participants in each group. Accounting for a potential 20% attrition rate, the target sample size was increased to 60 participants, with 30 participants per group. However, because all 84 students enrolled in the course were accessible and the intervention was educational in nature, the study was planned to include all 84 students, with 42 participants in each group.
Participants will receive simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training. A standardized neonatal resuscitation simulation scenario will be used across all assessment sessions. In the intervention group, video recordings of simulation performances will be used for video-based self-assessment, allowing students to review and evaluate their own performance. The comparison group will receive simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training without video-based self-assessment.
The effectiveness of the intervention will be evaluated based on neonatal resuscitation skills, clinical judgment, student satisfaction, and self-confidence. Clinical judgment will be assessed using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), which evaluates four dimensions of clinical judgment: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting.
Assessments will be conducted at three time points: pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and 4 weeks after the intervention (follow-up). The findings will be used to determine whether incorporating video-based self-assessment into simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training improves students' learning outcomes and whether these effects are maintained over time.
Ethics committee approval was obtained from the University of Health Sciences Hamidiye Ethics Committee for Non-Drug and Non-Medical Device Interventional Research (Date: August 26, 2026; No: 26-17).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Based Self-Assessment | Experimental | Behavioral: Video-Based Self-AssessmentParticipants in this group will receive nine weeks of neonatal resuscitation training based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines. Following the theoretical training, participants will perform neonatal resuscitation in a simulation setting, and their performances will be video-recorded by the researchers. After completing the simulation, participants will individually review their own video recordings to critically reflect on their performance, identify strengths, and recognize areas requiring improvement. No scoring or assessment form will be used by participants during the video review. Following the simulation and video-based self-assessment, participants will attend a standardized researcher-led debriefing session. Outcome assessments will be conducted at pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and four weeks after the post-test (follow-up). |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Participants in this group will receive the same nine weeks of neonatal resuscitation training based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and will perform neonatal resuscitation in a standard simulation setting. Participants will not participate in video-based self-assessment during the intervention period. Following each simulation session, participants will attend the same standardized researcher-led debriefing session as the experimental group. Outcome assessments will be conducted at pre-test, immediately after the intervention (post-test), and four weeks after the post-test (follow-up). After completion of all study procedures, participants in the control group will be offered the opportunity to review video recordings of their own performance. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Volunteering to participate in the study.
- Being an active fourth-year student in the Midwifery Department of Hamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences.
- Regularly attending the relevant theoretical courses.
- Providing informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having previously attended a Neonatal Resuscitation Program, certificate training, or course.
- Having previously participated in any simulation-based neonatal resuscitation training.
- Being absent from the simulation training or any of the assessment sessions.
- Withdrawing from the study at any stage.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Video-Based Self-AssessmentParticipants will review video recordings of their own neonatal resuscitation simulation performance to identify their strengths and areas requiring improvement and to support self-reflection and self-awareness. | Behavioural | Video-Based Self-Assessment |
Primary outcome
Neonatal Resuscitation Skills Assessment Form
Time frame: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
It is based on the General Directorate of Public Health, Newborn Resuscitation/Neonatal Resuscitation Programme (NRP) Certified Practitioner Training Programme.
Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR)
Time frame: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
The Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR), developed by Lasater (2007) based on Tanner's Clinical Judgment Model and adapted into Turkish by Sezer et al., will be used to assess students' clinical judgment skills. The rubric consists of 11 items across four dimensions: noticing, interpreting, responding, and reflecting. Each item is scored from 1 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 11 to 44, with higher scores indicating higher levels of clinical judgment. The Turkish version demonstrated high internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.91 for the overall rubric and coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 for the subscales. In this study, the rubric will be completed by trained observers during the simulation sessions.
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS)
Time frame: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.
The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006) to assess students' satisfaction and self-confidence in learning within simulation-based learning environments. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ünver et al. The Turkish version consists of 12 items and includes two subscales: "Satisfaction with Current Learning" (5 items) and "Self-Confidence in Learning" (7 items). The scale contains no negatively worded items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning (Jeffries \& Rizzolo, 2006; Ünver et al.). In the Turkish validity and reliability study, Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.85 for the Satisfaction with Current Learning subscale, 0.77 for the Self-Confidence in Learning subscale, and 0.89 for the total scale (Ünver et al.).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Neonatal Resuscitation
Recruiting
The Periviable GOALS Decision Support Tool
Pregnancy Preterm, Premature Birth
Recruiting
Sustained Cord Circulation at Emergency Cesarean Section
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Fetal Hypoxia
Not yet recruiting
Sustained Inflation and Chest Compression vs 3:1 C:V Ratio in Asphyxiated Newborns
Cardiac Arrest
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Cryo-FIRST: Effectiveness of INTERCEPT Fibrinogen Complex (IFC) for Trauma-Associated Hemorrhage
Hypofibrinogenemia, Hemorrhage
Recruiting
Manual T-piece Versus Ventilator Positive Pressure Ventilation During Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Neonates
Neonatal Resuscitation, Apnea Neonatal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Leyla KAYA, PhD principal investigator
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Video-Based Self-Assessment in people with Neonatal Resuscitation and Simulation-Based Education, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Leyla KAYA, PhD (054566449327, leylakaya02@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neonatal Resuscitation Skills Assessment Form (time frame: Pre-test, immediately after participants were assigned to groups; post-test, immediately after the pre-test; follow-up, 4 weeks after the post-test.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.