AzTrials
AzTrials

Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Applying Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization (UV phF) to Standard Titanium Implants Immediately Before SurgeryUVNCT07868744

Clinical Assessment of UV Photofunctionalization on Stability and Osseointegration of Early Loaded Implants

A study testing UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implants in people with Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Applying Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization (UV phF) to Standard Titanium Implants Immediately Before Surgery and Monitoring Early Implant Stability and Osseointegration During the Critical Initial Healing Phase, run by Future University in Egypt at 1 site in Egypt.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if UV light treatment (photo functionalization) works to help dental implants heal faster and become stable enough for early use in adults missing teeth in the lower back jaw. It will also learn about the survival rate and safety of these implants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implants
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 30 Mar 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults ≥18 years of age.
  • Patients with single or multiple missing teeth in a healed edentulous ridge located in the mandibular posterior area.
  • Patients classified as having D2 or D3 bone quality based on pre-operative CBCT scans.
  • Patients possessing sufficient bone volume for implant placement without the need for major grafting procedures.
  • Patients demonstrating good oral hygiene and compliance.

Who cannot join

  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases.
  • Bone quality of D1 or D4.
  • Smoking >10 cigarettes/day.
  • Active infection or periodontal disease.
  • Need for extensive bone augmentation.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Parafunctional habits.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Future university hospital

    Cairo, Fifth Settlement, 11835

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Clinical Assessment of UV Photofunctionalization on Stability and Osseointegration of Early Loaded Implants A Prospective Clinical Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if UV light treatment (photo functionalization) works to help dental implants heal faster and become stable enough for early use in adults missing teeth in the lower back jaw. It will also learn about the survival rate and safety of these implants. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do the UV-treated implants achieve the required stability score (IST ≥ 65) at 4 to 6 weeks to allow for early placement of the artificial tooth? What are the implant survival rates, and how do the gums and surrounding bone respond 6 months after the artificial tooth is placed? Researchers will test the stability of these UV-treated implants against a standard clinical threshold to see if they safely support an early treatment timeline. Participants will :Have a UV-treated titanium dental implant surgically placed in their lower jaw. Visit the clinic for check ups and non-invasive stability tests at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after surgery. Receive their final artificial tooth between 4 to 6 weeks, provided the implant is completely stable. Return for follow-up X-rays and tissue checks at 1, 3, and 6 months after receiving the artificial tooth.

Read the detailed description

Background and Scientific Rationale Standard titanium dental implants are prone to "biological aging" during storage, a process characterized by the progressive accumulation of atmospheric hydrocarbons on the implant surface. This contamination negatively alters the electrostatic charge of the surface and increases its hydrophobicity. Consequently, the hydrophobic surface impairs critical early healing steps, specifically the adsorption of proteins and the attachment of osteoblasts (bone-forming cells), which can compromise early implant stability. To overcome this biological challenge, the study utilizes Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization (UV phF). This chairside conditioning method uses UVC light to decompose organic contaminants, remove hydrocarbons, and expose the underlying titanium dioxide layer. The treatment converts the implant surface to a "super-hydrophilic" state, which is hypothesized to significantly improve the affinity for osteogenic cells, accelerate bone deposition, and enhance early bone-implant contact (BIC). This accelerated osseointegration is essential for successfully executing a demanding 4 to 6-week early loading protocol in the posterior mandible. Study Design and Participant Selection This is a prospective, single-arm clinical trial targeting adult patients (18 years and older) who require single or multiple dental implants in a healed edentulous ridge of the mandibular posterior area. The bone quality at the target site must be classified as D2 or D3 based on pre-operative CBCT imaging, with sufficient bone volume to avoid major grafting procedures. The study calculates a target recruitment of 22 patients to allow for a 20% attrition rate, ensuring that a minimum of 18 evaluable implants are available to achieve an 80% statistical power. Patients will be excluded if they have uncontrolled systemic diseases, D1 or D4 bone quality, active infection, periodontal disease, are pregnant or lactating, or smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day. Interventions and Surgical ProceduresImplant Preparation: Point UV® Implants (Titanium Grade 4) will undergo UV phF surface treatment according to the manufacturer's specified 12 to 24-hour cycle prior to placement. Surgical Phase: The procedure will be performed under local anesthesia, beginning with the elevation of a full-thickness envelope flap. After site preparation, the UV-treated implant will be inserted. Initial Measurements: The insertion torque will be immediately recorded using a calibrated torque wrench, and the primary implant stability (IST) will be measured on Day 1. Post-Operative Care: The surgical flap will be sutured, and patients will be prescribed Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (875 mg/125 mg) for 5 days, Ibuprofen (400 mg) for 3 days, and a Chlorhexidine (0.12-0.2%) mouthwash for 1 week. Sutures will be removed two weeks post-surgery, and a soft diet is recommended for the first 7 days. Measurement Device and Loading Protocol Implant stability will be assessed using the AnyCheck® device, which utilizes a non-invasive magnetic percussion method. Unlike traditional resonance frequency analysis that requires removing the healing abutment, AnyCheck taps directly against the existing healing abutment, preserving the soft-tissue biological seal during the healing phase. Measurements will be taken on Day 1, Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6. The early loading protocol (placement of the final prosthetic restoration) will only proceed at 4 to 6 weeks if specific criteria are met: The initial IST recorded on Day 1 must be ≥ 70. The follow-up IST at Week 4 to 6 must be ≥ 65. If these stability thresholds are not met, loading will be postponed and reassessed at Week 8. Follow-Up and Secondary Outcomes All patients will be monitored for at least 6 months following the delivery of the final prosthesis. Secondary outcomes include evaluating marginal bone level changes using a parallel-technique periapical X-ray at 1, 3, and 6 months. Additionally, the peri-implant soft-tissue response will be assessed using a periodontal probe 6 months after the final prosthesis is placed. Any adverse effects, such as pain, swelling, infection, or mobility before loading, will be recorded, and such implants may be excluded from the final analysis.

Being tested
UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implants
Keywords
UV Photofunctionalization (phF), Ultraviolet (UV) surface treatment, Early loading, Titanium aging, Superhydrophilic implant, Ultraviolet (UV)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implantsDevice

    Also called Point UV Implant, UV-phF titanium implants

    Unlike standard titanium implants that are placed directly from the packaging, the implants in this study (Point UV® Implant System, Titanium Grade 4) undergo Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization (UV phF) immediately prior to surgical insertion to activate the implant surface. The surgical placement is strictly limited to healed edentulous ridges located specifically in the mandibular posterior area (lower jaw).The intervention is exclusively performed on patients categorized as having D2 or D3 bone quality, verified by pre-operative CBCT scans. The intervention employs an early loading prosthetic protocol, distinguishing it from conventional/delayed loading approaches.

Study groups in NCT07868744
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
UV-Photofunctionalized Titanium ImplantsExperimentalThe study is defined as a "single-arm, clinical study". Because there is only one group in the trial, all participants are enrolled into this single arm and receive the intervention being tested (the UV-photofunctionalized dental implants). Therefore, this arm serves as the experimental group. There are no comparator, placebo, or sham arms in this study.
Receives: Device: UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implants

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary implant stability

    mplant Stability Test (IST): Stability is quantified via IST values using the AnyCheck® device, which employs a non-invasive magnetic percussion method. Insertion Torque: Mechanical stability at placement is measured in Newton centimeters (N·cm/Nm) using a calibrated torque wrench.

    Measured: IST values are recorded immediately after the surgical placement (Day 1 / Day 0), and during follow-up visits at Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Assessing the overall survival and success of the implants at 6 months after functional loading.

    This metric tracks the overall clinical success and retention of the implant in the patient's mouth. The study actively monitors for adverse clinical signs that would indicate failure, such as implant mobility, pain, swelling, or active infection.

    Measured: The final survival rate is assessed 6 months after the implant has been loaded with the final prosthesis. Any implant showing signs of failure before loading is excluded from the final analysis.

  2. Peri-implant Soft-Tissue Response

    This outcome evaluates the health and stability of the gum tissues surrounding the dental implant after the artificial tooth has been attached.

    Measured: The primary evaluation is recorded 6 months after the final prosthesis is delivered. According to the participant timeline, periodontal probing is specifically conducted at Week 8 to 10, Week 20 to 22, and Week 32 to 34.

  3. Marginal Bone Level Change

    This outcome monitors the preservation or loss of the bone immediately surrounding the neck of the implant once it is bearing the chewing load (functional loading).

    Measured: X-rays are taken at 1, 3, and 6 months after the placement of the final prosthesis.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the implant stability and the feasibility of early loading for UV-photofunctionalized (UV-phF) titanium implants at 4 to 6 weeks post-placement in the D2/D3 bone of the posterior mandible.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07868744
Sponsor's protocol ID
FUE.REC (33)/3-2026
Acronym
UV
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
4 Oct 2026
Last updated
9 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Al-Hity TR, El-Dhuwaib B, Al-Zahawi AR, Gul SS. Comparison of primary and secondary stability of a one-piece compressive conometric implant system in the posterior upper and lower jaws. Front Oral Health. 2025 Jul 25;6:1625593. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1625593. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40786186
  • Sandhu S, et al.; Impact of UV-Photofunctionalization on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A 3-year Clinical Follow-up; Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022; 33(S24); 118.

  • Sanchez-Perez A, Cachazo-Jimenez C, Sanchez-Matas C, Martin-de-Llano JJ, Davis S, Carda-Batalla C. Effects of Ultraviolet Photoactivation on Osseointegration of Commercial Pure Titanium Dental Implant After 8 Weeks in a Rabbit Model. J Oral Implantol. 2020 Apr 1;46(2):101-107. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00122.

    PubMed 31905048
  • Liu Y, et al.; Role of Photofunctionalization in Orthopedic and Dental Customized Implants: A Review of Bio-Integration; Bio-Integration; 2025; 6(1); 0094.

  • Funato A, Ogawa T; Photofunctionalized implants: A clinical breakthrough in healing time and success rate; Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(4); 1263-1272.

  • Al-Obaidi MH, et al.; Evaluating dental implant stability using three devices Osstell, Periotest, and AnyCheck: a clinical study; J Baghdad Coll Dent; 2024; 36(3); 14-22.

  • Chacko A, Varghese S, et al.; Enhancing osseointegration: A comprehensive review of UV photofunctionalization for titanium dental implants; IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2025; 11(2); 107-114.

  • Yamuna R, Keerthivasan MS, Narasimman M, Tamizhesai B, Venkatakrishnan CJ; Photofunctionalization of dental implants - A literature review; Indian J Dent Sci; 2025; 17; 95-103.

  • Razali M, Ngeow WC, Omar RA, Chai WL; An Integrated Overview of Ultraviolet Technology for Reversing Titanium Dental Implant Degradation: Mechanism of Reaction and Effectivity; Appl Sci; 2020; 10(1654); 1-23.

  • Lang X, Qiao B, Ge Z, Yan J, Zhang Y. Clinical Effects of Photofunctionalization on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 28;11(23):7042. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237042.

    PubMed 36498616
  • Ghambaryan N, Jilavyan A, Burnazyan S, Khudaverdyan M, Gegham T, Hakobyan G. Clinical Outcome of Immediate Loading UV-Photofunctionalized Implants in Patients with Completely Edentulous Mandible, Placed with Guided Surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(Suppl 1):64-75. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01798-z. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

    PubMed 37041958
  • Arroyo-Lamas N, Arteagoitia I, Ugalde U. Surface Activation of Titanium Dental Implants by Using UVC-LED Irradiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 5;22(5):2597. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052597.

    PubMed 33807532
  • Houshmand B, Rezaei Esfahroodi Z, Behnamghader A, Mohammadreza S, Azizi A, Ramezani K. Evaluation of UV photofunctionalization effect on ultrastructural properties of SLA titanium disks: An in vitro study. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 11;15(2):117-122. doi: 10.34172/japid.2023.015. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 38357335

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in