AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy VolunteersPILATES-FMSNCT07869862

Effects of 8-Week Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates Exercises on Functional Movement Screen Scores and Joint Range of Motion in Recreationally Active Males

A study testing Reformer Pilates Training and Mat Pilates Training in people with Healthy Volunteers and Physical Fitness, run by Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare how 8 weeks of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates affect movement quality and joint flexibility in active young men. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does Mat Pilates or Reformer Pilates improve whole-body movement scores measured by the Functional Movement Screen… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Volunteers, Physical Fitness
What is being tested?
Reformer Pilates Training and Mat Pilates Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
15 Apr 2026to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy recreationally active males aged 18 to 25 years
  • Regularly engaging in recreational physical activity (at least 2-3 days per week)
  • Voluntarily agreeing to participate and providing signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Any history of musculoskeletal injury or orthopedic surgery within the last 6 months
  • Chronic cardiovascular, metabolic, or neurological disorders
  • Prior formal training experience in Mat or Reformer Pilates within the past 6 months
  • Inability to complete the 8-week exercise intervention or assessment sessions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University School of Physical Education and Sports

    Tokat Province, Merkez, 60100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effects of 8-Week Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates Exercises on Functional Movement Screen Scores and Joint Range of Motion in Recreationally Active Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare how 8 weeks of Mat Pilates and Reformer Pilates affect movement quality and joint flexibility in active young men. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does Mat Pilates or Reformer Pilates improve whole-body movement scores measured by the Functional Movement Screen (FMS)? Does Mat Pilates or Reformer Pilates increase joint flexibility (range of motion) in the hips, shoulders, and ankles? Researchers will compare Mat Pilates, Reformer Pilates, and an inactive control group to see if one type of Pilates works better than the other.

Read more

Participants will:

Complete movement quality tests and joint flexibility measurements before and after the 8-week period.

Take part in structured Mat Pilates or Reformer Pilates exercise sessions for 8 weeks, or continue their usual daily activities without Pilates (control group).

Read the detailed description

Pilates exercises are widely utilized to enhance core stability, postural control, and neuromuscular coordination. However, evidence directly comparing equipment-based (Reformer) and floor-based (Mat) Pilates interventions on movement patterns and mobility in active males is limited.

Thirty-six recreationally active male participants were randomly allocated into three equal parallel groups:

Reformer Pilates Group: Performed progressive reformer-based exercise sessions (3 days per week, 8 weeks).

Mat Pilates Group: Performed progressive mat-based exercise sessions (3 days per week, 8 weeks).

Control Group: Maintained habitual daily activities without engaging in structured exercise training.

Assessments were conducted at baseline and at the conclusion of the 8-week period. Primary outcomes included composite and subtest scores of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). Secondary outcomes included active joint range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, hip, and ankle joints, alongside body composition parameters (body weight, BMI, body fat percentage, and fat-free mass).

Being tested
Reformer Pilates Training, Mat Pilates Training
Keywords
Pilates, Functional Movement Screen, Range of Motion, Health, Reformer Pilates, Mat Pilates

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Reformer Pilates TrainingBehavioural

    A structured 8-week progressive equipment-based Reformer Pilates training protocol conducted 3 days per week (approximately 50-60 minutes per session).

  • Mat Pilates TrainingBehavioural

    A structured 8-week progressive floor-based Mat Pilates training protocol conducted 3 days per week (approximately 50-60 minutes per session).

Study groups in NCT07869862
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalParticipants completed progressive reformer-based Pilates exercise sessions for 8 weeks (3 sessions per week).
Receives: Behavioral: Reformer Pilates Training
Mat Pilates GroupActive comparatorParticipants completed progressive mat-based Pilates exercise sessions for 8 weeks (3 sessions per week).
Receives: Behavioral: Mat Pilates Training
Control GroupNo interventionParticipants maintained their habitual physical activities and did not engage in any structured exercise training during the 8-week period.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Composite Score

    Functional movement quality assessed via Functional Movement Screen (FMS) consisting of 7 subtests (deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability). Each subtest is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3 points. When bilateral testing was conducted, the lower score was recorded. Scores of all seven subtests are aggregated/summed to calculate a total composite score ranging from 0 to 21 points. Higher composite scores represent better functional movement quality and movement competency.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change from Baseline in Hip Flexion Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active hip flexion range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  2. Change from Baseline in Hip Extension Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active hip extension range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  3. Change from Baseline in Hip Abduction Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active hip abduction range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  4. Change from Baseline in Hip Internal Rotation Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active hip internal rotation range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and week 8

  5. Change from Baseline in Hip External Rotation Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active hip external rotation range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  6. Change from Baseline in Shoulder Hyperextension Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active shoulder hyperextension range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  7. Change from Baseline in Ankle Dorsiflexion Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  8. Change from Baseline in Ankle Plantar Flexion Range of Motion at 8 Weeks

    Active ankle plantar flexion range of motion measured in degrees (°) using a universal standard goniometer. Two measurements were obtained for both right and left limbs and averaged. Higher degrees indicate greater joint mobility.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  9. Change from Baseline in Body Fat Percentage at 8 Weeks

    Fat mass percentage measured in percentage (%) using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  10. Change from Baseline in Body Weight at 8 Weeks

    Total body weight measured in kilograms (kg).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  11. Change from Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at 8 Weeks

    Body mass index calculated as body weight divided by height squared (kg/m^2).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

  12. Change from Baseline in Fat-Free Mass at 8 Weeks

    Fat-free mass measured in kilograms (kg) via bioelectrical impedance analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 8

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2026
  2. Study start15 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (Reformer Pilates, Mat Pilates, and Control)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07869862
Sponsor's protocol ID
1496-2026
Acronym
PILATES-FMS
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
2 Oct 2026
Last updated
16 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant raw and processed data collected during the study, including Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores, joint range of motion (ROM) measurements, and body composition parameters, are made publicly available.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Reformer Pilates Training and Mat Pilates Training in people with Healthy Volunteers and Physical Fitness, run by Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) Composite Score (time frame: Baseline and Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in