AzTrials
AzTrials

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)NCT07872514

Personalized Probiotic Treatments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

A study testing Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
What is being tested?
Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Oct 2026to 30 Jul 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Willing and able to sign written informed consent
  • At least moderate IBS symptoms (IBS-SSS >175)

Who cannot join

  • Use of antibiotics, antibiotics or probiotics, currently or within the last 4 weeks
  • New IBS treatments (mediations, diet or psychotherapy) started within last 3 months. Medications will be allowed, provided the patient is on a stable dose for more than 3 months.
  • Current organic gastrointestinal or autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease
  • History of major gastrointestinal surgery (bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, colectomy, bowel resection)
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Concurrent systemic disease and/or laboratory abnormalities considered by investigators to be a risk or that could interfere with data collection Participation in another dietary or pharmacological treatment study within the last 4 weeks

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site
  • McMaster University

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Deciphering the Role of Bacterial Histamine and Bioactive Phospholipids in IBS: Precision Medicine Pilot Study

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. This may be due to how gut bacteria break down food. Some bacteria produce harmful chemicals like histamine and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)/lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which can cause pain and gut problems. These chemicals may affect about 35% of IBS patients. The goal is to find out which patients have these bacteria. Then, doctors can give them treatments that match their gut bacteria. This could help reduce symptoms and improve their lives. If the study is successful, it could change how we understand, diagnose, and treat IBS, leading to new treatments that focus on personalized microbiota-directed treatments targeting specific causative mechanisms.

Read the detailed description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and abnormal bowel habits, affecting 5 million Canadians. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and treatments, directed at symptoms, are only 10-15% more effective than a placebo. In the absence of specific mechanistic biomarkers to guide the right treatment for the right patient, clinicians employ the classical "trial-and-error" therapeutical approach. This is often not successful, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and imposing a significant socioeconomic burden.Growing evidence suggests that diet-microbiota interactions play a key role in IBS, leading to low-grade inflammation and symptom genesis. Indeed, up to 84% of IBS patients link their symptoms to ingestion of specific foods. There are likely multiple food-related mechanisms that underlie symptom generation in IBS, including bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber, immunostimulatory effects of proteins contained in wheat, or inflammation-mediated sensitization to food antigens. We recently demonstrated that bacterial production of histamine and/or bioactive phospholipids lysophosphatidyl-choline (LPC) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) trigger visceral hyperalgesia and gut dysfunction in subgroups of patients, and which together can account for symptom genesis in approximately 35% of patients with IBS.The concept of precision (personalized) medicine has gained prominence in last few decades, moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, acknowledging significant variability in disease expression and treatment responses, and recognizing that the conventional approach based on large clinical trials is directed at "average patients". Despite its potential, precision medicine has seen limited adoption in clinical practice. Precision medicine for IBS has not yet been considered, because it is not perceived as life threatening and because of our limited understanding of its causes. However, during the last decade we have made significant strides in understanding the pathophysiology of IBS, identifying gut bacteria and diet as key factors, which can be modified. We recently showed that 20-25% IBS patients have bacteria that convert dietary histidine into histamine, a known pain mediator. Bacterial histamine drives accumulation and activation of mast cells, leading to the development of visceral hypersensitivity. A low fermentable carbohydrate (FODMAP) diet or lactic acid bacteria mitigate these effects by changing the acidity of the colon milieu, as bacterial histidine decarboxylase is highly pH-sensitive. Our on-going pilot study (NCT04364750) suggests that patients' symptoms and bacterial histamine change significantly with 3-day challenges or treatment with mixture of lactobacilli. Further, we found that additional 15-20% patients with IBS have altered bacterial metabolism of dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC) with increased production of LPC and its metabolite LPA, known mediators of neuropathic pain. IBS patient have higher levels of fecal LPC and LPA during periods of severe abdominal pain and mice colonized with their microbiota develop increased pain responses when fed a PC-enriched diet. Altogether, this suggests a synergistic effect between diet and microbiome in symptoms genesis in two subsets of patients with IBS. Therefore, this proposal seeks to establish a transformative process to optimize personalized treatment of patients with IBS, focusing on diet-microbiota interactions as key drivers of symptoms and intestinal pathology. N-of-1 trials, also called "personalized trials," employ a repeated randomized crossover design in a single patient to compare different blinded treatments or challenge effects. This design is most feasible when the treatment/challenge effects have a rapid onset and offset of action, as is the case in IBS patients, especially with food related symptoms. Indeed, these may occur as soon as 15 minutes postprandially, and may last for several hours. In addition, the microbiome and its metabolites are quickly affected by diet and dietary changes, with significant changes occurring within the first 24 hours in an in vitro model and within 48 hours in healthy volunteers. As in traditional crossover trials, carryover effects must be considered with n-of-1 design, but can be addressed through wash-out periods and focusing on the symptoms in the latter part of each treatment period. In general, n-of-1 trials are shorter lasting only months, while conventional randomized controlled trials (RCT) can take up to several years. When a series of n-of-1 trials are conducted in similar patients, the results can be aggregated to produce population-level estimates of treatment effects (equivalent to RCT meta-analyses). In this project, we will first identify IBS patients with histamine and LPC/LPA producing microbiota, and then treat them using "n-of-1" trial design using specific probiotics, either lactic acid-producing bacteria know to inhibit production of histamine through effects on histidine-decarboxylase4 or probiotics impairing conversion of phosphatidylcholine into LPC, in a fast-track bench-to-bedside approach.

Being tested
Probiotic containing B longum, Probiotic Lactobacillus, Placebo
Keywords
Gut microbiota, Probiotics, IBS, Precision medicine, N of 1 trials, Histamine, LPC, LPA
Medical subject headings
Irritable Bowel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Probiotic containing B longumDietary supplement

    This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of LPC and LPA

  • Probiotic LactobacillusDietary supplement

    This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of Histamine

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Placebo - microcrystalline cellulose

Study groups in NCT07872514
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ProbioticActive comparatorProbiotic treatment selected based on the screening results
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic containing B longum; Dietary Supplement: Probiotic Lactobacillus
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorCapsules similar to treatment containing microcrystalline cellulose
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in abdominal pain

    The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."

    Measured: Reduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life

    The visual analog scale (VAS) assessing improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life assessed by Visual Analog Scale

    Measured: Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life (VAS) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.

  2. 3-month improvement in IBS symptoms

    To evaluate sustained treatment effects beyond the acute study period, IBS symptom severity will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), a validated instrument measuring overall symptom burden. This assessment compares symptom severity at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into the durability and longer-term impact of probiotic treatment on IBS symptom trajectory.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)

  3. 3-month improvement in somatization

    To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological symptom manifestation, somatization will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), a validated screening instrument measuring somatic symptom burden. This assessment compares somatization scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the psychological distress experienced as physical symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)

  4. 3-month improvement in anxiety, depression and stress

    To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, and stress will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), validated instruments measuring emotional distress. These assessments compare psychological symptom scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the anxiety, depression, and stress burden commonly associated with IBS.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)

  5. 3-month improvement in Quality of Life

    To evaluate the broader impact of probiotic treatment on functional well-being, quality of life will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QoL), a validated disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life. This assessment compares quality of life scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in IBS symptoms translate into meaningful gains in daily functioning, social engagement, and overall life satisfaction.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2026
  2. Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
N-of-1 trials are single-patient, multiple-period crossover studies in which an individual serves as their own control, cycling through different active treatments and control/placebo phases in randomized order. By eliminating between-subject variability, this design is particularly powerful for conditions with rapid symptom fluctuations, personalized treatment responses, and high baseline heterogeneity, characteristics that make N-of-1 methodology ideally suited for precision medicine. When aggregated across multiple individual trials, N-of-1 results yield population-level estimates statistically equivalent to randomized controlled trial meta-analyses, enabling both individualized therapeutic optimization and generalizable evidence for evidence-based precision interventions.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07872514
Sponsor's protocol ID
HiREB#19371
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2026
Last updated
13 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • De Palma G, Reed DE, Bercik P. Diet-microbial cross-talk underlying increased visceral perception. Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2166780. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2166780.

    PubMed 36656562
  • Guyatt G, Sackett D, Adachi J, Roberts R, Chong J, Rosenbloom D, Keller J. A clinician's guide for conducting randomized trials in individual patients. CMAJ. 1988 Sep 15;139(6):497-503.

    PubMed 3409138
  • McDougall JJ, Reid AR. Joint Damage and Neuropathic Pain in Rats Treated With Lysophosphatidic Acid. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 4;13:811402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.811402. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 35185905
  • De Palma G, Shimbori C, Reed DE, Yu Y, Rabbia V, Lu J, Jimenez-Vargas N, Sessenwein J, Lopez-Lopez C, Pigrau M, Jaramillo-Polanco J, Zhang Y, Baerg L, Manzar A, Pujo J, Bai X, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Caminero A, Madsen K, Surette MG, Beyak M, Lomax AE, Verdu EF, Collins SM, Vanner SJ, Bercik P. Histamine production by the gut microbiota induces visceral hyperalgesia through histamine 4 receptor signaling in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2022 Jul 27;14(655):eabj1895. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1895. Epub 2022 Jul 27.

    PubMed 35895832

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction in abdominal pain (time frame: Reduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07872514, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in