Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)NCT07872514
Personalized Probiotic Treatments for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
A study testing Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- What is being tested?
- Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to 30 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- Willing and able to sign written informed consent
- At least moderate IBS symptoms (IBS-SSS >175)
Who cannot join
- Use of antibiotics, antibiotics or probiotics, currently or within the last 4 weeks
- New IBS treatments (mediations, diet or psychotherapy) started within last 3 months. Medications will be allowed, provided the patient is on a stable dose for more than 3 months.
- Current organic gastrointestinal or autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease
- History of major gastrointestinal surgery (bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, colectomy, bowel resection)
- Connective tissue disease
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Concurrent systemic disease and/or laboratory abnormalities considered by investigators to be a risk or that could interfere with data collection Participation in another dietary or pharmacological treatment study within the last 4 weeks
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Deciphering the Role of Bacterial Histamine and Bioactive Phospholipids in IBS: Precision Medicine Pilot Study
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. This may be due to how gut bacteria break down food. Some bacteria produce harmful chemicals like histamine and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)/lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which can cause pain and gut problems. These chemicals may affect about 35% of IBS patients. The goal is to find out which patients have these bacteria. Then, doctors can give them treatments that match their gut bacteria. This could help reduce symptoms and improve their lives. If the study is successful, it could change how we understand, diagnose, and treat IBS, leading to new treatments that focus on personalized microbiota-directed treatments targeting specific causative mechanisms.
Read the detailed description
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and abnormal bowel habits, affecting 5 million Canadians. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and treatments, directed at symptoms, are only 10-15% more effective than a placebo. In the absence of specific mechanistic biomarkers to guide the right treatment for the right patient, clinicians employ the classical "trial-and-error" therapeutical approach. This is often not successful, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and imposing a significant socioeconomic burden.Growing evidence suggests that diet-microbiota interactions play a key role in IBS, leading to low-grade inflammation and symptom genesis. Indeed, up to 84% of IBS patients link their symptoms to ingestion of specific foods. There are likely multiple food-related mechanisms that underlie symptom generation in IBS, including bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber, immunostimulatory effects of proteins contained in wheat, or inflammation-mediated sensitization to food antigens. We recently demonstrated that bacterial production of histamine and/or bioactive phospholipids lysophosphatidyl-choline (LPC) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) trigger visceral hyperalgesia and gut dysfunction in subgroups of patients, and which together can account for symptom genesis in approximately 35% of patients with IBS.The concept of precision (personalized) medicine has gained prominence in last few decades, moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, acknowledging significant variability in disease expression and treatment responses, and recognizing that the conventional approach based on large clinical trials is directed at "average patients". Despite its potential, precision medicine has seen limited adoption in clinical practice. Precision medicine for IBS has not yet been considered, because it is not perceived as life threatening and because of our limited understanding of its causes. However, during the last decade we have made significant strides in understanding the pathophysiology of IBS, identifying gut bacteria and diet as key factors, which can be modified. We recently showed that 20-25% IBS patients have bacteria that convert dietary histidine into histamine, a known pain mediator. Bacterial histamine drives accumulation and activation of mast cells, leading to the development of visceral hypersensitivity. A low fermentable carbohydrate (FODMAP) diet or lactic acid bacteria mitigate these effects by changing the acidity of the colon milieu, as bacterial histidine decarboxylase is highly pH-sensitive. Our on-going pilot study (NCT04364750) suggests that patients' symptoms and bacterial histamine change significantly with 3-day challenges or treatment with mixture of lactobacilli. Further, we found that additional 15-20% patients with IBS have altered bacterial metabolism of dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC) with increased production of LPC and its metabolite LPA, known mediators of neuropathic pain. IBS patient have higher levels of fecal LPC and LPA during periods of severe abdominal pain and mice colonized with their microbiota develop increased pain responses when fed a PC-enriched diet. Altogether, this suggests a synergistic effect between diet and microbiome in symptoms genesis in two subsets of patients with IBS. Therefore, this proposal seeks to establish a transformative process to optimize personalized treatment of patients with IBS, focusing on diet-microbiota interactions as key drivers of symptoms and intestinal pathology. N-of-1 trials, also called "personalized trials," employ a repeated randomized crossover design in a single patient to compare different blinded treatments or challenge effects. This design is most feasible when the treatment/challenge effects have a rapid onset and offset of action, as is the case in IBS patients, especially with food related symptoms. Indeed, these may occur as soon as 15 minutes postprandially, and may last for several hours. In addition, the microbiome and its metabolites are quickly affected by diet and dietary changes, with significant changes occurring within the first 24 hours in an in vitro model and within 48 hours in healthy volunteers. As in traditional crossover trials, carryover effects must be considered with n-of-1 design, but can be addressed through wash-out periods and focusing on the symptoms in the latter part of each treatment period. In general, n-of-1 trials are shorter lasting only months, while conventional randomized controlled trials (RCT) can take up to several years. When a series of n-of-1 trials are conducted in similar patients, the results can be aggregated to produce population-level estimates of treatment effects (equivalent to RCT meta-analyses). In this project, we will first identify IBS patients with histamine and LPC/LPA producing microbiota, and then treat them using "n-of-1" trial design using specific probiotics, either lactic acid-producing bacteria know to inhibit production of histamine through effects on histidine-decarboxylase4 or probiotics impairing conversion of phosphatidylcholine into LPC, in a fast-track bench-to-bedside approach.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- Being tested
- Probiotic containing B longum, Probiotic Lactobacillus, Placebo
- Keywords
- Gut microbiota, Probiotics, IBS, Precision medicine, N of 1 trials, Histamine, LPC, LPA
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Probiotic containing B longumDietary supplement
This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of LPC and LPA
Probiotic LactobacillusDietary supplement
This probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of Histamine
PlaceboDietary supplement
Placebo - microcrystalline cellulose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Active comparator | Probiotic treatment selected based on the screening results Receives: Dietary Supplement: Probiotic containing B longum; Dietary Supplement: Probiotic Lactobacillus |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Capsules similar to treatment containing microcrystalline cellulose Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in abdominal pain
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: Reduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life
The visual analog scale (VAS) assessing improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life assessed by Visual Analog Scale
Measured: Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life (VAS) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.
3-month improvement in IBS symptoms
To evaluate sustained treatment effects beyond the acute study period, IBS symptom severity will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS), a validated instrument measuring overall symptom burden. This assessment compares symptom severity at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into the durability and longer-term impact of probiotic treatment on IBS symptom trajectory.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in somatization
To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological symptom manifestation, somatization will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15), a validated screening instrument measuring somatic symptom burden. This assessment compares somatization scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the psychological distress experienced as physical symptoms.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in anxiety, depression and stress
To evaluate the impact of probiotic treatment on psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, and stress will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), validated instruments measuring emotional distress. These assessments compare psychological symptom scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in gut-brain axis function reduce the anxiety, depression, and stress burden commonly associated with IBS.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in Quality of Life
To evaluate the broader impact of probiotic treatment on functional well-being, quality of life will be assessed at 3-month follow-up using the IBS Quality of Life Instrument (IBS-QoL), a validated disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life. This assessment compares quality of life scores at 3 months post-treatment to baseline measurements, providing insight into whether probiotic-mediated improvements in IBS symptoms translate into meaningful gains in daily functioning, social engagement, and overall life satisfaction.
Measured: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- N-of-1 trials are single-patient, multiple-period crossover studies in which an individual serves as their own control, cycling through different active treatments and control/placebo phases in randomized order. By eliminating between-subject variability, this design is particularly powerful for conditions with rapid symptom fluctuations, personalized treatment responses, and high baseline heterogeneity, characteristics that make N-of-1 methodology ideally suited for precision medicine. When aggregated across multiple individual trials, N-of-1 results yield population-level estimates statistically equivalent to randomized controlled trial meta-analyses, enabling both individualized therapeutic optimization and generalizable evidence for evidence-based precision interventions.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Weston Family Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Premysl Bercik, McMaster University
- Investigators
- Premysl Bercik, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Farncombe Institute, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07872514
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HiREB#19371
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
De Palma G, Reed DE, Bercik P. Diet-microbial cross-talk underlying increased visceral perception. Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2166780. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2166780.
PubMed 36656562Guyatt G, Sackett D, Adachi J, Roberts R, Chong J, Rosenbloom D, Keller J. A clinician's guide for conducting randomized trials in individual patients. CMAJ. 1988 Sep 15;139(6):497-503.
PubMed 3409138McDougall JJ, Reid AR. Joint Damage and Neuropathic Pain in Rats Treated With Lysophosphatidic Acid. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 4;13:811402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.811402. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35185905De Palma G, Shimbori C, Reed DE, Yu Y, Rabbia V, Lu J, Jimenez-Vargas N, Sessenwein J, Lopez-Lopez C, Pigrau M, Jaramillo-Polanco J, Zhang Y, Baerg L, Manzar A, Pujo J, Bai X, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Caminero A, Madsen K, Surette MG, Beyak M, Lomax AE, Verdu EF, Collins SM, Vanner SJ, Bercik P. Histamine production by the gut microbiota induces visceral hyperalgesia through histamine 4 receptor signaling in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2022 Jul 27;14(655):eabj1895. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1895. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
PubMed 35895832
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Deciphering the Role of Bacterial Histamine and Bioactive Phospholipids in IBS: Precision Medicine Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07872514
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HiREB#19371
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
- Keywords
- Gut microbiota, Probiotics, IBS, Precision medicine, N of 1 trials, Histamine, LPC, LPA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Weston Family Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterized by stomach pain and altered bowel habits. It affects about 5 million people in Canada. Doctors don't fully understand what causes IBS, so treatments often don't work well. Many patients say certain foods make their symptoms worse. This may be due to how gut bacteria break down food. Some bacteria produce harmful chemicals like histamine and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC)/lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which can cause pain and gut problems. These chemicals may affect about 35% of IBS patients. The goal is to find out which patients have these bacteria. Then, doctors can give them treatments that match their gut bacteria. This could help reduce symptoms and improve their lives. If the study is successful, it could change how we understand, diagnose, and treat IBS, leading to new treatments that focus on personalized microbiota-directed treatments targeting specific causative mechanisms.
Detailed description
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal (GI) disorder characterized by chronic abdominal pain and abnormal bowel habits, affecting 5 million Canadians. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood and treatments, directed at symptoms, are only 10-15% more effective than a placebo. In the absence of specific mechanistic biomarkers to guide the right treatment for the right patient, clinicians employ the classical "trial-and-error" therapeutical approach. This is often not successful, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and imposing a significant socioeconomic burden.Growing evidence suggests that diet-microbiota interactions play a key role in IBS, leading to low-grade inflammation and symptom genesis. Indeed, up to 84% of IBS patients link their symptoms to ingestion of specific foods. There are likely multiple food-related mechanisms that underlie symptom generation in IBS, including bacterial fermentation of dietary fiber, immunostimulatory effects of proteins contained in wheat, or inflammation-mediated sensitization to food antigens. We recently demonstrated that bacterial production of histamine and/or bioactive phospholipids lysophosphatidyl-choline (LPC) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) trigger visceral hyperalgesia and gut dysfunction in subgroups of patients, and which together can account for symptom genesis in approximately 35% of patients with IBS.The concept of precision (personalized) medicine has gained prominence in last few decades, moving away from a 'one-size-fits-all' approach, acknowledging significant variability in disease expression and treatment responses, and recognizing that the conventional approach based on large clinical trials is directed at "average patients". Despite its potential, precision medicine has seen limited adoption in clinical practice. Precision medicine for IBS has not yet been considered, because it is not perceived as life threatening and because of our limited understanding of its causes. However, during the last decade we have made significant strides in understanding the pathophysiology of IBS, identifying gut bacteria and diet as key factors, which can be modified. We recently showed that 20-25% IBS patients have bacteria that convert dietary histidine into histamine, a known pain mediator. Bacterial histamine drives accumulation and activation of mast cells, leading to the development of visceral hypersensitivity. A low fermentable carbohydrate (FODMAP) diet or lactic acid bacteria mitigate these effects by changing the acidity of the colon milieu, as bacterial histidine decarboxylase is highly pH-sensitive. Our on-going pilot study (NCT04364750) suggests that patients' symptoms and bacterial histamine change significantly with 3-day challenges or treatment with mixture of lactobacilli. Further, we found that additional 15-20% patients with IBS have altered bacterial metabolism of dietary phosphatidylcholine (PC) with increased production of LPC and its metabolite LPA, known mediators of neuropathic pain. IBS patient have higher levels of fecal LPC and LPA during periods of severe abdominal pain and mice colonized with their microbiota develop increased pain responses when fed a PC-enriched diet. Altogether, this suggests a synergistic effect between diet and microbiome in symptoms genesis in two subsets of patients with IBS. Therefore, this proposal seeks to establish a transformative process to optimize personalized treatment of patients with IBS, focusing on diet-microbiota interactions as key drivers of symptoms and intestinal pathology. N-of-1 trials, also called "personalized trials," employ a repeated randomized crossover design in a single patient to compare different blinded treatments or challenge effects. This design is most feasible when the treatment/challenge effects have a rapid onset and offset of action, as is the case in IBS patients, especially with food related symptoms. Indeed, these may occur as soon as 15 minutes postprandially, and may last for several hours. In addition, the microbiome and its metabolites are quickly affected by diet and dietary changes, with significant changes occurring within the first 24 hours in an in vitro model and within 48 hours in healthy volunteers. As in traditional crossover trials, carryover effects must be considered with n-of-1 design, but can be addressed through wash-out periods and focusing on the symptoms in the latter part of each treatment period. In general, n-of-1 trials are shorter lasting only months, while conventional randomized controlled trials (RCT) can take up to several years. When a series of n-of-1 trials are conducted in similar patients, the results can be aggregated to produce population-level estimates of treatment effects (equivalent to RCT meta-analyses). In this project, we will first identify IBS patients with histamine and LPC/LPA producing microbiota, and then treat them using "n-of-1" trial design using specific probiotics, either lactic acid-producing bacteria know to inhibit production of histamine through effects on histidine-decarboxylase4 or probiotics impairing conversion of phosphatidylcholine into LPC, in a fast-track bench-to-bedside approach.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- N-of-1 trials are single-patient, multiple-period crossover studies in which an individual serves as their own control, cycling through different active treatments and control/placebo phases in randomized order. By eliminating between-subject variability, this design is particularly powerful for conditions with rapid symptom fluctuations, personalized treatment responses, and high baseline heterogeneity, characteristics that make N-of-1 methodology ideally suited for precision medicine. When aggregated across multiple individual trials, N-of-1 results yield population-level estimates statistically equivalent to randomized controlled trial meta-analyses, enabling both individualized therapeutic optimization and generalizable evidence for evidence-based precision interventions.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Probiotic containing B longum, Dietary Supplement: Probiotic LactobacillusProbiotic treatment selected based on the screening results |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: PlaceboCapsules similar to treatment containing microcrystalline cellulose |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- Willing and able to sign written informed consent
- At least moderate IBS symptoms (IBS-SSS >175)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Use of antibiotics, antibiotics or probiotics, currently or within the last 4 weeks
- New IBS treatments (mediations, diet or psychotherapy) started within last 3 months. Medications will be allowed, provided the patient is on a stable dose for more than 3 months.
- Current organic gastrointestinal or autoimmune diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, celiac disease or inflammatory bowel disease
- History of major gastrointestinal surgery (bariatric surgery, gastrectomy, colectomy, bowel resection)
- Connective tissue disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic containing B longumThis probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of LPC and LPA | Dietary supplement | Probiotic |
| Probiotic LactobacillusThis probiotic will be used in the group who have higher levels of Histamine | Dietary supplement | Probiotic |
| PlaceboPlacebo - microcrystalline cellulose | Dietary supplement | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Reduction in abdominal pain
Time frame: Reduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
5 secondary outcomes
Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life
Time frame: Improvement in bowel habit satisfaction, bloating, and impact on daily life (VAS) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.
3-month improvement in IBS symptoms
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in somatization
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in anxiety, depression and stress
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
3-month improvement in Quality of Life
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment) to 3-month follow-up (post-intervention)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36656562De Palma G, Reed DE, Bercik P. Diet-microbial cross-talk underlying increased visceral perception. Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2166780. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2166780.
- Background: PubMed 3409138Guyatt G, Sackett D, Adachi J, Roberts R, Chong J, Rosenbloom D, Keller J. A clinician's guide for conducting randomized trials in individual patients. CMAJ. 1988 Sep 15;139(6):497-503.
- Background: PubMed 35185905McDougall JJ, Reid AR. Joint Damage and Neuropathic Pain in Rats Treated With Lysophosphatidic Acid. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 4;13:811402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.811402. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 35895832De Palma G, Shimbori C, Reed DE, Yu Y, Rabbia V, Lu J, Jimenez-Vargas N, Sessenwein J, Lopez-Lopez C, Pigrau M, Jaramillo-Polanco J, Zhang Y, Baerg L, Manzar A, Pujo J, Bai X, Pinto-Sanchez MI, Caminero A, Madsen K, Surette MG, Beyak M, Lomax AE, Verdu EF, Collins SM, Vanner SJ, Bercik P. Histamine production by the gut microbiota induces visceral hyperalgesia through histamine 4 receptor signaling in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2022 Jul 27;14(655):eabj1895. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1895. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Not yet recruiting
NEUROMODULATION WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION IN ADULTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME: A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLIND, SHAM-CONTROLLED CROSSOVER STUDY
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Recruiting
Visceral Sensitivity in IBD (Irritable Bowel Disease) and IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
IBS, Ulcerative Colitis, Active
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
SIMBA in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Microbiome
Not yet recruiting
Psyllium Husk in Pediatric IBS
Prebiotic, IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
Recruiting
IBS Personalized Diet vs. Low FODMAP Diet Randomized Control Trial
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Premysl Bercik, MD principal investigator
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Farncombe Institute, McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Probiotic containing B longum and Probiotic Lactobacillus in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in abdominal pain (time frame: Reduction in abdominal pain severity (Visual Analog Scale) comparing probiotic-treatment weeks to placebo-treatment weeks across the 8-week study period.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07872514, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2026.