AzTrials
AzTrials

Skin AgingMD-AGENCT07873112

Evaluation of the Performance and Safety of the MD60000 Device in the Treatment of Skin Imperfections Due to Aging.

A study testing MD60000 in people with Skin Aging, run by Promoitalia Group Spa at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Here is the English translation of the summary: The Clinical Investigation Plan with code CIP-01-25 outlines a single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm clinical study sponsored by Promoitalia Group S.p.A. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Skin Aging
What is being tested?
MD60000
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
6 Oct 2026to 1 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged between 18 and 65 years.
  • Presence of facial skin defects/wrinkles with a Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale (LWSS) score ≥ 1 at baseline.
  • Signed written informed consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects aged under 18 or over 65 years.
  • Presence of concomitant skin diseases, active infections, or inflammation in the area to be treated.
  • Known severe allergies, hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or any component of the investigational product, or history of anaphylactic reactions.
  • History of autoimmune diseases, severe chronic/systemic pathologies, or bleeding/coagulation disorders.
  • History of hypertrophic scars, keloids, or abnormal cicatrization.
  • Recent aesthetic treatments (e.g., dermal fillers, botulinum toxin, laser, chemical peels) in the target anatomical area within the preceding months.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women (negative pregnancy test required at screening for women of childbearing potential).
  • Concomitant conditions or therapies that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise subject safety or interfere with study evaluations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Clinica santa maria la bruna

    Torre del Greco, Napoli, 80059

    Giuseppe Ferraro, +39 366 465 48 16, giuseppe.ferraro@unimol.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Here is the English translation of the summary:

The Clinical Investigation Plan with code CIP-01-25 outlines a single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm clinical study sponsored by Promoitalia Group S.p.A. and conducted at the Casa di Cura Santa Maria La Bruna in Torre del Greco under the responsibility of Principal Investigator Giuseppe Ferraro, with Teia Research S.r.l. acting as the CRO. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety of the MD60000 medical device, an intradermal, biodegradable, sterile, and isotonic gel based on 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid integrated with PLA, intended for the correction of skin imperfections caused by physiological skin aging, such as facial wrinkles. The investigation is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 (MDR) in order to collect clinical data for regulatory conformity assessment, adhering to ISO 14155 standards and the Declaration of Helsinki.

Read more

The study design involves enrolling forty-three adult patients aged between eighteen and sixty-five years with facial skin defects characterized by a baseline score of one or higher on the Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale. Patients with skin diseases, active infections, or recent aesthetic treatments in the same anatomical area are excluded, as well as pregnant or breastfeeding women, individuals with a history of allergic reactions to the components, autoimmune diseases, coagulation disorders, or a predisposition to hypertrophic scars or keloids. Participation for each subject ranges between forty-five and sixty-five days, while the overall estimated duration of the entire clinical investigation is approximately six months.

The procedural pathway comprises four main visits. During the first screening and baseline visit, eligibility criteria are verified, informed consent and medical history are collected, and baseline photographic evaluations and wrinkle severity assessments are performed. If conditions permit, the first treatment session can occur on the same day, during which the clinician performs an intradermal injection of MD60000 up to a maximum volume of two milliliters. A similar second treatment session follows after an interval of at least fourteen days. The final phase consists of a follow-up visit thirty days after the second treatment, during which final photographs are taken and data regarding patient satisfaction and safety are collected.

Treatment efficacy is measured using primary and secondary metrics. The primary performance endpoint is defined as the improvement in the Lemperle scale score between the initial baseline visit and the final follow-up, considered clinically relevant if a median reduction of one point or greater is achieved, confirmed statistically using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The secondary endpoint assesses the patient's subjective satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) thirty days after the completion of treatment, met if at least seventy percent of participants report an rating of improved, much improved, or excellent.

Regarding safety, the study evaluates the frequency, severity, and causal relationship of any adverse events or effects occurring during the investigation. The safety profile is considered acceptable in the absence of device-related serious adverse events or device deficiencies, provided that unexpected, mild, device-related adverse events do not exceed a maximum threshold of ten percent. Statistical analysis involves evaluating the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population set for safety parameters and the Per-Protocol (PP) set for performance metrics.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, non-controlled, single-arm clinical investigation (Code: CIP-01-25) is conducted pursuant to Article 61 of the European Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR) to evaluate the aesthetic performance and safety profile of the MD60000 medical device. MD60000 is a sterile, biodegradable, and isotonic intradermal gel containing 3.3% linear hyaluronic acid, poly(lactic acid) (PLA), and a physiological buffer. As a Class III device intended purely for non-medical aesthetic enhancement, its primary mechanism of action relies on tissue volume augmentation via the hydrophilic properties of hyaluronic acid to correct age-related facial skin defects and wrinkles.

Given that MD60000 is non-innovative and comparable to existing hyaluronic acid-based intradermal fillers with a well-established history of clinical use, this investigation is designed to confirm conformity for regulatory purposes with a minimized sample size and protocol complexity. A total of 43 adult subjects presenting with facial skin defects (Lemperle Wrinkle Severity Scale [LWSS] $\ge 1$) will be enrolled. No control group is included, as no spontaneous improvement is expected for age-related static wrinkles without intervention.

The study workflow spans up to 65 days per participant and consists of two intradermal injection sessions (at Baseline/Day 0 and Day 21 $\pm 6$ days) using up to 2 mL of product per session depending on defect severity. Final clinical assessments are performed at a follow-up visit 30 days after the second injection.

Primary aesthetic performance is quantified through validated objective wrinkle grading using the LWSS, where success is defined as a median individual score improvement of $\ge 1$ point from baseline to the 30-day post-treatment follow-up. Secondary performance focuses on subject-reported satisfaction using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Safety evaluation involves continuous monitoring of adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse device effects (ADEs/SADEs), and device deficiencies according to EN ISO 14155 standards. Statistical analyses will be performed on the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population for safety metrics and on the Per-Protocol (PP) population for primary and secondary performance endpoints.

Conditions
Skin Aging
Being tested
MD60000
Keywords
skin, aging, wrinkles, medical device, Hyaluronic acid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MD60000Device

    Intradermal gel composition containing 3.3% linear high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid (PLA). Administered via intradermal injection in two separate treatment sessions to evaluate aesthetic performance on skin aging/wrinkles and safety outcomes over a 30-day follow-up period.

Study groups in NCT07873112
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MD60000 Treatment GroupExperimentalSubjects will receive two intradermal injections of MD60000 gel (3.3% linear hyaluronic acid combined with polylactic acid / PLA) administered during the treatment phase, with performance and safety evaluated over a 30-day follow-up period.
Receives: Device: MD60000

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline in Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS) Score

    Change in wrinkle severity evaluated using the Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS). The scale ranges from 0 (no wrinkles) to 5 (very deep wrinkles, redundant fold). A lower score indicates greater aesthetic improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit

  2. Incidence and Severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Device Defect Logs

    Assessment of device safety evaluated through the recording, incidence, severity, and causal relationship of local and systemic adverse events, local injection site reactions (e.g., erythema, edema, pain), and device defects throughout the study duration.

    Measured: From baseline (Day 0) up to 30 (± 7) days post-treatment

  3. Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Rating

    Assessment of overall aesthetic improvement rated by the Investigator using the GAIS 5-point scale (1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Worse).

    Measured: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Subject Satisfaction Score Measured by Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)

    Subject-assessed aesthetic improvement using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), a 5-point ordinal scale (1 = Very Much Improved, 2 = Much Improved, 3 = Improved, 4 = No Change, 5 = Worse). Success is defined as at least 70% of subjects reporting a score of 3 or lower.

    Measured: 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit (Visit 4)

  2. Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Device Deficiencies

    Incidence, frequency, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), device-related adverse effects (ADEs/SADEs), and device deficiencies recorded throughout the study.

    Measured: From baseline (Day 0) through 30 (± 7) days post-treatment follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Oct 2026
  2. Study start6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion6 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
43 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07873112
Sponsor's protocol ID
CIP-01-25
Acronym
MD-AGE
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2026
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lee JH, Kim J, Lee YN, Choi S, Lee YI, Suk J, Lee JH. The efficacy of intradermal hyaluronic acid filler as a skin quality booster: A prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Feb;23(2):409-416. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15944. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

    PubMed 37705328

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MD60000 in people with Skin Aging, run by Promoitalia Group Spa at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Grazia Iannacci (+39 331 591 3106, Executive.assistant@webpromoitalia.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline in Lemperle Wrinkle Assessment Scale (LWSS) Score (time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and 30 (± 7) days after the final treatment visit). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07873112, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in