AzTrials
AzTrials

EdentulismNCT07873983

Dynamic Postural Balance and Masticatory Efficiency in Edentulous Patients With All-on-4 Prostheses

A study testing All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation in people with Edentulism and All-on-4, run by Beni-Suef University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Title: Correlation Between Dynamic Postural Balance and Masticatory Efficiency in Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with All-on-4 Fixed Prostheses Background: Total tooth loss (edentulism) alters sensory feedback from the mouth, which can negatively affect head orientation, body alignment, and overall balance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 60 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Edentulism, All-on-4, Masticatory Efficiency
What is being tested?
All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
25 Jul 2025to 12 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 60 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Completely edentulous patients aged 50-60 years.
  • Patients previously rehabilitated with complete removable dentures.
  • Sufficient interarch space of at least 12 mm.
  • Adequate oral hygiene.
  • Willingness and ability to attend follow-up visits.

Who cannot join

  • Liver disease, significant cardiac disease, or autoimmune diseases that contraindicate implant placement.
  • Previous radiotherapy to the jaws.
  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases or neurological disorders.
  • Temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
  • Neuromuscular disorders.
  • Smoking.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of traumatic jaw injuries.
  • Flabby ridges.
  • Orthopedic problems affecting balance or mobility.
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with follow-up visits.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry, Beni-Suef University

    Cairo, Giza Governorate

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Correlation Between Dynamic Postural Balance and Masticatory Efficiency in Completely Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated With All-on-4 Fixed Prostheses

Title: Correlation Between Dynamic Postural Balance and Masticatory Efficiency in Edentulous Patients Rehabilitated with All-on-4 Fixed Prostheses Background: Total tooth loss (edentulism) alters sensory feedback from the mouth, which can negatively affect head orientation, body alignment, and overall balance, increasing the risk of falls in older adults. While complete dentures replace missing teeth, their lack of stability often limits full recovery of chewing function and balance. Fixed All-on-4 implant restorations provide a rigid, bone-anchored base that restores full functional efficiency and stabilizes the occlusion. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate masticatory (chewing) efficiency in completely edentulous patients treated with maxillary and mandibular All-on-4 fixed implant-supported restorations, and to determine its correlation with dynamic postural body balance over time. Methods: Sixteen completely edentulous male patients aged 50-60 years received maxillary and mandibular All-on-4 fixed restorations with standardized lingualized occlusal schemes. Masticatory efficiency was assessed using a color-changing chewing gum (scored on a 1-5 scale). Dynamic postural body balance was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, which records the time in seconds taken to stand from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Measurements were recorded at three time points: immediately after final restoration delivery, at 3 months post-loading, and at 6 months post-loading. Expected Outcomes: The study aims to clarify how stabilizing the bite with fixed implant restorations impacts both chewing performance and dynamic walking balance, supporting neuromuscular adaptation and functional independence in edentulous patients.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Edentulism and the loss of masticatory function are linked to a significant disruption of oral proprioceptive feedback, impairing the trigeminal-cervical reflex arc. The trigeminal-cervical-vestibular axis regulates the contraction of antigravity muscles throughout the body. Without specialized periodontal mechanoreceptors, total tooth loss obliterates key oral proprioceptive input, frequently leading to altered head posture, impaired spatial orientation, increased postural sway, and an elevated risk of falls, particularly in older adults. While conventional complete dentures replace missing teeth, their mucogingival instability can send erratic sensory signals that confuse central processing centers. Implant-supported fixed restorations (All-on-4) offer a rigid, bone-anchored base that re-establishes stable mechanoreceptive feedback pathways, providing the central nervous system with a reliable structural reference point for spatial coordination. Study Procedures:

Participants in this clinical study undergo the following standard sequence of treatment and evaluation: Pre-Surgical Planning \& Implant Placement:Pre-operative panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dual-scans are obtained to construct tissue-supported surgical guides. Four implants (3.7 mm diameter, 11 mm length) are surgically inserted into the mandible and maxilla using a flapless, fully guided technique. The two anterior implants are placed vertically, while the two posterior implants are angled at 30 degrees to avoid critical anatomical structures. Multi-unit abutments are attached, and provisional acrylic restorations are immediately loaded. Prosthetic Rehabilitation:Following osseointegration, final computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) fixed prostheses are fabricated and delivered. All restorations are standardized with a lingualized occlusal scheme and a distal cantilever of one tooth per side to maintain uniform biomechanics across all participants. Follow-Up and Assessment Schedule:

Assessments are conducted at three specific intervals: baseline (immediately following final prosthetic delivery), 3 months post-loading, and 6 months post-loading: Masticatory Efficiency Evaluation: Assessed using a standardized color-changing chewing gum (Masticatory Performance Evaluating Gum XYLITOL). Participants chew the gum freely for 3 minutes. Chewed specimens are flattened to a uniform 1 mm thickness and evaluated on a validated 5-point color scale (1 = green/lowest efficiency; 5 = red/highest efficiency). Dynamic Postural Balance Evaluation: Measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Participants start seated in a standardized chair, stand up upon command, walk 3 meters at their regular pace, turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. Test conditions (footwear, walkway, time of day) are strictly standardized across visits. Time taken is recorded in seconds across three trials and averaged

Being tested
All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation
Keywords
completely edentulous patients, All-on four implant prosthesis, Masticatory efficiency, dynamic balance, timed up and go test

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic RehabilitationDevice

    Rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients with maxillary and mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses using the All-on-4 concept. Each arch was restored using four dental implants, with two anterior implants placed axially and two posterior implants placed at an approximately 30° angulation. The definitive prostheses were designed digitally and fabricated with lingualized occlusion and a distal cantilever on each side.

Study groups in NCT07873983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
All-on-4 Fixed ProsthesesExperimentalParticipants received maxillary and mandibular All-on-4 fixed prostheses. The prostheses were fabricated using a digital workflow and designed with lingualized occlusion. Masticatory efficiency and dynamic postural balance were assessed after prosthetic rehabilitation and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up.
Receives: Device: All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation Between Masticatory Efficiency and Dynamic Postural Balance(Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho))

    The correlation between masticatory efficiency and dynamic postural balance was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Masticatory efficiency was measured using color-changing chewing gum scored on a 5-point scale, and dynamic postural balance was measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, recorded in seconds. The correlation coefficient was calculated at 3 and 6 months after prosthetic rehabilitation.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months after prosthetic rehabilitation.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Dynamic postural balance(Timed up and go test)

    Dynamic postural balance was assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The time required to complete the test was recorded in seconds. Measurements were obtained immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation and at 3 and 6 months after rehabilitation.

    Measured: Immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation, and at 3 and 6 months after rehabilitation.

  2. Masticatory Efficiency( Score on a 5-point scale)

    Masticatory efficiency was evaluated using color-changing chewing gum (Masticatory Performance Evaluating Gum, Lotte Co. Ltd., Japan). Performance was assessed using a 5-point color scale ranging from 1 (green) to 5 (red), according to the manufacturer's assessment scale.

    Measured: Immediately after prosthetic rehabilitation, and at 3 and 6 months after rehabilitation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Oct 2026
  2. Study start25 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion12 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion12 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
All 16 participants in the study received the same intervention (maxillary and mandibular All-on-4 fixed prostheses) and were followed prospectively over time.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07873983
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC-FDBSU-10042025-01-SR
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
6 Oct 2026
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing All-on-4 Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation in people with Edentulism and All-on-4, run by Beni-Suef University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation Between Masticatory Efficiency and Dynamic Postural Balance(Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho)) (time frame: 3 and 6 months after prosthetic rehabilitation.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in