AzTrials
AzTrials

OSA - Obstructive Sleep ApneaNCT07880067

Effects of Surgery on Oral Frailty and Dysphagia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

An observational study of OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Dysphagia, run by National Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in Taiwan.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Dysphagia is a commonly reported complaint among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), particularly those who have undergone upper-airway (oropharyngeal) surgery. However, how surgical treatment for OSA affects swallowing function and oral function (oral frailty) remains unclear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
What is being tested?
Upper airway surgery for OSA and Non-surgical management
How many people
450 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
12 Jun 2026to 31 Dec 2028
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea attending the sleep medicine outpatient clinic of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taiwan, who intend to receive next-step treatment (surgical or non-surgical).

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed by a physician with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index >= 15 events/hour)
  • Aged 20 years or older
  • Willing to receive next-step treatment for obstructive sleep apnea
  • Willing to participate and provides written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosed with central sleep apnea
  • Neuromuscular disease (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease)
  • Diagnosed with oral cancer and currently receiving oral treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 802

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Surgery on Improving Oral Frailty and Dysphagia in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA): A Prospective Cohort Study

Dysphagia is a commonly reported complaint among patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), particularly those who have undergone upper-airway (oropharyngeal) surgery. However, how surgical treatment for OSA affects swallowing function and oral function (oral frailty) remains unclear.

This prospective cohort study recruits adults with moderate-to-severe OSA from the sleep medicine clinic of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taiwan. Participants choose their own treatment as part of routine care; the study does not assign or influence treatment. Participants who undergo OSA surgery form the surgery group, and those who receive non-surgical treatment (e.g., CPAP) or no treatment form the non-surgical group. Swallowing difficulty (EAT-10) and oral frailty (seven oral hypofunction indicators) are assessed before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

Read the detailed description

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide. Impaired swallowing reflex, pharyngeal sensory deficits and dysphagia have been reported in 16-78% of patients with OSA, and oropharyngeal surgery (e.g., uvulopalatopharyngoplasty) may further alter swallowing physiology. Oral frailty, a cluster of declines in oral function, is associated with dysphagia, physical frailty and mortality, yet it has not been examined in surgically treated OSA patients.

Design: Prospective observational cohort study. This registration covers Phase 2 of a two-phase project; Phase 1 is a separate retrospective analysis of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (2001-2020) comparing the incidence of dysphagia between OSA patients and matched non-OSA controls.

Participants: Adults aged 20 years or older with moderate-to-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index >= 15 events/hour) who intend to receive next-step treatment. The target sample size is 450 (surgery group 225; non-surgical/no-treatment group 225), estimated with G*Power (exact test; p1 = 0.16, p2 = 0.05, power = 0.95, allocation ratio 1:1).

Exposure: Surgical treatment chosen by the patient, such as radiofrequency reduction of the soft palate or tongue base, palatine tonsillectomy, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), CO2 laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP), transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and other upper-airway procedures. Treatment decisions are made by patients and their physicians; the study only records the treatment received.

Assessments (T0 before treatment; T1, T2 and T3 at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment): Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10); oral frailty assessed by the seven oral hypofunction indicators (Minakuchi et al., 2018): tongue coating index, Saxon test, oral diadochokinesis (/pa/, /ta/, /ka/), number of natural teeth, tongue pressure (Iowa Oral Performance Instrument), self-reported masticatory ability, and the repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST). Covariates include demographics, anthropometrics, blood pressure, comorbidities, smoking, alcohol use, exercise, prior oropharyngeal surgery, fatigue and OSA severity (AHI).

Analysis: Descriptive statistics will summarize treatment choices and baseline characteristics; between-group differences will be compared; repeated-measures analysis will compare changes in dysphagia and oral frailty between the surgery and non-surgical groups over 6 months.

Being tested
Upper airway surgery for OSA, Non-surgical management
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, oral frailty, oral hypofunction, dysphagia, swallowing, upper airway surgery, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, tongue pressure
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Upper airway surgery for OSAProcedure or surgery

    Upper-airway surgical procedures chosen by the patient as part of routine care, including radiofrequency reduction of the soft palate or tongue base, palatine tonsillectomy, partial glossectomy, uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), CO2 laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP), transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and related procedures. Not assigned by the study.

  • Non-surgical managementOther

    CPAP or other non-surgical management (e.g., oral appliance, weight control), or no treatment, as chosen by the patient as part of routine care. Not assigned by the study.

Study groups in NCT07880067
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-surgical groupAdults with moderate-to-severe OSA who choose non-surgical treatment (e.g., CPAP) or no treatment as part of routine care. Treatment is not assigned by the study.
Receives: Other: Non-surgical management
Surgery groupAdults with moderate-to-severe OSA who elect upper-airway surgery as part of routine care (e.g., radiofrequency reduction of the palate or tongue base, tonsillectomy, UPPP, LAUP, TORS). Treatment is not assigned by the study.
Receives: Procedure: Upper airway surgery for OSA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in swallowing difficulty measured by the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10)

    Chinese version of the EAT-10; 10 self-rated items scored 0 (no problem) to 4 (severe problem); total score 0-40, with higher scores indicating worse swallowing difficulty. A total score of 3 or more indicates swallowing problems.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  2. Change in oral frailty (number of oral hypofunction indicators)

    Number of the seven oral hypofunction indicators met (Minakuchi et al., 2018): poor oral hygiene, oral dryness, reduced occlusal force, reduced tongue-lip motor function, reduced tongue pressure, decreased masticatory function and deteriorated swallowing function. Range 0-7; meeting 3 or more indicators defines oral frailty (oral hypofunction).

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Tongue pressure

    Maximum tongue pressure (kPa) measured with the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI); participants press the bulb against the palate for 7 seconds, three trials with 30-second rests, mean value used. Less than 30 kPa indicates low tongue pressure.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  2. Tongue coating index

    Tongue coating index (TCI, %); 50% or higher indicates poor oral hygiene.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  3. Oral dryness (Saxon test)

    Saliva production measured by the Saxon test (gauze placed under the tongue for 1 minute); less than 0.1 g/min indicates oral dryness.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  4. Oral diadochokinesis

    Number of repetitions per second of the syllables /pa/, /ta/ and /ka/ over 5 seconds; fewer than 6 per second for any syllable indicates reduced tongue-lip motor function.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  5. Number of natural teeth

    Number of remaining natural teeth; fewer than 20 indicates reduced occlusal force.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  6. Self-reported masticatory ability

    Self-reported masticatory ability questionnaire; difficulty or inability to chew 4 or more listed foods indicates decreased masticatory function.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

  7. Repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST)

    Number of voluntary saliva swallows in 30 seconds; 3 or more is considered normal.

    Measured: Baseline (before treatment), and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2026
  2. Study start12 Jun 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07880067
Sponsor's protocol ID
KAFGHIRB114-068
Other IDs
802KB114599
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
11 Oct 2026
Last updated
19 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in