AzTrials
AzTrials

Intracerebral HemorrhageCR-4-HealthNCT07882784

Outcome Prediction and Recovery After Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage

An observational study of Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Hemorrhagic Stroke, run by University Medical Centre Maribor at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with high mortality and frequent long-term disability. Current tools to predict how an individual patient will recover are limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Stroke
How many people
300 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 31 Oct 2028
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Consecutive adults with acute spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to stroke units, neurology wards, neurosurgical units or intensive care units of three hospital centres in Slovenia and Austria.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Acute spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage confirmed by non-contrast CT or MRI
  • Admission during the acute phase of haemorrhage to one of the participating centres
  • Written informed consent from the patient or, if the patient lacks capacity, consent from a legally authorised representative

Who cannot join

  • Intracerebral haemorrhage secondary to head trauma
  • Haemorrhage due to an intracranial neoplasm
  • Isolated subarachnoid haemorrhage or another primary type of intracranial haemorrhage
  • Expected survival of less than 24 hours due to non-neurological comorbidity
  • End-of-life care decision already made at presentation
  • Withdrawal of consent or major protocol violation

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Martin Rakuša, MD, PhD contact

+386 2 321 16 56

martin.rakusa@ukc-mb.si

3 sites in 2 countries

Austria2 sites
  • LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Medical University of Graz

    Graz, 8036

  • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee

    Klagenfurt, 9020

Other trials in Austria

Slovenia1 site
  • University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology

    Maribor, 2000

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: CrossReg-4-Health: A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study of Outcome Prediction and Recovery After Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage

Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with high mortality and frequent long-term disability. Current tools to predict how an individual patient will recover are limited.

CrossReg-4-Health is a prospective, multicentre observational cohort study that will enrol 300 consecutive adults with acute spontaneous ICH at three hospitals in Slovenia and Austria. During hospitalisation, the study will collect clinical data, standardised neurological and pain assessments, routine laboratory results, CT, CT angiography and MRI findings, and two research blood samples for biomarkers of brain injury, inflammation, coagulation and pain. Participants will be followed up at 6 and 12 months for survival, functional outcome, neurological status, pain, health-related quality of life, rehabilitation use and readmissions.

The main aim is to develop a multimodal prognostic model for functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) 12 months after ICH.

Read the detailed description

Background: Outcome prediction after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) relies mainly on clinical severity and neuroimaging markers and only partially captures multidimensional recovery. Blood-based biomarkers, pain burden, rehabilitation exposure, care trajectories and patient-reported outcomes are rarely integrated in prospective real-world cohorts.

Design: Prospective, multicentre, longitudinal observational cohort study conducted within the Interreg Slovenia-Austria project CrossReg-4-Health (grant SIAT00307). Approximately 100 consecutive patients will be enrolled at each of three centres (University Medical Centre Maribor; LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz; Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee). Treatment follows routine clinical practice and is not influenced by study participation.

Assessments:

  • Admission: demographics, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, medication (including antithrombotic treatment), premorbid mRS, NIHSS, GCS, baseline non-contrast CT (NCCT), routine laboratory tests, first research blood sample.
  • Approximately 24-48 hours: repeat NCCT for haematoma expansion, repeat NIHSS, second research blood sample where feasible.
  • During hospitalisation: hierarchical pain assessment (NRS 0-10 in communicative patients; Behavioural Pain Scale in ventilated or non-communicative patients; revised Nociception Coma Scale in disorders of consciousness; PAIC15 or Doloplus-2 in aphasia or cognitive impairment), MRI when clinically stable (T2, FLAIR, SWI), care-trajectory data.
  • Discharge: NIHSS, mRS, length of stay, discharge destination, rehabilitation plan.
  • 6 and 12 months: survival, NIHSS, mRS, pain (NRS), PROMIS-29, EQ-5D VAS, rehabilitation use, readmissions, living status.

Biomarkers: S100B, GFAP, NfL, CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-10, D-dimer and exploratory substance P, analysed centrally in batches. Remaining aliquots are stored in the institutional biobank only with separate optional consent.

Neuroimaging: haematoma volume and location, intraventricular haemorrhage, haematoma expansion, perihaematomal oedema, CTA spot sign, CT and MRI markers of cerebral small vessel disease (white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis, lacunes, enlarged perivascular spaces) and MRI-based aetiology. CT-based radiomics and premorbid frailty indicators are exploratory.

Statistical analysis: The primary model is multivariable logistic regression for unfavourable outcome (mRS 4-6 vs 0-3) at 12 months with approximately 15 prespecified candidate predictor parameters (sample size checked using the Riley framework: outcome proportion 0.55, anticipated Cox-Snell R2 0.25, target shrinkage 0.90). Penalised regression may be used. Performance will be assessed by discrimination, calibration and overall performance, with internal validation by bootstrapping or cross-validation. The full ordinal mRS will be analysed with proportional odds regression as a secondary analysis. Mortality will be analysed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. Missing data will be handled by multiple imputation, with complete-case sensitivity analysis.

Embedded substudy: A subset of up to 100 participants with upper-limb motor impairment will take part in an exploratory rehabilitation substudy of haptic-assisted virtual reality training, registered separately on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Keywords
intracerebral haemorrhage, prognostic model, biomarkers, GFAP, neurofilament light chain, cerebral small vessel disease, post-stroke pain, PROMIS-29, quality of life, care trajectories
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Hemorrhagic Stroke, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Type 1F, Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07882784
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spontaneous ICH cohortConsecutive adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to one of three participating centres, managed according to routine clinical practice.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Unfavourable functional outcome at 12 months (modified Rankin Scale 4-6)

    Proportion of participants with mRS 4-6 (unfavourable) versus 0-3. The mRS ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death); higher scores indicate worse outcome. Used as the outcome of the multivariable prognostic model.

    Measured: 12 months after ICH onset

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Functional outcome on the full ordinal modified Rankin Scale at 12 months

    Distribution of mRS scores (0 = no symptoms to 6 = death; higher scores indicate worse outcome), analysed with proportional odds regression.

    Measured: 12 months after ICH onset

  2. Functional outcome at 6 months (modified Rankin Scale)

    mRS score (0 = no symptoms to 6 = death; higher scores indicate worse outcome).

    Measured: 6 months after ICH onset

  3. All-cause mortality

    Proportion of participants who died from any cause.

    Measured: 30 days, 6 months and 12 months after ICH onset

  4. Change in neurological deficit (NIHSS) during hospitalisation

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0-42; higher scores indicate more severe deficit).

    Measured: Admission, approximately 48 hours, and hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  5. Neurological deficit at follow-up (NIHSS)

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0-42; higher scores indicate more severe deficit).

    Measured: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  6. Pain burden during hospitalisation

    Pain assessed hierarchically according to communication ability: Numeric Rating Scale 0-10 (higher = more pain) in communicative patients; Behavioural Pain Scale, revised Nociception Coma Scale, PAIC15 or Doloplus-2 in non-communicative patients.

    Measured: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  7. Pain intensity at follow-up (Numeric Rating Scale)

    Numeric Rating Scale 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain).

    Measured: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  8. Health-related quality of life (PROMIS-29)

    PROMIS-29 domain T-scores (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles, pain interference) and pain intensity item. Higher scores indicate more of the domain measured.

    Measured: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  9. Self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS)

    EuroQol visual analogue scale, 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Measured: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  10. Intensive care unit length of stay

    Days in the intensive care unit.

    Measured: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  11. ICU-to-ward transition time

    Time from admission to transfer from the intensive care unit to a ward, in days.

    Measured: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  12. Total hospital length of stay

    Days from admission to discharge.

    Measured: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  13. Discharge destination

    Categories such as home, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term care facility, other hospital, or death.

    Measured: At hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  14. Rehabilitation exposure

    Type, setting and amount of rehabilitation received.

    Measured: From admission to 12 months after ICH onset

  15. Hospital readmissions

    Number of participants readmitted and number of readmissions.

    Measured: Up to 12 months after ICH onset

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07882784
Sponsor's protocol ID
CrossReg for Health-COHORT
Other IDs
SIAT00307
Acronym
CR-4-Health
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
12 Oct 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No, due to legal restrictions.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in