AzTrials
AzTrials

Episiotomy , Perineal PainNCT07883473

Pudendal Nerve Block for Pain Relief During Episiotomy Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Pudendal Nerve Block and Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration in people with Episiotomy , Perineal Pain, run by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Episiotomy is a surgical cut made in the perineum, the area between the vagina and anus, during vaginal childbirth. Repairing an episiotomy can cause pain, and adequate pain relief is important for maternal comfort during and after delivery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Episiotomy , Perineal Pain
What is being tested?
Pudendal Nerve Block and Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
31 Oct 2026to 15 Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18 years or older.
  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Vaginal delivery at the Department of Maternal and Child Health, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, with mediolateral episiotomy.
  • Routine episiotomy repair.
  • Able to understand the study information and provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetic agents.
  • Coagulation disorder or significant bleeding tendency.
  • Local infection at the injection site.
  • Third- or fourth-degree perineal tear.
  • Extensive vaginal or cervical laceration requiring additional anesthesia.
  • Major postpartum hemorrhage or another major postpartum complication requiring urgent management.
  • Chronic pelvic or perineal pain, or regular analgesic use before delivery.
  • Inability to understand the pain assessment scale or provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Zeenat Usman/Medical officier, MS obstetrics and gyanecology contact

+923315333910

usmanbut2@gmail.com

Sobia Luqman/Assisstant Professor, FCPS obstetrics and gyane contact

+923348626904

sobialuqman8@gmail.com

Pakistan1 site
  • Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS)

    Islamabad, ICT, 04485

    Zeenat Usman, MS obstetrics and Gyanecology, +923315333910, usmanbut2@gmail.com

    Sobia Luqman, FCPS obstetrics and gyanecolog, +923348626904, sobialuqman8@gmail.com

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Episiotomy is a surgical cut made in the perineum, the area between the vagina and anus, during vaginal childbirth. Repairing an episiotomy can cause pain, and adequate pain relief is important for maternal comfort during and after delivery.

This study will compare two methods of providing anesthesia during episiotomy repair in women undergoing vaginal delivery with a mediolateral episiotomy at the Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan.

Read more

A total of 80 eligible women will be enrolled and randomly assigned in equal numbers to two groups. The intervention group will receive a bilateral pudendal nerve block in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum pain relief. The control group will receive conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy area, along with routine repair and standard postpartum pain relief.

Pain will be assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on which 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain will be assessed during episiotomy repair and at 1, 3, and 6 hours after delivery.

The study will also compare the need for additional pain medication, pain during sitting and walking, patient comfort and satisfaction, the duration of episiotomy repair, the need for additional local anesthetic, and complications associated with the procedures.

The aim is to determine whether pudendal nerve block provides better pain relief during episiotomy repair and improves early postpartum comfort compared with conventional local anesthetic infiltration.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Episiotomy is a surgical incision of the perineum performed during vaginal childbirth. The procedure is followed by tissue repair and may be associated with acute perineal pain and discomfort during the early postpartum period. Pain may interfere with sitting, walking, and routine postpartum activities.

Conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy site is commonly used during repair. However, adequate anesthesia may not always be achieved. Pudendal nerve block is a regional anesthetic technique that targets the pudendal nerve, which provides sensory innervation to much of the lower vagina, vulva, perineum, and anus. It may provide anesthesia to the tissues involved in episiotomy repair.

This study will compare pudendal nerve block with conventional local perineal infiltration to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing pain during episiotomy repair and improving early postpartum comfort.

Study Design and Setting

This is a randomized controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at the Department of Maternal and Child Health (MCH), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan.

The planned sample size is 80 women, with 40 participants allocated to each group. Eligible women will be recruited consecutively during the study period. Following eligibility assessment and informed consent, participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or control group.

The study duration is planned to be three months following institutional ethical approval, as stated in the study synopsis.

Study Population

The study population will consist of women aged 18 years or older who undergo vaginal delivery with a mediolateral episiotomy at MCH PIMS.

Inclusion Criteria

Participants must:

  1. Be aged 18 years or older.
  2. Have a singleton pregnancy.
  3. Have a vaginal delivery at MCH PIMS.
  4. Require a mediolateral episiotomy.
  5. Have an uncomplicated episiotomy requiring routine repair.
  6. Be able to understand the study information and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Women will be excluded if they have:

  1. An allergy or contraindication to the proposed local anesthetic.
  2. A known coagulation disorder or significant bleeding tendency.
  3. Local infection at the proposed injection site.
  4. An associated third- or fourth-degree perineal tear.
  5. An extensive vaginal or cervical laceration requiring additional anesthesia.
  6. Major postpartum hemorrhage or another major postpartum complication requiring urgent management.
  7. Chronic pelvic or perineal pain, or regular use of analgesic medication before delivery.
  8. An inability to understand the pain assessment scale or provide informed consent.

Study Groups and Interventions

Intervention Group: Participants will receive bilateral pudendal nerve block using the local anesthetic specified in the study protocol, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia. The protocol describes the proposed use of 2% lidocaine, 2 mL, for pudendal nerve block. The procedure will be performed using a standardized technique by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist.

Control Group: Participants will receive conventional local perineal infiltration anesthesia according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol.

Both groups will receive routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome:

The primary outcome is pain intensity during episiotomy repair, measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 mm represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain assessments are planned at predefined stages of repair. The specific primary assessment stage should be consistent with the finalized study protocol.

Secondary Outcomes:

  1. Postpartum pain intensity measured using VAS at 1, 3, and 6 hours after delivery.
  2. Requirement for rescue analgesia during the first 6 hours postpartum.
  3. Time to first rescue analgesia and total rescue analgesic use during the first 6 hours.
  4. Pain during sitting and walking within the first 6 hours postpartum.
  5. Patient-reported comfort and satisfaction with pain management.
  6. Duration of episiotomy repair.
  7. Requirement for additional local anesthetic and success or failure of pudendal nerve block.
  8. Frequency of complications and adverse effects associated with the procedures.

Safety Monitoring

Potential complications associated with pudendal nerve block include injection-site pain or discomfort, local hematoma, infection, excessive bleeding, local anesthetic toxicity, temporary neurological symptoms, and inadequate block. Participants will be monitored for adverse effects, and clinically significant complications will be managed according to institutional protocols.

The procedure will be performed by appropriately trained personnel using the established technique and relevant precautions for local anesthetic administration.

Data Collection and Statistical Analysis

Data will be collected using a structured data collection proforma. Baseline information will include age, gravidity and parity, gestational age, delivery-related information, indication for episiotomy, and relevant obstetric or medical history. Procedural details, pain scores, rescue analgesia, comfort, satisfaction, and adverse events will also be documented.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 26. Continuous variables will be summarized using means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Categorical variables will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. Between-group comparisons will use appropriate statistical tests according to variable type and distribution. Repeated postoperative pain measurements will be analyzed using an appropriate repeated-measures method. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Blinding

Complete blinding of participants and the clinicians performing the procedures may not be feasible because the anesthetic techniques differ. Outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation where feasible, and coded group identifiers will be used for statistical analysis.

Ethical Considerations

Participation will be voluntary, and informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. Participants may withdraw from the study without affecting their routine clinical care. The study will be conducted in accordance with the approved institutional protocol and applicable ethical requirements.

Being tested
Pudendal Nerve Block, Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration
Keywords
Pudendal nerve block Local anesthetic infiltration Postpartum pain Visual Analogue Scale

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pudendal Nerve BlockProcedure or surgery

    Bilateral pudendal nerve block performed using the standardized technique specified in the study protocol, with the local anesthetic described in the protocol (2% lidocaine, 2 mL). The procedure will be performed by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia.

  • Conventional Local Perineal InfiltrationProcedure or surgery

    Conventional local anesthetic infiltration around the episiotomy site according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol. Routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia will also be provided.

Study groups in NCT07883473
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pudendal Nerve Block GroupExperimentalParticipants will receive bilateral pudendal nerve block using the local anesthetic specified in the study protocol, in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia. The protocol describes the use of 2% lidocaine, 2 mL, for the pudendal nerve block. The procedure will be performed by an appropriately trained obstetrician or anesthetist using a standardized technique.
Receives: Procedure: Pudendal Nerve Block
Conventional Local Infiltration GroupActive comparatorParticipants will receive conventional local perineal infiltration anesthesia according to the standard MCH PIMS episiotomy-repair protocol. Routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia will be provided.
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity during episiotomy repair

    Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 mm represents the worst imaginable pain. Pain will be assessed at predefined stages during episiotomy repair, including after anesthesia administration, at commencement of repair, during repair, and at completion of repair.

    Measured: During episiotomy repair

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Postpartum pain intensity

    pain intensity measured using a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst imaginable pain.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 hours postpartum

  2. Requirement for rescue analgesia

    Proportion of participants requiring additional analgesic medication for inadequate episiotomy-related pain relief.

    Measured: First 6 hours postpartum

  3. Patient satisfaction with pain management

    Patient satisfaction with pain management assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.

    Measured: 1-6 hours postpartum

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2026
  2. Study start31 Oct 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study uses a randomized, parallel-group design. Eligible women undergoing vaginal delivery with mediolateral episiotomy will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. The intervention group will receive bilateral pudendal nerve block in addition to routine episiotomy repair and standard postpartum analgesia. The control group will receive conventional local perineal infiltration with routine repair and standard postpartum analgesia. Participants will remain in their assigned groups throughout the study.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07883473
Sponsor's protocol ID
F.1-1/2015/ERB/SZABMU/1634
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
13 Oct 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The decision regarding sharing individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. Any potential sharing will be considered in accordance with institutional policies, ethical approval requirements, participant confidentiality, and applicable data protection requirements. If data sharing is considered in the future, only appropriately de-identified data may be shared, subject to necessary institutional and ethical approvals.

Publications

  • Aissaoui Y, Bruyere R, Mustapha H, Bry D, Kamili ND, Miller C. A randomized controlled trial of pudendal nerve block for pain relief after episiotomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):625-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee48f.

    PubMed 18633043

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pudendal Nerve Block and Conventional Local Perineal Infiltration in people with Episiotomy , Perineal Pain, run by Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zeenat Usman/Medical officier, MS obstetrics and gyanecology (+923315333910, usmanbut2@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain intensity during episiotomy repair (time frame: During episiotomy repair). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07883473, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in