ASCVDEMPOWERNCT07883564
Improving Implementation of Guideline-Recommended LDL-C Management in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients
An observational study of ASCVD, run by Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether implementing evidence-based strategies in cardiology practices can improve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management in adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ASCVD
- How many people
- 2,500 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Oct 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Study population will be comprised of patients receiving care at private cardiology practices. All patients will have experienced a qualifying cardiac event: MI w/ at least 50% stenosis, PCI, first time CAC score of at least 300.
Who may be able to join
- Patients who were discharged from the hospital with a recent acute myocardial infarction (MI) (identified by catheterization records and with > 50% stenosis) or coronary stent (if they are very-high risk).
- Patients discharged from the hospital without a recent acute MI following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and/or with ischemic heart disease if they are high but not very high risk, or with a CAC score > 300 and aged 40-75.
- Patients aged 40-75 years old with CAC score > 300.
Who cannot join
- Age under 18 years.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Capital Cardiology Associates
Albany, New York, 12211
Christopher Chapman, 518-818-2723, cchapman@capitalcardiology.com
Clearwater Cardiovascular Consultants
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Michele Cameron, 727-467-9393 ext. 3113, cameronm@cccheart.com
Cardiovascular Institute of the South
Houma, Louisiana, 70360
Deanna Benoit, 985-873-5613, deanna.benoit@cardio.com
First Coast Cardiovascular Institute
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Vanessa Hernandez, 954-260-9979, vhernandez@firstcoastcardio.com
Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Sydney Rose, 999-999-9999, sydneyrose@ccpdocs.com
About this study
Official title: Improving Implementation of Guideline-Recommended LDL-C Management in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: A Multilevel Implementation Science Study
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether implementing evidence-based strategies in cardiology practices can improve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management in adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Participants include adults with a recent myocardial infarction (heart attack), coronary stent placement, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ischemic heart disease, or a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 300 or higher. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do implementation strategies increase the proportion of patients who receive LDL-C testing, have lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) started or intensified, and achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals within 6 months of their index visit?
- Do implementation strategies improve cardiovascular risk factor management and LDL-C goal attainment at 3 and 12 months after the index visit?
- How acceptable, feasible, and effective are these implementation strategies for patients, clinicians, and healthcare sites? Researchers will compare outcomes among patients receiving care after implementation of the study strategies with outcomes from a retrospective cohort of similar patients treated before the strategies were introduced.
Read more
Participants will:
- Receive usual cardiovascular care from their healthcare providers.
- Be cared for at sites implementing one or more evidence-based strategies, which may include clinician performance scorecards, electronic health record best practice alerts, clinician education, patient education, and/or follow-up through an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) care pathway.
- Attend routine follow-up visits and undergo LDL-C testing and other cardiovascular assessments as part of standard clinical care.
- Have information from their electronic health records reviewed, including laboratory results, medications, blood pressure measurements, smoking status, and cardiovascular outcomes.
- Complete surveys about their experiences with the implementation strategies, if applicable.
- Be followed for up to 12 months after their index visit.
Read the detailed description
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although clinical guidelines recommend aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering for patients at high cardiovascular risk, many patients do not receive recommended LDL-C monitoring, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification, or achieve LDL-C treatment goals in routine clinical practice. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of evidence-based strategies intended to improve guideline-recommended lipid management in high-risk cardiovascular patients.
This is a multicenter, hybrid Type II implementation-effectiveness study using a prospective stepped-wedge design with a retrospective comparator cohort. Participating cardiology practices will transition from pre-implementation standard care to implementation of one or more evidence-based strategies designed to improve LDL-C management. The study will evaluate both clinical effectiveness outcomes and implementation outcomes using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
The study population includes adults with recent myocardial infarction (MI), coronary stent placement or a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 300 or greater who receive care at participating cardiovascular practices. A retrospective cohort meeting the same eligibility criteria will serve as the baseline comparator. The retrospective and prospective cohorts will be non-overlapping.
The study will be conducted in approximately five cardiovascular practice sites within the United States. During the retrospective phase, electronic health record (EHR) data and chart review will be used to evaluate historical LDL-C management and cardiovascular outcomes. These data will be used to generate clinician performance scorecards that provide feedback regarding adherence to guideline-recommended care.
All participating sites will implement clinician scorecards. Sites may additionally implement one or more evidence-based strategies, including:
- Passive electronic health record best practice alerts that notify clinicians about guideline-recommended LDL-C management.
- Physician education focused on contemporary cardiovascular risk reduction and guideline-directed lipid management.
- Patient education resources regarding LDL-C, cardiovascular risk, medication adherence, and lifestyle modification.
- An Advanced Practice Provider (APP) care pathway that provides additional patient follow-up, education, and care coordination.
Patients will receive routine clinical care according to local practice standards. Clinical data will be collected from the EHR at baseline and during follow-up. Prospective participants will be followed for up to 12 months after the index visit, with assessments performed at approximately 3, 6, and 12 months. Data collection may include lipid measurements, medication use, blood pressure, smoking status, cardiovascular events, healthcare utilization, and implementation-related measures.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether implementation of these evidence-based strategies improves LDL-C testing, LLT initiation or intensification, and achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C goals at 6 months compared with the retrospective baseline cohort. Secondary objectives include assessing these outcomes at 3 and 12 months, evaluating additional cardiovascular risk factor management measures, and examining implementation outcomes including reach, acceptability, adoption, fidelity, and cost.
Implementation outcomes will be evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methods. Reach will assess the proportion and characteristics of patients receiving implementation strategies. Adoption will assess clinician utilization of the strategies. Acceptability will be evaluated through patient and clinician surveys. Implementation fidelity will be assessed through implementation logs documenting adaptations, barriers, and facilitators. Cost analyses will evaluate resources required to deploy the strategies across participating sites.
The study is expected to enroll up to approximately 500 patients per site, with an anticipated total enrollment of approximately 3,000 patients across five sites. Power analyses based on clustered regression models indicated that the planned sample size is sufficient to detect clinically meaningful improvements in LLT intensification and related outcomes while accounting for clustering by site and relevant patient-level covariates.
The retrospective cohort will serve as the baseline comparator for the prospective implementation cohort. Analyses will account for clustering of patients within participating sites and adjust for relevant patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, baseline lipid levels, and medication use.
Primary effectiveness outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effects regression and time-to-event methods. LLT initiation or intensification will be evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. LDL-C testing and LDL-C goal attainment will be analyzed using time-to-event approaches, including Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models.
Secondary outcomes, including smoking cessation, blood pressure goal attainment, use of glucose-lowering therapies among eligible patients, and implementation outcomes, will be assessed using appropriate mixed-effects, time-to-event, descriptive, and qualitative analytic methods. Implementation data will be analyzed according to the RE-AIM framework. Descriptive analyses will compare outcomes across sites and combinations of implementation strategies. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to evaluate implementation experiences and barriers documented in implementation logs and other narrative data sources.
All analyses will be conducted on de-identified data, and study findings will be used to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and potential scalability of multilevel implementation strategies intended to improve cardiovascular risk reduction and LDL-C management in high-risk cardiovascular populations.
- Conditions
- ASCVD
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective Cohort | Participants enrolled and followed prior to the deployment of implementation strategy(ies). | |
| Prospective Cohort | Participants enrolled and followed after the deployment of implementation strategy(ies). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Binary indicator of LDL-C <55 mg/dL for patients with a recent MI or coronary stent and <70 mg/dL for patients undergoing PCI with no MI and/or ischemic heart disease or with a CAC score of at least 300 at 6-month post visit, with time to event.
LDL-C level/goal attainment per guidelines. LDL-C laboratory testing.
Measured: Within 6-months post qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients who received LDL-C testing, with time to event.
LDL-C laboratory testing.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients in whom lipid lowering therapy was initiated/intensified within the first six months after index event.
Any change in prescriptions/dosages of lipid lowering medications (statins, ezetimibe, BAS, PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid +/- ezetimibe, fibrates, prescription OM3FA).
Measured: Within 6-months post qualifying event.
Secondary outcomes (15)
Persistence of cardiovascular risk goals after being discharged from the APP pathway strategy: Prescription of GLP1/SGLT2 inhibitors
Prescription or removal of GLP1/SGLT2 inhibitor medications.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Cardiac Rehab
Binary indication of whether cardiac rehab was ordered and initiated.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Blood Pressure
Self-reported home measurement or in-office measurement of blood pressure.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: BMI
Height in inches and weight in pounds as measured during office visit will be combined to report BMI in lbs/in^2.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Smoking Status
Binary indicator of smoking status.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of LDL-C <55 mg/dL for patients with a recent MI or coronary stent and <70 mg/dL patients undergoing PCI with no MI and/or ischemic heart disease and for those with a CAC score > 300 at 3- and 12-month post visit, with time to event.
LDL-C laboratory testing, LDL-C level/goal attainment per guidelines.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients in whom LLT was initiated/intensified at the 3- and 12-month visits post-index.
Any change in prescriptions/dosages of lipid lowering medications (statins, ezetimibe, BAS, PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid +/- ezetimibe, fibrates, prescription OM3FA).
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients with noted transition to non-smoking status, with time to event.
Subset of smokers at index event.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of any prescribed GLP1 agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor within 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up periods post qualifying event.
Subset of diagnosed diabetics and pre-diabetics at index. Any changes in prescriptions/dosages of GLP1, SGLT2i medications.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Percentage of patients who achieved their blood pressure goal.
Time to event analyses.
Measured: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Implementation outcome: Acceptability
Patient and clinician ratings of acceptability of strategies measured via survey.
Measured: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Reach
Proportion of patients who received an implementation strategy, which strategy(ies), and their characteristics.
Measured: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Adoption
Proportion of clinicians who used a strategy and their characteristics.
Measured: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Fidelity
Adaptations to how strategies are implemented across healthcare sites (descriptive via logs).
Measured: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Cost
The cost of each strategy deployed at each site via a profit/loss statement.
Measured: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ASCVDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen, Thomas Jefferson University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dean Karalis, Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07883564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCP 2.0
- Acronym
- EMPOWER
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Implementation of Guideline-Recommended LDL-C Management in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients: A Multilevel Implementation Science Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07883564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMPOWER / CCP 2.0
- Conditions
- ASCVD
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiology Consultants of PhiladelphiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen, Thomas Jefferson University
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to learn whether implementing evidence-based strategies in cardiology practices can improve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management in adults at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Participants include adults with a recent myocardial infarction (heart attack), coronary stent placement, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ischemic heart disease, or a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 300 or higher. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Do implementation strategies increase the proportion of patients who receive LDL-C testing, have lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) started or intensified, and achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C goals within 6 months of their index visit?
- Do implementation strategies improve cardiovascular risk factor management and LDL-C goal attainment at 3 and 12 months after the index visit?
- How acceptable, feasible, and effective are these implementation strategies for patients, clinicians, and healthcare sites? Researchers will compare outcomes among patients receiving care after implementation of the study strategies with outcomes from a retrospective cohort of similar patients treated before the strategies were introduced.
Participants will:
- Receive usual cardiovascular care from their healthcare providers.
- Be cared for at sites implementing one or more evidence-based strategies, which may include clinician performance scorecards, electronic health record best practice alerts, clinician education, patient education, and/or follow-up through an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) care pathway.
- Attend routine follow-up visits and undergo LDL-C testing and other cardiovascular assessments as part of standard clinical care.
- Have information from their electronic health records reviewed, including laboratory results, medications, blood pressure measurements, smoking status, and cardiovascular outcomes.
- Complete surveys about their experiences with the implementation strategies, if applicable.
- Be followed for up to 12 months after their index visit.
Detailed description
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Although clinical guidelines recommend aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering for patients at high cardiovascular risk, many patients do not receive recommended LDL-C monitoring, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) intensification, or achieve LDL-C treatment goals in routine clinical practice. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of evidence-based strategies intended to improve guideline-recommended lipid management in high-risk cardiovascular patients.
This is a multicenter, hybrid Type II implementation-effectiveness study using a prospective stepped-wedge design with a retrospective comparator cohort. Participating cardiology practices will transition from pre-implementation standard care to implementation of one or more evidence-based strategies designed to improve LDL-C management. The study will evaluate both clinical effectiveness outcomes and implementation outcomes using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
The study population includes adults with recent myocardial infarction (MI), coronary stent placement or a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 300 or greater who receive care at participating cardiovascular practices. A retrospective cohort meeting the same eligibility criteria will serve as the baseline comparator. The retrospective and prospective cohorts will be non-overlapping.
The study will be conducted in approximately five cardiovascular practice sites within the United States. During the retrospective phase, electronic health record (EHR) data and chart review will be used to evaluate historical LDL-C management and cardiovascular outcomes. These data will be used to generate clinician performance scorecards that provide feedback regarding adherence to guideline-recommended care.
All participating sites will implement clinician scorecards. Sites may additionally implement one or more evidence-based strategies, including:
- Passive electronic health record best practice alerts that notify clinicians about guideline-recommended LDL-C management.
- Physician education focused on contemporary cardiovascular risk reduction and guideline-directed lipid management.
- Patient education resources regarding LDL-C, cardiovascular risk, medication adherence, and lifestyle modification.
- An Advanced Practice Provider (APP) care pathway that provides additional patient follow-up, education, and care coordination.
Patients will receive routine clinical care according to local practice standards. Clinical data will be collected from the EHR at baseline and during follow-up. Prospective participants will be followed for up to 12 months after the index visit, with assessments performed at approximately 3, 6, and 12 months. Data collection may include lipid measurements, medication use, blood pressure, smoking status, cardiovascular events, healthcare utilization, and implementation-related measures.
The primary objective is to evaluate whether implementation of these evidence-based strategies improves LDL-C testing, LLT initiation or intensification, and achievement of guideline-recommended LDL-C goals at 6 months compared with the retrospective baseline cohort. Secondary objectives include assessing these outcomes at 3 and 12 months, evaluating additional cardiovascular risk factor management measures, and examining implementation outcomes including reach, acceptability, adoption, fidelity, and cost.
Implementation outcomes will be evaluated using quantitative and qualitative methods. Reach will assess the proportion and characteristics of patients receiving implementation strategies. Adoption will assess clinician utilization of the strategies. Acceptability will be evaluated through patient and clinician surveys. Implementation fidelity will be assessed through implementation logs documenting adaptations, barriers, and facilitators. Cost analyses will evaluate resources required to deploy the strategies across participating sites.
The study is expected to enroll up to approximately 500 patients per site, with an anticipated total enrollment of approximately 3,000 patients across five sites. Power analyses based on clustered regression models indicated that the planned sample size is sufficient to detect clinically meaningful improvements in LLT intensification and related outcomes while accounting for clustering by site and relevant patient-level covariates.
The retrospective cohort will serve as the baseline comparator for the prospective implementation cohort. Analyses will account for clustering of patients within participating sites and adjust for relevant patient characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities, baseline lipid levels, and medication use.
Primary effectiveness outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effects regression and time-to-event methods. LLT initiation or intensification will be evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression models. LDL-C testing and LDL-C goal attainment will be analyzed using time-to-event approaches, including Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models.
Secondary outcomes, including smoking cessation, blood pressure goal attainment, use of glucose-lowering therapies among eligible patients, and implementation outcomes, will be assessed using appropriate mixed-effects, time-to-event, descriptive, and qualitative analytic methods. Implementation data will be analyzed according to the RE-AIM framework. Descriptive analyses will compare outcomes across sites and combinations of implementation strategies. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to evaluate implementation experiences and barriers documented in implementation logs and other narrative data sources.
All analyses will be conducted on de-identified data, and study findings will be used to evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, and potential scalability of multilevel implementation strategies intended to improve cardiovascular risk reduction and LDL-C management in high-risk cardiovascular populations.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective Cohort | – | –Participants enrolled and followed prior to the deployment of implementation strategy(ies). |
| Prospective Cohort | – | –Participants enrolled and followed after the deployment of implementation strategy(ies). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Study population will be comprised of patients receiving care at private cardiology practices. All patients will have experienced a qualifying cardiac event: MI w/ at least 50% stenosis, PCI, first time CAC score of at least 300.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who were discharged from the hospital with a recent acute myocardial infarction (MI) (identified by catheterization records and with > 50% stenosis) or coronary stent (if they are very-high risk).
- Patients discharged from the hospital without a recent acute MI following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and/or with ischemic heart disease if they are high but not very high risk, or with a CAC score > 300 and aged 40-75.
- Patients aged 40-75 years old with CAC score > 300.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age under 18 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Binary indicator of LDL-C <55 mg/dL for patients with a recent MI or coronary stent and <70 mg/dL for patients undergoing PCI with no MI and/or ischemic heart disease or with a CAC score of at least 300 at 6-month post visit, with time to event.
Time frame: Within 6-months post qualifying event.
LDL-C level/goal attainment per guidelines. LDL-C laboratory testing.
Binary indicator of patients who received LDL-C testing, with time to event.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
LDL-C laboratory testing.
Binary indicator of patients in whom lipid lowering therapy was initiated/intensified within the first six months after index event.
Time frame: Within 6-months post qualifying event.
Any change in prescriptions/dosages of lipid lowering medications (statins, ezetimibe, BAS, PCSK9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid +/- ezetimibe, fibrates, prescription OM3FA).
15 secondary outcomes
Persistence of cardiovascular risk goals after being discharged from the APP pathway strategy: Prescription of GLP1/SGLT2 inhibitors
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Cardiac Rehab
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Blood Pressure
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: BMI
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Persistence of cardiovascular risk after discharge from the APP pathway strategy: Smoking Status
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of LDL-C <55 mg/dL for patients with a recent MI or coronary stent and <70 mg/dL patients undergoing PCI with no MI and/or ischemic heart disease and for those with a CAC score > 300 at 3- and 12-month post visit, with time to event.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients in whom LLT was initiated/intensified at the 3- and 12-month visits post-index.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of patients with noted transition to non-smoking status, with time to event.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Binary indicator of any prescribed GLP1 agonist or SGLT2 inhibitor within 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up periods post qualifying event.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Percentage of patients who achieved their blood pressure goal.
Time frame: Up to 365 days following qualifying event.
Implementation outcome: Acceptability
Time frame: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Reach
Time frame: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Adoption
Time frame: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Fidelity
Time frame: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Implementation Outcome: Cost
Time frame: From the implementation initiation through study completion, approximately 20 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for ASCVD
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Study Evaluating LDL-C Change and Adherence to Inclisiran Lipid-lowering Therapy in ASCVD
Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia
Not yet recruiting
Hs-CRP-Guided Colchicine Treatment Targets in Very-High-Risk Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After PCI (TARGET-CHD)
Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Clazakizumab (LY5724886) in Adults With Elevated hsCRP and at Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Event
Atherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Phase 2 Study of Kylo-11 in ASCVD Patients With Elevated Lp(a)
Lipoprotein Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ASCVD, run by Cardiology Consultants of Philadelphia at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dean G Karalis, M.D. (2674795325, deankaralis@ccpdocs.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Binary indicator of LDL-C <55 mg/dL for patients with a recent MI or coronary stent and <70 mg/dL for patients undergoing PCI with no MI and/or ischemic heart disease or with a CAC score of at least 300 at 6-month post visit, with time to event. (time frame: Within 6-months post qualifying event.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.