AzTrials
AzTrials

Urethral StricturePhase 3NCT07883837

Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Mitomycin C Injection Following Visual Internal Urethrotomy in Urethral Stricture

A Phase 3 study testing Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection in people with Urethral Stricture, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

this is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Ain Shams University to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different substances injected after visual internal urethrotomy for treating urethral stricture in adult men. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Urethral Stricture
What is being tested?
Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Aug 2025to 1 Apr 2026
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who had urethral stricture and had not undergone visual internal urethrotomy in the past.
  • Stricture length equal to or less than 1.5 cm.
  • Adult males.

Who cannot join

  • Documented or suspicious prostate cancer.
  • History of hypospadias repair and urethroplasty.
  • Patients who had neurogenic bladder.
  • Untreated urinary tract infection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Demerdash hospitals.

    Cairo, Abbassia, 11591

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Mitomycin C Injection Following Visual Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Urethral Stricture in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

this is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Ain Shams University to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different substances injected after visual internal urethrotomy for treating urethral stricture in adult men. Fifty male patients with short urethral strictures were randomly divided into two equal groups, with one group receiving a mitomycin C injection and the other receiving a platelet-rich plasma injection at the site of the urethrotomy. Patients were followed for six months, with evaluations at three and six months that included symptom scores, quality of life assessments, urine flow measurements, post-void residual urine volume, and recurrence rates.

Being tested
Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection, Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection
Keywords
Urethral Stricture, Mitomycin C, Platlet Rich Plasma, Visual internal urethrotomy
Medical subject headings
Urethral Stricture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injectionProcedure or surgery

    Patients underwent visual internal urethrotomy using a cold knife at the 12 o'clock position, with additional incisions at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions if needed, until healthy tissue was reached. After the incision, a vial containing 10 mg of mitomycin C was reconstituted with 20 mL of normal saline to obtain a stock solution of 0.5 mg/mL. From this solution, 8 mL was withdrawn and further diluted with 2 mL of normal saline, resulting in a final volume of 10 mL at a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, giving a total administered dose of 4 mg. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared mitomycin C solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with 2 to 3 additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision at the incised stricture segment. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days.

  • Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injectionProcedure or surgery

    Patients underwent visual internal urethrotomy in the same manner as Group A. Platelet-rich plasma was prepared using the double-spin method. A total of 50 mL of whole blood was withdrawn with anticoagulant and centrifuged at 100 g for 15 minutes, then the platelet-containing plasma was collected and centrifuged again at 1600 g for 20 minutes at 22°C. The lower third containing the platelet pellets was collected, yielding about 5 mL of sterile platelet-rich plasma, which was mixed with 5 mL of normal saline to produce a 10 mL solution. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared platelet-rich plasma solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days.

Study groups in NCT07883837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Mitomycin C GroupActive comparatorPatients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection.
Receives: Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection
Group B: Platlet Rich Plasma GroupExperimentalPatients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional platelet-rich plasma injection.
Receives: Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical effectiveness in improving patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms according to the International Prostate Symptom Score

    This outcome measure assessed the degree of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms reported by patients after the intervention. The International Prostate Symptom Score is a validated, patient-reported questionnaire consisting of seven questions that evaluate the severity of urinary symptoms, including incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, giving a total score range of 0 to 35, where scores of 1 to 7 indicate mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicate moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicate severe symptoms.

    Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery

  2. Clinical effectiveness in improving patient's uroflometry

    This outcome assessed urinary flow using uroflowmetry, a non-invasive test measuring the rate and pattern of urine flow.It records average and maximum urinary flow rates in milliliters per second. These values were compared between both groups to determine whether either treatment produced greater improvement. A maximum flow rate above 10 mL per second was considered successful, while a value below 10 mL per second was considered suspicious for recurrence and prompted further evaluation with retrograde cystourethrography.

    Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Quality of Life Assessment

    This outcome assessed the impact of urinary symptoms on patients' daily lives using the quality of life question from the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire. Patients were asked how they would feel if they had to spend the rest of their lives with their current urinary condition, with responses ranging from delighted to terrible on a scale of 0 to 6.

    Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery

  2. Post-void residual urine volume

    This outcome assessed bladder emptying by measuring the amount of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding, using pelvi-abdominal ultrasound.

    Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07883837
Sponsor's protocol ID
FMASU MS 510/2025
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
13 Oct 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ali L, Shahzad M, Orakzai N, Khan I, Ahmad M. Efficacy of mitomycin C in reducing recurrence of anterior urethral stricture after internal optical urethrotomy. Korean J Urol. 2015 Sep;56(9):650-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.650. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

    PubMed 26366278
  • Noureldin YA, Fathy A, Ahmed S, Shaer AE, Ali S, Saki Z, Sebaey A. Intralesional injection of mitomycin C following internal urethrotomy of de novo bulbar urethral stricture:New experience using a novel adjustable-tip needle. Arab J Urol. 2021 Mar 1;19(4):473-479. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1891688. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34881065
  • Issam Al Azzawi. The role of mitomycin C intralesional injection during visual internal urethrotomy in urethral stricture recurrence. Arab Journal of Urology. 2018; 16(sup1): S8-S9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.10.062

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection in people with Urethral Stricture, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical effectiveness in improving patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07883837, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in