Urethral StricturePhase 3NCT07883837
Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Mitomycin C Injection Following Visual Internal Urethrotomy in Urethral Stricture
A Phase 3 study testing Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection in people with Urethral Stricture, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
this is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Ain Shams University to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different substances injected after visual internal urethrotomy for treating urethral stricture in adult men. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urethral Stricture
- What is being tested?
- Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2025to 1 Apr 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who had urethral stricture and had not undergone visual internal urethrotomy in the past.
- Stricture length equal to or less than 1.5 cm.
- Adult males.
Who cannot join
- Documented or suspicious prostate cancer.
- History of hypospadias repair and urethroplasty.
- Patients who had neurogenic bladder.
- Untreated urinary tract infection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Demerdash hospitals.
Cairo, Abbassia, 11591
About this study
Official title: Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Mitomycin C Injection Following Visual Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Urethral Stricture in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
this is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Ain Shams University to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different substances injected after visual internal urethrotomy for treating urethral stricture in adult men. Fifty male patients with short urethral strictures were randomly divided into two equal groups, with one group receiving a mitomycin C injection and the other receiving a platelet-rich plasma injection at the site of the urethrotomy. Patients were followed for six months, with evaluations at three and six months that included symptom scores, quality of life assessments, urine flow measurements, post-void residual urine volume, and recurrence rates.
- Conditions
- Urethral Stricture
- Being tested
- Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection, Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection
- Keywords
- Urethral Stricture, Mitomycin C, Platlet Rich Plasma, Visual internal urethrotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Urethral Stricture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injectionProcedure or surgery
Patients underwent visual internal urethrotomy using a cold knife at the 12 o'clock position, with additional incisions at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions if needed, until healthy tissue was reached. After the incision, a vial containing 10 mg of mitomycin C was reconstituted with 20 mL of normal saline to obtain a stock solution of 0.5 mg/mL. From this solution, 8 mL was withdrawn and further diluted with 2 mL of normal saline, resulting in a final volume of 10 mL at a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, giving a total administered dose of 4 mg. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared mitomycin C solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with 2 to 3 additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision at the incised stricture segment. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days.
Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injectionProcedure or surgery
Patients underwent visual internal urethrotomy in the same manner as Group A. Platelet-rich plasma was prepared using the double-spin method. A total of 50 mL of whole blood was withdrawn with anticoagulant and centrifuged at 100 g for 15 minutes, then the platelet-containing plasma was collected and centrifuged again at 1600 g for 20 minutes at 22°C. The lower third containing the platelet pellets was collected, yielding about 5 mL of sterile platelet-rich plasma, which was mixed with 5 mL of normal saline to produce a 10 mL solution. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared platelet-rich plasma solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Mitomycin C Group | Active comparator | Patients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection. Receives: Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection |
| Group B: Platlet Rich Plasma Group | Experimental | Patients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional platelet-rich plasma injection. Receives: Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical effectiveness in improving patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms according to the International Prostate Symptom Score
This outcome measure assessed the degree of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms reported by patients after the intervention. The International Prostate Symptom Score is a validated, patient-reported questionnaire consisting of seven questions that evaluate the severity of urinary symptoms, including incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, giving a total score range of 0 to 35, where scores of 1 to 7 indicate mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicate moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicate severe symptoms.
Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Clinical effectiveness in improving patient's uroflometry
This outcome assessed urinary flow using uroflowmetry, a non-invasive test measuring the rate and pattern of urine flow.It records average and maximum urinary flow rates in milliliters per second. These values were compared between both groups to determine whether either treatment produced greater improvement. A maximum flow rate above 10 mL per second was considered successful, while a value below 10 mL per second was considered suspicious for recurrence and prompted further evaluation with retrograde cystourethrography.
Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quality of Life Assessment
This outcome assessed the impact of urinary symptoms on patients' daily lives using the quality of life question from the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire. Patients were asked how they would feel if they had to spend the rest of their lives with their current urinary condition, with responses ranging from delighted to terrible on a scale of 0 to 6.
Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Post-void residual urine volume
This outcome assessed bladder emptying by measuring the amount of urine remaining in the bladder after voiding, using pelvi-abdominal ultrasound.
Measured: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Aug 2025
- Primary completion1 Mar 2026
- Study completion1 Apr 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urethral StrictureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ain Shams UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Younan Ramsis, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07883837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMASU MS 510/2025
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ali L, Shahzad M, Orakzai N, Khan I, Ahmad M. Efficacy of mitomycin C in reducing recurrence of anterior urethral stricture after internal optical urethrotomy. Korean J Urol. 2015 Sep;56(9):650-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.650. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
PubMed 26366278Noureldin YA, Fathy A, Ahmed S, Shaer AE, Ali S, Saki Z, Sebaey A. Intralesional injection of mitomycin C following internal urethrotomy of de novo bulbar urethral stricture:New experience using a novel adjustable-tip needle. Arab J Urol. 2021 Mar 1;19(4):473-479. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1891688. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34881065Issam Al Azzawi. The role of mitomycin C intralesional injection during visual internal urethrotomy in urethral stricture recurrence. Arab Journal of Urology. 2018; 16(sup1): S8-S9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.10.062
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Mitomycin C Injection Following Visual Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Urethral Stricture in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07883837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FMASU MS 510/2025
- Conditions
- Urethral Stricture
- Keywords
- Urethral Stricture, Mitomycin C, Platlet Rich Plasma, Visual internal urethrotomy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ain Shams UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
this is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted at Ain Shams University to compare the effectiveness and safety of two different substances injected after visual internal urethrotomy for treating urethral stricture in adult men. Fifty male patients with short urethral strictures were randomly divided into two equal groups, with one group receiving a mitomycin C injection and the other receiving a platelet-rich plasma injection at the site of the urethrotomy. Patients were followed for six months, with evaluations at three and six months that included symptom scores, quality of life assessments, urine flow measurements, post-void residual urine volume, and recurrence rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Mitomycin C Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injectionPatients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection. |
| Group B: Platlet Rich Plasma Group | Experimental | Procedure: Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injectionPatients who underwent visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional platelet-rich plasma injection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who had urethral stricture and had not undergone visual internal urethrotomy in the past.
- Stricture length equal to or less than 1.5 cm.
- Adult males.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Documented or suspicious prostate cancer.
- History of hypospadias repair and urethroplasty.
- Patients who had neurogenic bladder.
- Untreated urinary tract infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injectionPatients underwent visual internal urethrotomy using a cold knife at the 12 o'clock position, with additional incisions at the 4 and 8 o'clock positions if needed, until healthy tissue was reached. After the incision, a vial containing 10 mg of mitomycin C was reconstituted with 20 mL of normal saline to obtain a stock solution of 0.5 mg/mL. From this solution, 8 mL was withdrawn and further diluted with 2 mL of normal saline, resulting in a final volume of 10 mL at a concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, giving a total administered dose of 4 mg. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared mitomycin C solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with 2 to 3 additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision at the incised stricture segment. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days. | Procedure or surgery | Group A: Mitomycin C Group |
| Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injectionPatients underwent visual internal urethrotomy in the same manner as Group A. Platelet-rich plasma was prepared using the double-spin method. A total of 50 mL of whole blood was withdrawn with anticoagulant and centrifuged at 100 g for 15 minutes, then the platelet-containing plasma was collected and centrifuged again at 1600 g for 20 minutes at 22°C. The lower third containing the platelet pellets was collected, yielding about 5 mL of sterile platelet-rich plasma, which was mixed with 5 mL of normal saline to produce a 10 mL solution. Using an endoscopic injection needle, 2 to 3 mL of the prepared platelet-rich plasma solution was injected submucosally per site at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, with additional sites injected in some cases, all under direct endoscopic vision. A 20-F silicone urethral catheter was then left in place for 10 days. | Procedure or surgery | Group B: Platlet Rich Plasma Group |
Primary outcome
Clinical effectiveness in improving patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms according to the International Prostate Symptom Score
Time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
This outcome measure assessed the degree of improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms reported by patients after the intervention. The International Prostate Symptom Score is a validated, patient-reported questionnaire consisting of seven questions that evaluate the severity of urinary symptoms, including incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, giving a total score range of 0 to 35, where scores of 1 to 7 indicate mild symptoms, 8 to 19 indicate moderate symptoms, and 20 to 35 indicate severe symptoms.
Clinical effectiveness in improving patient's uroflometry
Time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
This outcome assessed urinary flow using uroflowmetry, a non-invasive test measuring the rate and pattern of urine flow.It records average and maximum urinary flow rates in milliliters per second. These values were compared between both groups to determine whether either treatment produced greater improvement. A maximum flow rate above 10 mL per second was considered successful, while a value below 10 mL per second was considered suspicious for recurrence and prompted further evaluation with retrograde cystourethrography.
2 secondary outcomes
Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Post-void residual urine volume
Time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 26366278Ali L, Shahzad M, Orakzai N, Khan I, Ahmad M. Efficacy of mitomycin C in reducing recurrence of anterior urethral stricture after internal optical urethrotomy. Korean J Urol. 2015 Sep;56(9):650-5. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.9.650. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
- Background: PubMed 34881065Noureldin YA, Fathy A, Ahmed S, Shaer AE, Ali S, Saki Z, Sebaey A. Intralesional injection of mitomycin C following internal urethrotomy of de novo bulbar urethral stricture:New experience using a novel adjustable-tip needle. Arab J Urol. 2021 Mar 1;19(4):473-479. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1891688. eCollection 2021.
- BackgroundIssam Al Azzawi. The role of mitomycin C intralesional injection during visual internal urethrotomy in urethral stricture recurrence. Arab Journal of Urology. 2018; 16(sup1): S8-S9. DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.10.062
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urethral Stricture
Recruiting
Intraoperative Lidocaine or Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Pain Modulation After Urethral Reconstruction.
Urethral Stricture
Active, not recruiting
Outcomes of Double-face Augmentation Urethroplasty
Urethral Stricture, Anterior, Urethral Stricture Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Optilume PoST AppRoval Clinical Evaluation of Andrology ParaMeters
Urethral Stricture
Active, not recruiting
Early vs Late Urinary Catheter Removal After Renal Transplantation
Kidney Transplant; Complications, Kidney Transplant Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
LishitonglinUS-01 Trial
Urethra Stricture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal intralesional mitomycin C injection and Visual internal urethrotomy followed by submucosal Platlet Rich Plasma injection in people with Urethral Stricture, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical effectiveness in improving patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (time frame: At 3 months and 6 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07883837, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.