AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT07887880

A Novel Multimodal Approach to Promote Motor Recovery and Plasticity After Stroke

A study testing tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation) and FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practice in people with Stroke, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Upper extremity (UE) paresis or weakness is one of the most frequent impairments after stroke. Despite intense rehabilitation, motor and functional recovery of patients with severe hand impairments is poor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation) and FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practice
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
78 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Nov 2026to 15 Feb 2031
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female and male subjects are eligible for inclusion only if all of the following criteria are met:
  • Age between 40-85 years
  • Diagnosis of first-ever subcortical stroke (single cerebrovascular accident)
  • Stroke onset of at least six months prior to the time of participation
  • Limited functional wrist and finger flexion and extension, as indicated between 5º-20º active movement
  • Cognitive skills to actively participate, as indicated by scores of ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental Status Examina-tion
  • English speaking

Who cannot join

  • A subject is not eligible for inclusion if any of the following criteria apply:
  • Presence of severe aphasia preventing the ability to follow 1-step directions at least 80% of the time
  • Excessive spasticity of the wrist and finger muscles, defined as a Modified Ashworth Score >2
  • Diagnosis of neurological disorders other than stroke
  • History of recent seizure or epilepsy while taking anticonvulsants
  • Orthopedic/musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., arthritis) affecting the upper extremity
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Presence of metallic implants in the head or neck
  • Currently or planning to become pregnant
  • Difficulty maintaining alertness or remaining still
  • Ferromagnetic metallic implants, pacemakers, other implanted devices, or ventilators (for MRI)
  • Bodyweight > 300 lbs due to MRI scanner dimensions (for subjects also undergoing MRI)
  • Psychiatric diagnosis according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fifth Edition (DSM-V), or who are on psychotropic medication
  • Participation in concurrent occupational therapy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

Other trials in United States

About this study

Upper extremity (UE) paresis or weakness is one of the most frequent impairments after stroke. Despite intense rehabilitation, motor and functional recovery of patients with severe hand impairments is poor. Hence, there is a need for more effective treatments to enhance motor function in patients with severe hand impairments after stroke. Adaptive functional electrical stimulation (FES) appears to be a promising treatment and has the potential to facilitate active movement in individuals with severe impairments post-stroke. In addition, transcranial random noise stimulation (trns) is a widely studied, non-invasive and safe method to enhance the corticomotor excitability in individuals with chronic stroke. However, the effect of combining trns and adaptive FES in patients with severe hand impairments has not been investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate whether combining trns with FES will enhance hand function in individuals with chronic stroke than FES alone. The investigators predict that combining trns with FES will significantly enhance hand function than FES alone.

Read the detailed description

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether combining transcranial random noise stimulation with functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice will enhance hand function in individuals with severe paresis post-stroke than functional electrical stimulation alone.

The study is an experimental randomized study comparing the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation with functional electrical stimulation to functional electrical stimulation alone on recovery of function in the more-affected hand in individuals with chronic stroke.

Participants were randomized to receive transcranial random noise stimulation and functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice or sham-transcranial random noise stimulation and functional electrical stimulation-facilitated task practice.

Participants received 18 treatment sessions over 6 weeks (3 times/week for 6-8 weeks).

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation), FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practice, Sham-tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation)
Keywords
Stroke, Hand, Brain Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation)Device

    Individuals in this group will receive tRNS at 2 mA intensity between 101-640 Hz. The current will be gradually ramped up for and down for the first and last 30 seconds of the stimulation.

  • FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practiceDevice

    The FES-assisted task-specific practice will focus on restituting the movement components composing functional tasks. We will use the principles of motor learning with FES-assisted task-specific practice. Based on motor learning principles, our intervention will include 1) movement practice as close to normative as possible, 2) a high number of repetitions, 3) attention to the motor task, and 4) training specificity.

  • Sham-tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation)Device

    Individuals in this group will receive sham-tRNS via the same electrode configuration as the tRNS. The stimulation will gradually ramp up for 30 seconds and then fade away for the rest of the intervention session.

Study groups in NCT07887880
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practiceSham comparatorParticipants will receive the intervention 3x/week for 6-8 weeks for a total of 18 intervention sessions. Participants will receive sham-tRNS during the FES-assisted task-specific practice.
Receives: Device: FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practice; Device: Sham-tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation)
tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practiceExperimentalParticipants will receive the intervention 3x/week for 6-8 weeks for a total of 18 intervention sessions. Participants will receive tRNS during the FES-assisted task-specific practice.
Receives: Device: tRNS (Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation); Device: FES (Functional Electrical Stimulation)-assisted task-specific practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale

    Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE.

    Measured: 6-9 weeks post-intervention

  2. Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score

    Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function.

    Measured: 6-9 weeks post-intervention

  3. Transcranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential

    Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability.

    Measured: 6-9 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale

    Changes in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. This scale measures voluntary motor control of the paretic upper extremity (UE) using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially, and 2=performs fully. The total possible score ranges from 0-66 with higher scores indicating a better voluntary motor control of the paretic UE.

    Measured: 12-14 weeks post intervention

  2. Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score

    Changes in Stroke Impact Scale - Hand Function Score between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. Participants report paretic upper extremity (UE) use in five commonly performed daily tasks (e.g., carry a bag of groceries) using a 5-point ordinal scale, which ranges from 0-5, where 0=cannot use paretic and 5=not difficult at all to use paretic UE. The total score ranges from 0-25 with higher scores indicating better UE function.

    Measured: 12-14 weeks post intervention

  3. Transcranial Magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potential

    Changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEPs) between the experimental (tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) and control (sham-tRNS and FES-assisted task-specific practice) conditions. MEPs will be obtained by placing a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil over the hand knob of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex. TMS-induced MEP amplitude will be obtained by averaging peak to peak amplitudes of 20 MEPs from the flexor carpii radials and/or extensor digitorum communis muscles. Higher values of MEP indicate greater corticospinal excitability.

    Measured: 12-14 weeks post intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2026
  2. Study start2 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
78 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07887880
Sponsor's protocol ID
00193557
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
1 Jul 2026
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in