AzTrials
AzTrials

Alcohol Misuse PreventionPhase 2CCePPNCT07888153

Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches

A Phase 2 study testing Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions in people with Alcohol Misuse Prevention and Sexual Violence Prevention, run by University of New Hampshire at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award research study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level social ecological model approach consisting of six established e-health primary… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 24 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Sep 2026to 1 Oct 2028
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • full-time University of New Hampshire student
  • first-year University of New Hampshire student
  • live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
  • not married

Who cannot join

  • not a University of New Hampshire first-year student
  • does not live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
  • married

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sharyn J Potter, PhD, MPH contact

16038623630

sharyn.potter@unh.edu

Jane G Stapleton, MS contact

6038625444

jane.stapleton@unh.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting

  • University of New Hampshire

    Durham, New Hampshire, 03824

    Sharyn J Potter, PhD, 6038623630, sharyn.potter@unh.edu

    Jane G Stapleton, MA, 6038625444, jane.stapleton@unh.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches to Address Campus Sexual Assault and Alcohol Misuse.

The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award research study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level social ecological model approach consisting of six established e-health primary prevention strategies in a feasibility study.

Read the detailed description

The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award Pilot Study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level approach consisting of six established e-health primary prevention strategies of a Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program, with six evidence-based and proven alcohol misuse and sexual violence prevention strategies as a full package of synergistic cross-cutting interventions that target multiple levels of the social ecological model (individual, relationship, and community).

Being tested
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions
Keywords
sexual violence, sexual assault, alcohol misuse, E-Health, bystander

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual InterventionsBehavioural

    Also called RealConsent, +Change, ShipHappens

    Three sexual violence and alcohol misuse ehealth prevention programs for college students.

Study groups in NCT07888153
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Programming InterventionExperimentalParticipants in the intervention arm will participate in the RealConsent serial webinar program, the +Change Social Norms Program, and the ShipHappens Bystander Video Game.
Receives: Behavioral: Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Control ArmNo interventionTrue control group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization

    Sexual assault victimization was assessed with Revised Sexual Experience Survey. Participants were asked how often they experienced 7 unwanted sexual experiences. Also, the tactic that was used (for example, "using force") was also noted. Response options ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (3 or more times). An overall score for the Revised Sexual Experience Survey, was calculated by Summing each Outcome and Tactic Score with a range from 0 to 135 with higher scores indicating more sexual violence victimization, a worse score than the lower scores. The second method combines several of the outcomes, but keeps tactics separate, resulting in a potential range of 0 to 63 with the higher score being a worse score than the lower score.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration

    The Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration is a 7-item, behaviorally specific self-report instrument designed to assess the perpetration of unwanted sexual behaviors. It covers sexual coercion, unwanted contact, attempted rape, and rape, typically asking about acts committed since age 14 or in the past year. The higher score indicates more unwanted sexual experiences and therefore is a worse score than a lower score.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise

    The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test is a 10-item screening tool developed by the World Health Organization to assess alcohol consumption, drinking behaviors, and alcohol-related problems. The higher the score indicates more alcohol related problems, therefore a worse score.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Drinking Behavior Questionnaire

    A ten-item self report measure looking at an individual's drinking habits. The higher the score indicates more problematic drinking habits, therefore a worse score.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)

  1. Bystander Attitudes Scale Revised

    12-item measure of attitudes towards bystander behaviors. Higher scores are better scores indicating that the participant is more willing to engage in prosocial bystander intervention before, during, or after sexual assault or violence situations.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Barriers to Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention Scale

    The Barriers to Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention Scale is a 16-item, 7-point Likert-scale questionnaire that measures five key psychological barriers hindering bystander intervention in sexual violence. It assesses failure to notice, interpret risk, take responsibility, possess skills, or fear of negative evaluation. Higher scores are worse scores indicating greater perceived barriers to prosocial bystander intervention.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. Social Self-identification Scale

    4-item measure to assess the relevancy of the intervention to the participant's life. The higher score indicates that intervention was more relevant to the participant's life indicating a better score.

    Measured: 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Bystander Efficacy Scale

    The Bystander Efficacy Scale measures the effectiveness of sexual violence prevention programs based on preventing antecedents to sexual violence by increasing prosocial bystander behavior. On this measure, participants are asked to indicate their confidence, on an 11-point scale, in performing each of the listed 14 bystander behaviors. Higher average scores are better scores indicating a person's greater bystander self-efficacy (higher confidence in one's ability to intervene).

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  5. Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale,

    The Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale, is a 22-item instrument designed to measure contemporary, often subtle, rape-supportive beliefs. It updates the original 45-item scale to reflect modern language and attitudes, aiming to reduce social desirability bias, featuring a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Agree, 5 = Strongly Disagree). The higher the score is the worse score indicating that the participants holds negative rape myth scores.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  6. Intent to Help Friends-Stranger Scale

    Intent to Help Friends-Stranger Scale is a psychometric instrument designed to measure a bystander's intention to intervene in situations involving interpersonal violence (sexual assault, dating violence) depending on their relationship to the victim. The higher the score is the better score indicating participants are more willing to help a friend or stranger in a probably dangerous situation.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

  7. Alcohol Expectancies Regarding Sex, Aggression, and Sexual Vulnerability Questionnaire

    The Alcohol Expectancies Regarding Sex, Aggression, and Sexual Vulnerability Questionnaire is used too assess three types of sex-related alcohol expectancies: sexual affect, sexual drive, and vulnerability to sexual coercion. A higher score is worse than a lower score.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2026
  2. Study start21 Sep 2026
  3. Primary completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07888153
Sponsor's protocol ID
UNH-15-FY2025_126-01
Other IDs
R15AA031809
Acronym
CCePP
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
5 May 2026
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The research team will retain and share aggregated quantitative and qualitative data (after all identifying information is redacted), if users commit to the following: (1) using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology (for example, using a secure firewall-protected server to store datasets and transcriptions); and (3) destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. If the researcher agrees to these stipulations, the PI will send him/her the data set prepared using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 29 and/or the de-identified transcriptions from focus groups. Research participants will be identified by number. All data, including focus group transcriptions, will not include identifying information from any participant. Any information that could potentially identify a participant will be removed from the data set.

Publications

  • Potter SJ, Moynihan MM, Stapleton JG. Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(5):971-90. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365870. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

    PubMed 20522887

  • Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 5;16(9):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3426.

    PubMed 25198417

  • Salazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, McGroarty-Koon K. Formative Research With College Men to Inform Content and Messages for a Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention Program. Health Commun. 2017 Sep;32(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214219. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

    PubMed 27593559

  • Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Gilmore AK, Salazar LF, Potter SJ, Stapleton JG, Orchowski LM. Advancing a Comprehensive Multilevel Approach to Sexual Violence Prevention Using Existing Efficacious Programs. J Forensic Nurs. 2024 Jan-Mar 01;20(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000457. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

    PubMed 38015061

  • Basile KC, DeGue S, Jones K, et al. STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevension. Published online 2016.

  • Potter S, Howard R, Murphy S, Moynihan MM. Long-term impacts of college sexual assaults on women survivors' educational and career attainments. J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):496-507. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440574. Epub 2018 Mar 30.

    PubMed 29447618

  • doi:10.1177/1521025115584750

  • doi:10.1037/a0033470

  • Crosby RA, Salazar LF. Essentials of Public Health Research Methods. 1st ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2021. Accessed October 11, 2023. https://www.jblearning.com/catalog

  • Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cares AC, Potter SJ, Williams LM, Stapleton JG. Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later? J Interpers Violence. 2015 Jan;30(1):110-32. doi: 10.1177/0886260514532719. Epub 2014 May 20.

    PubMed 24850763

  • Potter SJ, Stapleton JG. Bringing in the target audience in bystander social marketing materials for communities: suggestions for practitioners. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):797-812. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410364.

    PubMed 21727157

  • Potter SJ, Flanagan M, Seidman M, Hodges H, Stapleton JG. Developing and Piloting Videogames to Increase College and University Students' Awareness and Efficacy of the Bystander Role in Incidents of Sexual Violence. Games Health J. 2019 Feb;8(1):24-34. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0172. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

    PubMed 30183345

  • Gilmore AK, Lewis MA, George WH. A randomized controlled trial targeting alcohol use and sexual assault risk among college women at high risk for victimization. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

    PubMed 26408290

  • Gilmore AK, Leone RM, Oesterle DW, Davis KC, Orchowski LM, Ramakrishnan V, Kaysen D. Web-Based Alcohol and Sexual Assault Prevention Program With Tailored Content Based on Gender and Sexual Orientation: Preliminary Outcomes and Usability Study of Positive Change (+Change). JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 22;6(7):e23823. doi: 10.2196/23823.

    PubMed 35867393

  • Salazar LF, Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Sebeh Y, Nizam Z, Hayat M. A Web-Based Sexual Violence, Alcohol Misuse, and Bystander Intervention Program for College Women (RealConsent): Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 21;25:e43740. doi: 10.2196/43740.

    PubMed 37342080

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Interventions in people with Alcohol Misuse Prevention and Sexual Violence Prevention, run by University of New Hampshire at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sharyn J Potter, PhD, MPH (16038623630, sharyn.potter@unh.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07888153, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in