Health AgingNCT07890623
EVS With Exercise for Balance With Older Adults
A study testing Noisy electrical vestibular stimulation in people with Health Aging and Balance, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study will test whether electrical stimulation of the balance system adds benefit to an exercise program for adults aged 60 years and older. The treatment is called noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Aging, Balance
- What is being tested?
- Noisy electrical vestibular stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2027to 30 Nov 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 60 years or older.
- Able to provide informed consent and understand study instructions.
- Able to attend the 12-week RISE STRONG program and complete the assigned six-week EVS or sham course.
- Able to complete baseline testing and participate safely in an adapted exercise program, with mobility aids or modifications where appropriate.
- Able to stand with feet together for one minute with eyes open and one minute with eyes closed.
- Able to walk up to 200 metres on a flat surface.
Who cannot join
- Pacemaker, cochlear implant or another implanted electronic device.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site
Bethany Chapel
Calgary, Alberta, T3E 7B6
Bethany Chapel, 403-249-8605, info@bethanychapel.com
About this study
Official title: Electrical Vestibular Stimulation for Balance With Exercise in Older Adults
This study will test whether electrical stimulation of the balance system adds benefit to an exercise program for adults aged 60 years and older. The treatment is called noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS). It uses low-level electrical current delivered through electrodes placed behind the ears and on the neck.
Participants who join the trial will be assigned by chance, in equal numbers, to active nEVS or sham nEVS. Sham sessions use the same equipment and preparation and will have no current delivered. Both groups will attend the RISE STRONG exercise program for 12 weeks. Exercise classes take place twice weekly and last about 35 to 45 minutes.
Participants will attend 18 active or sham sessions over six weeks. Each session lasts 20 minutes. Two sessions each week may take place on exercise days, and one additional weekly visit is expected. The stimulation course may take place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Standing balance will be measured before and after the six-week course to compare the two groups. Other assessments examine walking, physical function, cognition, and self-reported health. The study will also record attendance, treatment completion, and adverse events.
Read the detailed description
The study will examine whether vestibular stimulation complements exercise-related improvements in balance and physical function. Because both randomized groups participate in the same exercise program, the treatment comparison will estimate the additional effect of active noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS) relative to sham within that program. Changes across the full exercise program will provide additional context for interpreting the treatment findings.
The randomized trial is embedded within the RISE STRONG program. Participation in the trial will require research consent separate from consent for program services. Individuals who decline or discontinue trial participation may continue to access the exercise program. Exercise participants who are not randomized will not form part of the active-versus-sham comparison.
Randomization and masking Participants will be randomized individually in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence with randomly varying block sizes, stratified by the planned stimulation window: exercise weeks 1-6 or 7-12. An independent researcher will generate and securely maintain the allocation sequences. Upcoming assignments will be concealed from recruiting staff, and allocation will be released only after research consent, eligibility confirmation and pretreatment assessments are complete.
Participants and investigators will remain masked to treatment assignment. A separate trained treatment operator may know the assignment to administer the allocated procedure. Access to allocation information will be restricted according to study role. Both groups will use the same equipment setup and scheduled session duration. Participants' perceptions of allocation will be assessed before planned disclosure, as specified in the registered masking outcome.
Integration with the exercise program Exercise will include strength and power, balance, mobility, flexibility and walking activities. Initial exercise placement will reflect baseline physical performance and safety review. Qualified staff will adapt activities and document progression according to each participant's ability and tolerance. Exercise placement and progression will be independent of stimulation assignment.
Each participant will remain in the assigned active or sham group throughout the stimulation course. The early and late stimulation windows are scheduling strata within a parallel-group trial; participants will not cross over between active and sham treatment. Stimulation will be administered seated under supervision, with visits coordinated with exercise attendance where possible.
Assessment timing and consistency Treatment-relative time and exercise-program time will be recorded separately. Treatment week 0 is the pretreatment assessment before the first assigned session. Physical assessments are scheduled at treatment weeks 0, 3 and 6, while the registered patient-reported and cognitive outcomes are assessed before and after the six-week course. The week-6 assessment is the end-of-course endpoint; the week-3 assessment characterizes the interim response.
This schedule will apply to both stimulation windows. For participants treated during exercise weeks 1-6, exercise-program week 12 represents later follow-up after stimulation. For participants treated during exercise weeks 7-12, it coincides with treatment completion. Program-baseline and week-12 observations will therefore be distinguished from treatment-relative observations in the dataset and analyses. Questionnaire and cognitive testing will be scheduled around the assigned stimulation course rather than relying solely on the beginning and end of the exercise program.
Trained assessors will use standardized instructions, sensor placement and scoring procedures across visits. Footwear, walking aids, test setup and assistance will be kept consistent where feasible, and necessary changes will be documented. Rest and close guarding will be provided during physical assessments. Incomplete tests, early termination, use of external support and technical recording failures will be documented separately. Questionnaire assistance will follow the relevant instrument instructions, and administration mode will be recorded.
Safety and treatment delivery Staff will review current symptoms and relevant health changes before study procedures and inspect electrode sites before stimulation. The treatment operator will remain with the participant during each session. Stimulation will be paused for discomfort or dizziness and stopped when indicated; it will not resume while symptoms persist. Physical tasks may be modified or deferred when they cannot be completed safely. Participants will receive study contact information for concerns arising between visits.
Session records will distinguish attendance from completion of the assigned treatment and document interruptions, device problems, modifications and reasons for discontinuation. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the registered surveillance period and reviewed alongside treatment exposure and exercise attendance. Participants who discontinue stimulation may continue outcome assessments if they agree to further research follow-up.
Analysis and data quality The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, retaining participants in their randomized groups. End-of-course Phybrata power will be compared using analysis of covariance, adjusting for pretreatment Phybrata power and the assigned stimulation window. Changes from pretreatment will also be summarized. Treatment-effect estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Secondary continuous outcomes will be evaluated using appropriate baseline-adjusted models. Repeated physical assessments may additionally be examined using mixed-effects models with participant-level random intercepts and treatment, time and treatment-by-time terms. Categorical and ordinal outcomes will be analyzed using methods appropriate to their measurement scales. Secondary analyses will be interpreted as exploratory, and attendance, treatment completion and safety findings will be summarized descriptively by assigned group. Whole-program changes will be interpreted separately from the randomized treatment comparison.
The statistical analysis plan will specify the balance-condition analysis, processing and trial-aggregation rules, missing-data methods and any sensitivity analyses before comparative treatment results are examined. Missing observations and their reasons will be summarized by group and visit. Data-quality procedures will include checks for completeness and plausible values, documentation of protocol deviations, and version control for processing and analysis.
Research records will use coded study identifiers, with direct identifiers and the linkage key held separately under restricted access. Previously collected program or company-held data will remain distinguishable from prospectively collected trial data and will be used for research only under the applicable consent and ethics permissions. Results will be reported in aggregate, with prespecified and exploratory analyses identified separately.
- Conditions
- Health Aging, Balance
- Being tested
- Noisy electrical vestibular stimulation, Sham device
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Noisy electrical vestibular stimulationDevice
Also called Neurvesta, galvanic vestibular stimulation
Active subthreshold noisy electrical vestibular stimulation is delivered using the Neurvesta system (Neursantys Inc.) through two mastoid electrodes and two electrodes on the back of the neck, with the collar resting on the shoulders. Sessions are supervised and performed seated for 20 minutes, three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions. The course takes place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12.
Stimulation profile: +/- 0.35 mA (0.7 peak-to-peak) with a bandwidth of 0.001-300 Hz for 20 minutes.
Sham deviceOther
Sham uses the same skin preparation, four electrodes, collar power-on and app connection as active treatment, but stimulation is not started and no electrical current is delivered. The participant remains seated for 20 minutes while a separate timer is used. Staff remain present and record the session in the study log. Sessions occur three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions, during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active subthreshold stochastic electrical vestibular stimulation | Experimental | Participants receive active noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS) for 20 minutes per session, three sessions weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions. The assigned course takes place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Participants also attend the common 12-week RISE STRONG exercise program, with two supervised classes weekly lasting approximately 35 to 45 minutes and an individualized home-exercise plan. Receives: Device: Noisy electrical vestibular stimulation |
| Sham electrical vestibular stimulation | Sham comparator | Participants undergo the same preparation, electrode placement, collar setup and app connection as the active group, but electrical stimulation is not started. They remain seated for 20 minutes using a separate timer. Sham sessions occur three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions, during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Participants also receive the same 12-week RISE STRONG exercise program and individualized home-exercise plan. Receives: Other: Sham device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phybrata power
Change in Phybrata power from pretreatment to completion of the 6-week course, calculated from head-mounted accelerometers recording a 60-second standing assessment under different standing balance conditions (mCTSIB; floor yes open, floor eyes closed, compliant surface eyes open, compliant surface eyes closed). Values are expressed in watts taking the sum of the squared acceleration of the tri-axial accelerometer multiplied by a time scaling factor. Lower values indicate less sway, a negative change indicates improved performance. The primary comparison is active vs sham nEVS, adjusted for pretreatment performance.
Measured: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Secondary outcomes (15)
Gait speed
Change in overground gait speed in metres per second over a 25-foot course. Speed equals distance divided by walking time. Higher values indicate faster walking.
Measured: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Timed-up-and-go
Change in time, in seconds, to stand from a chair, walk 3 metres at a self selected pace, turn, return to the chair, and sit. Usual walking aids are permitted and recorded. Lower completion time indicates faster functional mobility.
Measured: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Short Physical Performance Battery total score
Change in short physical performance battery (SPPB) total score. Standardized standing balance, usual-pace walking, and repeated chair0rise components contribute 0-4 points, giving a total score from 0-12. Higher scores indicate better physical performance.
Measured: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Grip strength
Change in hand-grip strength in kilograms, measured using acalibrated hand dynameter in a standardized seated position. Two valid attempts are recorded. The participants best score is used for analysis. Higher values indicate greater grip strength.
Measured: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
PROMIS Global Physical Health Score
Change in physical health assessed using the PROMIS Global Health v1.2 questionnaire. The four-item physical health raw score will be converted to a T-score using the official scoring tables. T-scores range from 16.2 to 67.7, with higher scores indicating better physical health. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course score minus the pretreatment score; positive values indicate improvement
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
PROMIS Global Mental Health Score
Change in mental health assessed using the PROMIS Global Health v1.2 questionnaire. The four-item mental health raw score will be converted to a T-score using the official scoring tables. T-scores range from 21.2 to 67.6, with higher scores indicating better mental health. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course score minus the pretreatment score; positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Mobility Response Levels
Number and percentage of participants in each response level of the EQ-5D-5L mobility dimension at each assessment. The dimension concerns walking about. Levels range from 1 to 5, with level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 the most severe problems or inability. Lower levels indicate fewer problems. Each dimension is reported separately.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Self Care Response Levels
Number and percentage of participants in each response level of the EQ-5D-5L self care dimension at each assessment. The dimension concerns washing or dressing. Levels range from 1 to 5, with level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 the most severe problems or inability. Lower levels indicate fewer problems. Each dimension is reported separately.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Usual Activities Response Levels
Number and percentage of participants in each response level of the EQ-5D-5L usual activities dimension at each assessment. The dimension concerns usual daily activities. Levels range from 1 to 5, with level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 the most severe problems or inability. Lower levels indicate fewer problems. Each dimension is reported separately.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Pain or Discomfort Response Levels
Number and percentage of participants in each response level of the EQ-5D-5L pain or discomfort dimension at each assessment. The dimension concerns pain or discomfort. Levels range from 1 to 5, with level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 the most severe problems or inability. Lower levels indicate fewer problems. Each dimension is reported separately.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Anxiety or Depression Response Levels
Number and percentage of participants in each response level of the EQ-5D-5L anxiety or depression dimension at each assessment. The dimension concerns anxiety or depression. Levels range from 1 to 5, with level 1 indicating no problems and level 5 the most severe problems or inability. Lower levels indicate fewer problems. Each dimension is reported separately.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Mean Change in M2C2 Symbol Search Response Time
Change in processing speed assessed using the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2) Symbol Search task. Participants identify matching symbol pairs as quickly and accurately as possible. The participant-level score is the median response time, in milliseconds, across valid correct test trials. Lower values indicate faster processing speed. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course score minus the pretreatment score; negative values indicate improvement.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Grid Memory Spatial Recall Error
Change in visuospatial working memory assessed using the M2C2 Grid Memory task. Participants recall previously displayed dot locations following a brief distraction task. The participant-level score is the mean trial-level Euclidean distance error between recalled and original dot locations. A score of zero indicates no spatial recall error; lower values indicate better performance. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course score minus the pretreatment score; negative values indicate improvement.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Color Dots Recall Accuracy
Change in visual working memory and color-location binding assessed using the M2C2 Color Dots task. Participants recall the colors and locations of previously presented dots. Accuracy will be calculated as the number of correct recall responses divided by the total number of scorable recall responses across the color and location phases, multiplied by 100, using the task version's scoring criteria. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better performance. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course percentage minus the pretreatment percentage; positive changes indicate improvement.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Color Shapes Accuracy
Change in visual working memory and color-shape binding assessed using the M2C2 Color Shapes task. Participants identify whether previously presented color-shape combinations remain unchanged or have changed. Accuracy will be calculated as the number of correct responses divided by the total number of scorable test responses, multiplied by 100. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating better performance. Change will be calculated as the end-of-course percentage minus the pretreatment percentage; positive changes indicate improvement.
Measured: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Health AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Neursantys Inc
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ryan Peters, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Ryan M Peters, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07890623
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB26-1714
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Raw data will be provided upon reasonable request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electrical Vestibular Stimulation for Balance With Exercise in Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07890623
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB26-1714
- Conditions
- Health Aging, Balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Neursantys Inc
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will test whether electrical stimulation of the balance system adds benefit to an exercise program for adults aged 60 years and older. The treatment is called noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS). It uses low-level electrical current delivered through electrodes placed behind the ears and on the neck.
Participants who join the trial will be assigned by chance, in equal numbers, to active nEVS or sham nEVS. Sham sessions use the same equipment and preparation and will have no current delivered. Both groups will attend the RISE STRONG exercise program for 12 weeks. Exercise classes take place twice weekly and last about 35 to 45 minutes.
Participants will attend 18 active or sham sessions over six weeks. Each session lasts 20 minutes. Two sessions each week may take place on exercise days, and one additional weekly visit is expected. The stimulation course may take place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Standing balance will be measured before and after the six-week course to compare the two groups. Other assessments examine walking, physical function, cognition, and self-reported health. The study will also record attendance, treatment completion, and adverse events.
Detailed description
The study will examine whether vestibular stimulation complements exercise-related improvements in balance and physical function. Because both randomized groups participate in the same exercise program, the treatment comparison will estimate the additional effect of active noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS) relative to sham within that program. Changes across the full exercise program will provide additional context for interpreting the treatment findings.
The randomized trial is embedded within the RISE STRONG program. Participation in the trial will require research consent separate from consent for program services. Individuals who decline or discontinue trial participation may continue to access the exercise program. Exercise participants who are not randomized will not form part of the active-versus-sham comparison.
Randomization and masking Participants will be randomized individually in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence with randomly varying block sizes, stratified by the planned stimulation window: exercise weeks 1-6 or 7-12. An independent researcher will generate and securely maintain the allocation sequences. Upcoming assignments will be concealed from recruiting staff, and allocation will be released only after research consent, eligibility confirmation and pretreatment assessments are complete.
Participants and investigators will remain masked to treatment assignment. A separate trained treatment operator may know the assignment to administer the allocated procedure. Access to allocation information will be restricted according to study role. Both groups will use the same equipment setup and scheduled session duration. Participants' perceptions of allocation will be assessed before planned disclosure, as specified in the registered masking outcome.
Integration with the exercise program Exercise will include strength and power, balance, mobility, flexibility and walking activities. Initial exercise placement will reflect baseline physical performance and safety review. Qualified staff will adapt activities and document progression according to each participant's ability and tolerance. Exercise placement and progression will be independent of stimulation assignment.
Each participant will remain in the assigned active or sham group throughout the stimulation course. The early and late stimulation windows are scheduling strata within a parallel-group trial; participants will not cross over between active and sham treatment. Stimulation will be administered seated under supervision, with visits coordinated with exercise attendance where possible.
Assessment timing and consistency Treatment-relative time and exercise-program time will be recorded separately. Treatment week 0 is the pretreatment assessment before the first assigned session. Physical assessments are scheduled at treatment weeks 0, 3 and 6, while the registered patient-reported and cognitive outcomes are assessed before and after the six-week course. The week-6 assessment is the end-of-course endpoint; the week-3 assessment characterizes the interim response.
This schedule will apply to both stimulation windows. For participants treated during exercise weeks 1-6, exercise-program week 12 represents later follow-up after stimulation. For participants treated during exercise weeks 7-12, it coincides with treatment completion. Program-baseline and week-12 observations will therefore be distinguished from treatment-relative observations in the dataset and analyses. Questionnaire and cognitive testing will be scheduled around the assigned stimulation course rather than relying solely on the beginning and end of the exercise program.
Trained assessors will use standardized instructions, sensor placement and scoring procedures across visits. Footwear, walking aids, test setup and assistance will be kept consistent where feasible, and necessary changes will be documented. Rest and close guarding will be provided during physical assessments. Incomplete tests, early termination, use of external support and technical recording failures will be documented separately. Questionnaire assistance will follow the relevant instrument instructions, and administration mode will be recorded.
Safety and treatment delivery Staff will review current symptoms and relevant health changes before study procedures and inspect electrode sites before stimulation. The treatment operator will remain with the participant during each session. Stimulation will be paused for discomfort or dizziness and stopped when indicated; it will not resume while symptoms persist. Physical tasks may be modified or deferred when they cannot be completed safely. Participants will receive study contact information for concerns arising between visits.
Session records will distinguish attendance from completion of the assigned treatment and document interruptions, device problems, modifications and reasons for discontinuation. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the registered surveillance period and reviewed alongside treatment exposure and exercise attendance. Participants who discontinue stimulation may continue outcome assessments if they agree to further research follow-up.
Analysis and data quality The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, retaining participants in their randomized groups. End-of-course Phybrata power will be compared using analysis of covariance, adjusting for pretreatment Phybrata power and the assigned stimulation window. Changes from pretreatment will also be summarized. Treatment-effect estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Secondary continuous outcomes will be evaluated using appropriate baseline-adjusted models. Repeated physical assessments may additionally be examined using mixed-effects models with participant-level random intercepts and treatment, time and treatment-by-time terms. Categorical and ordinal outcomes will be analyzed using methods appropriate to their measurement scales. Secondary analyses will be interpreted as exploratory, and attendance, treatment completion and safety findings will be summarized descriptively by assigned group. Whole-program changes will be interpreted separately from the randomized treatment comparison.
The statistical analysis plan will specify the balance-condition analysis, processing and trial-aggregation rules, missing-data methods and any sensitivity analyses before comparative treatment results are examined. Missing observations and their reasons will be summarized by group and visit. Data-quality procedures will include checks for completeness and plausible values, documentation of protocol deviations, and version control for processing and analysis.
Research records will use coded study identifiers, with direct identifiers and the linkage key held separately under restricted access. Previously collected program or company-held data will remain distinguishable from prospectively collected trial data and will be used for research only under the applicable consent and ethics permissions. Results will be reported in aggregate, with prespecified and exploratory analyses identified separately.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active subthreshold stochastic electrical vestibular stimulation | Experimental | Device: Noisy electrical vestibular stimulationParticipants receive active noisy electrical vestibular stimulation (nEVS) for 20 minutes per session, three sessions weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions. The assigned course takes place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Participants also attend the common 12-week RISE STRONG exercise program, with two supervised classes weekly lasting approximately 35 to 45 minutes and an individualized home-exercise plan. |
| Sham electrical vestibular stimulation | Sham comparator | Other: Sham deviceParticipants undergo the same preparation, electrode placement, collar setup and app connection as the active group, but electrical stimulation is not started. They remain seated for 20 minutes using a separate timer. Sham sessions occur three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions, during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Participants also receive the same 12-week RISE STRONG exercise program and individualized home-exercise plan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 60 years or older.
- Able to provide informed consent and understand study instructions.
- Able to attend the 12-week RISE STRONG program and complete the assigned six-week EVS or sham course.
- Able to complete baseline testing and participate safely in an adapted exercise program, with mobility aids or modifications where appropriate.
- Able to stand with feet together for one minute with eyes open and one minute with eyes closed.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pacemaker, cochlear implant or another implanted electronic device.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Noisy electrical vestibular stimulationAlso: Neurvesta, galvanic vestibular stimulationActive subthreshold noisy electrical vestibular stimulation is delivered using the Neurvesta system (Neursantys Inc.) through two mastoid electrodes and two electrodes on the back of the neck, with the collar resting on the shoulders. Sessions are supervised and performed seated for 20 minutes, three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions. The course takes place during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. Stimulation profile: +/- 0.35 mA (0.7 peak-to-peak) with a bandwidth of 0.001-300 Hz for 20 minutes. | Device | Active subthreshold stochastic electrical vestibular stimulation |
| Sham deviceSham uses the same skin preparation, four electrodes, collar power-on and app connection as active treatment, but stimulation is not started and no electrical current is delivered. The participant remains seated for 20 minutes while a separate timer is used. Staff remain present and record the session in the study log. Sessions occur three times weekly for six weeks, totaling 18 sessions, during exercise weeks 1 to 6 or 7 to 12. | Other | Sham electrical vestibular stimulation |
Primary outcome
Phybrata power
Time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Change in Phybrata power from pretreatment to completion of the 6-week course, calculated from head-mounted accelerometers recording a 60-second standing assessment under different standing balance conditions (mCTSIB; floor yes open, floor eyes closed, compliant surface eyes open, compliant surface eyes closed). Values are expressed in watts taking the sum of the squared acceleration of the tri-axial accelerometer multiplied by a time scaling factor. Lower values indicate less sway, a negative change indicates improved performance. The primary comparison is active vs sham nEVS, adjusted for pretreatment performance.
15 secondary outcomes
Gait speed
Time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Timed-up-and-go
Time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Short Physical Performance Battery total score
Time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
Grip strength
Time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)
PROMIS Global Physical Health Score
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
PROMIS Global Mental Health Score
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Mobility Response Levels
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Self Care Response Levels
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Usual Activities Response Levels
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Pain or Discomfort Response Levels
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Distribution of EQ 5D 5L Anxiety or Depression Response Levels
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course
Mean Change in M2C2 Symbol Search Response Time
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Grid Memory Spatial Recall Error
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Color Dots Recall Accuracy
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Mean Change in M2C2 Color Shapes Accuracy
Time frame: Immediately before the first EVS or sham session and at completion of the six-week course.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Raw data will be provided upon reasonable request.
Related trials for Health Aging
RecruitingObservational study
Fuzhou Aging Brain Health Initiative
Dementia, Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
China Healthy Aging and Fitness Longitudinal Study
Physical Fitness, Aging
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Increased Water Intake on Hormonal Response, Hydration Status, and Physical Function in Low-drinking Older Adults
Dehydrated, Water-Electrolyte Imbalance, Malnutrition, Dehydration (Physiology)
Recruiting
GLycaemic Outcomes With Whey Protein in ageING
Type 2 Diabetes, Appetite Regulation
RecruitingObservational study
Validation of Uzbek-Language ADAM, AMS, and IPSS Questionnaires in Men Aged 35-59 Years
Psychometric Validation of Men's Health Questionnaires
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ryan M Peters, PhD principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Noisy electrical vestibular stimulation in people with Health Aging and Balance, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jordan A King, PhD (4038083911, jordan.king1@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phybrata power (time frame: At the start of the 6-week intervention (week 0), midpoint (week 3), and end of the 6-week intervention (week 6)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.