Computer Vision SyndromeNCT07892040
Comparative Effects of Exercises on Pain, Cervical Proprioception, Neck Disability and Visual Performance in Patients With Computer Vision Syndrome.
A study testing Cervical Sensorimotor Training and Occulomotor Training in people with Computer Vision Syndrome, run by University of Management and Technology Lahore at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical sensorimotor training and oculomotor training in patients with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). It will evaluate their effects on neck pain, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and visual performance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Computer Vision Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Cervical Sensorimotor Training and Occulomotor Training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2026to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18-40 years.
- Both genders.
- Individuals using digital screens for more than 4 hours/day.
- NPRS range between 4-6.
- Presence of neck pain for at least 3 months
- CVS-Q smart score 7-10.
Who cannot join
- History of cervical trauma or surgery.
- Vestibular disorders.
- Neurological disorders.
- Cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy.
- Diagnosed migraine disorders.
- visual impairment corrected by lenses/glasses
- Inflammatory cervical conditions.
- Recent physiotherapy treatment within last 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Effects of Cervical Sensorimotor and Oculomotor Trainings on Pain, Cervical Proprioception, Neck Disability and Visual Performance in Patients With Computer Vision Syndrome.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical sensorimotor training and oculomotor training in patients with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). It will evaluate their effects on neck pain, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and visual performance. Both interventions aim to improve cervical neuromuscular control and visual function through targeted exercises. The findings will help identify the more effective rehabilitation approach for managing musculoskeletal and visual symptoms associated with CVS.
- Conditions
- Computer Vision Syndrome
- Being tested
- Cervical Sensorimotor Training, Occulomotor Training
- Keywords
- Visual Fatigue, Cervical Sensorimotor training, Joint Position Error, Neck Disability, Sensorimotor Integration, Oculomotor Training
- Medical subject headings
- Asthenopia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical Sensorimotor TrainingOther
Participants will perform Neutral Return, Target Angles, and Movement Sequence exercises using laser-guided head movements, starting with 5 repetitions per movement and progressing according to tolerance. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks.
Occulomotor TrainingOther
Group B will receive saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit, and gaze stabilization exercises (X1 and X2), starting at 3 minutes per exercise with weekly progression. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Sensorimotor Training | Experimental | Participants will perform Neutral Return, Target Angles, and Movement Sequence exercises using laser-guided head movements, starting with 5 repetitions per movement and progressing according to tolerance. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Receives: Other: Cervical Sensorimotor Training |
| Oculomotor Training | Active comparator | Group B will receive saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit, and gaze stabilization exercises (X1 and X2), starting at 3 minutes per exercise with weekly progression. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks Receives: Other: Occulomotor Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Numeric Rating Scale (NPRS) is most frequently used instruments to measure pain intensity .The 11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform ADLs).
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment
Neck Disability Index
The NDI is a self-reported questionnaire that checks how much neck pain impacts daily life. It covers 10 areas (like pain, self-care, work, and recreation), each scored from 0 to 5. A higher total (out of 50) means more disability:
- 0-4: No disability
- 5-14: Mild
- 15-24: Moderate
- 25-34: Severe Above 34: Complete disability The NDI is a reliable way to assess neck-related issues.
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment
Cervical Joint Position Error Test (JPE)
This test measures neck proprioception (body awareness). A laser pointer on the head tracks how close someone can return to their starting position after moving their head with eyes closed. The closer they get, the better their proprioception. A difference over 4.5° suggests impaired awareness. The JPE test is dependable for checking neck movement sense
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment
Visual Complaint Index (VCI)
The VCI is a questionnaire that asks about vision problems like eye strain, blurred or double vision, headaches, sensitivity to light, and fatigue-especially from screen use or neck problems. Each symptom is rated for how bad and how often it is. Multiply those scores for each symptom and add them up for a total. Higher totals mean more symptoms. The VCI helps spot issues linked to Computer Vision Syndrome and neck-related visual problems
Measured: Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2026
- Study start20 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Computer Vision SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical sensorimotor training and oculomotor training in patients with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). It will evaluate their effects on neck pain, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and visual performance. Both interventions aim to improve cervical neuromuscular control and visual function through targeted exercises. The findings will help identify the more effective rehabilitation approach for managing musculoskeletal and visual symptoms associated with CVS.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Management and Technology Lahore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Mustafa, University of Management and Technology Lahore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07892040
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RE-155-2026
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes