Tibial Plateau FractureNCT07897149
Personalized Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips After Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures
A study testing Crutch Tip Biofeedback System, Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-Bearing and Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-Bearing in people with Tibial Plateau Fracture, run by Comeback Mobility Inc.
Trial summary
This study will compare two approaches to rehabilitation after surgery for a fracture of the upper part of the shinbone that involves the knee joint (tibial plateau fracture). The main question is whether a personalized plan for putting weight on the injured leg, combined with feedback from smart crutch tips, helps… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Crutch Tip Biofeedback System, Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-Bearing and Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-Bearing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2026to 30 Nov 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
- Voluntary written informed consent provided before any study-specific procedures.
- Age 18-70 years, inclusive.
- Body weight 40-120 kg.
- Intra-articular proximal tibial fracture classified as AO/OTA 41-B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, or C3; Schatzker type I-VI. Closed fractures or Gustilo-Anderson type I open fractures are eligible. Type I open fractures must have a clean wound less than 1 cm, minimal soft-tissue injury, no substantial contamination, and no clinical signs of infection.
- Fracture treated with plate fixation.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Ability to undergo postoperative CT and MRI 4-14 days after plate fixation.
- Surgical skin closure with nonmetallic sutures and no metallic skin staples.
- No diabetes mellitus, or well-controlled diabetes mellitus with HbA1c ≤7.0%.
- Ability to maintain balance while walking with crutches and transfer 80% of body weight onto the crutches, assessed safely by trained personnel.
- Ability to use the study device, maintain remote contact with the study team, and attend follow-up visits.
- Acceptable postoperative result, with restored alignment of the proximal tibia in the coronal and sagittal planes, stable fixation, and no indication for immediate revision surgery.
Who cannot join
- Participants meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
- Clinically significant psychiatric, behavioral, or cognitive impairment.
- Pregnancy.
- Fractures of both lower limbs or other injuries preventing walking with crutches.
- Grade III-IV heart failure.
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or dementia.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Severe metabolic disorders or severe kidney, liver, or thyroid disease.
- Chronic alcoholism.
- Fracture in the setting of severe osteoporosis with a T-score ≤-2.5.
- Fracture caused by a bone tumor, including a primary tumor or metastasis.
- Fracture associated with bone infection, including osteomyelitis.
- Body mass index >35 kg/m².
- Complete disruption of the knee ligamentous apparatus.
- Rupture of both cruciate ligaments.
- Postoperative articular surface depression >5 mm.
- Postoperative interfragmentary gap >5 mm.
About this study
Official title: Individualized Postoperative Weight-Bearing Based on Finite Element Analysis and Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback in Patients With Intra-Articular Fractures of the Proximal Tibia
This study will compare two approaches to rehabilitation after surgery for a fracture of the upper part of the shinbone that involves the knee joint (tibial plateau fracture). The main question is whether a personalized plan for putting weight on the injured leg, combined with feedback from smart crutch tips, helps patients return to walking without assistance sooner than usual care, without increasing complications.
Participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups:
Read more
- Personalized rehabilitation: Researchers will use CT and MRI scans taken after surgery to create a computer model of the repaired bone and estimate how it responds to different loads. The treating doctor will use this information, together with the patient's clinical condition, to prescribe how much weight the patient may place on the injured leg. Smart Crutch Tips will provide feedback to help the patient follow this prescription.
- Usual care: The treating doctor will prescribe weight-bearing according to usual clinical practice. Participants will also use Smart Crutch Tips, but the devices will record information without showing the patient loading data, step counts, or related alerts.
Researchers will compare how long it takes participants to walk independently without crutches, a cane, or another walking aid. They will also assess bone healing, knee function, pain, swelling, fear of movement, adherence to weight-bearing instructions, and complications.
Participants will attend follow-up visits and complete assessments of their recovery. Imaging specialists who do not know which treatment group participants are in will assess fracture healing and whether the repaired bone has remained in position.
Read the detailed description
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study will evaluate individualized postoperative weight-bearing guided by finite element analysis (FEA) and Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback following plate fixation of intra-articular proximal tibial fractures. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the individualized rehabilitation group or the usual-care control group.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of individualized postoperative weight-bearing prescribed using FEA combined with Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback, compared with usual care. The primary objective is to compare the time to sustained independent walking without assistive devices between the two groups. The intervention combines individualized weight-bearing prescriptions with support for adherence; therefore, the study evaluates the clinical outcomes of this combined rehabilitation approach.
In the intervention group, postoperative CT and MRI data will be used to create patient-specific biomechanical models. FEA will be used to formulate an individualized weight-bearing recommendation for the operated limb, taking into account stresses and safety factors of the fixation components, interfragmentary displacements, and mechanical conditions at the fracture site. Recommended loading will be expressed as a percentage of body weight. The treating physician will determine the final weight-bearing prescription based on the FEA recommendation and the participant's clinical condition. Smart Crutch Tips will provide biofeedback to support adherence to the prescribed regimen.
In the control group, postoperative weight-bearing will be prescribed according to usual clinical practice. Smart Crutch Tips will collect data with patient-facing loading information, step counts, and associated notifications disabled. This allows device-recorded loading data to be collected in both groups while limiting the biofeedback intervention to the individualized rehabilitation group.
Participants and treating clinicians will know the assigned group. Independent imaging assessors will be blinded to group allocation. Standardized assessments will be used to evaluate recovery of independent walking, radiographic fracture healing, maintenance of fracture reduction, knee function, symptoms, adherence, and safety.
An exploratory component will examine associations between recorded mechanical loading, fracture healing, symptoms, and complications. Data from both groups will also be used to develop and retrospectively evaluate an algorithm for weight-bearing and step-activity recommendations that does not require individual FEA when generating recommendations. This exploratory analysis will involve internal evaluation using study data.
- Conditions
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- Being tested
- Crutch Tip Biofeedback System, Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-Bearing, Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-Bearing
- Keywords
- Intra-Articular Proximal Tibial Fracture, Postoperative Rehabilitation, Individualized Weight-Bearing, Finite Element Analysis, Biofeedback, Smart Crutch Tips, Weight-Bearing Adherence, Fracture Healing, Plate Fixation
- Medical subject headings
- Tibial Plateau Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Crutch Tip Biofeedback SystemDevice
Smart Crutch Tips are attached to the participant's crutches or cane to record loading and steps. The system shows loading and step counts and alerts the participant when loading is outside the range prescribed by the treating physician. Participants are trained to use the system and walk safely. Device settings are updated whenever the physician changes the prescribed loading range.
Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-BearingOther
Patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) uses CT and MRI obtained 4-14 days after plate fixation to formulate a loading recommendation, considering fixation component stresses and safety factors, interfragmentary displacements, and mechanical conditions at the fracture site. At week 3 (±7 days), the treating physician prescribes loading based on the FEA recommendation and clinical findings. Loading is expressed as a percentage of body weight. The physician may adjust the prescription during rehabilitation based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. At week 16, CT is used to assess fragment position and repeat FEA accounting for changes at the fracture site. The physician determines subsequent loading and whether restrictions can be lifted.
Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-BearingOther
The treating physician prescribes no weight-bearing on the operated limb for 6-12 weeks after plate fixation. The duration of restrictions and subsequent loading progression are based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. Smart Crutch Tips record loading and steps with biofeedback, alerts, and patient-facing loading information and step counts disabled. Recorded loading data and FEA are not used to guide weight-bearing prescriptions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized FEA-Guided Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback | Experimental | Participants receive individualized postoperative weight-bearing recommendations based on finite element analysis (FEA) using CT and MRI obtained 4-14 days after plate fixation. At week 3 (±7 days), the treating physician prescribes loading based on FEA results, wound status, symptoms, and available imaging. The prescription is entered into Smart Crutch Tips, with patient-facing step counts, loading information, and alerts for deviations from the prescribed range enabled. The physician may adjust loading during rehabilitation based on follow-up radiographs and clinical status, including before week 16. At week 16, CT is used to assess fragment position and repeat FEA accounting for changes at the fracture site. The treating physician makes the final decision on subsequent weight-bearing. Receives: Device: Crutch Tip Biofeedback System; Other: Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-Bearing |
| Usual-Care Weight-Bearing Without Biofeedback | Active comparator | Participants receive usual postoperative care, with no weight-bearing on the operated limb for 6-12 weeks after plate fixation. The treating physician determines the duration of restrictions and subsequent loading progression based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. Smart Crutch Tips record loading and steps, but biofeedback, alerts, and patient-facing loading information and step counts are disabled. Recorded loading data are not used to provide recommendations for adjusting weight-bearing. FEA does not guide loading prescriptions in this group. Participants receive training in safe walking and device use. Receives: Other: Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-Bearing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Sustained Independent Walking Without Walking Aids
Time in days from plate fixation to the first day of walking without crutches, a cane, or another walking aid, with pain in the injured limb during walking of no more than 2 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale at the time of transition, and no return to walking aids for at least 7 consecutive days. The event date is the first day of the confirmed period, not the date of confirmation. An independent assessor blinded to treatment group allocation confirms that the criteria are met and verifies the event date using participant reports and supporting records. Device non-use alone does not establish the outcome.
Measured: From plate fixation through 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (10)
Time to Radiographic Confirmation of Complete Fracture Union
Time in days from plate fixation to the first radiographic examination confirming complete fracture union. Complete union is defined as disappearance of the fracture line due to filling with bone tissue and complete bone remodeling at the fracture site. Anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique radiographs are compared with previous images and assessed by two independent radiologists blinded to treatment group allocation. Disagreements are resolved by a third blinded radiologist. Partial union does not meet the endpoint. The event date is the date of the first examination confirming complete union.
Measured: From plate fixation through 52 weeks
Proportion of Participants With Radiographic Secondary Loss of Reduction by Week 16
Proportion of participants with secondary loss of reduction on radiographs compared with the first postoperative radiographic examination. Loss of reduction is defined as at least one of the following changes: an increase in articular surface depression of at least 2 mm; an increase in interfragmentary gap of at least 2 mm; an increase in tibial plateau width of at least 5 mm; or worsening of varus/valgus alignment or posterior tibial slope by at least 5 degrees. These thresholds refer to changes from the postoperative baseline, not absolute residual displacement. Radiographs are assessed independently by radiologists blinded to treatment group allocation. Each participant is counted once, regardless of the number of criteria met. Insufficient imaging without a confirmed positive finding is classified as indeterminate, not as absence of loss of reduction
Measured: From the first postoperative radiographic examination through the week 16 assessment after plate fixation, inclusive.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Subscale Scores
Patient-reported knee outcomes assessed using the five KOOS subscales: Pain, Other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation Function, and Knee-Related Quality of Life. Each subscale is scored separately from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating fewer knee problems. No overall total score is calculated. Assessments are performed at all attended in-person follow-up visits. Weeks 8, 16, and 52 are the mandatory time points for comparison between groups. Assessments at conditional visits are analyzed accounting for cancellation of these visits after confirmed fracture union.
Measured: At weeks 8, 16, and 52 after plate fixation; additionally at weeks 12, 20, 26, and 39 if these conditional visits take place.
Knee Function Assessed by the Rasmussen Clinical Score
Knee function assessed using the Rasmussen Clinical Score, covering pain, walking capacity, knee extension, range of motion, and knee stability. Higher scores indicate better knee function. Range of motion is measured with a goniometer. Weight-bearing tests are performed only when clinically safe. Assessments are conducted at all attended in-person follow-up visits, with weeks 8, 16, and 52 serving as the mandatory time points for comparison between groups.
Measured: At weeks 8, 16, and 52 after plate fixation; additionally at weeks 12, 20, 26, and 39 if these conditional visits take place.
Fear of Movement Assessed by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-17)
Fear of movement assessed using the 17-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-17). Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement or reinjury. The first assessment is conducted remotely immediately after participant training at the week 3 visit, and the assessment is repeated at week 8. The first assessment is a post-training measurement and is not considered a pre-intervention baseline.
Measured: Immediately after training at the week 3 visit (±7 days) and at week 8 after plate fixation.
Adherence to Prescribed Weight-Bearing in the Individualized Rehabilitation Group
Percentage of technically valid recorded steps within the prescribed loading range in the individualized rehabilitation group. The analytical range is the prescribed target ±10 percentage points of body weight, with a lower limit of zero. Each step is compared with the prescription active at the time of recording. Only days with at least 20 technically valid steps and a known prescription are included. Adherence is calculated as 100 × valid steps within range / all valid steps on eligible days. It is summarized over the entire restriction period and separately by postoperative week. Higher percentages indicate greater adherence. Days with insufficient data are excluded, not assigned 0% or 100%. Participants without eligible data are classified as not evaluable. This outcome is not calculated in the usual-care group.
Measured: Throughout the physician-prescribed weight-bearing restriction period, up to 52 weeks after plate fixation; summarized overall and by postoperative week.
Proportion of Participants With Fixation Failure
Proportion of participants with implant breakage or deformation, or implant migration or loosening associated with loss of stability. Events are documented using available imaging and clinical assessments. The date, type of failure, diagnostic findings, and treatment are recorded. Fixation failure is assessed separately from secondary loss of fracture reduction. Each participant with at least one qualifying event is counted once, regardless of the number of fixation failure events.
Measured: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation
Proportion of Participants With Confirmed Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis
Proportion of participants with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis confirmed by diagnostic imaging or another appropriate instrumental examination. Routine ultrasound screening for asymptomatic thrombosis is not performed. The date, diagnostic findings, and treatment of each confirmed event are recorded. Each participant with at least one confirmed symptomatic event is counted once, regardless of the number of events.
Measured: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Proportion of Participants With Infectious Complications
Proportion of participants with at least one infectious complication related to the study fracture or its treatment, including deep infection. The date, infection site, diagnostic findings, and treatment are recorded. Each participant with at least one qualifying infection is counted once, regardless of the number of infectious events.
Measured: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Proportion of Participants Undergoing Reoperation for Fracture- or Treatment-Related Complications
Proportion of participants undergoing at least one additional operation because of a complication of the study fracture or its treatment. Implant removal or replacement due to a complication is included, even if the procedure was scheduled in advance. Routine implant removal without complications and operations for unrelated diseases or injuries are excluded. The date and indication for each qualifying operation are recorded. Each participant is counted once, regardless of the number of qualifying reoperations.
Measured: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2026
- Study start15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tibial Plateau FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study with two parallel groups and a target allocation ratio of 1:1 using stochastic minimization. The intervention group receives individualized postoperative weight-bearing guided by finite element analysis and Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback. The control group receives usual-care weight-bearing prescriptions and uses Smart Crutch Tips for data recording with patient-facing feedback disabled. Participants and treating clinicians are aware of group allocation; independent imaging assessors are blinded.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Comeback Mobility Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07897149
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CBM-UA-WB -2026/1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Individualized Postoperative Weight-Bearing Based on Finite Element Analysis and Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback in Patients With Intra-Articular Fractures of the Proximal Tibia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07897149
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CBM-UA-WB -2026/1
- Conditions
- Tibial Plateau Fracture
- Keywords
- Intra-Articular Proximal Tibial Fracture, Postoperative Rehabilitation, Individualized Weight-Bearing, Finite Element Analysis, Biofeedback, Smart Crutch Tips, Weight-Bearing Adherence, Fracture Healing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Comeback Mobility IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare two approaches to rehabilitation after surgery for a fracture of the upper part of the shinbone that involves the knee joint (tibial plateau fracture). The main question is whether a personalized plan for putting weight on the injured leg, combined with feedback from smart crutch tips, helps patients return to walking without assistance sooner than usual care, without increasing complications.
Participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups:
- Personalized rehabilitation: Researchers will use CT and MRI scans taken after surgery to create a computer model of the repaired bone and estimate how it responds to different loads. The treating doctor will use this information, together with the patient's clinical condition, to prescribe how much weight the patient may place on the injured leg. Smart Crutch Tips will provide feedback to help the patient follow this prescription.
- Usual care: The treating doctor will prescribe weight-bearing according to usual clinical practice. Participants will also use Smart Crutch Tips, but the devices will record information without showing the patient loading data, step counts, or related alerts.
Researchers will compare how long it takes participants to walk independently without crutches, a cane, or another walking aid. They will also assess bone healing, knee function, pain, swelling, fear of movement, adherence to weight-bearing instructions, and complications.
Participants will attend follow-up visits and complete assessments of their recovery. Imaging specialists who do not know which treatment group participants are in will assess fracture healing and whether the repaired bone has remained in position.
Detailed description
This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study will evaluate individualized postoperative weight-bearing guided by finite element analysis (FEA) and Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback following plate fixation of intra-articular proximal tibial fractures. Participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the individualized rehabilitation group or the usual-care control group.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of individualized postoperative weight-bearing prescribed using FEA combined with Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback, compared with usual care. The primary objective is to compare the time to sustained independent walking without assistive devices between the two groups. The intervention combines individualized weight-bearing prescriptions with support for adherence; therefore, the study evaluates the clinical outcomes of this combined rehabilitation approach.
In the intervention group, postoperative CT and MRI data will be used to create patient-specific biomechanical models. FEA will be used to formulate an individualized weight-bearing recommendation for the operated limb, taking into account stresses and safety factors of the fixation components, interfragmentary displacements, and mechanical conditions at the fracture site. Recommended loading will be expressed as a percentage of body weight. The treating physician will determine the final weight-bearing prescription based on the FEA recommendation and the participant's clinical condition. Smart Crutch Tips will provide biofeedback to support adherence to the prescribed regimen.
In the control group, postoperative weight-bearing will be prescribed according to usual clinical practice. Smart Crutch Tips will collect data with patient-facing loading information, step counts, and associated notifications disabled. This allows device-recorded loading data to be collected in both groups while limiting the biofeedback intervention to the individualized rehabilitation group.
Participants and treating clinicians will know the assigned group. Independent imaging assessors will be blinded to group allocation. Standardized assessments will be used to evaluate recovery of independent walking, radiographic fracture healing, maintenance of fracture reduction, knee function, symptoms, adherence, and safety.
An exploratory component will examine associations between recorded mechanical loading, fracture healing, symptoms, and complications. Data from both groups will also be used to develop and retrospectively evaluate an algorithm for weight-bearing and step-activity recommendations that does not require individual FEA when generating recommendations. This exploratory analysis will involve internal evaluation using study data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study with two parallel groups and a target allocation ratio of 1:1 using stochastic minimization. The intervention group receives individualized postoperative weight-bearing guided by finite element analysis and Smart Crutch Tips biofeedback. The control group receives usual-care weight-bearing prescriptions and uses Smart Crutch Tips for data recording with patient-facing feedback disabled. Participants and treating clinicians are aware of group allocation; independent imaging assessors are blinded.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized FEA-Guided Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback | Experimental | Device: Crutch Tip Biofeedback System, Other: Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-BearingParticipants receive individualized postoperative weight-bearing recommendations based on finite element analysis (FEA) using CT and MRI obtained 4-14 days after plate fixation. At week 3 (±7 days), the treating physician prescribes loading based on FEA results, wound status, symptoms, and available imaging. The prescription is entered into Smart Crutch Tips, with patient-facing step counts, loading information, and alerts for deviations from the prescribed range enabled. The physician may adjust loading during rehabilitation based on follow-up radiographs and clinical status, including before week 16. At week 16, CT is used to assess fragment position and repeat FEA accounting for changes at the fracture site. The treating physician makes the final decision on subsequent weight-bearing. |
| Usual-Care Weight-Bearing Without Biofeedback | Active comparator | Other: Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-BearingParticipants receive usual postoperative care, with no weight-bearing on the operated limb for 6-12 weeks after plate fixation. The treating physician determines the duration of restrictions and subsequent loading progression based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. Smart Crutch Tips record loading and steps, but biofeedback, alerts, and patient-facing loading information and step counts are disabled. Recorded loading data are not used to provide recommendations for adjusting weight-bearing. FEA does not guide loading prescriptions in this group. Participants receive training in safe walking and device use. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Voluntary written informed consent provided before any study-specific procedures.
- Age 18-70 years, inclusive.
- Body weight 40-120 kg.
- Intra-articular proximal tibial fracture classified as AO/OTA 41-B1, B2, B3, C1, C2, or C3; Schatzker type I-VI. Closed fractures or Gustilo-Anderson type I open fractures are eligible. Type I open fractures must have a clean wound less than 1 cm, minimal soft-tissue injury, no substantial contamination, and no clinical signs of infection.
- Fracture treated with plate fixation.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Clinically significant psychiatric, behavioral, or cognitive impairment.
- Pregnancy.
- Fractures of both lower limbs or other injuries preventing walking with crutches.
- Grade III-IV heart failure.
- Uncontrolled epilepsy or dementia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Crutch Tip Biofeedback SystemSmart Crutch Tips are attached to the participant's crutches or cane to record loading and steps. The system shows loading and step counts and alerts the participant when loading is outside the range prescribed by the treating physician. Participants are trained to use the system and walk safely. Device settings are updated whenever the physician changes the prescribed loading range. | Device | Individualized FEA-Guided Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback |
| Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-BearingPatient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) uses CT and MRI obtained 4-14 days after plate fixation to formulate a loading recommendation, considering fixation component stresses and safety factors, interfragmentary displacements, and mechanical conditions at the fracture site. At week 3 (±7 days), the treating physician prescribes loading based on the FEA recommendation and clinical findings. Loading is expressed as a percentage of body weight. The physician may adjust the prescription during rehabilitation based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. At week 16, CT is used to assess fragment position and repeat FEA accounting for changes at the fracture site. The physician determines subsequent loading and whether restrictions can be lifted. | Other | Individualized FEA-Guided Weight-Bearing With Smart Crutch Tips Biofeedback |
| Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-BearingThe treating physician prescribes no weight-bearing on the operated limb for 6-12 weeks after plate fixation. The duration of restrictions and subsequent loading progression are based on clinical status and follow-up radiographs. Smart Crutch Tips record loading and steps with biofeedback, alerts, and patient-facing loading information and step counts disabled. Recorded loading data and FEA are not used to guide weight-bearing prescriptions. | Other | Usual-Care Weight-Bearing Without Biofeedback |
Primary outcome
Time to Sustained Independent Walking Without Walking Aids
Time frame: From plate fixation through 52 weeks
Time in days from plate fixation to the first day of walking without crutches, a cane, or another walking aid, with pain in the injured limb during walking of no more than 2 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale at the time of transition, and no return to walking aids for at least 7 consecutive days. The event date is the first day of the confirmed period, not the date of confirmation. An independent assessor blinded to treatment group allocation confirms that the criteria are met and verifies the event date using participant reports and supporting records. Device non-use alone does not establish the outcome.
10 secondary outcomes
Time to Radiographic Confirmation of Complete Fracture Union
Time frame: From plate fixation through 52 weeks
Proportion of Participants With Radiographic Secondary Loss of Reduction by Week 16
Time frame: From the first postoperative radiographic examination through the week 16 assessment after plate fixation, inclusive.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Subscale Scores
Time frame: At weeks 8, 16, and 52 after plate fixation; additionally at weeks 12, 20, 26, and 39 if these conditional visits take place.
Knee Function Assessed by the Rasmussen Clinical Score
Time frame: At weeks 8, 16, and 52 after plate fixation; additionally at weeks 12, 20, 26, and 39 if these conditional visits take place.
Fear of Movement Assessed by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-17)
Time frame: Immediately after training at the week 3 visit (±7 days) and at week 8 after plate fixation.
Adherence to Prescribed Weight-Bearing in the Individualized Rehabilitation Group
Time frame: Throughout the physician-prescribed weight-bearing restriction period, up to 52 weeks after plate fixation; summarized overall and by postoperative week.
Proportion of Participants With Fixation Failure
Time frame: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation
Proportion of Participants With Confirmed Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis
Time frame: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Proportion of Participants With Infectious Complications
Time frame: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Proportion of Participants Undergoing Reoperation for Fracture- or Treatment-Related Complications
Time frame: From informed consent through 52 weeks after plate fixation.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Tibial Plateau Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
Recruiting
Comparison of Functional Outcome Between Locking Plate Technique Versus Hybrid Ilizarov Technique in Patients With Schatzker Type V and VI Tibial Plateau Fractures
Tibial Plateau Fracture
Recruiting
Continuous Passive Motion Following Fixation of Pelvic and Knee Fractures
Fractures, Bone
Enrolling by invitation
Gene Expression in Lower Extremity Acute Traumatic Compartment Syndrome
Tibial Shaft Fracture, Tibial Plateau Fracture
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Weight Bearing in Unicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures
Early Mobilization
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Crutch Tip Biofeedback System, Individualized FEA-Guided Postoperative Weight-Bearing and Usual-Care Postoperative Weight-Bearing in people with Tibial Plateau Fracture, run by Comeback Mobility Inc.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Sustained Independent Walking Without Walking Aids (time frame: From plate fixation through 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2026.