AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver Disease (Alcoholic or Not)INSPIRE-NLNCT07899853

In-situ vs Ex-situ Liver Preservation

A study testing In-situ perfusion: aNRP and Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMP in people with Liver Disease (Alcoholic or Not) and Transplantation, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial is to learn what machine preservation method is most clinically effective for liver transplantation (LTx) after donation after circulatory death (DCD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
What is being tested?
In-situ perfusion: aNRP and Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
752 participants
Where
3 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
4 Nov 2026to 1 Oct 2032
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All DCD donor livers (donor=>16 years) accepted for transplantation in the Netherlands

Who cannot join

  • HU recipients
  • Logistical or technical constraints for machine perfusion

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Volkert A Huurman, MD PhD contact

+31-624801027

v.a.l.huurman@lumc.nl

Niki L Lupgens, MSc contact

+31622855049

n.l.lupgens@lumc.nl

Netherlands3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • University Medical Center Groningen

    Groningen

    Vincent E de Meijer, MD PhD, +31-645955548, v.e.de.meijer@umcg.nl

    Wouke N Kuiper, Msc, +31-655257880, w.n.kuiper@umcg.nl

    Recruiting
  • Leiden University Medical Center

    Leiden

    Volkert A. Huurman, MD PhD, +31-624801027, v.a.l.huurman@lumc.nl

    Niki Lupgens, Msc, n.l.lupgens@lumc.nl

    Not yet recruiting
  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam, 3015 GD

    Jeroen de Jonge, MD PhD, +31-643904182, j.dejonge.1@erasmusmc.nl

    Sophie Ciere, Bsc, +31-640191073, s.ciere@erasmusmc.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: IN Situ Versus ex Situ Organ PreservatIon: a Randomized Evaluation in the Netherlands (INSPIRE-NL)

The goal of this Randomized Controlled Trial is to learn what machine preservation method is most clinically effective for liver transplantation (LTx) after donation after circulatory death (DCD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What perfusion method has the lowest death censored biliary complication rate at 1-year post LT?
  • Are there differences in the Core Outcome Set of liver transplantation outcomes?
  • Are there any differences in utilization outcomes?
  • Are there any differences in cost effectiveness?
  • Are there any differences in patient quality of life?
  • Are there any differences in resource utilization?
Read more

Researchers will compare preservation using in-situ abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) to (dual) hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (DHOPE) or DHOPE followed by controlled oxygenated rewarming and normothermic machine perfusion (DHOPE-COR-NMP).

Nothing will change from clinical practice for the liver recipients.

Read the detailed description

RELEVANCE Around 15% of waiting-list patients for liver transplantation are removed prematurely due to death or clinical deterioration. To reduce donor liver shortage, lower-quality livers are increasingly used, including those from donation after circulatory death (DCD), though these carry a higher risk of complications. Several machine perfusion techniques have been developed to recondition and/or assess donor livers: 'in situ' abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (aNRP), and 'ex-situ' Dual Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (DHOPE), in some cases followed by Controlled Oxygenated Rewarming (COR) and Normothermic Machine perfusion (NMP). All these techniques are reimbursed as proven effective treatment in the Netherlands. It remains unclear which strategy is most effective and cost-efficient for DCD livers. A direct comparison is needed to answer this question and decide on a future standard of care.

RESEARCH QUESTION Which machine perfusion technique is most clinically effective and cost-effective for liver transplantation after DCD?

HYPOTHESIS In situ preservation using aNRP reduces the one year incidence of total biliary complications when compared to ex situ preservation with DHOPE (±COR-NMP), with potential cost advantages.

INTERVENTION In situ perfusion (aNRP), restores oxygenated circulation to abdominal organs shortly after donor cardiac arrest to protect organs and allow functional assessment. In standard risk (SCD)-DCD livers, perfusion is performed for one hour without viability assessment. If (re)classified as high risk (extended criteria or ECD)-DCD liver, perfusion continues for two hours, including viability assessment.

COMPARISON The current standard ex-situ perfusion techniques in DCD liver transplantation: DHOPE for standard-risk SCD-DCD livers; or DHOPE-COR-NMP for ECD-DCD livers.

FOLLOW-UP TIME 60 month inclusion time, 12 month follow-up post-transplantation

STUDY DESIGN Multicenter 1:1 randomized controlled trial. DCD livers will be randomized (Castor EDC) after stratification for type (SCD-DCD or ECD-DCD) and transplantation center. Donor characteristics will be obtained from the Eurotransplant Registry, and perfusion parameters recorded prospectively. Recipient data will be extracted from electronic medical records for mandatory Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR) registration.

SAMPLE SIZE \& DATA ANALYSIS SCD-DCD 156 liver transplantations per group, total 312. ECD-DCD 102 liver transplantations per group, total 204. Overall: 516 liver transplantations.

Estimated randomizations: 752 total, approximately 236 procedures/randomisations do not result in transplantation due to long agonal phase and viability assessment.

Being tested
In-situ perfusion: aNRP, Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMP
Keywords
liver transplantation, machine perfusion, normothermic regional perfusion, DHOPE, DHOPE-COR-NMP, Health technology assessment
Medical subject headings
Liver Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • In-situ perfusion: aNRPProcedure or surgery

    This arm contains of 2 pre-defined strata: SCD-DCD livers: receiving 1 hour of aNRP, ECD-DCD livers: receiving 2 hours of aNRP. Both treatments are standard of care.

  • Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMPProcedure or surgery

    This arm contains of 2 pre-defined strata: SCD-DCD livers: receiving DHOPE, ECD-DCD livers: receiving DHOPE-COR-NMP. Both treatments are standard of care.

Study groups in NCT07899853
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DCD donor livers receiving machine preservation using ex-situ DHOPE +/- COR-NMPOtherThis arm contains of 2 pre-defined strata: SCD-DCD livers: receiving DHOPE, ECD-DCD livers: receiving DHOPE-COR-NMP. Both treatments are standard of care.
Receives: Procedure: Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMP
DCD donor livers receiving machine preservation using in-situ aNRPOtherThis arm contains of 2 pre-defined strata: SCD-DCD livers: receiving 1 hour of aNRP, ECD-DCD livers: receiving 2 hours of aNRP. Both treatments are standard of care.
Receives: Procedure: In-situ perfusion: aNRP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. one-year cumulative incidence of biliary complications

    Death censored incidence of biliary complications including biliary anastomotic strictures, post-transplant cholangiopathy and biliary leakages, all that necessitate intervention

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (37)
  1. cost-effectiveness

    QALYs derived from EQ-5D-5L questionnaire measured at six time points: waitlist registration, and at six weeks, three, six, twelve and twenty-four months post-transplantation. If aNRP is estimated to lead to higher costs as well as better health outcomes or to lower costs and worse health outcomes, an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) will be calculated (costs per QALY gained or savings per QALY lost). If not, one treatment will be considered dominant. As aNRP perfuses multiple organs at once, the overall costs per procedure and subsequent transplantations will be researched.

    Measured: 5 year

  2. Post transplant cholangiopathy rate

    Narrowing or irregularity of intra- or extra-hepatic donor bile duct excluding the biliary anastomosis leading to clinical symptoms or laboratory derangements in the absence of hepatic artery thrombosis for which an invasive intervention is required.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. patient QOL

    Health-Related Quality of Life via PROMIS questionnaire: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, that assesses seven core health domains using 4-item short form items plus one pain intensity item (scale 0-10, with 10 worse outcome).

    Measured: 2 year

  4. Patient mortality

    Recipient death

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Graft loss

    Failure of the liver allograft requiring either re-transplantation or leading to recipient mortality.

    Measured: 1 year

  6. post-transplant overall complications

    Also including vascular complications (hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis)

    And complications graded as Clavien Dindo => 3a, and the comprehensive complication index

    Measured: 1 year

  7. duration of hospital and ICU stay

    In days

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Environmental Demand

    Environmental Demand: Measured in global hectares (gha). Converts all physical inputs (Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Measured in kg CO₂e, Electricity: Measured in kWh an Consumables \& Waste: Measured in kg of waste and liters (L) of fluids) into the total biophysical land area required to support each distinct protocol.

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Liver utilization rate

    How many livers are transplanted and still functioning from organ offer to 1 year post transplantation. It takes in account the acceptance rate, discard rate, transplant rate and 1-year survival.

    Measured: 1 year

  10. Postoperative intra-abdominal bleeding

    Clinically significant bleeding event requiring percutaneous or surgical re-intervention

    Measured: During index in-hospital stay, on average 9 days

  11. Presence of post reperfusion syndrome

    A drop in mean arterial pression ≥30% from the baseline for at least 1 min and within 5 min from reperfusion

    Measured: During transplantation

  12. Need for renal replacement therapy

    Any extracorporeal therapy to supplement or replace renal function that was not present before transplant

    Measured: During index in-hospital stay, on average 9 days

  13. Intervention rates

    e.g. MRCP, ERCP and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage

    Measured: 1 year

  14. Reoperation rate

    Number of reoperations

    Measured: 1 year

  15. Early Allograft Failure Simplified Estimation Score

    EASE = -0.602 + 0.044*(MELD at transplant) + 0.065*(number of PACKED RED BLOOD CELL transfused units during surgery) + 2.567 (if arterial or portal thrombosis during days 1-10) + 0.000534*(AUC ln AST in POD1,2,3,7,10)2 - 0.093*(AUC ln PLT in POD1,3,7,10) - 7.766*(slope ln PLT in POD1,3,7,10) + 0.795*(slope ln billirubin in POD1,3,7,10) - 0.402 (if center volume ≥70 cases per year).

    Five EASE risk groups for graft and patient survival were defined as follows: (1) risk group 1: EASE score < -3.43; (2) risk group 2: -3.43 ≤ EASE score ≤ -1.26; (3) risk group 3: -1.25 ≤ EASE score ≤ -0.75; (4) risk group 4: -0.74 ≤ EASE score ≤ -0.01 (5) risk group 5: 0 ≤ EASE score ≤ 5. Risk group 5 is the worse outcome.

    Measured: 10 days post operative

  16. Retransplantation rate

    Failure of the liver allograft requiring explant and replacement with an alternative liver graft

    Measured: 1 year

  17. Primary non function rate

    Graft loss, re-transplantation, or patient death within 14 days of initial transplantation not secondary to hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complication, recurrent disease or acute rejection.

    Measured: 14 days

  18. Anastomotic stricture

    Localized narrowing of the biliary anastomosis between the donor and recipient bile ducts for which an invasive intervention is required.

    Measured: 1 year

  19. Bile leak

    Extra-luminal escape of biliary contents that requires invasive intervention (percutaneous or surgical)

    Measured: 1 year

  20. Early allograft dysfunction

    Enzymatic changes related to slow-resolving recipient liver disease that resolves without treatment should not be graded as a complication.

    Enzymatic changes related to an initially impaired graft function leading to more frequent observation (ie, laboratory tests, repeat ultrasound). Officially diagnosed if a patient meets at least one of the following lab conditions: AST or ALT > 2000 IU/L within the first 7 postoperative days, total bilirubin >= 10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7. International normalized ratio (INR) +. 1.6 on postoperative day 7.

    Measured: Postoperative day 7

  21. Death censored graft survival

    the probability that a transplanted organ is still functioning exactly one year after the procedure, excluding patients who died with a working organ from the failure count

    Measured: 1 year

  22. Overall graft survival

    the probability that a transplanted organ is still functioning exactly one year after the procedure

    Measured: 1 year

  23. Patient survival

    all-cause mortality within 365 days post-transplantation

    Measured: 1 year

  24. Accumulated team member working hours

    For assessing personnel sustainability. Team members include retrieving surgeons, organ perfusionists, organ donation coordinators, organ transplantation coordinators, transplant surgeons, scrub nurses during retrieval and transplantation, anesthesiologists, anesthetics nurse, drivers.

    Measured: 1 year

  25. Readmission rate

    Number of readmissions

    Measured: 1 year

  26. Creatinine values

    before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in µmol/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  27. Sodium values

    before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in mmol/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  28. Alkaline Phosphatase values

    In short: ALP. Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in U/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  29. Alanine Aminotransferase values

    In short: ALT. Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in U/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  30. gamma-Glutamyl Transferase values

    In short: GGT. Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in U/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  31. Bilirubin values

    Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in µmol/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  32. Aspartate Aminotransferase values

    In short: AST. Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in U/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  33. International Normalized Ratio values

    In short: INR. Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years.

    Measured: 5 years

  34. Thrombocytes values

    Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured /L.

    Measured: 5 years

  35. Urea values

    Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in mmol/L.

    Measured: 5 years

  36. eGFR values

    Measured before LTx, post-LTx days 1-7 and 10, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years. Measured in mL/min/1.73m²

    Measured: 5 years

  37. Utilized organs per donor

    Number of organs transplanted per donor

    Measured: Peri-operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2026
  2. Study start4 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
752 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07899853
Sponsor's protocol ID
11380032520009
Other IDs
15807
Acronym
INSPIRE-NL
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
7 Oct 2026
Last updated
3 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: IPD will not be shared. Anonimization of data needs to be addressed to provide sufficient patient and donor privacy according to national law.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing In-situ perfusion: aNRP and Ex-situ perfusion: DHOPE/DHOPE-COR-NMP in people with Liver Disease (Alcoholic or Not) and Transplantation, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 3 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Volkert A Huurman, MD PhD (+31-624801027, v.a.l.huurman@lumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

one-year cumulative incidence of biliary complications (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in