HemorrhageTORQUENCT07900360
Healthy Adults Aged 18-55, Three Ukrainian Windlass Tourniquets (SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2, PULS) Compared With CAT Gen 7, and Complete Limb Arterial Occlusion Confirmed by Doppler.
A study testing Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) in people with Hemorrhage and Healthy Volunteers, run by Foundation for Expert Deployment for Governance and Economic Growth (EDGE).
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if three Ukrainian-made windlass tourniquets (SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2 and PULS) stop arterial blood flow in the arm or leg as well as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Gen 7) does. The trial is in healthy adult volunteers, men and women aged 18 to 55 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemorrhage, Healthy Volunteers, Arterial Occlusion
- What is being tested?
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2026to 22 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women aged 18-55 years.
- Absence of vascular, neurological, endocrine, or rheumatological disease.
- Absence of coagulopathies.
- Written informed consent.
- Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-29.9 kg/m².
- Have all four limbs (both upper and lower limbs).
Who cannot join
- Any diagnosed disease of the arterial or venous system affecting vessel patency, vessel-wall integrity, or limb hemodynamics.
- Chronic or acute somatic disease in a progressive or decompensated state.
- History of any confirmed thrombotic or thromboembolic event, regardless of the type of event and its location.
- Sensory impairment of the limbs, or neurological impairment of limb sensory or motor function.
- Current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
- Musculoskeletal disease or injury compromising safe tourniquet application or gait testing.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Concurrent participation in another clinical investigation.
- History of organ transplantation.
- Cognitive impairment precluding informed consent or protocol compliance.
- Any hematological (blood) disease.
- Use of hormonal or immunosuppressive medication.
- Active systemic or local infection.
- History of malignancy, or a currently diagnosed neoplastic process in any organ or tissue.
- History of myocardial infarction or stroke.
- Renal or hepatic insufficiency.
- Chromosomal disease.
- Peripheral nervous system disease.
- Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, or lactation (women of childbearing potential).
- Low pain threshold
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may increase risk or confound interpretation of results.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices (Windlass-type Hemostatic Tourniquets) to Evaluate Their Efficacy and Safety Compared With Reference Medical Devices in Healthy Volunteers
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if three Ukrainian-made windlass tourniquets (SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2 and PULS) stop arterial blood flow in the arm or leg as well as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Gen 7) does. The trial is in healthy adult volunteers, men and women aged 18 to 55 years. Limb tourniquets are used to stop life-threatening bleeding from an arm or leg. The results will support a national standard for windlass tourniquets in Ukraine.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Read more
Does each Ukrainian tourniquet completely stop arterial blood flow below the tourniquet within 120 seconds as often as CAT Gen 7? Stopped blood flow will be confirmed by Doppler ultrasound.
Investigators will compare each Ukrainian tourniquet with CAT Gen 7 in the same participant, using one device on the arm and the other on the leg. They will look at whether blood flow is completely stopped and how quickly. They will also compare:
- pain and comfort during and after use;
- how fast normal blood flow returns after the tourniquet is removed;
- how reliably each device can be applied;
- any device problems and side effects.
Participants will:
Attend a screening visit with a medical history, physical examination, vital signs, ECG, tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg) and hepatitis C (anti-HCV) on the blood sample, and a rapid HIV test using a mouth swabblood, urine tests including pregnancy test (only for women).
Be randomly assigned to one pair of devices: CAT Gen 7 with SICH, CAT Gen 7 with DNIPRO GEN 2, or CAT Gen 7 with PULS. The order in which the two devices are used will also be chosen at random.
Have a tourniquet applied by trained study staff on two visits at least 24 hours apart. Each time, a different device is used on a different limb (upper arm or thigh), for no longer than 120 seconds.
Have blood flow checked with Doppler ultrasound by a doctor who does not know which device is being used.
Have skin temperature measured, and rate their pain and comfort. Receive follow-up phone calls about 24 hours and 72 hours after the second application. A clinic visit is arranged only if a side effect is reported.
Read the detailed description
Background Heavy bleeding from an injured arm or leg is one of the main causes of preventable death among people wounded in combat and in serious civilian accidents. A limb tourniquet is a strap placed around the limb above the wound. It is tightened by turning a rigid rod (the "windlass") until blood flow below it stops. International guidelines for combat casualty care (TCCC) recommend applying a windlass tourniquet immediately as the first step to control life-threatening limb bleeding. Wide use of such tourniquets, together with training, has saved many lives.
In Ukraine, several windlass tourniquets are manufactured locally, including SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2 and PULS. They are already widely used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, alongside internationally recognized devices such as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Gen 7). CAT is the reference tourniquet recommended by the U.S. Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care and has the largest body of evidence. Laboratory testing has shown that the Ukrainian tourniquets can stop arterial blood flow. However, they have never been compared directly with CAT in a randomized clinical study with blinded assessment of the result.
This study is therefore designed to:
provide independent, standardized clinical data to support a National Standard of Ukraine for windlass tourniquets.
Study design TORQUE is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical investigation with a blinded outcome assessor. It takes place at a single site in Kyiv, Ukraine: the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine. It is conducted according to with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ISO 14155:2026 (Good Clinical Practice for medical device studies), and the applicable Ukrainian regulations. It is a non-commercial study. This study is funded by the UK Government through the Foreign, Commonwealth \& Development Office (FCDO), with project implementation support provided by Alinea International Limited in Ukraine. The Acting Sponsor is a Ukrainian public organization "FUND FOR EXPERT SUPPORT OF GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" (EDGE). No medical device manufacturer is involved in the funding, conduct, management, or analysis of the study.
About 120 healthy adult volunteers will take part. They will be randomly assigned in equal numbers (40 each) to one of three device pairs:
CAT Gen 7 and SICH CAT Gen 7 and DNIPRO GEN 2 CAT Gen 7 and PULS
Each participant receives both devices in their pair, one at a time, on two different study days at least 24 hours apart. One device is placed on the upper arm and the other on the thigh, on the same side of the body. The order of the two devices, and which device goes on the arm or the thigh, is also chosen at random. Comparing both devices in the same person reduces the effect of differences between people.
All tourniquets are applied by trained and certified study staff, never by the participants themselves. A thin, standardized protective layer of gauze is placed under each tourniquet to protect the skin. Each application lasts no more than 120 seconds. The tourniquet is released immediately once blood flow is confirmed to be stopped, once 120 seconds have passed, or at any moment the participant asks.
The devices look different, so staff and participants know which device is used. To keep the main result objective, the doctor who checks blood flow with Doppler ultrasound does not know which device is being tested. This doctor sits behind a screen and wears noise-cancelling headphones during application.
What is being measured The main outcome is whether each tourniquet completely stops arterial blood flow below it within 120 seconds of the first turn of the windlass. Complete occlusion means no blood flow signal in the artery of the wrist or foot for at least 10 seconds, confirmed by several Doppler ultrasound methods. The study tests whether each Ukrainian device is not meaningfully worse than CAT Gen 7, defined as no more than 10 percentage points lower in success rate.
Other outcomes include:
- time needed to stop blood flow;
- pain, rated on a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale, and comfort, rated on a 1-5 scale, at four time points;
- return of normal blood flow 1 and 30 minutes after removal;
- skin temperature around and below the tourniquet, measured with an infrared thermometer, as an indicator of even pressure and recovery of circulation;
- how reliably each device can be applied, including number of attempts, loss of tension and slipping;
- any device faults;
- side effects such as numbness, tingling, bruising or pain lasting more than 24 hours.
A structured record of device faults will be shared with the manufacturers to help improve technical specifications.
What participants will do Screening visit: consent, vital signs,medical history, physical examination, ECG, blood, urine tests, and a pregnancy test for women, tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg) and hepatitis C (anti-HCV) on the blood sample, and a rapid HIV test using a mouth swabblood.
Day 1 and Day 3: a tourniquet is applied once on each day, with ultrasound checks before, during and after application. Participants rate their pain and comfort and stay at the site until normal circulation is confirmed.
Follow-up phone calls: on Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6. An extra clinic visit is arranged only if a side effect is reported.
Total time in the study is about 10 days, from screening to the last phone call.
Safety
Brief tourniquet use in healthy people commonly causes temporary pain, skin marks, redness or numbness. These usually go away quickly. Serious harm is very unlikely with an application time of 120 seconds or less. Measures that reduce risk include:
- strict eligibility criteria that exclude people with vascular, nerve, blood-clotting or other relevant conditions;
- trained staff and continuous medical supervision;
- the 120-second time limit and the protective gauze layer;
- a rest period between applications; follow-up phone calls.
An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will review safety data, including any serious adverse event. Participants may leave the study at any time without giving a reason.
Who can take part Healthy civilian men and women aged 18 to 55 years with a body mass index of 18.5-29.9 kg/m² can take part. Military personnel, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and people in dependent relationships with the study organizers are not included. This ensures that participation is fully voluntary.
Expected use of results Results will be reported for each device separately. They are intended to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, with no participant identifiable.
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage, Healthy Volunteers, Arterial Occlusion
- Being tested
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)
- Keywords
- Windlass tourniquet, Arterial occlusion, Doppler
- Medical subject headings
- Hemorrhage, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Device
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7.
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet DNIPRO: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7.
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7.
- Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7, Reference device: Combat Application Tourniquet Gen 7 (North American Rescue, USA), CE-marked, TCCC-recommended. Applied once by a trained operator using the same standardized procedure; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SICH → CAT | Experimental | Participants randomized to the SICH-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): SICH tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once to the limb by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
| CAT → SICH | Experimental | Participants randomized to the SICH-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): SICH tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 1. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
| Dnipro → CAT | Experimental | Participants randomized to the Dnipro-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): Dnipro tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
| CAT → Dnipro | Experimental | Participants randomized to the Dnipro-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): Dnipro tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 3. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
| PULS → CAT | Experimental | Participants randomized to the PULS-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): PULS tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
| CAT → PULS | Experimental | Participants randomized to the PULS-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): PULS tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 5. Receives: Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Applications Achieving Complete Arterial Occlusion Confirmed by Blinded Doppler Ultrasound
Complete distal arterial occlusion is defined as sustained absence of a distal arterial signal for at least 10 consecutive seconds, achieved within 120 seconds of the first windlass turn. It is confirmed by a blinded Doppler assessor using peak systolic/end-diastolic velocity, spectral waveform, color Doppler and handheld Doppler. Each application is scored as achieved or not achieved. The proportion of successful applications is compared between each investigational tourniquet (SICH, Dnipro, PULS) and the CAT Gen 7 reference within the same participants, to test non-inferiority.
Measured: During each tourniquet application (up to 120 seconds), on Day 1 and Day 3
Secondary outcomes (9)
Time to Complete Arterial Occlusion
Time in seconds from the first windlass turn to complete distal arterial occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler ultrasound (≥10 consecutive seconds without distal arterial signal). Applications that do not achieve occlusion are right-censored at 120 seconds. Compared within each pair: SICH, Dnipro or PULS vs CAT Gen 7.
Measured: During each tourniquet application (up to 120 seconds), Day 1 and Day 3.
Pain Intensity on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Participant-rated pain on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate more pain. Scores are categorized as no pain (0-4 mm), mild (5-44 mm), moderate (45-74 mm) or severe (75-100 mm). They are compared between devices within each pair, and the proportion of applications with severe pain is reported. VAS is a tolerability measure, not an efficacy criterion.
Measured: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately after application, during confirmed occlusion, immediately after device removal, and 30 minutes after removal (4 assessments per period).
Subjective Comfort on a 5-Point Likert Scale
Participant-rated comfort of the tourniquet application, answered as a single question on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = very comfortable). Higher scores indicate greater comfort. The assessment during occlusion is optional. Compared between devices within each pair.
Measured: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately after application, during confirmed occlusion (optional), immediately after device removal, and 30 minutes after removal (up to 4 assessments per period)
Recovery of Distal Arterial Perfusion After Device Removal
Distal arterial flow assessed by blinded Doppler ultrasound after the tourniquet is removed. The assessment covers pulsatile signal, peak systolic and end-diastolic velocity, spectral waveform, color Doppler, and handheld Doppler confirmation. Stable reperfusion at 30 minutes is reported as a binary outcome (achieved / not achieved) for each application.
Measured: Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 3: 1 ± 2 minutes and 30 ± 3 minutes after device removal.
Number of Application Attempts
Number of attempts needed to apply the tourniquet in each application period. It is recorded by the operator or investigator on a structured device-deficiency form at the time of occurrence, as a measure of application reliability.
Measured: During each tourniquet application, Day 1 and Day 3.
Proportion of Applications With Loss of Tension During Exposure
Proportion of applications in which the tourniquet loses tension during the exposure (occlusion) phase. Recorded by the operator or investigator on a structured device-deficiency form at the time of occurrence, as a measure of application reliability.
Measured: During each tourniquet application, up to 120 seconds, Day 1 and Day 3
Proportion of Applications With Tourniquet Migration
Proportion of applications in which the tourniquet moves from its original position on the limb during application or exposure. Recorded by the operator or investigator on a structured device-deficiency form at the time of occurrence, as a measure of application reliability.
Measured: During each tourniquet application, up to 120 seconds, Day 1 and Day 3.
Incidence of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs)
Number and proportion of participants with adverse device effects (ADEs) and Serious ADEs (SADEs), including unanticipated SADEs (USADEs) defined per MDR (EU) 2017/745, ISO 14155:2026 and MDCG 2020-10/1.
Measured: From first tourniquet application (Day 1) through end of follow-up: Day 4 (24 hours after Period 2), telephone follow-up, and Day 7 visit if symptomatic.
Change in Skin Temperature at the Tourniquet Application Site Measured by Infrared Thermometry.
Skin surface temperature (°C, recorded to 0.1 °C) at the tourniquet application site, measured with a calibrated non-contact infrared thermometer at a spot marked on the skin at baseline. Measurement conditions are standardized: at least 10-15 minutes of rest with the limb uncovered, room temperature kept within 20-25 °C and recorded at each measurement, and the same device held perpendicular to dry skin at the manufacturer-specified distance. The change is calculated as post-removal minus pre-application temperature and compared between devices within each pair (SICH, Dnipro or PULS vs CAT Gen 7). This is a supportive safety and perfusion measure, not an efficacy criterion.
Measured: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately before tourniquet application and immediately after device removal.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2026
- Study start15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion22 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Randomized, open-label (assessor-blinded), two-period, two-sequence crossover within pairs. 120 healthy volunteers are randomized 1:1:1 to one of three device pairs: SICH vs CAT, Dnipro vs CAT, or PULS vs CAT (40 participants per pair). Within each pair, the order of application (Reference → Investigational or Investigational → Reference) is randomized 1:1. The two applications take place on Day 1 and Day 3, with a wash-out between them. All devices are applied exclusively by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum application time 120 seconds). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a Doppler ultrasound assessor blinded to device identity. Each participant serves as their own control for the paired non-inferiority comparison.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Expert Deployment for Governance and Economic Growth (EDGE)
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07900360
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- V5-060226
- Acronym
- TORQUE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices (Windlass-type Hemostatic Tourniquets) to Evaluate Their Efficacy and Safety Compared With Reference Medical Devices in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07900360
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TORQUE / V5-060226
- Conditions
- Hemorrhage, Healthy Volunteers, Arterial Occlusion
- Keywords
- Windlass tourniquet, Arterial occlusion, Doppler
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Expert Deployment for Governance and Economic Growth (EDGE)University, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if three Ukrainian-made windlass tourniquets (SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2 and PULS) stop arterial blood flow in the arm or leg as well as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Gen 7) does. The trial is in healthy adult volunteers, men and women aged 18 to 55 years. Limb tourniquets are used to stop life-threatening bleeding from an arm or leg. The results will support a national standard for windlass tourniquets in Ukraine.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Does each Ukrainian tourniquet completely stop arterial blood flow below the tourniquet within 120 seconds as often as CAT Gen 7? Stopped blood flow will be confirmed by Doppler ultrasound.
Investigators will compare each Ukrainian tourniquet with CAT Gen 7 in the same participant, using one device on the arm and the other on the leg. They will look at whether blood flow is completely stopped and how quickly. They will also compare:
- pain and comfort during and after use;
- how fast normal blood flow returns after the tourniquet is removed;
- how reliably each device can be applied;
- any device problems and side effects.
Participants will:
Attend a screening visit with a medical history, physical examination, vital signs, ECG, tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg) and hepatitis C (anti-HCV) on the blood sample, and a rapid HIV test using a mouth swabblood, urine tests including pregnancy test (only for women).
Be randomly assigned to one pair of devices: CAT Gen 7 with SICH, CAT Gen 7 with DNIPRO GEN 2, or CAT Gen 7 with PULS. The order in which the two devices are used will also be chosen at random.
Have a tourniquet applied by trained study staff on two visits at least 24 hours apart. Each time, a different device is used on a different limb (upper arm or thigh), for no longer than 120 seconds.
Have blood flow checked with Doppler ultrasound by a doctor who does not know which device is being used.
Have skin temperature measured, and rate their pain and comfort. Receive follow-up phone calls about 24 hours and 72 hours after the second application. A clinic visit is arranged only if a side effect is reported.
Detailed description
Background Heavy bleeding from an injured arm or leg is one of the main causes of preventable death among people wounded in combat and in serious civilian accidents. A limb tourniquet is a strap placed around the limb above the wound. It is tightened by turning a rigid rod (the "windlass") until blood flow below it stops. International guidelines for combat casualty care (TCCC) recommend applying a windlass tourniquet immediately as the first step to control life-threatening limb bleeding. Wide use of such tourniquets, together with training, has saved many lives.
In Ukraine, several windlass tourniquets are manufactured locally, including SICH, DNIPRO GEN 2 and PULS. They are already widely used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, alongside internationally recognized devices such as the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT Gen 7). CAT is the reference tourniquet recommended by the U.S. Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care and has the largest body of evidence. Laboratory testing has shown that the Ukrainian tourniquets can stop arterial blood flow. However, they have never been compared directly with CAT in a randomized clinical study with blinded assessment of the result.
This study is therefore designed to:
provide independent, standardized clinical data to support a National Standard of Ukraine for windlass tourniquets.
Study design TORQUE is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical investigation with a blinded outcome assessor. It takes place at a single site in Kyiv, Ukraine: the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine. It is conducted according to with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ISO 14155:2026 (Good Clinical Practice for medical device studies), and the applicable Ukrainian regulations. It is a non-commercial study. This study is funded by the UK Government through the Foreign, Commonwealth \& Development Office (FCDO), with project implementation support provided by Alinea International Limited in Ukraine. The Acting Sponsor is a Ukrainian public organization "FUND FOR EXPERT SUPPORT OF GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT" (EDGE). No medical device manufacturer is involved in the funding, conduct, management, or analysis of the study.
About 120 healthy adult volunteers will take part. They will be randomly assigned in equal numbers (40 each) to one of three device pairs:
CAT Gen 7 and SICH CAT Gen 7 and DNIPRO GEN 2 CAT Gen 7 and PULS
Each participant receives both devices in their pair, one at a time, on two different study days at least 24 hours apart. One device is placed on the upper arm and the other on the thigh, on the same side of the body. The order of the two devices, and which device goes on the arm or the thigh, is also chosen at random. Comparing both devices in the same person reduces the effect of differences between people.
All tourniquets are applied by trained and certified study staff, never by the participants themselves. A thin, standardized protective layer of gauze is placed under each tourniquet to protect the skin. Each application lasts no more than 120 seconds. The tourniquet is released immediately once blood flow is confirmed to be stopped, once 120 seconds have passed, or at any moment the participant asks.
The devices look different, so staff and participants know which device is used. To keep the main result objective, the doctor who checks blood flow with Doppler ultrasound does not know which device is being tested. This doctor sits behind a screen and wears noise-cancelling headphones during application.
What is being measured The main outcome is whether each tourniquet completely stops arterial blood flow below it within 120 seconds of the first turn of the windlass. Complete occlusion means no blood flow signal in the artery of the wrist or foot for at least 10 seconds, confirmed by several Doppler ultrasound methods. The study tests whether each Ukrainian device is not meaningfully worse than CAT Gen 7, defined as no more than 10 percentage points lower in success rate.
Other outcomes include:
- time needed to stop blood flow;
- pain, rated on a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale, and comfort, rated on a 1-5 scale, at four time points;
- return of normal blood flow 1 and 30 minutes after removal;
- skin temperature around and below the tourniquet, measured with an infrared thermometer, as an indicator of even pressure and recovery of circulation;
- how reliably each device can be applied, including number of attempts, loss of tension and slipping;
- any device faults;
- side effects such as numbness, tingling, bruising or pain lasting more than 24 hours.
A structured record of device faults will be shared with the manufacturers to help improve technical specifications.
What participants will do Screening visit: consent, vital signs,medical history, physical examination, ECG, blood, urine tests, and a pregnancy test for women, tests for hepatitis B (HBsAg) and hepatitis C (anti-HCV) on the blood sample, and a rapid HIV test using a mouth swabblood.
Day 1 and Day 3: a tourniquet is applied once on each day, with ultrasound checks before, during and after application. Participants rate their pain and comfort and stay at the site until normal circulation is confirmed.
Follow-up phone calls: on Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6. An extra clinic visit is arranged only if a side effect is reported.
Total time in the study is about 10 days, from screening to the last phone call.
Safety
Brief tourniquet use in healthy people commonly causes temporary pain, skin marks, redness or numbness. These usually go away quickly. Serious harm is very unlikely with an application time of 120 seconds or less. Measures that reduce risk include:
- strict eligibility criteria that exclude people with vascular, nerve, blood-clotting or other relevant conditions;
- trained staff and continuous medical supervision;
- the 120-second time limit and the protective gauze layer;
- a rest period between applications; follow-up phone calls.
An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will review safety data, including any serious adverse event. Participants may leave the study at any time without giving a reason.
Who can take part Healthy civilian men and women aged 18 to 55 years with a body mass index of 18.5-29.9 kg/m² can take part. Military personnel, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and people in dependent relationships with the study organizers are not included. This ensures that participation is fully voluntary.
Expected use of results Results will be reported for each device separately. They are intended to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, with no participant identifiable.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Randomized, open-label (assessor-blinded), two-period, two-sequence crossover within pairs. 120 healthy volunteers are randomized 1:1:1 to one of three device pairs: SICH vs CAT, Dnipro vs CAT, or PULS vs CAT (40 participants per pair). Within each pair, the order of application (Reference → Investigational or Investigational → Reference) is randomized 1:1. The two applications take place on Day 1 and Day 3, with a wash-out between them. All devices are applied exclusively by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum application time 120 seconds). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a Doppler ultrasound assessor blinded to device identity. Each participant serves as their own control for the paired non-inferiority comparison.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SICH → CAT | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the SICH-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): SICH tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once to the limb by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. |
| CAT → SICH | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the SICH-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): SICH tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 1. |
| Dnipro → CAT | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the Dnipro-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): Dnipro tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. |
| CAT → Dnipro | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the Dnipro-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): Dnipro tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 3. |
| PULS → CAT | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the PULS-CAT pair, sequence 1. Period 1 (Day 1): PULS tourniquet (investigational). Period 2 (Day 3): CAT tourniquet (reference). Each device is applied once by a trained operator using a standardized procedure (maximum 120 seconds to occlusion). Arterial occlusion is assessed by a blinded Doppler ultrasound assessor. |
| CAT → PULS | Experimental | Device: Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)Participants randomized to the PULS-CAT pair, sequence 2. Period 1 (Day 1): CAT tourniquet (reference). Period 2 (Day 3): PULS tourniquet (investigational). Application and assessment as in Arm 5. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Men and women aged 18-55 years.
- Absence of vascular, neurological, endocrine, or rheumatological disease.
- Absence of coagulopathies.
- Written informed consent.
- Body mass index (BMI) 18.5-29.9 kg/m².
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Any diagnosed disease of the arterial or venous system affecting vessel patency, vessel-wall integrity, or limb hemodynamics.
- Chronic or acute somatic disease in a progressive or decompensated state.
- History of any confirmed thrombotic or thromboembolic event, regardless of the type of event and its location.
- Sensory impairment of the limbs, or neurological impairment of limb sensory or motor function.
- Current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference)1. Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7. 2. Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet DNIPRO: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7. 3. Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS: applied once by a trained operator to the upper arm or lower thigh; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s, then released. Compared with CAT Gen 7. 4. Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7, Reference device: Combat Application Tourniquet Gen 7 (North American Rescue, USA), CE-marked, TCCC-recommended. Applied once by a trained operator using the same standardized procedure; occlusion confirmed by blinded Doppler within 120 s. | Device | CAT → Dnipro, CAT → PULS, CAT → SICH, Dnipro → CAT, PULS → CAT, SICH → CAT |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Applications Achieving Complete Arterial Occlusion Confirmed by Blinded Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: During each tourniquet application (up to 120 seconds), on Day 1 and Day 3
Complete distal arterial occlusion is defined as sustained absence of a distal arterial signal for at least 10 consecutive seconds, achieved within 120 seconds of the first windlass turn. It is confirmed by a blinded Doppler assessor using peak systolic/end-diastolic velocity, spectral waveform, color Doppler and handheld Doppler. Each application is scored as achieved or not achieved. The proportion of successful applications is compared between each investigational tourniquet (SICH, Dnipro, PULS) and the CAT Gen 7 reference within the same participants, to test non-inferiority.
9 secondary outcomes
Time to Complete Arterial Occlusion
Time frame: During each tourniquet application (up to 120 seconds), Day 1 and Day 3.
Pain Intensity on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately after application, during confirmed occlusion, immediately after device removal, and 30 minutes after removal (4 assessments per period).
Subjective Comfort on a 5-Point Likert Scale
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately after application, during confirmed occlusion (optional), immediately after device removal, and 30 minutes after removal (up to 4 assessments per period)
Recovery of Distal Arterial Perfusion After Device Removal
Time frame: Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 3: 1 ± 2 minutes and 30 ± 3 minutes after device removal.
Number of Application Attempts
Time frame: During each tourniquet application, Day 1 and Day 3.
Proportion of Applications With Loss of Tension During Exposure
Time frame: During each tourniquet application, up to 120 seconds, Day 1 and Day 3
Proportion of Applications With Tourniquet Migration
Time frame: During each tourniquet application, up to 120 seconds, Day 1 and Day 3.
Incidence of Adverse Device Effects (ADEs) and Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs)
Time frame: From first tourniquet application (Day 1) through end of follow-up: Day 4 (24 hours after Period 2), telephone follow-up, and Day 7 visit if symptomatic.
Change in Skin Temperature at the Tourniquet Application Site Measured by Infrared Thermometry.
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 3: immediately before tourniquet application and immediately after device removal.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemorrhage
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
RecruitingObservational study
A Study in Children and, Adults With Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (cTTP) Treated With Adzynma
Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet SICH, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet Dnipro, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet PULS, Windlass-type hemostatic tourniquet CAT Gen 7 (reference) in people with Hemorrhage and Healthy Volunteers, run by Foundation for Expert Deployment for Governance and Economic Growth (EDGE).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tetyana Demidenko, MD (+38 050 488 57 54, tetyanademidenko@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Applications Achieving Complete Arterial Occlusion Confirmed by Blinded Doppler Ultrasound (time frame: During each tourniquet application (up to 120 seconds), on Day 1 and Day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2026.