StrokeCL-SCS-BCINCT07903116
Closed-Loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Hemiplegia
A study testing Spinal Cord Stimulation, Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface and Hand Exoskeleton in people with Stroke and Motor Dysfunction, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study evaluates a new closed-loop rehabilitation system for stroke survivors with arm weakness. The system combines a brain-computer interface (BCI, a special cap that reads brain signals), spinal cord stimulation (a temporary implanted electrode that sends gentle electrical pulses to the spine), and a robotic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Motor Dysfunction, Brain-computer Interface
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Cord Stimulation, Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface and Hand Exoskeleton
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-60 years.
- Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction due to primary stroke.
- Stable brain lesion and underlying etiology.
- Upper limb motor dysfunction for >6 months with no recent improvement despite standardized rehabilitation (plateau phase).
- Detectable wrist/finger extension motor intention (pre-activation recordable by sEMG).
- Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment score 10-42 (moderate to severe).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Affected major muscle strength ≥ grade 1.
- Normal hearing and language comprehension; able to cooperate with training.
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 22.
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Active infection, fever, or unstable vital signs/intracranial condition.
- Need for MRI during device implantation period.
- Hypotonic or flaccid paralysis of affected limb.
- Other causes of motor dysfunction (e.g., ALS, myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophy, hypokalemic periodic paralysis, spondylitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis).
- Severe sports injury or surgical history of affected limb (e.g., muscle tear, tendon rupture, rhabdomyolysis).
- Severe pain or musculoskeletal deformity affecting training.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Previous cervical/thoracic spine surgery, severe spinal deformity, or severe spinal stenosis precluding SCS electrode placement.
- Severe comorbidities (e.g., epilepsy, malignancy, severe cerebrovascular disease/brain tumor, uncontrolled or grade 3 hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, hepatic/renal insufficiency, electrolyte imbalance, coagulopathy, autoimmune disease, long-term use of drugs suppressing neuronal activity).
- Confirmed psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety, OCD, schizophrenia, autism, chronic sleep disorder, consciousness disorder).
- Implanted electronic devices (e.g., cochlear implant, pacemaker/ICD, drug pump).
- Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning pregnancy within 3 months.
- Participated in other clinical trials within past month or currently participating.
- Poor compliance of participant, family, or caregiver.
- Other conditions deemed unsuitable by surgeon/investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100071
Ran Huo, +861059976966
About this study
Official title: Clinical Application Study of Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Brain-Computer Interface System for Motor Function Reconstruction in Post-Stroke Limb Hemiplegia
This study evaluates a new closed-loop rehabilitation system for stroke survivors with arm weakness. The system combines a brain-computer interface (BCI, a special cap that reads brain signals), spinal cord stimulation (a temporary implanted electrode that sends gentle electrical pulses to the spine), and a robotic hand exoskeleton. When the participant imagines moving their affected hand, the system detects this intention from brain signals and immediately triggers the spinal stimulation and robotic assistance to help complete the movement. The goal is to test whether this "brain-spine-hand" closed-loop approach is safe and can improve upper limb function after stroke.
About 30 stroke patients with chronic arm weakness will be enrolled. Participants will first undergo brain signal testing to confirm they can produce detectable movement intentions. Eligible participants will then have a temporary spinal cord stimulator electrode placed under the skin near the spine. Over the next 4 weeks, they will receive daily training sessions (about 90 minutes, 5 days per week) using the closed-loop system. After 4 weeks, the electrode will be removed, and participants will continue standard rehabilitation. Hand and arm function will be assessed before, during, and after the intervention.
- Being tested
- Spinal Cord Stimulation, Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface, Hand Exoskeleton, Motor Imagery Rehabilitation Training
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Neurologic Manifestations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal Cord StimulationDevice
Also called SCS
Temporary invasive spinal cord stimulation triggered by motor intention to facilitate neural excitability.
Non-invasive Brain-Computer InterfaceDevice
Non-invasive EEG-based system for real-time motor intention detection.
Hand ExoskeletonDevice
Robotic exoskeleton guiding affected hand to complete grasping movements, synchronized with decoded motor intention and SCS stimulation.
Motor Imagery Rehabilitation TrainingBehavioural
Closed-loop motor imagery training combining BCI, SCS, and exoskeleton feedback.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation; Device: Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface; Device: Hand Exoskeleton; Behavioral: Motor Imagery Rehabilitation Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Score
Change in upper limb motor function measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). The total score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better upper limb motor function. Change is calculated as the score at 1 month after electrode removal minus the baseline score.
Measured: Baseline and 1 month
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in Action Research Arm Test Score
Upper limb functional performance will be evaluated using the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), which assesses grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movements. The total score ranges from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper limb function. Change will be calculated as the score at 1 month after electrode removal minus the score at Week 4 of stimulation.
Measured: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal) and 1 month after electrode removal
Change in Brunnstrom Recovery Stage of the Upper Extremity
Motor recovery of the affected upper extremity will be assessed using the Brunnstrom Recovery Stages. Recovery is classified into six stages, ranging from Stage I (flaccidity without voluntary movement) to Stage VI (near-normal voluntary movement and coordination). Higher stages indicate better motor recovery. Change will be calculated as the stage at 1 month after electrode removal minus the stage at Week 4 of stimulation.
Measured: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal) and 1 month after electrode removal
Change in Nine-Hole Peg Test Completion Time
Fine motor dexterity of the affected hand will be assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT). The time required to place and remove nine pegs will be recorded in seconds. Shorter completion times indicate better fine motor performance. Change will be calculated as the completion time at each follow-up assessment minus the completion time at electrode removal.
Measured: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Change in Grip Strength of the Affected Hand
Grip strength of the affected hand will be measured using a hand dynamometer and recorded in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater grip strength. Change will be calculated as the grip strength at each follow-up assessment minus the grip strength at electrode removal.
Measured: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Change in Lateral Pinch Strength of the Affected Hand
Lateral pinch strength of the affected hand will be measured using a pinch gauge and recorded in kilograms (kg). Lateral pinch strength represents the force generated between the thumb and the lateral aspect of the index finger. Higher values indicate greater pinch strength. Change will be calculated as the value at each follow-up assessment minus the value at electrode removal.
Measured: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZhongGuancun YiXin Institute Of Medical Engineering
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Yong Cao, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07903116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KYXM202605085208002
- Other IDs
- NJJK-01
- Acronym
- CL-SCS-BCI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Application Study of Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation Brain-Computer Interface System for Motor Function Reconstruction in Post-Stroke Limb Hemiplegia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07903116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CL-SCS-BCI / KYXM202605085208002
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- ZhongGuancun YiXin Institute Of Medical Engineering
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates a new closed-loop rehabilitation system for stroke survivors with arm weakness. The system combines a brain-computer interface (BCI, a special cap that reads brain signals), spinal cord stimulation (a temporary implanted electrode that sends gentle electrical pulses to the spine), and a robotic hand exoskeleton. When the participant imagines moving their affected hand, the system detects this intention from brain signals and immediately triggers the spinal stimulation and robotic assistance to help complete the movement. The goal is to test whether this "brain-spine-hand" closed-loop approach is safe and can improve upper limb function after stroke.
About 30 stroke patients with chronic arm weakness will be enrolled. Participants will first undergo brain signal testing to confirm they can produce detectable movement intentions. Eligible participants will then have a temporary spinal cord stimulator electrode placed under the skin near the spine. Over the next 4 weeks, they will receive daily training sessions (about 90 minutes, 5 days per week) using the closed-loop system. After 4 weeks, the electrode will be removed, and participants will continue standard rehabilitation. Hand and arm function will be assessed before, during, and after the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Experimental | Device: Spinal Cord Stimulation, Device: Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface, Device: Hand Exoskeleton, Behavioral: Motor Imagery Rehabilitation Training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age 18-60 years.
- Unilateral upper limb motor dysfunction due to primary stroke.
- Stable brain lesion and underlying etiology.
- Upper limb motor dysfunction for >6 months with no recent improvement despite standardized rehabilitation (plateau phase).
- Detectable wrist/finger extension motor intention (pre-activation recordable by sEMG).
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Active infection, fever, or unstable vital signs/intracranial condition.
- Need for MRI during device implantation period.
- Hypotonic or flaccid paralysis of affected limb.
- Other causes of motor dysfunction (e.g., ALS, myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophy, hypokalemic periodic paralysis, spondylitis, arthritis, osteomyelitis).
- Severe sports injury or surgical history of affected limb (e.g., muscle tear, tendon rupture, rhabdomyolysis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Cord StimulationAlso: SCSTemporary invasive spinal cord stimulation triggered by motor intention to facilitate neural excitability. | Device | Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation |
| Non-invasive Brain-Computer InterfaceNon-invasive EEG-based system for real-time motor intention detection. | Device | Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation |
| Hand ExoskeletonRobotic exoskeleton guiding affected hand to complete grasping movements, synchronized with decoded motor intention and SCS stimulation. | Device | Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation |
| Motor Imagery Rehabilitation TrainingClosed-loop motor imagery training combining BCI, SCS, and exoskeleton feedback. | Behavioural | Closed-loop SCS-BCI for Post-Stroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Score
Time frame: Baseline and 1 month
Change in upper limb motor function measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). The total score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better upper limb motor function. Change is calculated as the score at 1 month after electrode removal minus the baseline score.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in Action Research Arm Test Score
Time frame: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal) and 1 month after electrode removal
Change in Brunnstrom Recovery Stage of the Upper Extremity
Time frame: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal) and 1 month after electrode removal
Change in Nine-Hole Peg Test Completion Time
Time frame: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Change in Grip Strength of the Affected Hand
Time frame: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Change in Lateral Pinch Strength of the Affected Hand
Time frame: Week 4 of stimulation (electrode removal), 1 month and 2 months after electrode removal
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Transferring Speed of Processing Gains to Everyday Cognitive Tasks After Stroke
Stroke, Cognitive Dysfunction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Speaking-Valve-Based Decannulation Protocol for Tracheostomized Stroke Patients
Stroke Patients, Tracheostomy
RecruitingPhase 4
Blood Pressure Reduction to Limit the Evolution of Vascular Brain Lesions in Elderly Individuals
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Early Tendon Vibrations on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After a Stroke
Acute Stroke, Upper Limb Motor Deficit
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Metformin in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal Cord Stimulation, Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface and Hand Exoskeleton in people with Stroke and Motor Dysfunction, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ran Huo (+861059976966, huoran@bjtth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Score (time frame: Baseline and 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.