Multiple MyelomaPhase 3TRIlogy-6NCT07903272
A Trial Comparing Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Eligible
A Phase 3 study testing Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare how well Ramantamig plus Daratumumab (ramantamig-D) works compared with a treatment that includes Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd), followed by high-dose therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (using the participant's own stem cells), and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 14 Dec 2026to 11 Jan 2037
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
- Be considered a candidate for high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and commit to treatment with transplant. Transplant eligibility will be determined by the investigator per institutional standard of care, consistent with applicable regional guidelines
- Measurable disease as assessed by central laboratory at screening
- Have an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF)
Who cannot join
- History of uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to: a. Acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease, b. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (<)50 percent (%) of predicted, c. Moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years or uncontrolled asthma of any classification, d. Evidence of active systemic viral, fungal, or bacterial infection requiring systemic antiviral, antifungal, or antimicrobial therapy, e. Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy within 6 months before start of trial intervention. f. Disabling psychiatric conditions (for example, alcohol or drug abuse), severe dementia, or altered mental status, g. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or seizure within 6 months prior to randomization, h. Peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher, as defined by the national cancer institute (NCI) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 6.0
- Received any prior or current systemic therapy or stem cell transplant for any plasma cell dyscrasia, such as, but not limited to, smoldering MM, with the exception of emergency use of a short course of corticosteroids. Participants are allowed corticosteroids not exceeding greater than (>) 160 milligram (mg) of dexamethasone (or equivalent) within 14 days prior to trial intervention
- Received a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inducer within 5 half-lives prior to randomization
- Concurrent use of any investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the respective drug/investigational medicinal product (IMP) (whichever is longer) before randomization or currently enrolled in an investigational trial
- Radiotherapy on measurable soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) is not permitted even in the setting of palliation for symptomatic management. However, if the radiation is given for palliative purposes and the radiation portal covers less than or equal to (<=) 5% of the bone marrow reserve, the participant is eligible irrespective of the end date of radiotherapy
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial Comparing Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) Maintenance (DVRd + High-dose Therapy [HDT] + ASCT + DR) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Eligible
The purpose of this study is to compare how well Ramantamig plus Daratumumab (ramantamig-D) works compared with a treatment that includes Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd), followed by high-dose therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (using the participant's own stem cells), and maintenance treatment with Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), a blood cancer affecting plasma cells, who are eligible for transplant.
Read the detailed description
TRIlogy-6 trial is being conducted by 2 sponsors: J\&J (N=325) and EMN (N=675); the combined total of 1000 participants enrolled by both sponsors will be analyzed.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Ramantamig, Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RamantamigDrug
Also called JNJ-79635322
Ramantamig will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection.
DaratumumabDrug
Also called JNJ-54767414
Daratumumab will be administered as SC injection.
BortezomibDrug
Bortezomib will be administered as SC injection.
LenalidomideDrug
Lenalidomide will be administered orally.
DexamethasoneDrug
Dexamethasone will be administered orally or intravenously (IV).
HDT+ASCTDrug
HDT and ASCT will be performed as per standard of care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) | Experimental | Participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) dose of ramantamig-D. Receives: Drug: Ramantamig; Drug: Daratumumab |
| Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR | Active comparator | Participants will receive Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) along with High-Dose Therapy (HDT), Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) maintenance for 2 years or until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity whichever occurs first. Participants will have the option to continue lenalidomide and/or daratumumab maintenance therapy beyond 2 years, until PD, at the investigator's discretion and sponsor approval. Receives: Drug: Daratumumab; Drug: Bortezomib; Drug: Lenalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: HDT+ASCT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either confirmed progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. PD will be determined according to international myeloma working group (IMWG) response criteria.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR)
12-month MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 12 months (plus minus [+-] 3 months) from randomization, as determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS), prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]).
Measured: Up to approximately 12 months
Secondary outcomes (21)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death due to any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, then the participant's data will be censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants Achieving 24-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR
24-month sustained MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative CR status, as determined by NGS, for at least 24 months without any examination showing MRD positive status in between, and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including ASCT).
Measured: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
VGPR or better is defined as participants who achieve VGPR, CR, or stringent complete response (sCR) prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Complete Response (CR) or Better
CR or better is defined as participants who achieve CR or sCR prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Overall Response (ORR)
Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieve partial response (PR) or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Overall MRD-Negative CR
Overall MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD negative status, as determined by NGS, at any time point after randomization and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy and who achieve CR or better.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR
12-month sustained MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative CR status, as determined by NGS, for at least 12 months without any examination showing MRD positive status in between, and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including ASCT).
Measured: Up to 5 years
Progression-Free Survival 2 (PFS2)
PFS2 is defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and date of event, which is defined as PD, as assessed by investigator, on the first subsequent line of antimyeloma therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Severity
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. Any new or worsening AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study treatment through the day of last dose plus 30 days or prior to the start of subsequent anticancer therapy will be considered treatment-related regardless of the start date of the event. TEAEs will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 6.0. Severity scale ranges from Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, Grade 5= death related to adverse event.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants with Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
Number of participants with abnormalities in laboratory parameters (serum chemistry and hematology) will be reported.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Symptoms and Functioning Using the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) Scale Scores
The MySIm-Q is a disease-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment with established content validity for participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is included to be complementary to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). It includes 17 items resulting in a symptom subscale and an impact subscale. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.
Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC QLQ C30 Scale Scores
The EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3 includes 30 items that make up 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social); 1 global health status scale; 3 symptom scales (pain, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting); 5 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea); and a single impact item (financial difficulties). The item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.
Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Scores
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered, generic health status measure, consisting of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression), each with 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to perform or extreme problems). Higher scores indicate worse HRQoL.
Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the MySIm-Q scale scores will be reported. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale scores will be reported. The item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the EQ-5D-5L scale scores will be reported. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health each with 5 levels of severity with higher scores indicating worse HRQoL.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using MySIm-Q scale score will be reported. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale score will be reported. he item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using EQ-5D-5L scale score will be reported. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health each with 5 levels of severity with higher scores indicating worse HRQoL.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants Who Report Side Effect Burden as Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item List (EORTC IL) 46
The EORTC IL46 consists of a single question that measures global impression of burden due to treatment-related symptoms. The response options range from "not at all" to "very much" on a 4 point scale.
Measured: Up to approximately 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2026
- Study start14 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion11 Jan 2037 (estimated)
- Study completion11 Jan 2037 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Myeloma Network B.V.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07903272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 79635322MMY3003
- Other IDs
- 2026-528315-27-00
- Acronym
- TRIlogy-6
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at www.innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Randomized Trial Comparing Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) Maintenance (DVRd + High-dose Therapy [HDT] + ASCT + DR) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Eligible
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07903272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRIlogy-6 / 79635322MMY3003
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- European Myeloma Network B.V.
- Study start
- 14 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 11 Jan 2037 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 11 Jan 2037 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare how well Ramantamig plus Daratumumab (ramantamig-D) works compared with a treatment that includes Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd), followed by high-dose therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (using the participant's own stem cells), and maintenance treatment with Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), a blood cancer affecting plasma cells, who are eligible for transplant.
Detailed description
TRIlogy-6 trial is being conducted by 2 sponsors: J\&J (N=325) and EMN (N=675); the combined total of 1000 participants enrolled by both sponsors will be analyzed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) | Experimental | Drug: Ramantamig, Drug: DaratumumabParticipants will receive subcutaneous (SC) dose of ramantamig-D. |
| Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR | Active comparator | Drug: Daratumumab, Drug: Bortezomib, Drug: Lenalidomide, Drug: Dexamethasone, Drug: HDT+ASCTParticipants will receive Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) along with High-Dose Therapy (HDT), Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) maintenance for 2 years or until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity whichever occurs first. Participants will have the option to continue lenalidomide and/or daratumumab maintenance therapy beyond 2 years, until PD, at the investigator's discretion and sponsor approval. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
- Be considered a candidate for high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and commit to treatment with transplant. Transplant eligibility will be determined by the investigator per institutional standard of care, consistent with applicable regional guidelines
- Measurable disease as assessed by central laboratory at screening
- Have an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- History of uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to: a. Acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease, b. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (<)50 percent (%) of predicted, c. Moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years or uncontrolled asthma of any classification, d. Evidence of active systemic viral, fungal, or bacterial infection requiring systemic antiviral, antifungal, or antimicrobial therapy, e. Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy within 6 months before start of trial intervention. f. Disabling psychiatric conditions (for example, alcohol or drug abuse), severe dementia, or altered mental status, g. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or seizure within 6 months prior to randomization, h. Peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher, as defined by the national cancer institute (NCI) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 6.0
- Received any prior or current systemic therapy or stem cell transplant for any plasma cell dyscrasia, such as, but not limited to, smoldering MM, with the exception of emergency use of a short course of corticosteroids. Participants are allowed corticosteroids not exceeding greater than (>) 160 milligram (mg) of dexamethasone (or equivalent) within 14 days prior to trial intervention
- Received a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inducer within 5 half-lives prior to randomization
- Concurrent use of any investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the respective drug/investigational medicinal product (IMP) (whichever is longer) before randomization or currently enrolled in an investigational trial
- Radiotherapy on measurable soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) is not permitted even in the setting of palliation for symptomatic management. However, if the radiation is given for palliative purposes and the radiation portal covers less than or equal to (<=) 5% of the bone marrow reserve, the participant is eligible irrespective of the end date of radiotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RamantamigAlso: JNJ-79635322Ramantamig will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection. | Drug | Arm A: Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) |
| DaratumumabAlso: JNJ-54767414Daratumumab will be administered as SC injection. | Drug | Arm A: Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D), Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR |
| BortezomibBortezomib will be administered as SC injection. | Drug | Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR |
| LenalidomideLenalidomide will be administered orally. | Drug | Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR |
| DexamethasoneDexamethasone will be administered orally or intravenously (IV). | Drug | Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR |
| HDT+ASCTHDT and ASCT will be performed as per standard of care. | Drug | Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DR |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either confirmed progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. PD will be determined according to international myeloma working group (IMWG) response criteria.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months
12-month MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 12 months (plus minus [+-] 3 months) from randomization, as determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS), prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]).
21 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants Achieving 24-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Complete Response (CR) or Better
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Overall Response (ORR)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants with Overall MRD-Negative CR
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Progression-Free Survival 2 (PFS2)
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Severity
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Number of Participants with Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Symptoms and Functioning Using the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) Scale Scores
Time frame: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC QLQ C30 Scale Scores
Time frame: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Scores
Time frame: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Percentage of Participants Who Report Side Effect Burden as Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item List (EORTC IL) 46
Time frame: Up to approximately 10 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at www.innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Study Contact (844-434-4210, Participate-In-This-Study1@its.jnj.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Up to approximately 10 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.