AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3TRIlogy-6NCT07903272

A Trial Comparing Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Eligible

A Phase 3 study testing Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare how well Ramantamig plus Daratumumab (ramantamig-D) works compared with a treatment that includes Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd), followed by high-dose therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (using the participant's own stem cells), and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
14 Dec 2026to 11 Jan 2037
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
  • Be considered a candidate for high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and commit to treatment with transplant. Transplant eligibility will be determined by the investigator per institutional standard of care, consistent with applicable regional guidelines
  • Measurable disease as assessed by central laboratory at screening
  • Have an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
  • Participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF)

Who cannot join

  • History of uncontrolled illness, including but not limited to: a. Acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease, b. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with an forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than (<)50 percent (%) of predicted, c. Moderate or severe persistent asthma within the past 2 years or uncontrolled asthma of any classification, d. Evidence of active systemic viral, fungal, or bacterial infection requiring systemic antiviral, antifungal, or antimicrobial therapy, e. Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy within 6 months before start of trial intervention. f. Disabling psychiatric conditions (for example, alcohol or drug abuse), severe dementia, or altered mental status, g. Stroke, transient ischemic attack, or seizure within 6 months prior to randomization, h. Peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain Grade 2 or higher, as defined by the national cancer institute (NCI) common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 6.0
  • Received any prior or current systemic therapy or stem cell transplant for any plasma cell dyscrasia, such as, but not limited to, smoldering MM, with the exception of emergency use of a short course of corticosteroids. Participants are allowed corticosteroids not exceeding greater than (>) 160 milligram (mg) of dexamethasone (or equivalent) within 14 days prior to trial intervention
  • Received a strong cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) inducer within 5 half-lives prior to randomization
  • Concurrent use of any investigational agent within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the respective drug/investigational medicinal product (IMP) (whichever is longer) before randomization or currently enrolled in an investigational trial
  • Radiotherapy on measurable soft tissue plasmacytoma(s) is not permitted even in the setting of palliation for symptomatic management. However, if the radiation is given for palliative purposes and the radiation portal covers less than or equal to (<=) 5% of the bone marrow reserve, the participant is eligible irrespective of the end date of radiotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial Comparing Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D) Versus Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) Maintenance (DVRd + High-dose Therapy [HDT] + ASCT + DR) in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant Eligible

The purpose of this study is to compare how well Ramantamig plus Daratumumab (ramantamig-D) works compared with a treatment that includes Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd), followed by high-dose therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (using the participant's own stem cells), and maintenance treatment with Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), a blood cancer affecting plasma cells, who are eligible for transplant.

Read the detailed description

TRIlogy-6 trial is being conducted by 2 sponsors: J\&J (N=325) and EMN (N=675); the combined total of 1000 participants enrolled by both sponsors will be analyzed.

Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RamantamigDrug

    Also called JNJ-79635322

    Ramantamig will be administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection.

  • DaratumumabDrug

    Also called JNJ-54767414

    Daratumumab will be administered as SC injection.

  • BortezomibDrug

    Bortezomib will be administered as SC injection.

  • LenalidomideDrug

    Lenalidomide will be administered orally.

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    Dexamethasone will be administered orally or intravenously (IV).

  • HDT+ASCTDrug

    HDT and ASCT will be performed as per standard of care.

Study groups in NCT07903272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: Ramantamig and Daratumumab (Ramantamig-D)ExperimentalParticipants will receive subcutaneous (SC) dose of ramantamig-D.
Receives: Drug: Ramantamig; Drug: Daratumumab
Arm B: DVRd+ HDT+ ASCT+ DRActive comparatorParticipants will receive Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DVRd) along with High-Dose Therapy (HDT), Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) and Daratumumab and Lenalidomide (DR) maintenance for 2 years or until progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity whichever occurs first. Participants will have the option to continue lenalidomide and/or daratumumab maintenance therapy beyond 2 years, until PD, at the investigator's discretion and sponsor approval.
Receives: Drug: Daratumumab; Drug: Bortezomib; Drug: Lenalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone; Drug: HDT+ASCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the duration from the date of randomization to either confirmed progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurs first. PD will be determined according to international myeloma working group (IMWG) response criteria.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-Negative Complete Response (CR)

    12-month MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative status at 12 months (plus minus [+-] 3 months) from randomization, as determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS), prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]).

    Measured: Up to approximately 12 months

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death due to any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, then the participant's data will be censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving 24-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR

    24-month sustained MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative CR status, as determined by NGS, for at least 24 months without any examination showing MRD positive status in between, and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including ASCT).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  3. Percentage of Participants with Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better

    VGPR or better is defined as participants who achieve VGPR, CR, or stringent complete response (sCR) prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  4. Percentage of Participants with Complete Response (CR) or Better

    CR or better is defined as participants who achieve CR or sCR prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  5. Percentage of Participants with Overall Response (ORR)

    Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants who achieve partial response (PR) or better prior to subsequent antimyeloma therapy, in accordance with the IMWG criteria, during or after the trial intervention.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  6. Percentage of Participants with Overall MRD-Negative CR

    Overall MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD negative status, as determined by NGS, at any time point after randomization and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy and who achieve CR or better.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving 12-Month Sustained MRD-Negative CR

    12-month sustained MRD-negative CR is defined as participants who achieve MRD-negative CR status, as determined by NGS, for at least 12 months without any examination showing MRD positive status in between, and prior to PD or subsequent antimyeloma therapy (including ASCT).

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  8. Progression-Free Survival 2 (PFS2)

    PFS2 is defined as the time interval between the date of randomization and date of event, which is defined as PD, as assessed by investigator, on the first subsequent line of antimyeloma therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) by Severity

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. Any new or worsening AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study treatment through the day of last dose plus 30 days or prior to the start of subsequent anticancer therapy will be considered treatment-related regardless of the start date of the event. TEAEs will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 6.0. Severity scale ranges from Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, Grade 5= death related to adverse event.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  11. Number of Participants with Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters

    Number of participants with abnormalities in laboratory parameters (serum chemistry and hematology) will be reported.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  12. Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL), Symptoms and Functioning Using the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) Scale Scores

    The MySIm-Q is a disease-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment with established content validity for participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is included to be complementary to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). It includes 17 items resulting in a symptom subscale and an impact subscale. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.

    Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years

  13. Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC QLQ C30 Scale Scores

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3 includes 30 items that make up 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social); 1 global health status scale; 3 symptom scales (pain, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting); 5 single symptom items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea); and a single impact item (financial difficulties). The item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.

    Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years

  14. Change from Baseline in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 5-Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) Scale Scores

    The EQ-5D-5L is a self-administered, generic health status measure, consisting of a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). The descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression), each with 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to perform or extreme problems). Higher scores indicate worse HRQoL.

    Measured: From Baseline up to approximately 10 years

  15. Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores

    Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the MySIm-Q scale scores will be reported. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  16. Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores

    Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale scores will be reported. The item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  17. Time to Worsening in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores

    Time to worsening in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using the EQ-5D-5L scale scores will be reported. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health each with 5 levels of severity with higher scores indicating worse HRQoL.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  18. Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the MySIm-Q Scale Scores

    Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using MySIm-Q scale score will be reported. The recall period is the "past 7 days" and responses are reported on a 5-point verbal rating scale. Higher scores indicate greater severity/impact.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  19. Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Scale Scores

    Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale score will be reported. he item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater HRQoL, better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  20. Percentage of Participants With Meaningful Improvement in HRQoL, Symptoms and Functioning Using the EQ-5D-5L Scale Scores

    Percentage of participants with meaningful improvement in HRQoL, symptoms and functioning using EQ-5D-5L scale score will be reported. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions of health each with 5 levels of severity with higher scores indicating worse HRQoL.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

  21. Percentage of Participants Who Report Side Effect Burden as Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item List (EORTC IL) 46

    The EORTC IL46 consists of a single question that measures global impression of burden due to treatment-related symptoms. The response options range from "not at all" to "very much" on a 4 point scale.

    Measured: Up to approximately 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2026
  2. Study start14 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion11 Jan 2037 (estimated)
  4. Study completion11 Jan 2037 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07903272
Sponsor's protocol ID
79635322MMY3003
Other IDs
2026-528315-27-00
Acronym
TRIlogy-6
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
23 Oct 2026
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data sharing policy of Johnson \& Johnson Innovative Medicine is available at www.innovativemedicine.jnj.com/our-innovation/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ramantamig, Daratumumab and Bortezomib in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Study Contact (844-434-4210, Participate-In-This-Study1@its.jnj.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (time frame: Up to approximately 10 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in