Child MalnutritionNCT07906067
Laser Height Measuring Device Study in Vietnam
An observational study of Child Malnutrition and Wasting Syndrome, run by World Vision US at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate whether a portable laser device can accurately measure the height and length of children younger than 5 years in Quang Nam, Vietnam. Accurate height and length measurements are important for monitoring child growth and identifying children who may have wasting or stunting and need referral for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Child Malnutrition, Wasting Syndrome, Stunting
- What is being tested?
- Laser Height/Length Measuring Device and ShorrBoard
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 571 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- 28 May 2025to 1 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 59 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: The study population is drawn from community-dwelling children in selected villages in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Recruitment is embedded within the local routine child-growth monitoring and surveillance activities coordinated with the Ministry of Health and the provincial Centre for Disease Control. Households with young children in the selected villages will be mobilized and invited to attend measurement activities. Data collection will take place across eight villages, using trained community health worker teams and expert anthropometrists. The setting represents rural outreach conditions, including hot and humid environmental conditions, in which portable child anthropometry devices may be used.
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 0 through 59 months at the time of measurement.
- Living in, or present for routine child-growth monitoring in, one of the selected study villages in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam.
- Parent or legally authorized caregiver is able and willing to provide informed consent for the child to participate.
- Child is able to undergo routine length or height measurement with both the laser device and the ShorrBoard.
Who cannot join
- Child has a condition or physical limitation that prevents safe or valid measurement of recumbent length or standing height, such as severe spinal curvature or inability to position the legs appropriately for measurement.
- Parent or legally authorized caregiver does not provide informed consent.
- Child is too distressed, unwell, or unable to complete the required measurement procedures safely, as determined by trained study staff.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Validation Study of a Laser Anthropometric Device for Measuring Height and Length of Children Less Than 60 Months in Vietnam
This study will evaluate whether a portable laser device can accurately measure the height and length of children younger than 5 years in Quang Nam, Vietnam. Accurate height and length measurements are important for monitoring child growth and identifying children who may have wasting or stunting and need referral for health or nutrition services. Standard wooden measuring boards are reliable but can be heavy, costly, and difficult to use in community outreach settings.
The study will compare the laser device with the ShorrBoard, a standard wooden height/length board. Children aged 0-59 months whose caregivers provide consent will have their length (for younger children) or standing height (for older children) measured using both devices by trained community health workers and expert anthropometrists.
Read more
The main question is: Does the laser device produce height and length measurements that agree closely with the standard ShorrBoard and are similarly precise and reliable when used by frontline health workers?
The study hypothesis is that the laser device will show high agreement with the ShorrBoard and will be at least as precise and reliable for measuring children's height and length in a rural outreach setting. The study will also examine whether use of the two devices leads to different classifications of child wasting or stunting based on standard growth indicators.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, cross-sectional validation study conducted in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, to evaluate a portable laser-based anthropometric device for measuring recumbent length in children aged 0-23.9 months and standing height in children aged 24-59.9 months. The study is embedded within the sampling frame of the national routine child-growth monitoring activities. Quang Nam was selected because it includes hot and humid field conditions, where a portable device intended for community outreach must perform reliably.
The investigational device is a compact, battery-powered laser device designed for field measurement of child length and height. It will be evaluated against the ShorrBoard, a wooden length/height board used as the reference measurement method. The laser device is designed to be lighter, more portable, and easier to transport than conventional boards while retaining the measurement performance needed for child growth assessment in outreach settings. Measurements will be performed by trained community health workers and expert anthropometrists to assess device performance under conditions relevant to routine service delivery.
All households with children younger than 60 months in selected villages will be invited to participate. Data collection will occur across eight villages. Teams will include two measurers and one recorder; expert teams will remain consistent across villages, while volunteer community-health-worker teams will be recruited and trained for groups of villages.
Each enrolled child will undergo repeated length or height measurements with both the laser device and ShorrBoard. Children younger than 24 months will be measured lying down for recumbent length; children aged 24-59.9 months will be measured standing. Each device will be calibrated using a meter rule before use. Measurements will be recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. When two repeated measurements differ by more than 0.7 cm, a third measurement will be obtained; the two closest values will be retained for analysis.
To reduce potential measurement-order bias, the device used first by community health worker teams will alternate by day. Individual staff roles will remain stable during each data-collection day. Measurement locations will be designated by device, and teams will rotate between locations to balance environmental conditions such as lighting and temperature. Measurements by the different teams will be separated by at least 30 minutes to reduce recall effects while allowing assessment of consistency across time.
The sample size will be calculated to provide 90% statistical power to establish equivalence between the laser device and the conventional ShorrBoard using the Two One-sided Tests (TOST) procedure, with a prespecified equivalence margin of ±0.2 cm and a 5% significance level (α = 0.05). Assuming a true mean difference of 0 cm and a standard deviation of paired measurement differences of 0.671 cm, approximately 124 children with complete paired measurements will be required per age group. After adjusting for an anticipated 20% dropout or incomplete measurement rate, the minimum recruitment target will be 155 children per age group, or 310 children in total. Because the study will be conducted alongside routine growth-monitoring activities, all eligible children who present within the selected catchment areas may be measured, even if the target sample is exceeded.
Agreement between the laser device and reference measurements will be assessed using Bland-Altman methods, including the mean between-method difference and limits of agreement. Inter-method technical error of measurement will also be calculated. Reliability and repeatability will be assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, including consistency across measurers, devices, and measurement time points. Precision of repeated measurements will be assessed using standard deviations, coefficients of variation, and intra-rater technical error of measurement. Analyses will additionally examine whether the choice of measurement device changes categorical classification based on weight-for-length/height and length/height-for-age indices; paired categorical classifications will be compared using McNemar's test.
Data will be collected electronically using KoboCollect on Android devices, with paper tools available as backup. Electronic forms will incorporate required fields, range checks, and skip logic to reduce entry errors. Equipment calibration results will be recorded before measurement sessions. Field data will be reviewed daily using Excel and ENA for SMART/ENA 2008 software to identify digit preference, implausible anthropometric values, or enumerator-specific quality concerns. Measurements requiring verification may be repeated the following day, and field staff may be retrained when data-quality checks indicate a need.
Data will be transferred from encrypted, password-protected devices to the World Vision KoboCollect server when connectivity is available and subsequently to secure London School of Hygiene \& Tropical Medicine servers for processing. Identifiable information will be stored separately from study measurements and linked only through a study identifier. The analytical dataset will be de-identified before analysis. Data cleaning, processing, and analysis will be conducted in R using reproducible analysis scripts. Missing, unavailable, or implausible measurements will be reviewed against source records and protocol-based quality rules; measurements that cannot be verified will be documented and handled as missing in the relevant analysis.
This is a minimal-risk, non-invasive measurement study. Trained staff will follow standardized procedures intended to maintain children's comfort and safe positioning during measurement. Children identified through study measurements as meeting criteria for severe wasting will be referred to the nearest health facility for assessment and services according to applicable national guidance.
- Conditions
- Child Malnutrition, Wasting Syndrome, Stunting
- Being tested
- Laser Height/Length Measuring Device, ShorrBoard
- Keywords
- digital anthropometric devices, laser device, height, length, anthropometry, child
- Medical subject headings
- Child Nutrition Disorders, Wasting Syndrome, Growth Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laser Height/Length Measuring DeviceDevice
Laser Height/Length Measuring Device is the innovative digital device being validated
ShorrBoardDevice
Conventional wooden height board
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy and equivalence of laser height/length measurements compared with the ShorrBoard
The mean paired difference in height/length measurements (cm) between the laser device and conventional ShorrBoard when operated by expert measurers. Equivalence will be assessed using the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure with a prespecified equivalence margin of ±0.2 cm and a significance level of 0.05. Equivalence will be established if the entire 90% confidence interval of the mean paired difference falls within -0.2 to +0.2 cm.
Measured: Day 1
Intra-observer measurement precision (Technical Error of Measurement, TEM)
Measurement precision will be evaluated using TEM, calculated from repeated height/length measurements obtained with each device by expert measurers and community volunteers. Two measurements will be obtained initially. If the difference exceeds 0.7 cm, a third measurement will be taken, and the two closest readings will be retained. TEM will be calculated as √[Σ(d²)/(2n)] and reported in centimetres and millimetres. The expert ShorrBoard TEM must be less than 0.4 cm to qualify as an acceptable reference measurement process.
Measured: Day 1
Agreement between laser device and ShorrBoard height/length measurements
Agreement between the two devices will be evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, including mean measurement bias and 95% limits of agreement (mean paired difference ±1.96 standard deviations). Results will be expressed in centimetres and presented overall and separately by measurer cadre.
Measured: Day 1
Reliability and concordance of height/length measurements
Agreement between measurements obtained using the laser device and ShorrBoard will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement (ICC[A,1]) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). These statistics will quantify the consistency and concordance of measurements between devices.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (7)
Measurement accuracy by measurer cadre
The mean paired difference between laser and ShorrBoard measurements will be calculated separately for expert measurers and community volunteers to determine whether device accuracy differs according to measurer experience.
Measured: Day 1
Differences between expert and community volunteer measurements
The mean differences in height/length measurements between expert measurers and community volunteers will be evaluated separately for the laser device and ShorrBoard to assess measurer-related systematic bias.
Measured: Day 1
Device-by-measurer interaction
A linear mixed-effects model will assess whether the difference between laser and ShorrBoard measurements varies by measurer cadre. The interaction will be quantified as the difference between the volunteer and expert laser-minus-ShorrBoard contrasts.
Measured: Day 1
Differences in anthropometric z-scores
Differences in height-for-age/length-for-age (HAZ/LAZ) and weight-for-height/weight-for-length (WHZ/WLZ) z-scores derived from laser and ShorrBoard measurements will be calculated using WHO 2006 Child Growth Standards.
Measured: During a single study visit; repeated measurements with both devices are obtained at least 30 minutes apart
Agreement in stunting classification
Agreement in classifying children as stunted (HAZ/LAZ <-2) or severely stunted (HAZ/LAZ <-3) will be compared between devices using cross-tabulations, Cohen's kappa, and McNemar's test.
Measured: Day 1
Agreement in wasting classification
Agreement in classifying children as wasted (WHZ/WLZ <-2) or severely wasted (WHZ/WLZ <-3) will be compared between devices using cross-tabulations, Cohen's kappa, and McNemar's test.
Measured: Day 1
Differences in estimated prevalence of stunting and wasting
The prevalence of stunting, severe stunting, wasting, and severe wasting will be estimated separately using laser-derived and ShorrBoard-derived measurements. Paired prevalence differences will be reported in percentage points with 95% confidence intervals.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2026
- Study start28 May 2025
- Primary completion1 Jun 2025
- Study completion1 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Child MalnutritionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 571 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- World Vision US
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Charles Opondo, PhD, Study chair, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineHilary Davies-Kershaw, PhD, Study chair, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07906067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 024-066/DD-YTCC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the publication will be shared. This will include relevant participant-level demographic and baseline characteristics, anthropometric measurements, intervention allocation, follow-up measurements, and primary and secondary outcome variables used in the final analyses. Derived variables required to reproduce the published analyses will also be included. All direct identifiers and any variables that could reasonably enable participant re-identification will be removed prior to sharing. The shared dataset will therefore contain only the minimum de-identified participant-level data necessary to reproduce and further examine the reported study findings.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Validation Study of a Laser Anthropometric Device for Measuring Height and Length of Children Less Than 60 Months in Vietnam
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07906067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 024-066/DD-YTCC
- Conditions
- Child Malnutrition, Wasting Syndrome, Stunting
- Keywords
- digital anthropometric devices, laser device, height, length, anthropometry, child
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 571 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- World Vision USUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate whether a portable laser device can accurately measure the height and length of children younger than 5 years in Quang Nam, Vietnam. Accurate height and length measurements are important for monitoring child growth and identifying children who may have wasting or stunting and need referral for health or nutrition services. Standard wooden measuring boards are reliable but can be heavy, costly, and difficult to use in community outreach settings.
The study will compare the laser device with the ShorrBoard, a standard wooden height/length board. Children aged 0-59 months whose caregivers provide consent will have their length (for younger children) or standing height (for older children) measured using both devices by trained community health workers and expert anthropometrists.
The main question is: Does the laser device produce height and length measurements that agree closely with the standard ShorrBoard and are similarly precise and reliable when used by frontline health workers?
The study hypothesis is that the laser device will show high agreement with the ShorrBoard and will be at least as precise and reliable for measuring children's height and length in a rural outreach setting. The study will also examine whether use of the two devices leads to different classifications of child wasting or stunting based on standard growth indicators.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, cross-sectional validation study conducted in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, to evaluate a portable laser-based anthropometric device for measuring recumbent length in children aged 0-23.9 months and standing height in children aged 24-59.9 months. The study is embedded within the sampling frame of the national routine child-growth monitoring activities. Quang Nam was selected because it includes hot and humid field conditions, where a portable device intended for community outreach must perform reliably.
The investigational device is a compact, battery-powered laser device designed for field measurement of child length and height. It will be evaluated against the ShorrBoard, a wooden length/height board used as the reference measurement method. The laser device is designed to be lighter, more portable, and easier to transport than conventional boards while retaining the measurement performance needed for child growth assessment in outreach settings. Measurements will be performed by trained community health workers and expert anthropometrists to assess device performance under conditions relevant to routine service delivery.
All households with children younger than 60 months in selected villages will be invited to participate. Data collection will occur across eight villages. Teams will include two measurers and one recorder; expert teams will remain consistent across villages, while volunteer community-health-worker teams will be recruited and trained for groups of villages.
Each enrolled child will undergo repeated length or height measurements with both the laser device and ShorrBoard. Children younger than 24 months will be measured lying down for recumbent length; children aged 24-59.9 months will be measured standing. Each device will be calibrated using a meter rule before use. Measurements will be recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm. When two repeated measurements differ by more than 0.7 cm, a third measurement will be obtained; the two closest values will be retained for analysis.
To reduce potential measurement-order bias, the device used first by community health worker teams will alternate by day. Individual staff roles will remain stable during each data-collection day. Measurement locations will be designated by device, and teams will rotate between locations to balance environmental conditions such as lighting and temperature. Measurements by the different teams will be separated by at least 30 minutes to reduce recall effects while allowing assessment of consistency across time.
The sample size will be calculated to provide 90% statistical power to establish equivalence between the laser device and the conventional ShorrBoard using the Two One-sided Tests (TOST) procedure, with a prespecified equivalence margin of ±0.2 cm and a 5% significance level (α = 0.05). Assuming a true mean difference of 0 cm and a standard deviation of paired measurement differences of 0.671 cm, approximately 124 children with complete paired measurements will be required per age group. After adjusting for an anticipated 20% dropout or incomplete measurement rate, the minimum recruitment target will be 155 children per age group, or 310 children in total. Because the study will be conducted alongside routine growth-monitoring activities, all eligible children who present within the selected catchment areas may be measured, even if the target sample is exceeded.
Agreement between the laser device and reference measurements will be assessed using Bland-Altman methods, including the mean between-method difference and limits of agreement. Inter-method technical error of measurement will also be calculated. Reliability and repeatability will be assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients, including consistency across measurers, devices, and measurement time points. Precision of repeated measurements will be assessed using standard deviations, coefficients of variation, and intra-rater technical error of measurement. Analyses will additionally examine whether the choice of measurement device changes categorical classification based on weight-for-length/height and length/height-for-age indices; paired categorical classifications will be compared using McNemar's test.
Data will be collected electronically using KoboCollect on Android devices, with paper tools available as backup. Electronic forms will incorporate required fields, range checks, and skip logic to reduce entry errors. Equipment calibration results will be recorded before measurement sessions. Field data will be reviewed daily using Excel and ENA for SMART/ENA 2008 software to identify digit preference, implausible anthropometric values, or enumerator-specific quality concerns. Measurements requiring verification may be repeated the following day, and field staff may be retrained when data-quality checks indicate a need.
Data will be transferred from encrypted, password-protected devices to the World Vision KoboCollect server when connectivity is available and subsequently to secure London School of Hygiene \& Tropical Medicine servers for processing. Identifiable information will be stored separately from study measurements and linked only through a study identifier. The analytical dataset will be de-identified before analysis. Data cleaning, processing, and analysis will be conducted in R using reproducible analysis scripts. Missing, unavailable, or implausible measurements will be reviewed against source records and protocol-based quality rules; measurements that cannot be verified will be documented and handled as missing in the relevant analysis.
This is a minimal-risk, non-invasive measurement study. Trained staff will follow standardized procedures intended to maintain children's comfort and safe positioning during measurement. Children identified through study measurements as meeting criteria for severe wasting will be referred to the nearest health facility for assessment and services according to applicable national guidance.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- The study population is drawn from community-dwelling children in selected villages in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. Recruitment is embedded within the local routine child-growth monitoring and surveillance activities coordinated with the Ministry of Health and the provincial Centre for Disease Control. Households with young children in the selected villages will be mobilized and invited to attend measurement activities. Data collection will take place across eight villages, using trained community health worker teams and expert anthropometrists. The setting represents rural outreach conditions, including hot and humid environmental conditions, in which portable child anthropometry devices may be used.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children aged 0 through 59 months at the time of measurement.
- Living in, or present for routine child-growth monitoring in, one of the selected study villages in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam.
- Parent or legally authorized caregiver is able and willing to provide informed consent for the child to participate.
- Child is able to undergo routine length or height measurement with both the laser device and the ShorrBoard.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Child has a condition or physical limitation that prevents safe or valid measurement of recumbent length or standing height, such as severe spinal curvature or inability to position the legs appropriately for measurement.
- Parent or legally authorized caregiver does not provide informed consent.
- Child is too distressed, unwell, or unable to complete the required measurement procedures safely, as determined by trained study staff.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laser Height/Length Measuring DeviceLaser Height/Length Measuring Device is the innovative digital device being validated | Device | – |
| ShorrBoardConventional wooden height board | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Accuracy and equivalence of laser height/length measurements compared with the ShorrBoard
Time frame: Day 1
The mean paired difference in height/length measurements (cm) between the laser device and conventional ShorrBoard when operated by expert measurers. Equivalence will be assessed using the Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) procedure with a prespecified equivalence margin of ±0.2 cm and a significance level of 0.05. Equivalence will be established if the entire 90% confidence interval of the mean paired difference falls within -0.2 to +0.2 cm.
Intra-observer measurement precision (Technical Error of Measurement, TEM)
Time frame: Day 1
Measurement precision will be evaluated using TEM, calculated from repeated height/length measurements obtained with each device by expert measurers and community volunteers. Two measurements will be obtained initially. If the difference exceeds 0.7 cm, a third measurement will be taken, and the two closest readings will be retained. TEM will be calculated as √[Σ(d²)/(2n)] and reported in centimetres and millimetres. The expert ShorrBoard TEM must be less than 0.4 cm to qualify as an acceptable reference measurement process.
Agreement between laser device and ShorrBoard height/length measurements
Time frame: Day 1
Agreement between the two devices will be evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, including mean measurement bias and 95% limits of agreement (mean paired difference ±1.96 standard deviations). Results will be expressed in centimetres and presented overall and separately by measurer cadre.
Reliability and concordance of height/length measurements
Time frame: Day 1
Agreement between measurements obtained using the laser device and ShorrBoard will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement (ICC[A,1]) and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). These statistics will quantify the consistency and concordance of measurements between devices.
7 secondary outcomes
Measurement accuracy by measurer cadre
Time frame: Day 1
Differences between expert and community volunteer measurements
Time frame: Day 1
Device-by-measurer interaction
Time frame: Day 1
Differences in anthropometric z-scores
Time frame: During a single study visit; repeated measurements with both devices are obtained at least 30 minutes apart
Agreement in stunting classification
Time frame: Day 1
Agreement in wasting classification
Time frame: Day 1
Differences in estimated prevalence of stunting and wasting
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2026.
- Study protocol and SAP is includedLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in the publication will be shared. This will include relevant participant-level demographic and baseline characteristics, anthropometric measurements, intervention allocation, follow-up measurements, and primary and secondary outcome variables used in the final analyses. Derived variables required to reproduce the published analyses will also be included. All direct identifiers and any variables that could reasonably enable participant re-identification will be removed prior to sharing. The shared dataset will therefore contain only the minimum de-identified participant-level data necessary to reproduce and further examine the reported study findings.
Related trials for Child Malnutrition
Recruiting
Milk Fat Globule Membrane-Enhanced RUTF for Children With Severe Acute Malnutrition
Severe Acute Malnutrition, Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Effectiveness of an Alternative Protocol in the Management of Acute Malnutrition
Acute Malnutrition With no Complications
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety Study of SMOFlipid to Evaluate the Risk of Developing EFAD and/or PNAC in Pediatric and Adult Patients
Malnutrition, Child, Malnutrition
Enrolling by invitation
Effectiveness of Positive Deviance/Hearth in Treating Uncomplicated Moderate Acute Malnutrition in Children 6-59 Months in Mymensingh Division, Bangladesh
Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM), Undernutrition
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study of a Modified Therapeutic Food Compared With a Standard Nutrient Supplement in Young Children in Rural Guatemala
Stunting of Growth, Chronic Malnutrition
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles Opondo, PhD study chair
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Hilary Davies-Kershaw, PhD study chair
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Child Malnutrition and Wasting Syndrome, run by World Vision US at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy and equivalence of laser height/length measurements compared with the ShorrBoard (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.