Stroke, Acute IschemicPhase 3IMP-ACTNCT07906275
INTRA-ARTERIAL MeVO TREATMENT (IMP-ACT) Within the ACT-GLOBAL Adaptive Platform Trial-NCT06352632
A Phase 3 study testing Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Intravenous Thrombolysis and Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centre in people with Stroke, Acute Ischemic and Medium Vessel Occlusion, run by University of Calgary at 4 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
This domain will be conducted as part of ACT-GLOBAL platform trial and will have the nested domain name of IMP-ACT. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by intracranial arterial occlusion remains a major cause of disability and death. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic, Medium Vessel Occlusion
- What is being tested?
- Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Intravenous Thrombolysis and Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centre
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Dec 2026to 31 Mar 2031
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Platform inclusion criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke.
- Domain (IMP-ACT) inclusion criteria:
- All patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a medium vessel occlusion who are clinically eligible for immediate EVT and IAT. Patients with conditions described as relative contraindications for thrombolysis in national guidelines, where physician discretion is recommended, are eligible. Patients who received a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are eligible.
- Time from onset (or last seen well) to randomization ≤4.5 hours.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >5 at the time of randomization.
- Confirmed symptomatic and endovascularly treatable MeVO based on non-invasive neurovascular imaging (CTA or MRA) at one or more of the following locations: M2 or M3 segment, A2 or A3 segment, P2 or P3 segment.
- Good or moderate collateral status on CT angiography or MRA.
- Clinical deficit commensurate with the MeVO occlusion location.
- Consent process completed as per national laws and regulations and the applicable ethics committee requirements.
Who cannot join
- There are no platform-level exclusion criteria.
- Domain (IMP-ACT) exclusion criteria:
- ASPECTS <9.
- Well-demarcated hypodensity in the majority of the brain parenchyma supplied by the occluded vessel.
- Poor or no collateral status on CTA.
- Any evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on qualifying imaging.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient has a major co-morbid illness, such that they are unlikely to complete follow-up or achieve the primary outcome due to the underlying illness
- Any absolute contraindication for thrombolysis per current national guidelines - for example active bleeding, recent (<7 days) intracranial surgery, head trauma, acute intracranial or subarachnoid hemorrhage, or a bleeding diathesis.
- Adaptive enrichment: Adaptive enrichment rules will allow restriction of enrolment to patients presenting ≤3 hours and/or with NIHSS >7 if interim data suggest lack of benefit among those presenting later or with baseline NIHSS ≤7.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada4 sites
University of Calgary- Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Carol C Kenney, RN, 403-944-4286, ckenney@ucalgary.ca
Johanna Ospel, MD, johanna.ospel@ucalgary.ca
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta
Paige Lesoway
Brian Buck, MD
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia
Geni Maclean, RN, genoveva@bcstrokecentre.ca
Carson Ma, RN, carson.ma@vch.ca
University of Manitoba - Winnipeg Health Science Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba
About this study
Official title: Intra-Arterial Treatment of Medium-sized Primary Vessel Occlusions: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMP-ACT)Embedded in A Multi-faCtorial,mulTi-arm, Multi-staGe,Randomised,gLOBal Adaptive pLatform Trial for Stroke NCT06352632
This domain will be conducted as part of ACT-GLOBAL platform trial and will have the nested domain name of IMP-ACT. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by intracranial arterial occlusion remains a major cause of disability and death. Medium vessel occlusion stroke (MeVO), involving distal medium-sized intracranial arteries, accounts for approximately 25-40% of all AIS cases. Despite best medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis, up to 40% of MeVO patients fail to regain functional independence, and mortality remains approximately 10%.
These poor outcomes prompted several randomized trials evaluating endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for MeVO stroke, including the CIHR-funded ESCAPE-MeVO trial. ESCAPE-MeVO, DISTAL, and DISCOUNT did not demonstrate overall benefit of EVT compared with best medical management, whereas ORIENTAL-MeVO reported benefit in an Asian population. These conflicting findings have resulted in uncertainty regarding optimal MeVO management and suggest that treatment benefit may depend on patient selection.
Read more
A potential explanation for the neutral EVT trials is suboptimal reperfusion. In ESCAPE-MeVO, successful reperfusion was achieved in only 75% of patients, leaving substantial room for procedural improvement. At the same time, major procedural complications were infrequent, supporting the feasibility of exploring strategies to enhance reperfusion.
Subgroup analyses from ESCAPE-MeVO suggested that treatment effect may vary according to time from symptom onset and collateral status. Patients treated early after stroke onset and those with favorable collaterals appeared to derive greater benefit from EVT than later presenters or patients with poor collateral circulation. These findings support a more targeted treatment approach in selected MeVO patients.
Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) has emerged as a promising adjunct to EVT. Local delivery of thrombolytic agents may dissolve residual distal thrombi that are inaccessible or unsafe to treat mechanically and may improve both macrovascular and microvascular reperfusion. Because thrombus burden is generally smaller in MeVO stroke, adjunctive IAT may be particularly effective in this population.
However, no randomized trial has evaluated combined EVT and IAT for primary MeVO stroke. This study will address that evidence gap and determine whether adjunctive IAT can improve outcomes in carefully selected patients with MeVO stroke.
Read the detailed description
MeVO stroke is common and outcomes remain poor despite state-of-the-art treatment. Recent randomized trials identify a subgroup likely to benefit from EVT - patients with favourable collateral status treated early - and emerging evidence suggests that IAT can safely augment EVT reperfusion success. Equipoise in the stroke physician community has increased, and IMP-ACT shares common elements with other ACT-GLOBAL domains, allowing trial efficiency to be maximised and operational costs reduced by conducting the domain within the ACT-GLOBAL platform.
This domain will be conducted as part of the ACT-GLOBAL adaptive platform trial and has the nested domain name IMP-ACT. It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), adaptive, phase 3, parallel-group, controlled trial. Up to 800 participants with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion will be enrolled globally.
Male and female patients aged ≥18 years with acute ischemic stroke caused by a medium vessel occlusion (M2 or M3, A2 or A3, or P2 or P3 segment) confirmed on non-invasive neurovascular imaging, in whom the time from symptom onset (or last seen well) to randomization is ≤4.5 hours, with a baseline NIHSS score >5, good or moderate collateral status, and limited early ischemic change (ASPECTS ≥9), who are clinically eligible for immediate EVT and IAT and in whom the occlusion has been assessed by the attending neurointerventionalist as safely accessible by endovascular means.
Eligible patients are randomized to one of the following three arms:
- Control arm: usual care - intravenous thrombolysis if eligible, plus usual stroke unit care.
- Intervention arm 1: mechanical EVT, with tools and technique left to the discretion of the operator; intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs must not be administered.
- Intervention arm 2: mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis - microcatheter injection of tenecteplase up to 0.0625 mg/kg (maximum 6.25 mg) or alteplase up to 0.225 mg/kg (maximum 22.5 mg) over 5-10 minutes from a proximal, safe microcatheter position in the affected arterial territory, with agent selected according to local availability.
Randomization occurs immediately after baseline neuroimaging (NCCT/CTA), once clinical eligibility has been determined, via a centralized, secure, concealed, real-time web-based server, thereby ensuring allocation concealment. Participants are initially allocated 1:1:1. Once 150 participants have been enrolled, response-adaptive randomization (RAR) begins and allocation probabilities are updated with accumulating trial data at each adaptive interim analysis; enrolment to usual care will match the best-performing treatment arm. A minimal sufficient balance (covariate-adaptive) algorithm balances allocation by region, age, sex, baseline stroke severity (NIHSS), occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, time from last known well to randomization and calendar month. Treatment is open-label; blinding of enrolling staff is neither practical nor ethical in acute stroke, and sham endovascular procedures are not feasible. Endpoint assessment is blinded.
EVT and IAT are one-time treatments administered on Day 1. The duration of an EVT procedure ranges from 20 minutes or less to 2 hours, with the majority completed within 90 minutes; IAT adds 5-10 minutes to the same angiographic procedure. Each participant is followed for one 90-day period and is hospitalized and treated according to current standard of care. At Day 30 and 90, a blinded qualified central assessor - with no access to treatment allocation, imaging information or safety data - contacts the participant for efficacy assessment. The end of the domain is defined as the date of last contact of the last participant at the Day 90 follow-up.
Duration: Recruitment is expected to take 33 months. The End of Study Activity, defined as completion of data collection following the final follow-up visit of the last patient enrolled across all participating countries, will occur approximately 9 months after enrolment of the last patient.
Visit 1 - Day 1 (Baseline): Eligibility, informed consent, demographics, medical history, frailty questionnaire, stroke-focused examination and stroke severity (NIHSS), weight, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, ECG), baseline imaging (non-contrast CT head and CTA arch-to-vertex, ± perfusion), baseline blood work, concomitant medications, randomization and administration of the allocated intervention (endovascular procedure or usual care - EVT, EVT + IAT or usual care), final MeVO-eTICI, and serious adverse event monitoring.
Visit 2 - Day 2 (window 18-56 hours): Neurological assessment (NIHSS at 24 hours), ambulatory status, weight, laboratory (blood) tests, concomitant medications, stroke etiology, follow-up imaging including repeat CTA (arch to vertex), and serious adverse event monitoring. Follow-up imaging is used to assess infarct volume and hemorrhagic transformation; MRI (including at minimum axial DWI, FLAIR and a hemorrhage-sensitive sequence - gradient echo or susceptibility weighted imaging) is preferred and may be supplanted by non-contrast CT if MRI is unavailable. Follow-up imaging is considered a standard-of-care imaging procedure.
Visit 3 - Day 4 (or discharge if earlier): Ambulatory status, stroke care, imaging (MR head), and continued serious adverse event monitoring. Neurovascular imaging beyond Day 2 is collected only when conducted as per standard of care.
Visit 4 - Day 30 (window -5 to +5 days): Blinded central assessment of mRS (using the Rankin Focused Assessment tool) and EQ-5D-5L. Day 30 assessments are conducted by centralized telephone or online interview by central trial personnel blinded to treatment assignment and to treatment received; conventional blinded site-based personnel may undertake the assessment if necessary.
Visit 5 - Day 90 (window -14 to +14 days): Blinded central assessment of the primary outcome (mRS using the Rankin Focused Assessment tool), EQ-5D-5L, COSMOS, ambulatory status and place of residence. Day 90 assessments are conducted by centralized telephone or online interview by central trial personnel blinded to treatment assignment and to treatment received; conventional blinded site-based personnel may undertake the assessment if necessary.
Note: only serious adverse events are collected, from enrolment up to Day 4 (inclusive); simple adverse events are not collected.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic, Medium Vessel Occlusion
- Being tested
- Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Intravenous Thrombolysis, Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centre
- Keywords
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis, Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Angiography, Mevo, Tenecteplase, Alteplase, Platform, Domain, EVT
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mechanical Endovascular ThrombectomyProcedure or surgery
Mechanical endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure used to remove a blood clot from an intracranial artery causing acute ischemic stroke. A catheter is advanced through the arterial system to the site of occlusion, where specialized devices such as stent retrievers and aspiration catheters are used to restore blood flow by removing the clot. EVT is an established treatment for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke and is intended to improve neurological recovery by achieving rapid reperfusion of threatened brain tissue.
Intravenous ThrombolysisDrug
Also called tenecteplase, tNKase, Metalyse,
Tenecteplase IV may be administered, if eligible, as part of the Control Arm.
Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centreBiological
Also called Intra-arterial thrombolysis after endovascular therapy, Thrombolytic (2 options), tNKase, Metalyse,, tPA, Activase
The intervention group will receive local intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis using either tenecteplase at a dose of 0.0625mg/kg "maximum dose of 6.25mg" or alteplase "0.225 mg/kg; maximum dose, 20mg.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo comparator | usual care - intravenous thrombolysis (0.18mg/kg or 0.25mg/kg of tenecteplase) if eligible, plus usual stroke unit care. Receives: Drug: Intravenous Thrombolysis |
| Mechanical EVT | Active comparator | Tools and technique left to the discretion of the operator; intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs must not be administered. Receives: Procedure: Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy |
| Mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis | Active comparator | microcatheter injection of tenecteplase up to 0.0625 mg/kg (maximum 6.25 mg) or alteplase up to 0.225 mg/kg (maximum 22.5 mg) over 5-10 minutes from a proximal, safe microcatheter position in the affected arterial territory, with agent selected according to local availability. Receives: Procedure: Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy; Biological: Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centre |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A change of functional dependence analyzed across the whole distribution of outcomes assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS),
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) -which scores of 0 to 1 indicate a favourable outcome without or with symptoms but no disability, scores of 2 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
Measured: From enrollment to the Day 90 assessment - Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner
Secondary outcomes (12)
Ordinal Modified Rankin Score at 30 days
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) -which scores of 0 to 1 indicate a favourable outcome without or with symptoms but no disability, scores of 2 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
Measured: telephone called performed by a " blinded assessor" between 23-37 days after randomization
24-hour National Institute of Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized clinical assessment used by trained healthcare professionals to measure the severity of neurological impairment caused by a stroke.It evaluates 11 areas, including level of consciousness, gaze, visual fields, facial movement, arm and leg strength, coordination, sensation, language, speech and neglect. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. The NIHSS is used during the initial assessment and subsequent reassessments to document changes in neurological status and support treatment and clinical decision-making.
Measured: From enrollment (randomization ) to 18-56 hours (Day 2)
Difference between 24 hour and baseline National Institute of Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized clinical assessment used by trained healthcare professionals to measure the severity of neurological impairment caused by a stroke.It evaluates 11 areas, including level of consciousness, gaze, visual fields, facial movement, arm and leg strength, coordination, sensation, language, speech and neglect. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. The NIHSS is used during the initial assessment and subsequent reassessments to document changes in neurological status and support treatment and clinical decision-making.
Measured: From enrollment (randomization) to 18-56 hours (Day 2)
Final reperfusion quality (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (MeVO eTICI) scale)
The thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grading system as a tool for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. In neurointerventional radiology it is commonly used for patients post endovascular revascularization.
Measured: From enrollment (randomization) to post EVT procedure. Completed by the Central Core lab at 30 days after randomization
Infarct volume on 18-56-hour scan
The thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grading system as a tool for determining the response of thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. In neurointerventional radiology it is commonly used for patients post endovascular revascularization.
Measured: Completed by the Central Core lab at 30 days after randomization
The proportion of patients with Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage from enrolment up to Day 4
Serious Adverse events include the following events :results in death, life threatening,Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,Results in persistent disability/incapacity,Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, an important medical event that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed in the SAE selection.
Measured: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH-1 and PH-2)
PH-1-2:( hemorrhage grading scale) homogeneous hyperdensity occupying over 30% of the infarct zone, with significant mass effect
Measured: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
Safety Assessments of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) from enrollment up to Day 4
Serious Adverse events include the following events :results in death, life threatening,Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization,Results in persistent disability/incapacity,Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, an important medical event that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent an outcome listed in the SAE selection.
Measured: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
The Ordinal shift of 7 levels of mRS at 90 days (mRS 5 and 6 will be collapsed in one category)
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) -which scores of 0 to 1 indicate a favourable outcome without or with symptoms but no disability, scores of 2 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
Measured: Done by telephone at the Day 90 assessment (Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner)
Ambulatory status of the patient's mobility at discharge
Assessing mobility of the patient at discharge- these are the questions that are asked: If alive, can the subject walk 10 steps without assistance? (Without assistance from another person. The use of a walking aid is acceptable- yes or no.
Measured: Completed at Day discharge or Day 4 or from randomization.
Name and location of the Place of residence at 90 days
Assessing the patient's residence at the Day 90 follow up. the information being collected is: What is the subject's place of residence at final contact? (-home, acute care hospital, repatriation to secondary hospital, inpatient rehabilitation care hospital, care facility, deceased or unknown)
Measured: Completed at the Day 90 assessment.
Summative total length of hospital stay in the first 90-days after stroke onset
Calculating the total number of days the patient was hospitalized since their hospital admission.
Measured: Completed at the Day 90 assessment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2026
- Study start15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stroke, Acute IschemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This domain will be conducted as part of the ACT-GLOBAL adaptive platform trial and has the nested domain name IMP-ACT. It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), adaptive, phase 3, parallel-group, controlled trial. Up to 800 participants with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion will be enrolled globally. The IA thrombolytic agent used (tenecteplase or alteplase).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The George Institute for Global Health, Australia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Bijoy Menon, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Bijoy K Menon, MD, Principal investigator, University of CalgaryCraig Anderson, MD, Principal investigator, The George Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07906275
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INTRA-ARTERIAL MeVO TREATMENT
- Other IDs
- ACT GLOBAL
- Acronym
- IMP-ACT
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Domain information and tabular trial results will be posted on the National Institutes of Health's website www.clinicaltrials.gov within one year of domain completion.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intra-Arterial Treatment of Medium-sized Primary Vessel Occlusions: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMP-ACT)Embedded in A Multi-faCtorial,mulTi-arm, Multi-staGe,Randomised,gLOBal Adaptive pLatform Trial for Stroke NCT06352632
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07906275
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMP-ACT / INTRA-ARTERIAL MeVO TREATMENT
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic, Medium Vessel Occlusion
- Keywords
- Intra-arterial thrombolysis, Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Angiography, Mevo, Tenecteplase, Alteplase, Platform, Domain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The George Institute for Global Health, Australia
- Study start
- 15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This domain will be conducted as part of ACT-GLOBAL platform trial and will have the nested domain name of IMP-ACT. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by intracranial arterial occlusion remains a major cause of disability and death. Medium vessel occlusion stroke (MeVO), involving distal medium-sized intracranial arteries, accounts for approximately 25-40% of all AIS cases. Despite best medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis, up to 40% of MeVO patients fail to regain functional independence, and mortality remains approximately 10%.
These poor outcomes prompted several randomized trials evaluating endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for MeVO stroke, including the CIHR-funded ESCAPE-MeVO trial. ESCAPE-MeVO, DISTAL, and DISCOUNT did not demonstrate overall benefit of EVT compared with best medical management, whereas ORIENTAL-MeVO reported benefit in an Asian population. These conflicting findings have resulted in uncertainty regarding optimal MeVO management and suggest that treatment benefit may depend on patient selection.
A potential explanation for the neutral EVT trials is suboptimal reperfusion. In ESCAPE-MeVO, successful reperfusion was achieved in only 75% of patients, leaving substantial room for procedural improvement. At the same time, major procedural complications were infrequent, supporting the feasibility of exploring strategies to enhance reperfusion.
Subgroup analyses from ESCAPE-MeVO suggested that treatment effect may vary according to time from symptom onset and collateral status. Patients treated early after stroke onset and those with favorable collaterals appeared to derive greater benefit from EVT than later presenters or patients with poor collateral circulation. These findings support a more targeted treatment approach in selected MeVO patients.
Intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) has emerged as a promising adjunct to EVT. Local delivery of thrombolytic agents may dissolve residual distal thrombi that are inaccessible or unsafe to treat mechanically and may improve both macrovascular and microvascular reperfusion. Because thrombus burden is generally smaller in MeVO stroke, adjunctive IAT may be particularly effective in this population.
However, no randomized trial has evaluated combined EVT and IAT for primary MeVO stroke. This study will address that evidence gap and determine whether adjunctive IAT can improve outcomes in carefully selected patients with MeVO stroke.
Detailed description
MeVO stroke is common and outcomes remain poor despite state-of-the-art treatment. Recent randomized trials identify a subgroup likely to benefit from EVT - patients with favourable collateral status treated early - and emerging evidence suggests that IAT can safely augment EVT reperfusion success. Equipoise in the stroke physician community has increased, and IMP-ACT shares common elements with other ACT-GLOBAL domains, allowing trial efficiency to be maximised and operational costs reduced by conducting the domain within the ACT-GLOBAL platform.
This domain will be conducted as part of the ACT-GLOBAL adaptive platform trial and has the nested domain name IMP-ACT. It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), adaptive, phase 3, parallel-group, controlled trial. Up to 800 participants with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion will be enrolled globally.
Male and female patients aged ≥18 years with acute ischemic stroke caused by a medium vessel occlusion (M2 or M3, A2 or A3, or P2 or P3 segment) confirmed on non-invasive neurovascular imaging, in whom the time from symptom onset (or last seen well) to randomization is ≤4.5 hours, with a baseline NIHSS score >5, good or moderate collateral status, and limited early ischemic change (ASPECTS ≥9), who are clinically eligible for immediate EVT and IAT and in whom the occlusion has been assessed by the attending neurointerventionalist as safely accessible by endovascular means.
Eligible patients are randomized to one of the following three arms:
- Control arm: usual care - intravenous thrombolysis if eligible, plus usual stroke unit care.
- Intervention arm 1: mechanical EVT, with tools and technique left to the discretion of the operator; intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs must not be administered.
- Intervention arm 2: mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis - microcatheter injection of tenecteplase up to 0.0625 mg/kg (maximum 6.25 mg) or alteplase up to 0.225 mg/kg (maximum 22.5 mg) over 5-10 minutes from a proximal, safe microcatheter position in the affected arterial territory, with agent selected according to local availability.
Randomization occurs immediately after baseline neuroimaging (NCCT/CTA), once clinical eligibility has been determined, via a centralized, secure, concealed, real-time web-based server, thereby ensuring allocation concealment. Participants are initially allocated 1:1:1. Once 150 participants have been enrolled, response-adaptive randomization (RAR) begins and allocation probabilities are updated with accumulating trial data at each adaptive interim analysis; enrolment to usual care will match the best-performing treatment arm. A minimal sufficient balance (covariate-adaptive) algorithm balances allocation by region, age, sex, baseline stroke severity (NIHSS), occlusion location, intravenous thrombolysis, time from last known well to randomization and calendar month. Treatment is open-label; blinding of enrolling staff is neither practical nor ethical in acute stroke, and sham endovascular procedures are not feasible. Endpoint assessment is blinded.
EVT and IAT are one-time treatments administered on Day 1. The duration of an EVT procedure ranges from 20 minutes or less to 2 hours, with the majority completed within 90 minutes; IAT adds 5-10 minutes to the same angiographic procedure. Each participant is followed for one 90-day period and is hospitalized and treated according to current standard of care. At Day 30 and 90, a blinded qualified central assessor - with no access to treatment allocation, imaging information or safety data - contacts the participant for efficacy assessment. The end of the domain is defined as the date of last contact of the last participant at the Day 90 follow-up.
Duration: Recruitment is expected to take 33 months. The End of Study Activity, defined as completion of data collection following the final follow-up visit of the last patient enrolled across all participating countries, will occur approximately 9 months after enrolment of the last patient.
Visit 1 - Day 1 (Baseline): Eligibility, informed consent, demographics, medical history, frailty questionnaire, stroke-focused examination and stroke severity (NIHSS), weight, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, ECG), baseline imaging (non-contrast CT head and CTA arch-to-vertex, ± perfusion), baseline blood work, concomitant medications, randomization and administration of the allocated intervention (endovascular procedure or usual care - EVT, EVT + IAT or usual care), final MeVO-eTICI, and serious adverse event monitoring.
Visit 2 - Day 2 (window 18-56 hours): Neurological assessment (NIHSS at 24 hours), ambulatory status, weight, laboratory (blood) tests, concomitant medications, stroke etiology, follow-up imaging including repeat CTA (arch to vertex), and serious adverse event monitoring. Follow-up imaging is used to assess infarct volume and hemorrhagic transformation; MRI (including at minimum axial DWI, FLAIR and a hemorrhage-sensitive sequence - gradient echo or susceptibility weighted imaging) is preferred and may be supplanted by non-contrast CT if MRI is unavailable. Follow-up imaging is considered a standard-of-care imaging procedure.
Visit 3 - Day 4 (or discharge if earlier): Ambulatory status, stroke care, imaging (MR head), and continued serious adverse event monitoring. Neurovascular imaging beyond Day 2 is collected only when conducted as per standard of care.
Visit 4 - Day 30 (window -5 to +5 days): Blinded central assessment of mRS (using the Rankin Focused Assessment tool) and EQ-5D-5L. Day 30 assessments are conducted by centralized telephone or online interview by central trial personnel blinded to treatment assignment and to treatment received; conventional blinded site-based personnel may undertake the assessment if necessary.
Visit 5 - Day 90 (window -14 to +14 days): Blinded central assessment of the primary outcome (mRS using the Rankin Focused Assessment tool), EQ-5D-5L, COSMOS, ambulatory status and place of residence. Day 90 assessments are conducted by centralized telephone or online interview by central trial personnel blinded to treatment assignment and to treatment received; conventional blinded site-based personnel may undertake the assessment if necessary.
Note: only serious adverse events are collected, from enrolment up to Day 4 (inclusive); simple adverse events are not collected.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This domain will be conducted as part of the ACT-GLOBAL adaptive platform trial and has the nested domain name IMP-ACT. It is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE), adaptive, phase 3, parallel-group, controlled trial. Up to 800 participants with acute ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion will be enrolled globally. The IA thrombolytic agent used (tenecteplase or alteplase).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: Intravenous Thrombolysisusual care - intravenous thrombolysis (0.18mg/kg or 0.25mg/kg of tenecteplase) if eligible, plus usual stroke unit care. |
| Mechanical EVT | Active comparator | Procedure: Mechanical Endovascular ThrombectomyTools and technique left to the discretion of the operator; intra-arterial thrombolytic drugs must not be administered. |
| Mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis | Active comparator | Procedure: Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Biological: Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centremicrocatheter injection of tenecteplase up to 0.0625 mg/kg (maximum 6.25 mg) or alteplase up to 0.225 mg/kg (maximum 22.5 mg) over 5-10 minutes from a proximal, safe microcatheter position in the affected arterial territory, with agent selected according to local availability. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age ≥18 years.
- Clinical diagnosis of stroke.
- All patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a medium vessel occlusion who are clinically eligible for immediate EVT and IAT. Patients with conditions described as relative contraindications for thrombolysis in national guidelines, where physician discretion is recommended, are eligible. Patients who received a direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) are eligible.
- Time from onset (or last seen well) to randomization ≤4.5 hours.
- Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >5 at the time of randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- There are no platform-level exclusion criteria.
- ASPECTS <9.
- Well-demarcated hypodensity in the majority of the brain parenchyma supplied by the occluded vessel.
- Poor or no collateral status on CTA.
- Any evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on qualifying imaging.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical Endovascular ThrombectomyMechanical endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure used to remove a blood clot from an intracranial artery causing acute ischemic stroke. A catheter is advanced through the arterial system to the site of occlusion, where specialized devices such as stent retrievers and aspiration catheters are used to restore blood flow by removing the clot. EVT is an established treatment for selected patients with acute ischemic stroke and is intended to improve neurological recovery by achieving rapid reperfusion of threatened brain tissue. | Procedure or surgery | Mechanical EVT, Mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis |
| Intravenous ThrombolysisAlso: tenecteplase, tNKase, Metalyse,Tenecteplase IV may be administered, if eligible, as part of the Control Arm. | Drug | Control |
| Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centreAlso: Intra-arterial thrombolysis after endovascular therapy, Thrombolytic (2 options), tNKase, Metalyse,, tPA, ActivaseThe intervention group will receive local intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis using either tenecteplase at a dose of 0.0625mg/kg "maximum dose of 6.25mg" or alteplase "0.225 mg/kg; maximum dose, 20mg. | Biological | Mechanical EVT followed by adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis |
Primary outcome
A change of functional dependence analyzed across the whole distribution of outcomes assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS),
Time frame: From enrollment to the Day 90 assessment - Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) -which scores of 0 to 1 indicate a favourable outcome without or with symptoms but no disability, scores of 2 to 5 indicate increasing levels of disability (and dependency), and a score of 6 indicates death.
12 secondary outcomes
Ordinal Modified Rankin Score at 30 days
Time frame: telephone called performed by a " blinded assessor" between 23-37 days after randomization
24-hour National Institute of Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)
Time frame: From enrollment (randomization ) to 18-56 hours (Day 2)
Difference between 24 hour and baseline National Institute of Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS)
Time frame: From enrollment (randomization) to 18-56 hours (Day 2)
Final reperfusion quality (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (MeVO eTICI) scale)
Time frame: From enrollment (randomization) to post EVT procedure. Completed by the Central Core lab at 30 days after randomization
Infarct volume on 18-56-hour scan
Time frame: Completed by the Central Core lab at 30 days after randomization
The proportion of patients with Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage from enrolment up to Day 4
Time frame: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
Parenchymal hemorrhage (PH-1 and PH-2)
Time frame: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
Safety Assessments of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) from enrollment up to Day 4
Time frame: From enrollment ( randomization) to Day 4
The Ordinal shift of 7 levels of mRS at 90 days (mRS 5 and 6 will be collapsed in one category)
Time frame: Done by telephone at the Day 90 assessment (Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner)
Ambulatory status of the patient's mobility at discharge
Time frame: Completed at Day discharge or Day 4 or from randomization.
Name and location of the Place of residence at 90 days
Time frame: Completed at the Day 90 assessment.
Summative total length of hospital stay in the first 90-days after stroke onset
Time frame: Completed at the Day 90 assessment.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Domain information and tabular trial results will be posted on the National Institutes of Health's website www.clinicaltrials.gov within one year of domain completion.
Related trials for Stroke, Acute Ischemic
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Bijoy K Menon, MD principal investigator
University of Calgary
Craig Anderson, MD principal investigator
The George Institute
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mechanical Endovascular Thrombectomy, Intravenous Thrombolysis and Tenecteplase/Alteplase- depending upon availability at each treating centre in people with Stroke, Acute Ischemic and Medium Vessel Occlusion, run by University of Calgary at 4 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bijoy K Menon, MD (403-944-8107, bkmmenon@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A change of functional dependence analyzed across the whole distribution of outcomes assessed on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), (time frame: From enrollment to the Day 90 assessment - Day 90 outcomes are assessed in a blinded manner). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.